CAR_Public/160302.mbx             C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

             Wednesday, March 2, 2016, Vol. 18, No. 44


                            Headlines


ABM PARKING: "Reyes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to C.D. Cal.
ACE ELECTRICAL: "Karterouliotis" Suit Moved to M.D. Florida
ADT LLC: "Flores" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to E.D. California
ADT LLC: 2nd "Flores" Suit Moved from Super. Ct to E.D. Calif.
ADVANCED MICRO: Says Mediation Did Not Result in Settlement

AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces "Cheah" Suit Over Sale to Thermo Fisher
AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces "Cox" Suit Over Sale to Thermo Fisher
AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces 4 Class Actions over Thermo Fisher Merger
ALLSTATE INSURANCE: "Enger" Suit Moved to N.D. California
AMERICAN CORADIUS: Confidentiality Order Issued in "Davis" Suit

ANTHEM INC: Court Gives Plaintiffs 30 Days to File Amended Suit
ANTHEM LIFE: "Yost" Suit Moved from Common Pleas Ct to M.D. Pa.
ATLAS AIR: NY Court Granted Preliminary Approval of Settlement
BAKER HUGHES: Evaluating Background Facts of "Williams" Action
BAKER HUGHES: Deal in Halliburton Merger Suits Remains Pending

BAXALTA INC: Faces "Davis" Suit Over Planned Sale to Shire Plc
BHP BILLITON: Faces Class Action Over Samarco Dam Burst
BMW BANK: Foley Motors Alleges TCPA Violation
BOEING COMPANY: April 22 Class Action Lead Plaintiff Set
CAMPBELL-EWALD: Decision Moots Genesis Class Action Ruling

CANADA: Legionnaire's Disease Class Action Can Proceed
CIGNA CORP: "Patel" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
CLARK COUNTY, NV: "Britain" Suit Has Conditional Certification
CLOVIS ONCOLOGY: 3 Suits Consolidated; Bernstein Named Lead Atty.
COLUMBIA GAS: 6th Cir. Revives "Baatz" Suit

COMBINED INSURANCE: Bid to Dismiss "Dolmage" Suit Denied
COMMUNITY HEALTH: April 11 Oral Argument Set on Dismissal Bid
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Argument in Cyber Attack Case Set for April 15
COMMUNITY HEALTH: To Defend Against "Mounce" Class Action
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Plaintiffs' Bid for En Banc Review Pending

CORTLAND, NY: "Locke" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
CREDIT ONE: Bid for Leave to Appeal Bankruptcy Court Order Denied
CS METALS: "Hernandez" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
CTI BIOPHARMA: Shareholder Class Actions Filed in N.Y. and Wash.
CUMULUS MEDIA: "Carr" Suit Moved from N.Y. Sup. Ct. to S.D.N.Y.

CVR PARTNERS: MOU Reached in Class Suits Over Rentech Merger
CVS PHARMACY: Class Cert. Bid in "St. Pierre" Suit Denied
DAVE & BUSTER'S: Faces Class Action Over Background Checks
DRAFTKINGS INC: "Tewes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to M.D. Ga.
EXPERIAN INFO: "Holt" Suit Moved from M.D. Fla. to C.D. Cal.

FANDUEL INC: "Tewes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to M.D. Georgia
FLOYD, IN: Bid for Class Certification in "Gentry" Suit Granted
FORTISS LLC: Court Compels Arbitration of "Gerton" Claims
GARMIN LTD: Still Faces "Katz" Class Action
GARMIN LTD: Summary Judgment Motion Pending in "Meyers" Action

GEICO: "Griffith" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to N.D. California
GENERAL ELECTRIC: Appliance Park Fire Class Action Can Proceed
GOPRO INC: "Van Meerbeke" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
GRAIN PROCESSING: Iowa Court Certifies Emissions Class Action
GREAT AMERICAN LIFE: "Goertzen" Suit Moved to N.D. California

HHC TRS FP PORTFOLIO: "Membrives" Suit Moved to E.D.N.Y.
HONEYWELL INT'L: Sued Over Hoosick Falls Water Contamination
HUMANA INC: MOU Reached in Aetna Merger Litigation
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES: Still Defends MERSCORP Litigation
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES: Still Defends "Powell" Litigation

IDS PROPERTY: Suit by MSPA Claims 1 Moved to S.D. Florida
INTERNAP CORP: Court Dismisses Stockholder Class Action
J&F ANALYSTS: "Romero" Must Prove More Plaintiffs Want to Opt In
J&R CARE: Faces "Powell" Suit for Alleged FLSA Violation
KELLY SERVICES: Settlement Reached in "Hillston" Class Action

LCC INTERNATIONAL: Faces "Torgerson" FLSA Suit in Missouri
LINKEDIN CORP: Court Okays Class Action Settlement in "Perkins"
LVNV FUNDING: Bid for Class Certification in "Shular" Suit Denied
M&T BANK: 3rd Cir. Says Claims in "Cunningham" Suit Untimely
MAXLINEAR INC: Settlement of Merger Class Action Still Pending

MDL 1775: No Conflict of Interest for Kaplan Fox, Judge Says
MDL 2179: B3 Claims v. Clean-Up Responders Dismissed
MDL 2591: Parties Directed to Name Special Master by March 11
MDL 2657: "Martinez" Suit vs. GSK Consolidated in Boston
MDL 2672: N.D. Cal. Judge Enters Discovery Schedule

MDL 2672: Court Sets Protocol for Common Benefit Work & Expenses
MDL 2672: Court Sets Protocol for Handling Classified Info
MDL 2672: Order on Coordination with State Court Cases Entered
MEKRUTH INC: Violates N.Y. Minimum Wage Act, "Seeley" Suit Says
MERCEDES-BENZ USA: Court Rules on Bids to Dismiss "Ferrari" Suit

MONTREAL INSTITUTE: Settles Sexual Abuse Class Action for $21.6MM
NATIXIS FUNDING: Settles Bid-Rigging Class Action for $30MM
NCL CORP: Faces "Crankshaw" Suit for Alleged FLSA Violation
NEW AGE DENTAL: "Yadegar" Suit Alleges Conspiracy to Fix Prices
NEWELL RUBBERMAID: "Hirsch" Suit Seeks to Halt Jarden Acquisition

NEWELL RUBBERMAID: Robbins Geller Files Securities Class Action
NU SKIN: In Mediation to Resolve Suit Over Regulatory Probe
OCH-ZIFF CAPITAL: Court Narrows Claims in "Menaldi" Suit
OISHI HIBACHI: "Jolly" Suit Moved from Pulaski Court to E.D. Ark.
ORBITAL SERVICES: "Farias" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime

PANERA BREAD: To Defend Against Wage & Hour Class Actions
PARAMOUNT PICTURES: N.Y. Workers File Action Over Unpaid Wages
PELLA CORP: Bid for Summary Judgment Denied in "Conlay" Suit
PENNYMAC LOAN: Faces "Cooper" Suit Over Force-Placed Insurance
POPULAR COMMUNITY: Court Narrows Claims in "Valle" Suit

PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL: Bid to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas Okayed
PORT RESOURCES: "Giguere" Suit Claims FLSA, Labor Laws Violation
PRICELINE GROUP: Facing 40 Cases Over Travel Transaction Taxes
QUESTAR CORP: Faces Class Actions by Teamsters and Senatori
R.J. REYNOLDS: Proved Prudence in Divestiture of Nabisco Funds

RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT: "Mosquea" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
S.W. COWBOY: Court Rules on Summary Judgment Bids in "Kubiak"
SATYAM: 2nd Cir. Unseals Bernstein Litowitz Kickback Claims
SERVICE CORP: "Samborsky" Claims Sent to Arbitration
SERVICE CORP: "Moulton" Case to Continue v. Stewart Enterprises

SISTAR BEAUTY: Settles Overtime Suit; Class Notice Approved
SOUTHERN RESPONSE: High Court Tosses Policyholders' Class Action
STRIPE INC: Faces "Weisberg" TCPA Suit in California
TAKATA CORP: "Francis" Suit Removed to D. Virgin Islands
THERATECHNOLOGIES: SCC Trilogy Class Action Rulings at Issue

THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Matthews" Investors Lawsuit
TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS: Bid to Certify Class in "Dartell" Granted
TIME INC: Subscriptions Through 3rd Party Not Covered by VRPA
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: "Lopez" Suit Alleges TCPA Violation
TRAVELPORT WORLDWIDE: Files Motion to Dismiss "Gordon" Case

TRINITY INDUSTRIES: Court Denies Bid to Dismiss St. Clair Suit
TRUMP UNIVERSITY: Trump Named on Witness List in Fraud Suit
UNITED STATES: Faces Class Suit Over Risk Corridor Payments
VISTAS INT'L: "Rodriguez" Suit Seeks Unpaid OT Wages
VOLKSWAGEN AG: Faces Emission Class Actions in California

VONS COMPANIES: "Moreno" Suit Removed to C.D. California
WAL-MART STORES: Faces Fraud Class Action Over Parmesan Cheese
WASTE MANAGEMENT: Awaits Approval of Deffenbaugh Case Settlement
WATTS WATER: To Pay $4.1 Million Portion of Settlement
XO COMMUNICATIONS: Faces Class Action Over Termination Fees

YRC WORLDWIDE: Trial in Bryant Holdings Case Begins on June 6

* Dilapidated Legal Regime Impacts Ride-Sharing Pioneers
* Financial Sector Securities Class Action Downtrend to Continue
* MCPA, Lawmakers Join Suit v. Flushable Wipes Manufacturers


                            *********


ABM PARKING: "Reyes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to C.D. Cal.
------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Eva Reyes v. ABM Parking Services
Inc. et al., Case No. 30-02015-00804501, was removed from the
Orange County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the
District of California (Southern Division - Santa Ana). The
District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 8:16-cv-00070-CJC-DFM to
the proceeding.

ABM Parking Services provides parking management and building
maintenance services for airports, colleges and universities,
commercial office buildings and multi-use facilities, hotels,
retail/entertainment complexes, municipalities, residential
complexes, hotels, casinos, shopping malls, and special event
venues in the United States and Canada. Its services include
shuttle transportation; signage, graphics, and aesthetic
enhancement recommendations; stack parking programs; valet
parking; ADA compliance review; on and off street meter
collections; audits of procedures and revenue accounting; and
consulting on pre-construction design and layout of parking
facilities. The Company, a California Corporation, is
headquartered at Los Angeles, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jessica L Campbell, Esq.
          Kashif Haque, Esq.
          Samuel A Wong, Esq.
          AEGIS LAW FIRM PC
          9811 Irvine Center Drive Suite 100
          Irvine, CA 92618-2902
          Telephone: (949) 379 6250
          Facsimile: (949) 379 6251
          E-mail: jcampbell@aegislawfirm.com
                  khaque@aegislawfirm.com
                  swong@aegislawfirm.com

               - and -

          Samantha A Smith, Esq.
          Scott B Cooper, Esq.
          THE COOPER LAW FIRM PC
          4000 Barranca Parkway Suite 250
          Irvine, CA 92604
          Telephone: (949) 724 9200
          Facsimile: (949) 724 9255
          E-mail: samantha@cooper-firm.com
                  scott@cooper-firm.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Alejandro Gabriel Ruiz, Esq.
          Daniel F Fears, Esq.
          Sean A O'Brien, Esq.
          Laura B Fleming, Esq.
          PAYNE AND FEARS LLP
          4 Park Plaza Suite 1100
          Irvine, CA 92614
          Telephone: (949) 851 1100
          Facsimile: (949) 851 1212
          E-mail: agr@paynefears.com
                  dff@paynefears.com
                  sao@paynefears.com
                  lf@paynefears.com


ACE ELECTRICAL: "Karterouliotis" Suit Moved to M.D. Florida
-----------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Karterouliotis v. Ace Electrical
Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 2015-CA-4064, was removed from the
Pasco County Court, to the U.S. District Court for the District of
Middle District of Florida (Tampa). The District Court Clerk
assigned Case No. 8:16-cv-00125-MSS-EAJ to the proceeding.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff seeks overtime
compensation, liquidated damages, and prejudgment interest as a
result of the Defendants' violations of the Fair Labor Standards
Act.

Ace Electrical Systems is a Florida Profit Corporation. The
Company has annual revenue of $750,000 and employs a staff of
approximately 8.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Christopher D. Gray, Esq.
          Lindsey C Kofoed, Esq.
          Robin Mary Orosz, Esq.
          Wolfgang M. Florin, Esq.
          FLORIN ROEBIG, PA
          777 Alderman Rd
          Palm Harbor, FL 34683-2604
          Telephone: (727) 786 5000
          Facsimile: (727) 772 9833
          E-mail: cdg@FlorinRoebig.com
                  lck@florinroebig.com
                  rorosz@florinroebig.com
                  fgo@florinroebig.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          James R. Douglass III, Esq.
          Theresa M. Gallion, Esq.
          FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
          101 E. Kennedy Blvd Ste 2350
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: (813) 769 7500
          Facsimile: (813) 769 7501
          E-mail: jdouglass@laborlawyers.com
                  tgallion@laborlawyers.com


ADT LLC: "Flores" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to E.D. California
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Flores v. ADT LLC, Case No. BCV-
15-101564, was removed from the Kern County Superior Court, to the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
(Fresno). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-
00029-JLT to the proceeding.

ADT Corporation provides residential and small business electronic
security, fire protection and other related alarm monitoring
services in 35 countries.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Arnab Banerjee, Esq.
          Melissa Grant, Esq.
          Raul Perez, Esq.
          CAPSTONE LAW APC
          1840 Century Park East, Suite 450
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 556 4811
          Facsimile: (310) 943 0396
          E-mail: arnab.banerjee@capstonelawyers.com
                  melissa.grant@capstonelawyers.com
                  raul.perez@capstonelawyers.com

               - and -

          Suzy E. Lee, Esq.
          ARIAS OZZELLO & GIGNAC LLP
          6701 Center Drive West, 14th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90045
          Telephone: (310) 670 1600
          Facsimile: (310) 670 1231
          E-mail: slee@aogllp.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Alec Hillbo, Esq.
          Linda Claxton, Esq.
          OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK AND STEWART, P.C.
          2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800
          Phoenix, AZ 85016
          Telephone: (602) 778 3762
          Facsimile: (602) 778 3750
          E-mail: alec.hillbo@ogletreedeakins.com
                  linda.claxton@odnss.com


ADT LLC: 2nd "Flores" Suit Moved from Super. Ct to E.D. Calif.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Flores v. ADT LLC, Case No. BCV-
15-101564, was removed from Kern County Superior Court, to the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California -
(Fresno). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-
00124-JLT to the proceeding.

ADT Corporation, a Delaware limited liability company, provides
residential and small business electronic security, fire
protection and other related alarm monitoring services in 35
countries.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Arnab Banerjee, Esq.
          Melissa Grant, Esq.
          Raul Perez, Esq.
          CAPSTONE LAW APC
          1840 Century Park East, Suite 450
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 556 4811
          Facsimile: (310) 943 0396
          E-mail: arnab.banerjee@capstonelawyers.com
                  melissa.grant@capstonelawyers.com
                  raul.perez@capstonelawyers.com

               - and -

          Suzy E. Lee, Esq.
          ARIAS OZZELLO & GIGNAC LLP
          6701 Center Drive West, 14th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90045
          Telephone: (310) 670 1600
          Facsimile: (310) 670 1231
          E-mail: slee@aogllp.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Alec Hillbo, Esq.
          Linda Claxton, Esq.
          OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK AND STEWART, P.C.
          2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800
          Phoenix, AZ 85016
          Telephone: (602) 778 3762
          Facsimile: (602) 778 3750
          E-mail: alec.hillbo@ogletreedeakins.com
                  linda.claxton@odnss.com


ADVANCED MICRO: Says Mediation Did Not Result in Settlement
-----------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016,
for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015, that a court-ordered
mediation held in January 2016 did not result in a settlement of a
securities class action.

The company said, "On January 15, 2014, a class action lawsuit
captioned Hatamian v. AMD, et al., C.A. No. 3:14-cv-00226 (the
"Hatamian Lawsuit") was filed against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint purports to assert claims against AMD and certain
individual officers for alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. The plaintiffs seek to
represent a proposed class of all persons who purchased or
otherwise acquired our common stock during the period from April
4, 2011 through October 18, 2012. The complaint seeks damages
allegedly caused by alleged materially misleading statements
and/or material omissions by us and the individual officers
regarding our 32nm technology and "Llano" product, which
statements and omissions, the plaintiffs claim, allegedly operated
to artificially inflate the price paid for our common stock during
the period. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages,
attorneys' fees and costs."

"On July 7, 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims.
On March 31, 2015, the Court denied the motion to dismiss. On May
14, 2015, we filed our answer to plaintiffs' corrected amended
complaint. The discovery process is ongoing. On September 4, 2015,
plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification. A court-
ordered mediation held in January 2016 did not result in a
settlement of the lawsuit.

AMD is a global semiconductor company primarily offering:

   * x86 microprocessors, as a standalone central processing unit
(CPU) or as incorporated into an accelerated processing unit
(APU), chipsets, and discrete graphics processing units (GPUs) for
the consumer, commercial and professional graphics markets; and

   * server and embedded CPUs, GPUs and APUs, and semi-custom
System-on-Chip (SoC) products and technology for game consoles.


AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces "Cheah" Suit Over Sale to Thermo Fisher
-------------------------------------------------------------
JEFFREY S. L. CHEAH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
Situated, v. AFFYMETRIX, INC., JAMI DOVER NACHTSHEIM, FRANK
WITNEY, NELSON C. CHAN, GARY S. GUTHART, RICCARDO PUGLIUCCI, MER
ILEE RAINES, ROBERT H. TRICE, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC., WHITE
BIRCH MERGER CO., and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Case No: 16cv290794
(Cal. Super, County of Santa Clara, Jan. 26, 2016), is a
stockholder class action filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all
other public stockholders of Affymetrix, Inc., arising out of an
agreement to sell Affymetrix to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Affymetrix is in the business of microarray technology and
genomics analysis.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Leigh A. Parker, Esq.
     WEISSLAW LLP
     1516 South Bundy Drive, Suite 309
     Los Angeles, CA 90025
     Tel: (310) 208-2800
     Fax: (310)209-2348

        - and -

     Richard A. Acocelli, Esq.
     WEISSLAW LLP
     1500 Broadway, 16th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 682-3025
     Fax: (212) 682-3010


AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces "Cox" Suit Over Sale to Thermo Fisher
-----------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT COX Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, v. AFFYMETRIX, INC., THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.,
WHITE BIRCH MERGER CO. JAMI DOVER NACHTSHEIM, FRANK WITNEY, NELSON
C. CHAN, GARY S. GUTHART, RICCARDO PIGLIUCCI, MERILEE RAINES,
ROBERT H. TRICE and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Case No. 18CV990866
(Cal. Super., County of Santa Clara, Jan. 27, 2016), is a
stockholder class action filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all
other public stockholders of Affymetrix, Inc., arising out of an
agreement to sell Affymetrix to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Affymetrix is in the business of microarray technology and
genomics analysis.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     David T. Wissbroecker, Esq.
     Edward M. Gergosian, Esq.
     ROBBJNS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Tel: (619) 231-1058
     Fax: (619) 231-7423


AFFYMETRIX INC: Faces 4 Class Actions over Thermo Fisher Merger
---------------------------------------------------------------
Affymetrix, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that between January 19, 2016
and January 27, 2016, four substantially similar putative
shareholder class action suits were filed by individual
stockholders in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara
County against the Company's directors.

The complaints also name Thermo Fisher and Merger Sub as
defendants. The cases are captioned Steven Merola v. Affymetrix,
Inc., et al., Case No. 16CV290267, Betty Greenberg v. Frank
Witney, et al., Case No. 16CV290339, Jeffrey S.L. Cheah v.
Affymetrix, Inc., et al., Case No. 16CV290794, and Robert Cox v.
Affymetrix, Inc., et al., Case No. 16CV290866. (The Merola, Cheah,
and Cox cases also name the Company itself as a defendant.) The
complaints allege that the Company's directors breached their
fiduciary duties by failing to maximize stockholder value in
negotiating and approving the Merger Agreement. The complaints
also generally allege that the additional defendants named in each
suit aided and abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
The complaints seek, among other forms of relief, class
certification and injunctive relief blocking consummation of the
merger.

"The Company and the other defendants have not yet responded to
the complaints. The Company believes these actions are without
merit," the Company said.

Affymetrix is a provider of life science products and molecular
diagnostic products that enable parallel analysis of biological
systems at the gene, protein and cell level.


ALLSTATE INSURANCE: "Enger" Suit Moved to N.D. California
---------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Enger v. Allstate Insurance
Company et al., Case No. CIV536091, was removed from the San Mateo
Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California (Oakland). The District Court Clerk
assigned Case No. 4:16-cv-00136-JSW to the proceeding.

Allstate Insurance Company provides insurance services. The
company offers home security, business, supplemental health, long-
term care, boat, flood, identity theft expenses, and motor home
insurance products. It also provides financial products, such as
annuities, education savings, IRAs, and mutual funds; emergency
roadside assistance; and checking and savings accounts, money
market accounts, and certificates of deposit. In addition, the
company offers life insurance products. It provides its products
and services through a network of agencies, financial specialists,
brokers, bank representatives, insurance agents, and financial
advisors in the United States and Canada. The Company is
headquartered at Northbrook, Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          John R. Parker Jr., Esq.
          KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP
          401 Watt Avenue
          Sacramento, CA 95864
          Telephone: (916) 448 9800
          Facsimile: (916) 669 4499
          E-mail: jparker@cutterlaw.com

               - and -

          Curtis Brooks Cutter, Esq.
          CUTTER LAW, P.C.
          401 Watt Avenue
          Sacramento, CA 95864
          Telephone: (916) 290 9400
          Facsimile: (916) 588 9330
          E-mail: bcutter@cutterlaw.com

               - and -

          Robert A. Buccola, Esq.
          Steven Martin Campora, Esq.
          Dreyer Babich Buccola & Callaham, Esq.
          715 University Avenue
          Sacramento, CA 95825
          Telephone: (916) 920-2111

The Defendants are represented by:

          Anna Shiran, Esq.
          Sonia Renee Martin, Esq.
          DENTONS US LLP
          525 Market Street, 26th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94015
          Telephone: (415) 882 0151
          Facsimile: (415) 882 0300
          E-mail: anna.shiran@dentons.com
                  sonia.martin@dentons.com


AMERICAN CORADIUS: Confidentiality Order Issued in "Davis" Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned KRYSTAL DAVIS, on behalf of herself and
others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. AMERICAN CORADIUS
INTERNATIONAL LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 4:15-cv-03143-JMG-
CRZ (D. Neb.), the parties have agreed to the terms of an Agreed
Confidentiality Order issued by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart.
Judge Zwart also granted an unopposed motion for a protective
order filed by the defendants.

A full-text copy of Judge Zwart's February 18, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/uI10BXfrom Leagle.com.

Krystal Davis, Plaintiff, represented by Alexander H. Burke --
aburke@burkelawllc.com -- BURKE LAW OFFICES & Burke Smith --
burke@burkesmithlaw.com -- BURKE SMITH.

American Coradius International, LLC, The National Collegiate
Master Student Loan Trust I, Defendants, represented by James K.
Schultz -- jschultz@sessions.legal -- SESSIONS, FISHMAN LAW FIRM,
pro hac vice, Michael D. Slodov -- mslodov@session.legal --
SESSIONS, FISHMAN LAW FIRM, pro hac vice & Robert L. Bals --
rbals@shively.com -- SHIVELY, LANNIN LAW FIRM.


ANTHEM INC: Court Gives Plaintiffs 30 Days to File Amended Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Lucy H. Koh granted the motions to dismiss filed in the case
captioned IN RE ANTHEM, INC. DATA BREACH LITIGATION, Case No.
15-MD-02617-LHK (N.D. Cal.), but gave the plaintiffs 30 days from
date of the order to file an amended complaint curing their
deficiencies.

A putative class action was brought against Anthem, Inc., 28
Anthem affiliates (collectively, the "Anthem Defendants"), Blue
Cross Blue Shield Association, and 17 non-Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield Companies (collectively, the "Non-Anthem Defendants")
arising from problems with Anthem's data security which allowed
cyberattackers to breach the Anthem database and access the
personal identification information of individuals in the Anthem
database.  The claims alleged (1) failure to adequately protect
Anthem's data systems, (2) failure to disclose to customers that
Anthem did not have adequate security practices, and (3) failure
to timely notify customers of the data breach.

On November 23, 2015, the Anthem Defendants and Non-Anthem
Defendants filed their respective motions to dismiss.

Judge Koh issued an order as follows:

     1. Granting with leave to amend the Non-Anthem Defendants'
        motion to dismiss Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama;
        Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.; CareFirst of
        Maryland, Inc.; Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan;
        Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc.;
        Highmark Health Services; Highmark West Virginia, Inc.;
        BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.; Blue Cross and
        Blue Shield of Vermont; and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
        Illinois, with respect to the selected claims at issue in
        the motions to dismiss.

     2. Granting with leave to amend the Non-Anthem Defendants'
        motion to dismiss Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona,
        Inc.; BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.; and
        Highmark West Virginia, Inc. from this action in its
        entirety.

     3. Granting with leave to amend the Non-Anthem Defendants'
        motion to dismiss all Non-Anthem Defendants against whom
        no specific factual allegations were made with respect to
        Plaintiffs' New Jersey breach of contract, New York
        unjust enrichment, New York General Business Law Sec.
        349, and California Unfair Competition Law claims.

     4. Granting with leave to amend Defendants' motions to
        dismiss Plaintiffs' California breach of contract, New
        Jersey breach of contract, New York unjust enrichment,
        and Georgia Information and Privacy Protection Act
        claims, and in addition, granting with leave to amend
        Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' fraud claim
        under California's Unfair Competition Law.

     5. Granting with prejudice Defendants' motions to dismiss
        Plaintiffs' Indiana negligence, Kentucky Consumer
        Protection Act, Kentucky Data Breach Act, and Plaintiff
        Lawson's California breach of contract claim.

     6. Otherwise denying the Anthem and Non-Anthem Defendants'
        motions to dismiss

Judge Koh, however, gave the plaintiffs 30 days to file an amended
complaint curing the identified deficiencies.

A full-text copy of Judge Koh's February 14 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/hYTVkRfrom Leagle.com.

Anthem, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, In Re,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover -- craig.hoover@hoganlovells.com
-- Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan --
desmond.hogan@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan Lovells, Eve Hedy
Cervantez -- ecervantez@altshulerberzon.com -- Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse -- maren.clouse@hoganlovells.com --
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan --
michael.maddigan@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan Lovells US LLP,Peter R
Bisio -- peter.bisio@hoganlovells.com -- HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP &
Michael Ben Pasternak -- askmichael@theclevelandlawyer.com --
Michael Pasternak.

Loralee Giotta, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joseph N. Kravec, Jr. -- jkravec@fdpklaw.com
-- Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC,Nicole Diane Sugnet --
nsugnet@lchb.com -- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Stephen Francis Yunker -- sfy@yslaw.com -- Yunker & Schneider,
William Thomas Payne -- wpayne@fdpklaw.com -- Feinstein Doyle
Payne & Kravec, LLC & Wyatt A. Lison -- wlison@fdpklaw.com --
Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC.

Laura Fowles, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael W. Sobol, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & RoseMarie Maliekel, Clarence Dyer & Cohen LLP.

Danny Juliano, Plaintiff, represented by Donald W. Stewart, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Greg William Foster, STEWART
AND STEWART PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & T Dylan Reeves, STEWART & STEWART PC.

Susanne Powell, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold, Clayeo
C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C. Arnold a
Professional Law Corporation & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Casey Silva, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold, Clayeo C.
Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C. Arnold a
Professional Law Corporation & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Brent J Gearhart, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold,
Clayeo C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C.
Arnold a Professional Law Corporation & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Samantha Kirby, Plaintiff, represented by Theodore Walter Maya,
Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Bradley K King, Ahdoot & Wolfson APC, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan
and Morgan, P.A., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Theodore W.
Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C. & Tina Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson,
P.C..

Aswad Hood, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel C. Girard, Girard
Gibbs LLP,David Michael Berger, Girard Gibbs LLP, Eric H. Gibbs,
Girard Gibbs LLP,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Scott M.
Grzenczyk, Girard Gibbs LLP & Steven Augustine Lopez, Girard Gibbs
LLP.

Susan Morris, Plaintiff, represented by Aashish Y Desai, Desai Law
Firm PC,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, M. Adrianne De
Castro, Desai Law Firm, PC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joseph D'Angelo, III, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Shawn P. Haggerty, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Charity L. Latimer, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kurt J. McLaughlin, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Tamara Nedlouf, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb, Webb,
Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, G.
Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew C.
Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

John A. Thomas, II, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Richard Gillespie, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Lauren Roberts, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb, Webb,
Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, G.
Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen, Matthew C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Rosalynn C. Krissman, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E. Sweeney,
Hausfeld LLP & Christopher L. Lebsock, Hausfeld LLP.

Karen Meadows, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A
Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,
Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

John Keyser, Plaintiff, represented by David J. Hensel, PENCE
HENSEL LLC,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jeffrey Kaslowitz, Plaintiff, represented by William N Riley,
Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, James Piatt, Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC, Joseph N. Williams,
Rily Williams & Piatt, LLC,Lauren I Dubick, Kaplan Fox Kilsheimer
LLP, Laurence D. King, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Linda M. Fong,
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Mario Man-Lung Choi, Kaplan Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Robert N. Kaplan, Kaplan Kilsheimer & Fox LLP.

Michael S Weinberger, Plaintiff, represented by Carin Leigh
Marcussen, Federman and Sherwood, Danyel Struble,, THE CROSS LAW
FIRM, PC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, P. Gregory Cross,
THE CROSS LAW FIRM &William B. Federman, Federman & Sherwood.

Valerie Brescia, Plaintiff, represented by Cornelius Pellman
Dukelow, Abington Cole, Danyel Struble,, THE CROSS LAW FIRM, PC,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & P. Gregory Cross, THE
CROSS LAW FIRM.

Margaret McKinley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Kimberly C. Young, ELK & ELK, CO., Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Phillip A
Kuri & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos
Lehrman PL.

Nicholas Bowes, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Kimberly C. Young, ELK & ELK, CO., Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Phillip A
Kuri & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos
Lehrman PL.

Francis Matthew Hummel, Plaintiff, represented by Andy Katz, Law
Offices of Andy Katz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Noah
M. Schubert, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, Robert C. Schubert,
Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP & Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert
Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP.

Marissa Nasca, Plaintiff, represented by Andy Katz, Law Offices of
Andy Katz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Noah M. Schubert,
Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, Robert C. Schubert, Schubert
Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP & Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert Jonckheer &
Kolbe LLP.

Robert J. Farber, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Timothy LeBel,
Consumer Law Practice of Daniel T. LeBel, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Zachary R Scribner.

Sandy Myers, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Anthony Lawton, Lawton
Law Firm, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cliff Sojourner, Plaintiff, represented by Ahmed S Diab, Gomez
Trial Attorneys, Deborah Suzanne Dixon, Gomez Trial Attorneys, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, John Paul Fiske, Gomez
Iagmin Trial Attorneys & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Fazi Zand, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman
Sobol Shapiro LLP, Thomas Eric Loeser, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
LLP & Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson
Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Scott Heaton, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Rosemary M. Rivas, Finkelstein Thompson LLP.

Gloria K Park, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gordon M. Fauth, Jr., Litigation Law Group,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Rosanne L. Mah, Litigation Law Group.

Alyce G. Brown, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Karen
Hanson Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Natalie Finkelman Bennett,
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Todd David Carpenter,
Carpenter Law Group.

George Macros, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Steve Kawai, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Joseph Beckerman, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina
Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Tara Dozier, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Candyce Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

James O'Toole, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Jack Wenglewick, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina
Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cynthia Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cary Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cheri Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

David Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Terrell Adamson, Plaintiff, represented by Brian Gudmundson,
Attorney at Law, Daniel Stewart Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie
Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro
Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie
Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Brian Slater, 15-2820, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas Eric
Loeser, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Lisa Napoleon, 15-2822, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas Edmond Glynn, Glynn Law
Group.

Jennifer DeVito Jigarjian, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Stephen R. Basser, Barrack,
Rodos & Bacine.

Kellen Edwards, Plaintiff, represented by Barrett Jay Vahle,
Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson
LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, J. Austin Moore,
Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson,
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

George Nicoud, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP.

Tamara Trawick, Plaintiff, represented by Francis Joseph Balint,
Jr., Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, PC, Manfred Patrick
Muecke, Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman, & Balint, P.C., Andrew S.
Friedman, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, P.C, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Manfred Patrick Muecke, Jr.,
Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Balint PC & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cynthia Fessia, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Yale Basser, MARKUN
ZUSMAN FRENIERE AND COMPTON, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Marina Gil, Plaintiff, represented by Barrett Jay Vahle, Stueve
Siegel Hanson LLP, Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, J. Austin Moore, Stueve
Siegel Hanson LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Dana Hills, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP &Steven Lezell Woodrow, Woodrow & Peluso, LLC.

Mary Mellon, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea G. Schwarz, Paul
McInnes, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Richard M.
Paul, III, Paul McInnes LLP.

David Haag, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan and Morgan, P.A.,
John Allen Yanchunis, Sr., Morgan & Morgan, PA & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Maria Haag, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan and Morgan, P.A.,
John Allen Yanchunis, Sr., Morgan & Morgan, PA & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Monica Jones, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Everette L. Doffermyre, Jr., Doffermyre
Shields Canfield & Knowles, LLC, Joel R Rhine, Rhine Law Firm,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Steven W. Teppler, Abbott Law Group, P.A..

Elizabeth Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Thomas A. Withers, Oliver Maner & Gray.

Colleen Lesher, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot &
Wolfson, P.C., Theodore Walter Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Tina
Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gregory W. Jones, SIPRUT PC, Joseph J Siprut, Siprut
PC, Joseph Jeremy Siprut, Siprut PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Steven L. Langer, LANGER &
LANGER.

Vince Kandis, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot &
Wolfson, P.C., Theodore Walter Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Tina
Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gregory W. Jones, SIPRUT PC, Joseph J Siprut, Siprut
PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Steven L. Langer, LANGER & LANGER.

Amy Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea Schwartz, Paul
McInnes LLP,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan
Charles Little, SAEED & LITTLE, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard M. Paul, III, Paul
McInnes LLP & Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Richard Immerman, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Robert J. Schuckit, Schuckit & Associates,
P.C..

Brian Weinstock, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Robert J. Schuckit, Schuckit & Associates,
P.C..

Kathryn Leniski, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Danielle Evelyn Leonard, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, James Gerard Stranch, IV, Branstetter Stranch & Jennings,
Jonathan David Weissglass, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Karla Campbell,
Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC, Lisa M Port, Barrack, Rodos
& Bacine, Meredith Anne Johnson, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael
Gilman Stewart, Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Samuel M.
Ward, Barrack Rodos & Bacine & Stephen R. Basser, Barrack, Rodos &
Bacine.

Cathryn Salerno, Plaintiff, represented by James Bilsborrow, Weitz
and Luxenberg, Robin Lynn Greenwald, Weitz and Luxenberg, P.C.,
Benno B Ashrafi, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Denise Medina-Alvero, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Ed Zane, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg
PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Robin L. Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Rob Wengrzyn, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Sarah Pyle, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Troy Hobbs, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Choua Vang, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Patricia Mann, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Douglas Renzoni, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

John Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Brian D Chase, Bisnar Chase,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Isam C. Khoury, Cohelan
Khoury & Singer,James Jason Hill, Cohelan Khoury & Singer,
Jerusalem Beligan, BisnarChase,Jerusalem F Beligan, Bisnar Chase,
Michael D Singer, Cohelan Khoury and Singer, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Timothy Douglas Cohelan,
Cohelan Khoury & Singer.

Lucia Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Brian D Chase, Bisnar Chase,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Isam C. Khoury, Cohelan
Khoury & Singer,James Jason Hill, Cohelan Khoury & Singer,
Jerusalem F Beligan, Bisnar Chase, Michael D Singer, Cohelan
Khoury and Singer, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Timothy Douglas Cohelan, Cohelan Khoury & Singer.

Manuel Vasquez, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Jacob Dybnis,, Law
Office of Scott Glovsky, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Scott Charles Glovsky, Law Offices of Scott C. Glovsky.

Bethany Noel, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Jacob Dybnis,, Law
Office of Scott Glovsky, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Scott Charles Glovsky, Law Offices of Scott C. Glovsky.

Kelly Tharp, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Alfred Kafka, Cohen
Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul Boucher, Boucher,
LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Daniel Tharp, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Alfred Kafka, Cohen
Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul Boucher, Boucher,
LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Kenneth Coonce, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul
Boucher, Boucher, LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Chris Hudson, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gregory Garth Brown, Brown Charbonneau LLP,
Mark A Walsh, Attorney at Law, Michael J Walsh, Walsh and Walsh
PC, Michael James Walsh, Walsh & Associates & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Canaan Reich, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gregory Garth Brown, Brown Charbonneau LLP,
Mark A Walsh, Attorney at Law, Michael J Walsh, Walsh and Walsh PC
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Wilma J Peterman, Plaintiff, represented by David A. Slossberg,
Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Danielle Pierpont, Plaintiff, represented by Erin Green Comite,
Scott & Scott, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary
F Lynch, Carlson Lynch Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Jayne Arnold
Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Joseph P. Guglielmo, Scott & Scott LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Thomas Kay Boardman, SCOTTSCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP.

Frederick Ruhlemann, 15-2832, Plaintiff, represented by David N.
Rosen, David N. Rosen and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

David Ifversen, Plaintiff, represented by Amy N.L. Hanson, Cari C.
Laufenberg, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gretchen Freeman Cappio, Keller Rohrback, LLP, Hamish
S. Cohen, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP, Jeffrey Greg
Lewis, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN &
BIEDERMAN LLP.

Thomas Cahill, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, George Hoffman, III, HOFFMAN & NEWCOMB &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jacob Harker, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Oswaldo Herrera,
Cafferty Clobes Meriwether Sprengel LLP, David J. Hensel, PENCE
HENSEL LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Christopher Hank Becker, Plaintiff, represented by Sherrie R.
Savett, Berger & Montague, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jon Jason Lambiras,,
BERGER AND MONTAGUE, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E.
Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad,
Sherrie R Savett, BERGER & MONTAGUE & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

John L. McAffry, Plaintiff, represented by Sherrie R. Savett,
Berger & Montague, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jon Jason Lambiras,, BERGER AND
MONTAGUE, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen
and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad, Sherrie R Savett,
BERGER & MONTAGUE & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

John Thomas Hurley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jay P. Kennedy, KROGER GARDIS & REGAS
LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Robert Roth Sparks, STRAUSS TROY CO., LPA & Thomas P. Glass,
Strauss & Troy.

Ralph Staffieri, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Nanette Douglass, Plaintiff, represented by Irwin B. Levin, Cohen
Malad LLP, Andrew N. Friedman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC,
Douglas James McNamara, Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eric
Alfred Kafka, Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,Geoffrey Aaron Graber, Cohen
Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Sally Mae Handmaker, Cohen
Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad
&Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kimberly T Hyde, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew B. Miller,,
Starr Austen Miller LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Mark S. Fryman, Jr., Starr Austen Miller LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Scott L. Starr,, Starr
Austen Miller LLP.

Maureen Foley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, James Piatt, Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC,
Joseph N. Williams, Rily Williams & Piatt, LLC, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & William N Riley,
Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC.

Caroline Mertz, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew England Brashier,
Beasley Allen, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne
Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Karen Hanson Riebel, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN
LLP.

Geoffrey Spreter, Plaintiff, represented by ELLIOT ADLER, Adler
Law Group, APLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.
John Ourth, Plaintiff, represented by Evan D Buxner, Walther-Glenn
Law Associates, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kelly Ourth, Plaintiff, represented by Evan D Buxner, Walther-
Glenn Law Associates, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kenneth A Hodges, Plaintiff, represented by Alex G. Streett,
Streett Law Firm, P.A., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James A. Streett,, Streett Law Firm, P.A. & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Andy Yarber, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, George Hoffman, III, HOFFMAN & NEWCOMB &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Randi McInnis, 15-2864, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea G.
Schwarz, Paul McInnes, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
& Richard M. Paul, III, Paul McInnes LLP.

Julie Stanturf, Plaintiff, represented by Brennan Patrick Fagan,
Fagan Emert and Davis LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Frankie Joe Forbes,, Forbes Law Group, Michael J. Fleming,
Forbes Law Group, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Paul Treanor Davis, Fagan Emert and Davis LLC &
William Joseph Skepnek, Jr., Skepnek Law Firm, PA.

Maureen Moran, 15-2819, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, Rachele Renee Rickert, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP &Thomas Hamilton Burt, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman and Herz.

Anthony Pantuso, Plaintiff, represented by Brian P. Murray, Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Lee Albert, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Brad Haas, 15-2859, Plaintiff, represented by Chase C. Alvord,
Tousley Brian Stephens PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jason T Dennett,, Tousley
Brain Stephens PLLC, Kim D. Stephens, Tousley, Brain Stephens
PLLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen
and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen
Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Brian Mason, 15-2868, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin K. Grant,
McTeague, Higbee, Case, Cohen, Whitney and Toker, P.A., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joseph New, 15-3197, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Keith David Griffin, Girardi & Keese, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas V.
Girardi, Girardi & Keese.

Larry Keeton, 15-2871, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow,
Barnow and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

Garrett Coler, 15-2876, Plaintiff, represented by David W. Ruoff,
Howard Ruoff PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Roxanne Redhead, 15-2877, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gaitri Boodhoo, The Brualdi Law
Firm P.C., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Richard B. Brualdi, Attorney at Law.

S. R., 15-2877 - a minor child by and through her partent and
natural guardian Roxanne Redhead, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gaitri Boodhoo, The Brualdi Law
Firm P.C., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Richard B. Brualdi, Attorney at Law.

Alenka Maric, 15-2866, Plaintiff, represented by Emily A. Faith,
Bernheim & Dolinsky, PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Mark S. Fistos, Farmer, Jaffe,Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Seth Michael Lehrman, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe
Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman PL.

Lisa Diane Daniels, 15-2869, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Lisa S. Lee, Janet, Jenner and
Suggs, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Cameron Chehrazi, 15-2849, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP,
Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and
Malad, Robert S. Green, Green & Noblin, P.C., Scott D. Gilchrist,
Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Helen Braynis, 15-2849, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP,
Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and
Malad, Robert S. Green, Green & Noblin, P.C., Scott D. Gilchrist,
Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Larry Keeton, 15-2871, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow,
Barnow and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, John S. Steward, Steward Law Firm, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Monica Sabatino, 15-2873, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew
Dameron, Williams Dirks Dameron LLC, Eric L. Dirks, WILLIAMS
DIRKS, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maureen M.
Brady, MCSHANE AND BRADY LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Michael Sabatino, 15-2873, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew
Dameron, Williams Dirks Dameron LLC, Eric L. Dirks, WILLIAMS
DIRKS, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maureen M.
Brady, MCSHANE AND BRADY LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Sean Nicoll, 15-2878, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Paul C. Whalen,, Law Office of
Paul C. Whalen.

Hany Kamal, 15-2880, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gil Santamarina, Santamarina & Associates &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Annette Kamal, 15-2880, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gil Santamarina, Santamarina &
Associates & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Earl Edward Scofield, III, 15-2882, Plaintiff, represented by Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joel R Rhine, Rhine Law Firm
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Marnetta Xides, 15-2885, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael Ben Pasternak,, Michael
Pasternak & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Michael Renninger, Sr.., 15-2891, Plaintiff, represented by Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary F Lynch, Carlson Lynch
Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

David Smith, 15-2890, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Aaron Rihn,
Robert Peirce and Associates, P. C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Mark Whalen, 15-2888, Plaintiff, represented by Eric H. Weitz,,
Messa and Associates PC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Alison Swank, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley Christopher
Buhrow, Zimmerman Reed PllP, Brian Gudmundson, Attorney at Law,
Charles S Zimmerman, Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A
Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,
Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

Mary Ann Sizemore, 15-2887, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robert Armand Perez, Sr.,
Perez Law Firm Co. LPA.

Dale Alexander, 15-2883, Plaintiff, represented by Brian
Gudmundson, Attorney at Law, Daniel Frech, Spangenberg Shibley and
Liber LLP, Dennis R. Lansdowne, Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cassandra Hayes, 15-2883, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Frech,
Spangenberg Shibley and Liber LLP, Dennis R. Lansdowne,
Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

Ryan Patrick, 15-2884, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Ronald E. Johnson, Jr.,
Schachter, Hendy Johnson, PSC &Sarah Nicole Lynch,, Schachter
Hendy and Johnson.

Raymond Gnipp, 15-2886, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew England
Brashier, Beasley Allen, Bryan L Bleichner, Chestnut Cambronne PA,
Edwin J. Kilpela, Jr., Carlson Lynch, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Francis J. Rondoni,, Chestnut Cambronne, PA,
Gary F Lynch, Carlson Lynch Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Heidi M Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,Jamisen A. Etzel, Carlson Lynch,
Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP,Jeffrey D. Bores, Chestnut &
Cambronne, Karen Hanson Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Kate M.
Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Larry A. Golston, Beasley
Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & W. Daniel Miles, III, Beasley
Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles.

Lisa Shiltz, 15-2892, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS
LAW FIRM, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Rianna Ooten, an infant Under the Age of 18, By and Through Her
Next of Friend and Parent, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS
LAW FIRM, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Jennifer Ooten, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Ibrar Paracha, 15-2851, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan Charles Little, SAEED &
LITTLE, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Mark Krack, 15-2851, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan Charles Little, SAEED & LITTLE,
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
& Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Jillian J. Szalankiewicz, 15-2852, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny
E. Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Mark J. Plantan, 15-2852, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E.
Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Whitney Babbitt, 15-2853, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E.
Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Amanda Hadley, 15-2854, Plaintiff, represented by Cari C.
Laufenberg, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP,Gretchen Freeman Cappio, Keller Rohrback, LLP, Hamish
S. Cohen, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP, Jeffrey Greg
Lewis, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Lynn L. Sarko, KELLER ROHRBACK,
L.L.P., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP.

Francine Blain, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary S. Graifman, Kantrowitz
Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Howard Theodore Longman, Stull, Stull
& Brody, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Freda Bein Muldoon, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary S. Graifman, Kantrowitz
Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Howard Theodore Longman, Stull, Stull
& Brody, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Elizabeth Ames, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP,Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Brian Gudmundson, Attorney at
Law, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin,
Cohen Malad LLP,Jasper Ward, JONES WARD PLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Barbara Bader, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Steven L. Hayes, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan L. Bleichner,
Chestnut Cambronne PA, Edmond W. Foley, Foley & Small, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Francis J. Rondoni, Chestnut
Cambronne, PA, Jeffrey D. Bores, Chestnut & Cambronne & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Daniel Combs, Plaintiff, represented by Betsy Katherine Greene,
Greene & Schultz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Frederick Schultz, Greene & Schultz, Frederick William Schultz,
Greene & Schultz & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Patricia Oskam-Combs, Plaintiff, represented by Betsy Katherine
Greene, Greene & Schultz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Frederick William Schultz, Greene & Schultz & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Gary Bellegarde, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Brian Douglas Penny, Goldman Scarlato
Karon and Penny, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Mark S. Goldman, Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E.
Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &
Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Catherine Den Bleyker, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J.
Esades, Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Lillian Brisko, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Gregory Burke, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Rachel Calo, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Claudia Cass, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Maryann Daigle, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Thomas Dubyna, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Isabelle Freda, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Matthew Gates, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Barbara Gold, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Brenda Harrington, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Stephanie Kaufman, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Gerald Keaton, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Alvin Lawson, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Gary Mares, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kevin Organ, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Ronald Percy, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Wanda Pratt, 15-2875, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Daniel Randrup, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kenneth Solomon, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Martin Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Matthew McGill, 15-2863, Plaintiff, represented by Alex Davis,
Jones Ward PLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jasper
Ward, Jones Ward PLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Timothy Whalen, 15-2863, Plaintiff, represented by Alex Davis,
Jones Ward PLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jasper
Ward, JONES WARD PLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Corinne Berstein, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Howard Theodore Longman, Stull,
Stull & Brody,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Nicholas Kalfa, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Howard Theodore Longman, Stull,
Stull & Brody,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Daniels Diane Lisa, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee, Janet,
Jenner and Suggs, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Lisa Diane Daniels, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee, Janet,
Jenner and Suggs, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Debra Brock, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Frank Bailey, Jr., 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Phyllis Davis, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Janett Tillman, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Sam W Nigliazzo, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Jerry Young, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Jessica Katz, Plaintiff, represented by Joshua M Rubin, WeissLaw
LLP, Leigh Anne Parker, WeissLaw LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Y. Michael Smilow, 15-4739, Plaintiff, represented by Joshua M
Rubin, WeissLaw LLP, Leigh Anne Parker, WeissLaw LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joyce Benton, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph N. Kravec, Jr.,
Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jill Noble, 15-2874, Plaintiff, represented by William Joseph
Skepnek, Jr., Skepnek Law Firm, PA & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Thomas MacAusland, Plaintiff, represented by Jill Michelle
Manning, Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP.

Jessica Holguin, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R. Basser,
Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kimberly Kos-Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R.
Basser, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Gary Lasneski, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R. Basser,
Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jennifer Mertlich, Plaintiff, represented by Albert H. Kirby,
Sound Justice Law Group, PLLC, Bradley Jerome Moore, STRITMATTER
KESSLER WHELAN (SEA) & Catherine Jura Fleming, STRITMATTER KESSLER
WHELAN (SEA).

Robert Grondona, Plaintiff, represented by Ross Christophe
Cornell, Law Ofc Ross Cornell.

Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew N.
Friedman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Eric Alfred Kafka,
Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC & Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP.

Frank Bailey, 16-0339, Plaintiff, represented by Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen & Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen.

Hank Maurer, 16-0339, Plaintiff, represented by Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen & Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen.

Don West, 16-0462, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew N. Friedman,
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

Darrell Hunter, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Carrie Ramos, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Randy Polacsek, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Michelle Kaseta-Collins, Plaintiff, represented by E. Powell
Miller, The Miller Law Firm, P.C..

Anthem, Inc., formerly known as WellPoint Inc doing business as
Anthem Health Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Alexandria J.
Reyes, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Nelson Mullins Riley &
Scarborough, LLP, Cavender C Kimble, BALCH & BINGHAM LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Christopher W. Brooker, Wyatt,
Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, Craig H. Smith, Hogan Lovells US
LLP, David R. Boyd, Comey & Boyd, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Geraldine G. Sanchez, Roach Hewitt Ruprecht Sanchez & Bischoff,
P.C., Glenn Virgil Whitaker, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Gregory
Haynes, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, Jaime L. Theriot,
Troutman Sanders, LLP-ATL, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP, Lisa Fried, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Mark A.
Stafford, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Matthew H.
Geelan, Donahue, Durham & Noonan, P.C., Melissa McCoy Gormly,
Vorys, Sater Seymour and Pease LLP, Michael G. Durham, Donahue
Durham & Noonan PC, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael C. Theis, Hogan Lovells US LLP-Denver, Michael J. Tuteur,
Foley & Lardner LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC, Patrick
Joseph Dempsey, Hogan Lovels US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Robert Armand Perez, Sr., Perez Law Firm Co. LPA, Robert
Neal Webner, Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP, Robin J. Samuel,
Hogan Lovells USA LLP, Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC, Sally
F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C. & Stephen A. Loney, Jr., Hogan &
Hartson.

Blue Cross of California, doing business as Anthem Blue Cross,
Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA
LLP & Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

The Anthem Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders
LLP, Craig H. Smith, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough
LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,
Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA LLP & Stephen
A. Loney, Jr., Hogan & Hartson.

Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John
Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Michael M
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells
USA LLP.

The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., a California
corporation, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Robin
J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia Inc, Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Alexandria J. Reyes, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Jaime L. Theriot, Troutman Sanders,
LLP-ATL, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP
& Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Community Insurance Company, doing business as Anthem Blue Cross
and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie
Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Glenn Virgil Whitaker, Vorys
Sater Seymour & Pease, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP &Robert Neal
Webner, Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP.

Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP,Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP &
Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough,
LLP.

Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Mark A. Stafford, Nelson Mullins
Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP,
Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C. &Timothy James Parker, CARNEY
BADLEY SPELLMAN.

Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP,Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman
Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
& Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

Anthem Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Craig A Hoover, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, E. B. Chiles, IV, Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull PLLC,
John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Matthew H.
Geelan, Donahue, Durham & Noonan, P.C.,Michael G. Durham, Donahue
Durham & Noonan PC, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP & Sally F.
Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

Anthem Health Plans, Inc, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Matthew H. Geelan, Donahue, Durham
& Noonan, P.C. & Michael G. Durham, Donahue Durham & Noonan PC.

Amerigroup Corporation, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS
RICE, LLC, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC,Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS
RICE, LLC & Scott A. Wissel, Lewis Rice LLC - Kansas City.

Amerigroup Kansas, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS
RICE, LLC, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Scott A. Wissel, Lewis Rice
LLC - Kansas City.

Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Christopher
W. Brooker, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, Gregory
Haynes, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP &Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Health Plans of Maine Inc, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Geraldine G.
Sanchez, Roach Hewitt Ruprecht Sanchez & Bischoff, P.C., John
Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

HMO Missouri, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan,
Hogan Lovells US LLP,Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Neal F.
Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC.

Healthy Alliance Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, David W.
Gearhart, LEWIS RICE, LLC, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Ronald A.
Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC.

Empire HealthChoice HMO, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Empire HealthChoice Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP &Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP & John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, DefendantNEY TO BE NOTICED
Anthem Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Anthem Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Stephen A. Loney,
Jr., Hogan & Hartson.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Anthem Health Plans of New Hampshire, Inc., Defendant, represented
byCraig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

RightChoice Managed Care, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

UNICARE Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Highmark West Virginia Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Defendant, represented by Adam
P. Feinberg, Miller and Chevalier Chartered, Brian Kavanaugh,,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Katherine Wheaton Warner, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and Ellis LLP.

Independence Blue Cross, Defendant, represented by Mathieu
Shapiro, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell and Hippel LLP & Rigel Caitlin
Farr, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell and Hippel LLP.

USAble Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.


California Physician's Service, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, Defendant, represented by
Brian Kavanaugh, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Luke Christian Ruse,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP.

CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

BCBSM, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E.
Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

Highmark Health Services, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells & Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Defendant, represented by
Brian Kavanaugh, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Luke Christian Ruse,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.

Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company, Defendant, represented
byCraig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Vermont, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells &Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Anthem, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, In Re,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP,Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
& Michael Ben Pasternak, Michael Pasternak.

Loralee Giotta, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joseph N. Kravec, Jr., Feinstein Doyle Payne
& Kravec, LLC,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Stephen Francis Yunker, Yunker & Schneider,
William Thomas Payne, Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC & Wyatt
A. Lison, Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC.

Laura Fowles, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael W. Sobol, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & RoseMarie Maliekel, Clarence Dyer & Cohen LLP.

Danny Juliano, Plaintiff, represented by Donald W. Stewart, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Greg William Foster, STEWART
AND STEWART PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & T Dylan Reeves, STEWART & STEWART PC.

Susanne Powell, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold, Clayeo
C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C. Arnold a
Professional Law Corporation &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Casey Silva, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold, Clayeo C.
Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C. Arnold a
Professional Law Corporation &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Brent J Gearhart, Plaintiff, represented by Clayeo C. Arnold,
Clayeo C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joshua Haakon Watson, Clayeo C.
Arnold a Professional Law Corporation & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Samantha Kirby, Plaintiff, represented by Theodore Walter Maya,
Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Bradley K King, Ahdoot & Wolfson APC, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan
and Morgan, P.A., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Theodore W.
Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C. & Tina Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson,
P.C..

Aswad Hood, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel C. Girard, Girard
Gibbs LLP,David Michael Berger, Girard Gibbs LLP, Eric H. Gibbs,
Girard Gibbs LLP,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Scott M.
Grzenczyk, Girard Gibbs LLP & Steven Augustine Lopez, Girard Gibbs
LLP.

Susan Morris, Plaintiff, represented by Aashish Y Desai, Desai Law
Firm PC,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, M. Adrianne De
Castro, Desai Law Firm, PC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joseph D'Angelo, III, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Shawn P. Haggerty, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Charity L. Latimer, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kurt J. McLaughlin, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Tamara Nedlouf, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb, Webb,
Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, G.
Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew C.
Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

John A. Thomas, II, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Richard Gillespie, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb,
Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, G. Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Matthew
C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Lauren Roberts, Plaintiff, represented by Edward Adam Webb, Webb,
Klase & Lemond, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, G.
Franklin Lemond, Jr., Webb, Klase and Lemond, LLC, Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen, Matthew C. Klase, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Rosalynn C. Krissman, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E. Sweeney,
Hausfeld LLP & Christopher L. Lebsock, Hausfeld LLP.

Karen Meadows, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A
Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,
Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

John Keyser, Plaintiff, represented by David J. Hensel, PENCE
HENSEL LLC,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jeffrey Kaslowitz, Plaintiff, represented by William N Riley,
Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, James Piatt, Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC, Joseph N. Williams,
Rily Williams & Piatt, LLC,Lauren I Dubick, Kaplan Fox Kilsheimer
LLP, Laurence D. King, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Linda M. Fong,
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Mario Man-Lung Choi, Kaplan Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Matthew B. George, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Robert N. Kaplan, Kaplan Kilsheimer & Fox LLP.

Michael S Weinberger, Plaintiff, represented by Carin Leigh
Marcussen, Federman and Sherwood, Danyel Struble,, THE CROSS LAW
FIRM, PC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, P. Gregory Cross,
THE CROSS LAW FIRM &William B. Federman, Federman & Sherwood.

Valerie Brescia, Plaintiff, represented by Cornelius Pellman
Dukelow, Abington Cole, Danyel Struble,, THE CROSS LAW FIRM, PC,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & P. Gregory Cross, THE
CROSS LAW FIRM.

Margaret McKinley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Kimberly C. Young, ELK & ELK, CO., Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Phillip A
Kuri & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos
Lehrman PL.

Nicholas Bowes, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Kimberly C. Young, ELK & ELK, CO., Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Phillip A
Kuri & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos
Lehrman PL.

Francis Matthew Hummel, Plaintiff, represented by Andy Katz, Law
Offices of Andy Katz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Noah
M. Schubert, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, Robert C. Schubert,
Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP & Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert
Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP.

Marissa Nasca, Plaintiff, represented by Andy Katz, Law Offices of
Andy Katz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Noah M. Schubert,
Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, Robert C. Schubert, Schubert
Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP & Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert Jonckheer &
Kolbe LLP.

Robert J. Farber, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Timothy LeBel,
Consumer Law Practice of Daniel T. LeBel, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Zachary R Scribner.

Sandy Myers, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Anthony Lawton, Lawton
Law Firm, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cliff Sojourner, Plaintiff, represented by Ahmed S Diab, Gomez
Trial Attorneys, Deborah Suzanne Dixon, Gomez Trial Attorneys, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, John Paul Fiske, Gomez
Iagmin Trial Attorneys & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Fazi Zand, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman
Sobol Shapiro LLP, Thomas Eric Loeser, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
LLP & Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson
Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Scott Heaton, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Rosemary M. Rivas, Finkelstein Thompson LLP.

Gloria K Park, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gordon M. Fauth, Jr., Litigation Law Group,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Rosanne L. Mah, Litigation Law Group.

Alyce G. Brown, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Karen
Hanson Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Natalie Finkelman Bennett,
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Todd David Carpenter,
Carpenter Law Group.

George Macros, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Steve Kawai, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Joseph Beckerman, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina
Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Tara Dozier, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Candyce Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

James O'Toole, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Jack Wenglewick, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina
Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cynthia Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cary Kelley, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Cheri Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

David Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart Robinson,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson
Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Terrell Adamson, Plaintiff, represented by Brian Gudmundson,
Attorney at Law, Daniel Stewart Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie
Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro
Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Wesley Kaikaina Polischuk,, Robinson Calcagnie
Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc..

Brian Slater, 15-2820, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Stewart
Robinson, Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Mark P. Robinson, Jr.,
Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas Eric
Loeser, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Lisa Napoleon, 15-2822, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas Edmond Glynn, Glynn Law
Group.

Jennifer DeVito Jigarjian, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Stephen R. Basser, Barrack,
Rodos & Bacine.

Kellen Edwards, Plaintiff, represented by Barrett Jay Vahle,
Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson
LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, J. Austin Moore,
Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson,
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

George Nicoud, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP.

Tamara Trawick, Plaintiff, represented by Francis Joseph Balint,
Jr., Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, PC, Manfred Patrick
Muecke, Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman, & Balint, P.C., Andrew S.
Friedman, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, P.C, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Manfred Patrick Muecke, Jr.,
Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Balint PC & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cynthia Fessia, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Yale Basser, MARKUN
ZUSMAN FRENIERE AND COMPTON, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Marina Gil, Plaintiff, represented by Barrett Jay Vahle, Stueve
Siegel Hanson LLP, Norman E. Siegel, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, J. Austin Moore, Stueve
Siegel Hanson LLP, Jason S Hartley, Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Dana Hills, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP &Steven Lezell Woodrow, Woodrow & Peluso, LLC.

Mary Mellon, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea G. Schwarz, Paul
McInnes, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Richard M.
Paul, III, Paul McInnes LLP.

David Haag, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan and Morgan, P.A.,
John Allen Yanchunis, Sr., Morgan & Morgan, PA & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Maria Haag, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, John A. Yanchunis, Morgan and Morgan, P.A.,
John Allen Yanchunis, Sr., Morgan & Morgan, PA & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Monica Jones, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Everette L. Doffermyre, Jr., Doffermyre
Shields Canfield & Knowles, LLC, Joel R Rhine, Rhine Law Firm,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Steven W. Teppler, Abbott Law Group, P.A..

Elizabeth Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Thomas A. Withers, Oliver Maner & Gray.

Colleen Lesher, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot &
Wolfson, P.C., Theodore Walter Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Tina
Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gregory W. Jones, SIPRUT PC, Joseph J Siprut, Siprut
PC, Joseph Jeremy Siprut, Siprut PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Steven L. Langer, LANGER &
LANGER.

Vince Kandis, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Ahdoot, Ahdoot &
Wolfson, P.C., Theodore Walter Maya, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Tina
Wolfson, Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gregory W. Jones, SIPRUT PC, Joseph J Siprut, Siprut
PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Steven L. Langer, LANGER & LANGER.

Amy Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea Schwartz, Paul
McInnes LLP,Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan
Charles Little, SAEED & LITTLE, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard M. Paul, III, Paul
McInnes LLP & Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Richard Immerman, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Robert J. Schuckit, Schuckit & Associates,
P.C..

Brian Weinstock, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP & Robert J. Schuckit, Schuckit & Associates,
P.C..

Kathryn Leniski, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Danielle Evelyn Leonard, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, James Gerard Stranch, IV, Branstetter Stranch & Jennings,
Jonathan David Weissglass, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Karla Campbell,
Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC, Lisa M Port, Barrack, Rodos
& Bacine, Meredith Anne Johnson, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael
Gilman Stewart, Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, PLLC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Samuel M.
Ward, Barrack Rodos & Bacine & Stephen R. Basser, Barrack, Rodos &
Bacine.

Cathryn Salerno, Plaintiff, represented by James Bilsborrow, Weitz
and Luxenberg, Robin Lynn Greenwald, Weitz and Luxenberg, P.C.,
Benno B Ashrafi, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Denise Medina-Alvero, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Ed Zane, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg
PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Robin L. Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Rob Wengrzyn, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Sarah Pyle, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Troy Hobbs, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Choua Vang, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton Dalbey,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L. Greenwald,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Patricia Mann, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

Douglas Renzoni, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Barton
Dalbey, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, James J Bilsborrow, Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robin L.
Greenwald, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C..

John Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Brian D Chase, Bisnar Chase,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Isam C. Khoury, Cohelan
Khoury & Singer,James Jason Hill, Cohelan Khoury & Singer,
Jerusalem Beligan, BisnarChase,Jerusalem F Beligan, Bisnar Chase,
Michael D Singer, Cohelan Khoury and Singer, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Timothy Douglas Cohelan,
Cohelan Khoury & Singer.

Lucia Bell, Plaintiff, represented by Brian D Chase, Bisnar Chase,
Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Isam C. Khoury, Cohelan
Khoury & Singer,James Jason Hill, Cohelan Khoury & Singer,
Jerusalem F Beligan, Bisnar Chase, Michael D Singer, Cohelan
Khoury and Singer, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Timothy Douglas Cohelan, Cohelan Khoury & Singer.

Manuel Vasquez, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Jacob Dybnis,, Law
Office of Scott Glovsky, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Scott Charles Glovsky, Law Offices of Scott C. Glovsky.

Bethany Noel, Plaintiff, represented by Ari Jacob Dybnis,, Law
Office of Scott Glovsky, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Scott Charles Glovsky, Law Offices of Scott C. Glovsky.

Kelly Tharp, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Alfred Kafka, Cohen
Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul Boucher, Boucher,
LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Daniel Tharp, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Alfred Kafka, Cohen
Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul Boucher, Boucher,
LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Kenneth Coonce, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maria L. Weitz, BOUCHER LLP, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Raymond Paul
Boucher, Boucher, LLP & Shehnaz M. Bhujwala, Boucher, LLP.

Chris Hudson, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gregory Garth Brown, Brown Charbonneau LLP,
Mark A Walsh, Attorney at Law, Michael J Walsh, Walsh and Walsh
PC, Michael James Walsh, Walsh & Associates & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Canaan Reich, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gregory Garth Brown, Brown Charbonneau LLP,
Mark A Walsh, Attorney at Law, Michael J Walsh, Walsh and Walsh PC
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Wilma J Peterman, Plaintiff, represented by David A. Slossberg,
Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Danielle Pierpont, Plaintiff, represented by Erin Green Comite,
Scott & Scott, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary
F Lynch, Carlson Lynch Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Jayne Arnold
Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Joseph P. Guglielmo, Scott & Scott LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Thomas Kay Boardman, SCOTTSCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP.

Frederick Ruhlemann, 15-2832, Plaintiff, represented by David N.
Rosen, David N. Rosen and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

David Ifversen, Plaintiff, represented by Amy N.L. Hanson, Cari C.
Laufenberg, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Gretchen Freeman Cappio, Keller Rohrback, LLP, Hamish
S. Cohen, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP, Jeffrey Greg
Lewis, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN &
BIEDERMAN LLP.

Thomas Cahill, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, George Hoffman, III, HOFFMAN & NEWCOMB &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jacob Harker, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Oswaldo Herrera,
Cafferty Clobes Meriwether Sprengel LLP, David J. Hensel, PENCE
HENSEL LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Christopher Hank Becker, Plaintiff, represented by Sherrie R.
Savett, Berger & Montague, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jon Jason Lambiras,,
BERGER AND MONTAGUE, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E.
Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad,
Sherrie R Savett, BERGER & MONTAGUE & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

John L. McAffry, Plaintiff, represented by Sherrie R. Savett,
Berger & Montague, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jon Jason Lambiras,, BERGER AND
MONTAGUE, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen
and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad, Sherrie R Savett,
BERGER & MONTAGUE & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

John Thomas Hurley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jay P. Kennedy, KROGER GARDIS & REGAS
LLP,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Robert Roth Sparks, STRAUSS TROY CO., LPA & Thomas P. Glass,
Strauss & Troy.

Ralph Staffieri, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Nanette Douglass, Plaintiff, represented by Irwin B. Levin, Cohen
Malad LLP, Andrew N. Friedman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC,
Douglas James McNamara, Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eric
Alfred Kafka, Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,Geoffrey Aaron Graber, Cohen
Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Sally Mae Handmaker, Cohen
Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad
&Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kimberly T Hyde, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew B. Miller,,
Starr Austen Miller LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Mark S. Fryman, Jr., Starr Austen Miller LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Scott L. Starr,, Starr
Austen Miller LLP.

Maureen Foley, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, James Piatt, Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC,
Joseph N. Williams, Rily Williams & Piatt, LLC, Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & William N Riley,
Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC.

Caroline Mertz, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew England Brashier,
Beasley Allen, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jayne
Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Karen Hanson Riebel, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN
LLP.

Geoffrey Spreter, Plaintiff, represented by ELLIOT ADLER, Adler
Law Group, APLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

John Ourth, Plaintiff, represented by Evan D Buxner, Walther-Glenn
Law Associates, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kelly Ourth, Plaintiff, represented by Evan D Buxner, Walther-
Glenn Law Associates, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kenneth A Hodges, Plaintiff, represented by Alex G. Streett,
Streett Law Firm, P.A., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
James A. Streett,, Streett Law Firm, P.A. & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Andy Yarber, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, George Hoffman, III, HOFFMAN & NEWCOMB &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Randi McInnis, 15-2864, Plaintiff, represented by Ashlea G.
Schwarz, Paul McInnes, LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
& Richard M. Paul, III, Paul McInnes LLP.

Julie Stanturf, Plaintiff, represented by Brennan Patrick Fagan,
Fagan Emert and Davis LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Frankie Joe Forbes,, Forbes Law Group, Michael J. Fleming,
Forbes Law Group, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Paul Treanor Davis, Fagan Emert and Davis LLC &
William Joseph Skepnek, Jr., Skepnek Law Firm, PA.

Maureen Moran, 15-2819, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, Rachele Renee Rickert, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP &Thomas Hamilton Burt, Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman and Herz.

Anthony Pantuso, Plaintiff, represented by Brian P. Murray, Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Lee Albert, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Brad Haas, 15-2859, Plaintiff, represented by Chase C. Alvord,
Tousley Brian Stephens PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Jason T Dennett,, Tousley
Brain Stephens pLLC, Kim D. Stephens, Tousley, Brain Stephens
PLLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen
and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen
Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Brian Mason, 15-2868, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin K. Grant,
McTeague, Higbee, Case, Cohen, Whitney and Toker, P.A., Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joseph New, 15-3197, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Keith David Griffin, Girardi & Keese, Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Thomas V.
Girardi, Girardi & Keese.

Larry Keeton, 15-2871, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow,
Barnow and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

Garrett Coler, 15-2876, Plaintiff, represented by David W. Ruoff,
Howard Ruoff PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Roxanne Redhead, 15-2877, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gaitri Boodhoo, The Brualdi Law
Firm P.C., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Richard B. Brualdi, Attorney at Law.

S. R., 15-2877 - a minor child by and through her partent and
natural guardian Roxanne Redhead, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gaitri Boodhoo, The Brualdi Law
Firm P.C., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Richard B. Brualdi, Attorney at Law.

Alenka Maric, 15-2866, Plaintiff, represented by Emily A. Faith,
Bernheim & Dolinsky, PLLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Mark S. Fistos, Farmer, Jaffe,Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Seth Michael Lehrman, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. & Steven R. Jaffe, Farmer Jaffe
Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman PL.

Lisa Diane Daniels, 15-2869, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Lisa S. Lee, Janet, Jenner and
Suggs, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Cameron Chehrazi, 15-2849, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP,
Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and
Malad, Robert S. Green, Green & Noblin, P.C., Scott D. Gilchrist,
Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Helen Braynis, 15-2849, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP,
Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and
Malad, Robert S. Green, Green & Noblin, P.C., Scott D. Gilchrist,
Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Larry Keeton, 15-2871, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow,
Barnow and Associates, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, John S. Steward, Steward Law Firm, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet,
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Monica Sabatino, 15-2873, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew
Dameron, Williams Dirks Dameron LLC, Eric L. Dirks, WILLIAMS
DIRKS, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maureen M.
Brady, MCSHANE AND BRADY LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Michael Sabatino, 15-2873, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew
Dameron, Williams Dirks Dameron LLC, Eric L. Dirks, WILLIAMS
DIRKS, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Maureen M.
Brady, MCSHANE AND BRADY LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Sean Nicoll, 15-2878, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Paul C. Whalen,, Law Office of
Paul C. Whalen.

Hany Kamal, 15-2880, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gil Santamarina, Santamarina & Associates &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Annette Kamal, 15-2880, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gil Santamarina, Santamarina &
Associates & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Earl Edward Scofield, III, 15-2882, Plaintiff, represented by Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Joel R Rhine, Rhine Law Firm
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Marnetta Xides, 15-2885, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Michael Ben Pasternak,, Michael
Pasternak & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Michael Renninger, Sr.., 15-2891, Plaintiff, represented by Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary F Lynch, Carlson Lynch
Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

David Smith, 15-2890, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Aaron Rihn,
Robert Peirce and Associates, P. C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP &Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Mark Whalen, 15-2888, Plaintiff, represented by Eric H. Weitz,,
Messa and Associates PC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP
& Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Alison Swank, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley Christopher
Buhrow, Zimmerman Reed PllP, Brian Gudmundson, Attorney at Law,
Charles S Zimmerman, Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A
Toops, Cohen and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,
Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and
Malad, LLP.

Mary Ann Sizemore, 15-2887, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Robert Armand Perez, Sr.,
Perez Law Firm Co. LPA.

Dale Alexander, 15-2883, Plaintiff, represented by Brian
Gudmundson, Attorney at Law, Daniel Frech, Spangenberg Shibley and
Liber LLP, Dennis R. Lansdowne, Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, Eve
Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Cassandra Hayes, 15-2883, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Frech,
Spangenberg Shibley and Liber LLP, Dennis R. Lansdowne,
Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.

Ryan Patrick, 15-2884, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Ronald E. Johnson, Jr.,
Schachter, Hendy Johnson, PSC &Sarah Nicole Lynch,, Schachter
Hendy and Johnson.

Raymond Gnipp, 15-2886, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew England
Brashier, Beasley Allen, Bryan L Bleichner, Chestnut Cambronne PA,
Edwin J. Kilpela, Jr., Carlson Lynch, Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP,Francis J. Rondoni,, Chestnut Cambronne, PA,
Gary F Lynch, Carlson Lynch Sweet & Kilpela, LLP, Heidi M Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,Jamisen A. Etzel, Carlson Lynch,
Jayne Arnold Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP,Jeffrey D. Bores, Chestnut &
Cambronne, Karen Hanson Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Kate M.
Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Larry A. Golston, Beasley
Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & W. Daniel Miles, III, Beasley
Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles.

Lisa Shiltz, 15-2892, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS
LAW FIRM, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Rianna Ooten, an infant Under the Age of 18, By and Through Her
Next of Friend and Parent, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS
LAW FIRM, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Jennifer Ooten, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Matthew Stonestreet, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM,
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &
Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM.

Ibrar Paracha, 15-2851, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan Charles Little, SAEED &
LITTLE, LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Mark Krack, 15-2851, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy Cervantez,
Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jonathan Charles Little, SAEED & LITTLE,
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
& Syed Ali Saeed, SAEED AND LITTLE LLP.

Jillian J. Szalankiewicz, 15-2852, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny
E. Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Mark J. Plantan, 15-2852, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E.
Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Whitney Babbitt, 15-2853, Plaintiff, represented by Bonny E.
Sweeney, Hausfeld LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Amanda Hadley, 15-2854, Plaintiff, represented by Cari C.
Laufenberg, KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP,Gretchen Freeman Cappio, Keller Rohrback, LLP, Hamish
S. Cohen, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP, Jeffrey Greg
Lewis, Keller Rohrback L.L.P., Lynn L. Sarko, KELLER ROHRBACK,
L.L.P., Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Sean P. Burke, MATTINGLY BURKE COHEN & BIEDERMAN LLP.

Francine Blain, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary S. Graifman, Kantrowitz
Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Howard Theodore Longman, Stull, Stull
& Brody, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Freda Bein Muldoon, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Gary S. Graifman, Kantrowitz
Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Howard Theodore Longman, Stull, Stull
& Brody, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Elizabeth Ames, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP,Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Brian Gudmundson, Attorney at
Law, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin,
Cohen Malad LLP,Jasper Ward, JONES WARD PLC, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Barbara Bader, Plaintiff, represented by Andrei V. Rado, Milberg
LLP, Ariana J. Tadler, Milberg LLP, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Steven L. Hayes, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan L. Bleichner,
Chestnut Cambronne PA, Edmond W. Foley, Foley & Small, Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Francis J. Rondoni, Chestnut
Cambronne, PA, Jeffrey D. Bores, Chestnut & Cambronne & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Daniel Combs, Plaintiff, represented by Betsy Katherine Greene,
Greene & Schultz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Frederick Schultz, Greene & Schultz, Frederick William Schultz,
Greene & Schultz & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP.

Patricia Oskam-Combs, Plaintiff, represented by Betsy Katherine
Greene, Greene & Schultz, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Frederick William Schultz, Greene & Schultz & Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Gary Bellegarde, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Brian Douglas Penny, Goldman Scarlato
Karon and Penny, P.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Mark S. Goldman, Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C., Nicole Diane
Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Richard E.
Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad &
Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Catherine Den Bleyker, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J.
Esades, Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen
and Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Lillian Brisko, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Gregory Burke, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Rachel Calo, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Claudia Cass, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Maryann Daigle, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Thomas Dubyna, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Isabelle Freda, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Matthew Gates, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Barbara Gold, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Brenda Harrington, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Stephanie Kaufman, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Gerald Keaton, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Alvin Lawson, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Gary Mares, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad,Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kevin Organ, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Ronald Percy, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Wanda Pratt, 15-2875, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Daniel Randrup, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades, Heins
Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP,
Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and Malad
LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP,
Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen and
Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad, LLP.

Kenneth Solomon, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Martin Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Vincent J. Esades,
Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon
LLP, Irwin B. Levin, Cohen Malad LLP, Lynn A Toops, Cohen and
Malad LLP, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen and Malad, Scott D.
Gilchrist, Cohen and Malad & Vess Allen Miller, Cohen and Malad,
LLP.

Matthew McGill, 15-2863, Plaintiff, represented by Alex Davis,
Jones Ward PLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jasper
Ward, Jones Ward PLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Timothy Whalen, 15-2863, Plaintiff, represented by Alex Davis,
Jones Ward PLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Jasper
Ward, JONES WARD PLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP.

Corinne Berstein, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Howard Theodore Longman, Stull,
Stull & Brody,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Nicholas Kalfa, 15-2845, Plaintiff, represented by Eve Hedy
Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP, Howard Theodore Longman, Stull,
Stull & Brody,Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP & Patrice L. Bishop, Stull, Stull & Brody.

Daniels Diane Lisa, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee, Janet,
Jenner and Suggs, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Lisa Diane Daniels, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee, Janet,
Jenner and Suggs, LLC, Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler Berzon LLP &
Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Debra Brock, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Frank Bailey, Jr., 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Phyllis Davis, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Janett Tillman, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Sam W Nigliazzo, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A.
Kulesa, Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Jerry Young, 15-2846, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy A. Kulesa,
Levi & Korsinsky, Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP &Shannon L Hopkins, Levi Korsinsky LLP.

Jessica Katz, Plaintiff, represented by Joshua M Rubin, WeissLaw
LLP, Leigh Anne Parker, WeissLaw LLP & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Y. Michael Smilow, 15-4739, Plaintiff, represented by Joshua M
Rubin, WeissLaw LLP, Leigh Anne Parker, WeissLaw LLP & Nicole
Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Joyce Benton, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph N. Kravec, Jr.,
Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jill Noble, 15-2874, Plaintiff, represented by William Joseph
Skepnek, Jr., Skepnek Law Firm, PA & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Thomas MacAusland, Plaintiff, represented by Jill Michelle
Manning, Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP.

Jessica Holguin, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R. Basser,
Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Kimberly Kos-Williams, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R.
Basser, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Gary Lasneski, Plaintiff, represented by Stephen R. Basser,
Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Nicole Diane Sugnet, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Jennifer Mertlich, Plaintiff, represented by Albert H. Kirby,
Sound Justice Law Group, PLLC, Bradley Jerome Moore, STRITMATTER
KESSLER WHELAN (SEA) & Catherine Jura Fleming, STRITMATTER KESSLER
WHELAN (SEA).

Robert Grondona, Plaintiff, represented by Ross Christophe
Cornell, Law Ofc Ross Cornell.

Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew N.
Friedman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Eric Alfred Kafka,
Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC & Eve Hedy Cervantez, Altshuler
Berzon LLP.

Frank Bailey, 16-0339, Plaintiff, represented by Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen & Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen.

Hank Maurer, 16-0339, Plaintiff, represented by Karen Hanson
Riebel, Lockridge Grindal Nauen & Kate M. Baxter-Kauf, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen.

Don West, 16-0462, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew N. Friedman,
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

Darrell Hunter, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Carrie Ramos, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Randy Polacsek, 16-0463, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa S. Lee,
Janet, Jenner and Suggs, LLC.

Michelle Kaseta-Collins, Plaintiff, represented by E. Powell
Miller, The Miller Law Firm, P.C..

Anthem, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Alexandria J.
Reyes, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Nelson Mullins Riley &
Scarborough, LLP, Cavender C Kimble, BALCH & BINGHAM LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Christopher W. Brooker, Wyatt,
Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, Craig H. Smith, Hogan Lovells US
LLP, David R. Boyd, Comey & Boyd, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Geraldine G. Sanchez, Roach Hewitt Ruprecht Sanchez & Bischoff,
P.C., Glenn Virgil Whitaker, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Gregory
Haynes, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, Jaime L. Theriot,
Troutman Sanders, LLP-ATL, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP & Lisa Fried, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Anthem, Inc., Defendant, represented by Lucile Hartley Cohen,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Mark A. Stafford, Nelson
Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

Anthem, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew H. Geelan,
Donahue, Durham & Noonan, P.C..

Anthem, Inc., formerly known as WellPoint Inc doing business as
Anthem Health Inc., Defendant, represented by Melissa McCoy
Gormly, Vorys, Sater Seymour and Pease LLP, Michael G. Durham,
Donahue Durham & Noonan PC, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US
LLP, Michael C. Theis, Hogan Lovells US LLP-Denver, Michael J.
Tuteur, Foley & Lardner LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
Patrick Joseph Dempsey, Hogan Lovels US LLP,Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Robert Armand Perez, Sr., Perez Law Firm Co. LPA,
Robert Neal Webner, Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP,Robin J.
Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA LLP, Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C. & Stephen A. Loney, Jr., Hogan &
Hartson.

Blue Cross of California, doing business as Anthem Blue Cross,
Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA
LLP & Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

The Anthem Companies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders
LLP, Craig H. Smith, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough
LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,
Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA LLP & Stephen
A. Loney, Jr., Hogan & Hartson.

Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John
Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Michael M
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Robin J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells
USA LLP.

The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., a California
corporation, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Robin
J. Samuel, Hogan Lovells USA LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia Inc, Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Alexandria J. Reyes, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Jaime L. Theriot, Troutman Sanders,
LLP-ATL, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP
& Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Community Insurance Company, doing business as Anthem Blue Cross
and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie
Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Glenn Virgil Whitaker, Vorys
Sater Seymour & Pease, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP &Robert Neal
Webner, Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP.

Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue
Cross and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Cassandra Lauren Crawford,
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman
Sanders LLP, Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Mark A. Stafford, Nelson Mullins Riley &
Scarborough, LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Sally F.
Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C. & Timothy James Parker, CARNEY BADLEY
SPELLMAN.

Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP,Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman
Sanders LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
& Sally F. Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

Anthem Companies, Inc., doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield
of Wisconsin doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of
Kentucky, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. B. Chiles, IV, Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull PLLC, John
Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Matthew H.
Geelan, Donahue, Durham & Noonan, P.C., Michael G. Durham, Donahue
Durham & Noonan PC, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP & Sally F.
Zweig, KATZ & KORIN P.C..

Anthem Health Plans, Inc, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Matthew H. Geelan, Donahue, Durham
& Noonan, P.C. & Michael G. Durham, Donahue Durham & Noonan PC.

Amerigroup Corporation, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS
RICE, LLC, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Michael M Maddigan, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC,Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS
RICE, LLC & Scott A. Wissel, Lewis Rice LLC - Kansas City.

Amerigroup Kansas, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R
Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP,
Craig A Hoover, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS
RICE, LLC, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, John Derrick Martin,
Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP,Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Scott A. Wissel, Lewis Rice
LLC - Kansas City.

Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc., doing business as Anthem
Blue Cross Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP,Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Christopher W. Brooker,
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville,Gregory Haynes, Wyatt,
Tarrant & Combs LLP - Louisville, John Derrick Martin, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson
Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Health Plans of Maine Inc, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, Geraldine G.
Sanchez, Roach Hewitt Ruprecht Sanchez & Bischoff, P.C., John
Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

HMO Missouri, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover,
Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald Maddigan,
Hogan Lovells US LLP,Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R
Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, David W. Gearhart, LEWIS RICE, LLC,
John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile
Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Neal F.
Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Ronald A. Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC.

Healthy Alliance Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, David W.
Gearhart, LEWIS RICE, LLC, John Derrick Martin, Nelson Mullins
Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley
Scarborough LLP, Neal F. Perryman, LEWIS RICE, LLC & Ronald A.
Norwood, LEWIS RICE, LLC.

Empire HealthChoice HMO, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Empire HealthChoice Inc., a New York corporation doing business as
Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP &Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP & John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, DefendantNEY TO BE NOTICED
Anthem Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Anthem Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP, Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Stephen A. Loney,
Jr., Hogan & Hartson.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Anthem Health Plans of New Hampshire, Inc., Defendant, represented
byCraig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

RightChoice Managed Care, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

UNICARE Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan,
Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP, John Derrick
Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP & Lucile Hartley
Cohen, Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond
Hogan, Hogan Lovells,Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Michael McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Highmark West Virginia Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael McDonald
Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Michael
McDonald Maddigan, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP & Chad R Fuller, Troutman Sanders LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Defendant, represented by Adam
P. Feinberg, Miller and Chevalier Chartered, Brian Kavanaugh,,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Katherine Wheaton Warner, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and Ellis LLP.

Independence Blue Cross, Defendant, represented by Mathieu
Shapiro, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell and Hippel LLP & Rigel Caitlin
Farr, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell and Hippel LLP.

USAble Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Craig
Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.

California Physician's Service, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP,E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, Defendant, represented by
Brian Kavanaugh, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Luke Christian Ruse,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP.

CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

BCBSM, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan
Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E.
Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells
US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc., Defendant,
represented by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison
Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells,
Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

Highmark Health Services, Defendant, represented by Craig Alan
Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan
Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc., Defendant, represented
by Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells & Maren
Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Defendant, represented by
Brian Kavanaugh, Kirkland and Ellis LLP, Luke Christian Ruse,
Kirkland and Ellis LLP & Timothy Conrad Pickert, Kirkland and
Ellis LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Allison Marie Holt, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan Lovells, Maren Jessica
Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP & Peter R Bisio, HOGAN LOVELLS US
LLP.

Anthem Life & Disability Insurance Company, Defendant, represented
byCraig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Vermont, Defendant, represented by
Craig Alan Hoover, Hogan Lovells US LLP, E. Desmond Hogan, Hogan
Lovells &Maren Jessica Clouse, Hogan Lovells US LLP.


ANTHEM LIFE: "Yost" Suit Moved from Common Pleas Ct to M.D. Pa.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Yost v. Anthem Life Insurance
Company, Case No. 1756-2015, was removed from the Court of Common
Pleas of Pike County, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania (Scranton). The District Court Clerk
assigned Case No. 3:16-cv-00079-UN2 to the proceeding.

The Plaintiff alleges that the claims for reimbursement and
subrogation made by Anthem Life have placed a cloud on his right
to receive the proceeds of his settlement with the tortfeasor in
connection with the auto accident in which he was injured, and
have deprived him of the right to possession and use of those
settlement monies.

Anthem Life Insurance operates as a subsidiary of Rocky Mountain
Hospital & Medical Service Inc. The Company is headquartered at
Columbus, Ohio.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Charles Kannebecker, Esq.
          James C. Haggerty, Esq.
          WEINSTEIN SCHNEIDER KANNEBECKER & LOKUTA
          104 W. High St.
          Milford, PA 18337
          Telephone: (570) 296 6471
          Facsimile: (570) 296 2653
          E-mail: kannebecker@wskllawfirm.com
                  jhaggerty@hgsklawyers.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Dan J. Hofmeister Jr., Esq.
          Douglas R Widin, Esq.
          John N. Ellison, Esq.
          Miranda A. Jannuzzi, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
          Chicago, IL 60606
          Telephone: (312) 207 1000
          E-mail: dhofmeister@reedsmith.com
                  dwidin@reedsmith.com
                  mjannuzzi@reedsmith.com


ATLAS AIR: NY Court Granted Preliminary Approval of Settlement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18,
2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York has
issued an order granting preliminary approval of the settlement in
the class action lawsuits related to alleged pricing practices.

The Company and Old Polar were named defendants, along with a
number of other cargo carriers, in several class actions in the
United States arising from allegations about the pricing practices
of Old Polar and a number of air cargo carriers. These actions
were all centralized in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York. Polar was later joined as an
additional defendant. The consolidated complaint alleged, among
other things, that the defendants, including the Company and Old
Polar, manipulated the market price for air cargo services sold
domestically and abroad through the use of surcharges, in
violation of United States, state, and European Union antitrust
laws. The suit sought treble damages and attorneys' fees.

On January 7, 2016, the Company, Old Polar, and Polar entered into
a settlement agreement to resolve all claims by participating
class members against the Company, Old Polar and Polar. The
Company, Polar, and Old Polar deny any wrongdoing or liability,
and there is no admission of any wrongdoing or liability in the
settlement agreement.

Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Old Polar has agreed to make
installment payments over three years to settle the plaintiffs'
claims, with payments of $35.0 million paid on January 15, 2016,
$35.0 million due on or before January 15, 2017, and $30.0 million
due on or before January 15, 2018, resulting in an accrual of
$100.0 million as of December 31, 2015.

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
York issued an order granting preliminary approval of the
settlement on January 12, 2016. The settlement is still subject to
final court approval.

AAWW is a holding company with a principal wholly owned operating
subsidiary, Atlas Air, Inc. ("Atlas"). It also has a 51% economic
interest and 75% voting interest in Polar Air Cargo Worldwide,
Inc. ("Polar"). AAWW is also the parent company of several wholly
owned subsidiaries related to its dry leasing services
(collectively referred to as "Titan").


BAKER HUGHES: Evaluating Background Facts of "Williams" Action
--------------------------------------------------------------
Baker Hughes Incorporated said in its Form 10-K Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that a class and
collective action lawsuit alleging that the Company failed to pay
a nationwide class of workers overtime in compliance with the Fair
Labor Standards Act and North Dakota law was filed on April 30,
2015, titled Williams et al. v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations,
Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota.

"We are evaluating the background facts and at this time are not
able to predict the outcome of this lawsuit or whether it will
have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows," the Company said.


BAKER HUGHES: Deal in Halliburton Merger Suits Remains Pending
--------------------------------------------------------------
Baker Hughes Incorporated said in its Form 10-K Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the settlement of
class action lawsuits related to the pending merger with
Halliburton remains subject to certain conditions, including
consummation of the Merger, final documentation, and court
approval.

These lawsuits have been filed in Delaware in connection with the
Company's pending Merger with Halliburton:

   * On November 24, 2014, Gary Molenda, a purported shareholder
of the Company, filed a class action lawsuit in the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware ("Delaware Chancery Court")
against Baker Hughes, the Company's Board of Directors,
Halliburton, and Red Tiger LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Halliburton ("Red Tiger" and together with all defendants,
"Defendants") styled Gary R. Molenda v. Baker Hughes, Inc., et
al., Case No. 10390-CB.

   * On November 26, 2014, a second purported shareholder of the
Company, Booth Family Trust, filed a substantially similar class
action lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court.

   * On December 1, 2014, New Jersey Building Laborers Annuity
Fund and James Rice, two additional purported shareholders of the
Company, filed substantially similar class action lawsuits in
Delaware Chancery Court.

   * On December 10, 2014, a fifth purported shareholder of the
Company, Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, filed another
substantially similar class action lawsuit in the Delaware
Chancery Court.

    * On December 24, 2014, a sixth purported shareholder of the
Company, Annette Shipp, filed another substantially similar class
action lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court.

All of the lawsuits make substantially similar claims.  The
plaintiffs generally allege that the members of the Company's
Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties to our
shareholders in connection with the Merger negotiations by
entering into the Merger Agreement and by approving the Merger,
and that the Company, Halliburton, and Red Tiger aided and abetted
the purported breaches of fiduciary duties.

More specifically, the lawsuits allege that the Merger Agreement
provides inadequate consideration to our shareholders, that the
process resulting in the Merger Agreement was flawed, that the
Company's directors engaged in self-dealing, and that certain
provisions of the Merger Agreement improperly favor Halliburton
and Red Tiger, precluding or impeding third parties from
submitting potentially superior proposals, among other things.
The lawsuit filed by Annettee Shipp also alleges that our Board of
Directors failed to disclose material information concerning the
proposed Merger in the preliminary registration statement on Form
S-4.

On January 7, 2015, James Rice amended his complaint, adding
similar allegations regarding the disclosures in the preliminary
registration statement on Form S-4.  The lawsuits seek unspecified
damages, injunctive relief enjoining the Merger, and rescission of
the Merger Agreement, among other relief.  On January 23, 2015,
the Delaware lawsuits were consolidated under the caption In re
Baker Hughes Inc. Stockholders Litigation, Consolidated C.A. No.
10390-CB (the "Consolidated Case"). Pursuant to the Court's
consolidation order, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on
February 4, 2015, which alleges substantially similar claims and
seeks substantially similar relief to that raised in the six
individual complaints, except that while Baker Hughes is named as
a defendant, no claims are asserted against the Company.

On March 18, 2015, the parties reached an agreement in principle
to settle the Consolidated Case in exchange for the Company making
certain additional disclosures. Those disclosures were contained
in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2015. The settlement
remains subject to certain conditions, including consummation of
the Merger, final documentation, and court approval.

On November 26, 2014, a seventh class action challenging the
Merger was filed by a purported shareholder of the Company in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
(Houston Division).  The lawsuit, styled Marc Rovner v. Baker
Hughes Inc., et al., Cause No. 4:14-cv-03416 (the "Rovner
lawsuit"), asserts claims against the Company, most of our current
Board of Directors, Halliburton, and Red Tiger.  The lawsuit
asserts substantially similar claims and seeks substantially
similar relief as that sought in the Delaware lawsuits.  On March
20, 2015, counsel for Mr. Rovner filed a notice of voluntary
dismissal, and on March 23, 2015, the Court entered an order
dismissing the Rovner lawsuit without prejudice.


BAXALTA INC: Faces "Davis" Suit Over Planned Sale to Shire Plc
--------------------------------------------------------------
PAUL DAVIS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. BAXALTA INCORPORATED, WAYNE T. HOCKMEYER, BLAKE E.
DEVITT, KAREN FERRANTE, JOHN D. FORSYTH, GAIL D. FOSLER, JAMES R.
GAVIN III, LUDWIG N. HANTSON, FRAN€OIS NADER, ALBERT P.L.
STROUCKEN, SHIRE PLC, and BEARTRACKS, INC., Case No. 11939
(Del.Ch., January 27, 2016), is a stockholder class action brought
by Plaintiff on behalf of the stockholders of Baxalta Incorporated
against Baxalta, the board of directors of Baxalta, Shire plc to
enjoin the sale of the Company.

Baxalta is a global, innovative biopharmaceutical leader with a
sustainable portfolio of differentiated therapies that seek to
address unmet medical needs across many disease areas, including
hemophilia, immunology and oncology.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Seth D. Rigrodsky, Esq.
     Brian D. Long, Esq.
     Gina M. Serra, Esq.
     Jeremy J. Riley, Esq.
     RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A.
     2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120
     Wilmington, DE 19803
     Tel: (302) 295-5310

        - and -

     Brian C. Kerr, Esq.
     BROWER PIVEN A.
     475 Park Avenue South, 33rd Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 501-9000


BHP BILLITON: Faces Class Action Over Samarco Dam Burst
-------------------------------------------------------
Veselin Valchev, writing for Invezz, reports that US investors in
BHP Billiton Plc American Depository Receipts (ADRs), a form of
company stock, have filed a lawsuit against the Anglo-Australian
miner and its bosses over allegations that the company had
fraudulently overstated its ability to manage safety risks prior
to the Samarco dam burst in Brazil in November.

In a complaint filed on Feb. 24 in the US District Court in
Manhattan, investors led by the Jackson County Employees'
Retirement System in Michigan accuse BHP of inflating the price of
its ADRs by ignoring safety risks and overstating its commitment
to safety, Reuters reported.

Four BHP officials were also explicitly named as part of the
lawsuit, including Chief Executive Andrew Mackenzie and Chairman
Jac Nasser.


BMW BANK: Foley Motors Alleges TCPA Violation
---------------------------------------------
FOLEY MOTORS, INC., an Illinois corporation, individually and as
the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, v.
BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC,
CREDITSMARTS CORP. and JOHN DOES 1-10, Case No: 1:16-cv-01044-JBM-
JEH (C.D. Ill., February 4, 2016), challenges the Defendants'
alleged practice of sending unsolicited facsimiles, which violates
the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Brian J. Wanca, Esq.
     Ryan M. Kelly, Esq.
     ANDERSON + WANCA
     3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
     Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
     Tel: 847-368-1500
     Fax: 847-368-1501
     E-mail: bwanca@andersonwanca.com
             rkelly@andersonwanca.com


BOEING COMPANY: April 22 Class Action Lead Plaintiff Set
--------------------------------------------------------
Levi & Korsinsky on Feb. 24 disclosed that a class action lawsuit
has been commenced in the USDC for the Northern District of
Illinois on behalf of investors who purchased The Boeing Company
("Boeing" or the "Company") securities between February 9, 2012
and February 11, 2016.

To get more information, click here: http://zlk.9nl.com/boeing
There is no cost or obligation to you.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants
made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to
disclose that: (a) Boeing's use of program accounting for the
Company's 787 Dreamliner and/or 747 jumbo aircrafts relied on
inflated sales forecasts; (b) Boeing's use of program accounting
for the Company's 787 Dreamliner and/or 747 jumbo aircrafts relied
on understated estimates of production costs; and (c) as a result
of the foregoing, Boeing's public statements were materially false
and misleading at all relevant times.

If you suffered a loss in Boeing you have until April 22, 2016 to
request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your
ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as
a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Joseph
E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at
(212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972, or visit
http://zlk.9nl.com/boeing

Levi & Korsinsky -- http://www.zlk.com-- is a national firm with
offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Washington D.C.
The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise in prosecuting
securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing
investors throughout the nation in securities and shareholder
lawsuits.


CAMPBELL-EWALD: Decision Moots Genesis Class Action Ruling
----------------------------------------------------------
David Carpenter and Micah Moon, writing for Corporate Counsel,
report that nearly three years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court held
that an offer of judgment to the named plaintiff for the full
amount sought could moot a collective action brought under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.  It also gave indications that it might
extend that rule to other kinds of cases.  But the court seemed to
change course in its ruling in another case late in January. And
some of the reasoning offered in support of that decision has left
commentators scratching their heads.

The court's first decision was in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v.
Symczyk, which it decided under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
(FRCP) 68.  Almost immediately the Genesis decision ignited a
debate over whether the court's holding was also applicable to
FRCP 23 class actions. When presented with this very question,
federal courts issued conflicting rulings on the effect of an
offer of judgment on a pending, putative class action.  While some
courts ruled that an offer of judgment did moot a class
representative's claims, requiring dismissal of the entire class
action, other courts held that an offer of judgment by itself was
insufficient to dismiss a case.

In the immediate aftermath of Genesis, depending on the
jurisdiction in which a defendant found itself, an offer of
judgment to a putative class representative was potentially a
winning strategy.  The Genesis decision, which was drafted by
Justice Clarence Thomas, offered hope to many defendants as the
path forward for evading certain onerous class actions.
Justice Thomas appeared to invite class action defendants to
employ the strategy described in Genesis, noting that the law that
gave rise to that decision "has invariably focused on the fleeting
nature of the challenged conduct giving rise to the claim, not on
the defendant's litigation strategy."  He also added that "a claim
for damages cannot evade review . . . [because] putative
plaintiffs remain free to vindicate their rights in their own
suits."  For many courts and defendants, it was not a stretch to
view Thomas's language as a roadmap for class defendants to
quickly resolve potential class action litigation.

But after the court's decision in January, this is likely no
longer an option.

The Campbell-Ewald Decision

On January 20, the court ruled in Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez that a
putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) was not rendered moot by a class member's
rejected settlement offer and offer of judgment.  "[A]n unaccepted
settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff's
case," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the 6-3 majority. She
was joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Sonia
Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Thomas concurred in the judgment.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by
Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito.  Justice Alito also
filed a separate dissenting opinion.

FRCP 68, the court's majority held, "hardly supports" the position
that a settlement offer can render a case or controversy moot.
Adopting Kagan's reasoning from her dissent in Genesis, the court
found that "basic principles of contract law" dictate that a
"settlement bid and [FRCP] 68 offer of judgment, once rejected,
[have] no continuing efficacy."  The court further declared that
an action only becomes moot when "it is impossible for a court to
grant any effectual relief . . . to the prevailing party" and that
"[a]s long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small,
in the outcome of the litigation, the case is not moot."
Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the Campbell-Ewald decision,
however, was the concurring opinion from Thomas, who had seemed to
favor the alternative in his Genesis opinion. Although he found
that the majority did "not advance a sound basis for [its]
conclusion," he felt that "the common-law history of tenders . . .
which led to Rule 68 . . . demonstrates that a mere offer of the
sum owed is insufficient to eliminate a court's jurisdiction to
decide the case to which the offer related."  In an apparent 180
from his Genesis opinion, Justice Thomas wrote that a review of
the history of tenders "reveals one unbroken practice that should
resolve this case: A defendant's offer to pay the plaintiff --
without more -- would not have deprived a court of jurisdiction."

Impact of the Opinion

For class action defendants, the court's opinion and Thomas's
concurrence in make it pretty clear that offers of judgment or
settlement offers to putative class members are no longer viable
defense strategies.  The majority did, however, leave a bit of an
opening for class action defendants.  While the court held that
"an unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot
a plaintiff's case," it went on to note: "We need not, and do not,
now decide whether the result would be different if a defendant
deposits the full amount of the plaintiff's individual claim in an
account payable to the plaintiff, and the court then enters
judgment for the plaintiff in that amount.  That question is
appropriately reserved for a case in which it is not
hypothetical."  In his dissent, Justice Roberts proclaimed that
the "good news is that this case is limited to its facts."  While
the majority held "that an offer of complete relief is
insufficient to moot a case," it did not "say that payment of
complete relief leads to the same result."  So there is some hope
remaining for defendants seeking to employ this strategy in a
class action.

At the same time, there is little that indicates that the court
would reach a different result in such a case.  Although
Justice Thomas did seem to contemplate a different result when a
defendant provides something "substantially more than a bare
offer," every indication is that a majority of the court has no
interest in allowing defendants to get rid of class actions using
FRCP 68.  Moreover, it is difficult to imagine a factual scenario
where a defendant can deposit an amount of money in a plaintiff's
account or obtain a judgment after an FRCP 68 offer has been
rejected.

The best advice for potential defendants in TCPA class actions, or
other cases involving similar statutory damage regimes, is that
compliance with these statutes is now more than ever a must.
Businesses should make efforts to ensure TCPA compliance at all
levels, running internal audits to make sure that no details have
been left to chance.  While an FRCP 68 offer may no longer be as
helpful to class action defendants, the traditional tools for
prevailing in class actions remain.


CANADA: Legionnaire's Disease Class Action Can Proceed
------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Press reports that a Quebec court has authorized a class-
action suit related to an outbreak of legionnaire's disease that
is believed to have contributed to 14 deaths.

The lead plaintiff is Solange Allen, whose husband,
Claude Desjardins, died in August 2012 at the age of 64.

The class-action filed in Quebec Superior Court states that 167
people suffered financially from the outbreak in Quebec City.
The defendants include the Quebec Health Department and regional
health officials in the provincial capital.

The plaintiffs are seeking $50,000 plus expenses for anyone who
contracted the disease, $10,000 plus expenses for anyone who
looked after someone with the disease, $125,000 for a surviving
spouse, and $30,000 for the beneficiaries of people who died.
They also want funeral costs covered.

A coroner's report in 2013 said public health authorities did not
have the proper tools to combat the outbreak, which came 16 years
after similar cases in 1996 prompted calls for change.

Legionnaires' disease is contracted by breathing in small droplets
of water contaminated with bacteria.  Symptoms include coughs,
fever, chills and respiratory problems.

The deadly bacteria grows in the stagnant water of cooling systems
and spreads in little droplets through air conditioning.
Heavy smokers and people with weak immune systems are most at risk
of catching the disease, which is not contagious and cannot be
transmitted from one person to another.

It presents little or no risk to most people, although elderly
people are more vulnerable.


CIGNA CORP: "Patel" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
---------------------------------------------------------
JYOTINDRA PATEL, Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, v. CIGNA CORP., DAVID M. CORDANI, and THOMAS
A. MCCARTHY, Case 3:16-cv-00182 (D. Conn. February 4, 2016), was
filed on behalf of a class consisting of all persons other than
Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Cigna securities
between February 27, 2014 and January 21, 2016, both dates
inclusive, seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants'
violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies
under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.

Cigna Corp., a health services organization, provides insurance
and related products and services in the United States and
internationally. The Company distributes its products and services
through insurance brokers and insurance consultants or directly to
employers, unions, and other groups, as well as through the direct
response television and the Internet.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Matthew L. Tuccillo, Esq.
     Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq.
     J. Alexander Hood II, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 661-1100
     Fax: (212) 661-8665
     E-mail: mltuccillo@pomlaw.com
             jalieberman@pomlaw.com
             ahood@pomlaw.com

        - and -

     Patrick V. Dahlstrom, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     10 South La Salle Street, Suite 3505
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Tel: (312) 377-1181
     Fax: (312) 377-1184
     E-mail: pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com


CLARK COUNTY, NV: "Britain" Suit Has Conditional Certification
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey granted in part and denied in part the
renewed motion for conditional certification of the case captioned
Trina Britain, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Clark County, Nevada,
Defendant, No. 2:12-cv-01240-JAD-NJK (D. Nev.) as a collective
action.

Bailiffs and deputy marshals in Clark County's Eight Judicial
District Court and Las Vegas Court sued Clark County under the
Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") for unpaid lunch periods during
which they were required to work off the clock.

Trina Britain and her co-plaintiffs renewed their motion for
conditional certification of the case as a collective action and
moved for approval of the notice of the collective action,
appointment of their counsel as interim counsel for the
collective-action group, and other related relief.

Judge Dorsey held that conditional certification of the collective
action is warranted as the plaintiffs have provided sufficient
evidence to support a finding that the bailiffs and deputy
marshals who were employed at any state district-court or justice-
court facility in Clark County, Nevada are similarly situated.
The judge also found that the proper temporal scope for the
conditionally certified action is from July 13, 2009 to the
present.

As to the appointment of interim counsel, Judge Dorsey found that
the Law Offices of Daniel Marks can fairly and adequately perform
the role of interim class counsel for the putative class in the
conditionally certified FLSA action.

The collective-action notice was approved as to its form, although
Judge Dorsey specified a few substantive and several minor edits
that must be made to the notice.  The opt-in authorization was
approved without edits.

Judge Dorsey granted the request to serve the notice and consent
form through first-class mail to the last-known address for all
current and former bailiffs and marshals covered by the collective
action.  The judge, however, denied the request for supplemental
service of the notice and consent form by the Clark County Deputy
Marshals Association.  The County was ordered to provide the last-
known addresses.

A full-text copy of Judge Dorsey's February 23, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/RHYxQDfrom Leagle.com.

Trina Britain, Ronald Brooks, Ian Massy, Karen Pixler, Anthony
Smith, Michael Smith, Dennis Curran, Anthony Vogel, Lamons Walker,
Bret Cegavske, Billy Crank, Kevin Eckhart, Randy Hawkes, Grajeda
Nubia, Michael Petty, Tom Serrano, Enrique Stiegelmeyer, Karl
Beavers, Kenneth Hawkes, Ric Moon, Eric Prunty, Anthony Russo,
Plaintiffs, represented by Adam Levine, Law Office of Daniel Marks
& Daniel Marks, Law Office of Daniel Marks.

Clark County, Nevada, Defendant, represented by Robert W Freeman,
Jr. -- robert.freeman@lewisbrisbois.com -- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard
& Smith LLP & Cayla Witty -- cwitty@lrrc.com -- Lewis Roca
Rothgerber Christie LLP.


CLOVIS ONCOLOGY: 3 Suits Consolidated; Bernstein Named Lead Atty.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Raymond P. Moore granted various motions seeking
consolidation of the case captioned SONNY P. MEDINA, Plaintiff, v.
CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC., PATRICK J. MAHAFFY, Defendants, Case No.
15-cv-2546-RM-MEH (D. Colo.) with two other cases brought in the
same district.  The judge also granted the appointment of the
Arkin group, composed of M. Arkin (1999) LTD and Arkin
Communications LTD, as lead plaintiff, and Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossman LLP as lead counsel.

A class action complaint was filed by Sonny P. Medina against
Clovis Oncology, Inc. and Patrick J. Mahaffy alleging that Clovis
and its officers and directors made false or misleading statements
with respect to the lung-cancer treatment drug "rociletnib", and
that the false or misleading nature of these statements came to
public light on November 16, 2015, causing a significant drop in
the value of Clovis' common stock.

Subsequent to the publication of a notice on Medina's action,
several parties each filed motions for consolidation of this case
with two other cases brought in the same district: (1) Steven
Kimbro v. Clovis Oncology, Inc., Patrick J. Mahaffy, Erle T. Mast,
15-cv-02547-RBJ; and (2) Ralph P. Rocco v. Clovis Oncology, Inc.,
Patrick J. Mahaffy, Erle T. Mast, 15-cv-02697-CBS.  Each of the
parties also sought appointment of lead plaintiff and lead
counsel.

On January 22, 2016, all the moving parties, but for the Arkin
group, expressed their belief that they are not the group with the
largest financial interest in the relief sought, and that they
shall not oppose the appointment of a competing movant which the
court finds to be a typical and adequate member of the purported
class.

Judge Moore found that Clovis and Mahaffy do not oppose, and
likely support, consolidation in his district.  The judge also
found that the cases involve common questions of law and fact,
that the named-defendants in all but one respect are the same, and
that the complaints all seek relief pursuant to the same
securities laws and/or regulations.

As to the appointment of a lead plaintiff, Judge Moore found that
the Arkin group clearly has the largest financial interest in the
relief sought and that it satisfies Fed.R.Civ.P. 23's requirements
of typicality and adequacy for lead-plaintiff purposes.

Judge Moore also approved the Arkin group's motion to appoint
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP as lead counsel, but
denied the appointment of Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP as liaison
counsel after seeing "no compelling reason" to make such an
appointment.

A full-text copy of Judge Moore's February 18, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/4szXeHfrom Leagle.com.

Sonny P. Medina, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Bruce Carey --
rob@hbsslaw.com -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP & Alexander
Anthony Krot, III -- akrot@zlk.com -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP.

John Moran, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Bruce Carey, Hagens
Berman Sobol Shapiro, LLP.

M. Arkin (1999) LTD, Arkin Communications LTD, Plaintiffs,
represented by Kathryn A. Reilly -- reilly@wtotrial.com -- Wheeler
Trigg O'Donnell, LLP & Michael L. O'Donnell --
odonnell@wtotrial.com -- Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell, LLP.

Ralph P. Rocco, Steve (I) Kimbro, Plaintiff, and Pension Fund
Group, Movant, represented by Kip Brian Shuman --
kip@shumanlawfirm.com -- Shuman Law Firm, The.

Clovis Oncology, Inc., Patrick J. Mahaffy, Defendants, represented
by Carrie Elizabeth Johnson -- cjohnson@bhfs.com -- Brownstein
Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Jeffrey Mark Villanueva, Jeffrey M.
Villanueva, P.C. & John V. McDermott, Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, LLP.

Erle T. Mast, Defendant, represented by Carrie Elizabeth Johnson,
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP.

Nail Koymen, Karl Showrai, Thomas Jankowski, Movants, represented
by Robert Vincent Prongay -- rprongay@glancylaw.com -- Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP.

Todd Rinaldi, Myo Thant, Movants, represented by Francis Paul
McConville -- fmcconville@labaton.com -- Labaton Sucharow LLP.


COLUMBIA GAS: 6th Cir. Revives "Baatz" Suit
-------------------------------------------
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the
district court's dismissal of the case captioned RICHARD BAATZ, et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee, No. 15-3208 (6th Cir.), and remanded the case
to the district court for further proceedings.  The 6th Circuit
held that although the first-to-file rule does apply to the case,
the dismissal was an abuse of the district court's discretion.

A group of almost 40 landowners in Medina, Ohio, sued Colombia Gas
Transmission in the Northern District of Ohio for storing natural
gas under their property without compensation in violation of the
Natural Gas Act.  The district court dismissed the case under the
"first-to-file rule" on the ground that it was duplicative of an
earlier-filed class action being litigated in the Souther District
of Ohio, Wilson v. Columbia Gas Transmission LLC, No. 2:12-cv-
01203.

The Medina landowners had filed their action against Columbia in
the Northern District of Ohio on March 5, 2014.  On April 22,
2014, Columbia filed a counterclaim in the "Wilson" case where it
attempted to join the Medina landowners as counterclaim-defendants
in a condemnation action.  The Medina landowners contended that
the first-to-file rule does not apply because Columbia has never
filed a complaint, and that, in any event, they have the first-
filed claim because they filed their complaint before Columbia
filed its counterclaim in the "Wilson" case.

The 6th Circuit, however, found that the "Wilson" case covers
substantially the same parties and issues and has the same
potential to completely resolve the Medina landowners' claims.
Further, the plaintiffs in the "Wilson" case filed their complaint
over a year before the Medina landowners filed their case.  Thus,
the 6th Circuit concluded that the first-to-file rule applies.

Nevertheless, the 6th Circuit held that the district court should
not have dismissed the case because the Medina landowners have
raised legitimate concerns about whether their claims will be
heard in the "Wilson" case.  The appellate court suggested instead
that staying the case while the "Wilson" court resolves the
various issues raised by the Medina landowners would probably be
the most reasonable course of action.

A full-text copy of the Sixth Circuit's February 24, 2016 opinion
is available at http://is.gd/DdGZz3from Leagle.com.

ARGUED: Daniel F. Lindner, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants.
Paul K. Stockman -- pstockman@mcguirewoods.com -- McGUIRE WOODS,
LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Daniel F. Lindner, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants.
Paul K. Stockman, Branden P. Moore -- bmoore@mcguirewoods.com --
MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Jodie Herrmann
Lawson -- jlawson@mcguirewoods.com -- McGUIRE WOODS LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.


COMBINED INSURANCE: Bid to Dismiss "Dolmage" Suit Denied
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ruben Castillo denied the motion filed by Combined Insurance
Company of America to dismiss the case captioned ANNE DOLMAGE,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, v. COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant,
No. 14 C 3809 (N.D. Ill.).

Anne Dolmage brought a putative class action against Combined
Insurance for a data breach which caused its insureds' personal
information to be posted online, unsecure and unprotected for a
16-month period.

On September 25, 2015, Dolmage filed her amended complaint
asserting a breach of contract claim, alleging that Combined
Insurance breached the promises made in its Privacy Pledge in
connection with the handling of the insureds' personal
information, resulting in the theft of this information and
attendant damages.  The Privacy Pledge refers to a document that
Dolmage and other enrollees received from Combined Insurance
entitled, "Our Privacy Pledge to You."

Combined Insurance moved for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P.
12(b)(6), arguing failure to allege a plausible breach of a
contract claim.

Judge Castillo found that the Privacy Pledge is enforceable
against Combined Insurance because it was incorporated into the
parties' insurance agreement.  The judge also found that Combined
Insurance plausibly failed to take adequate steps to ensure that
Enrolltek, a third party who did work on behalf of Combined
Insurance, also complied with its privacy standards.  Judge
Castillo found that there could be a causal link between Combined
Insurance's failure to ensure the confidentiality of the data and
the damages alleged.

A full-text copy of Judge Castillo's February 23, 2016 memorandum
opinion and order is available at http://is.gd/JgBQjzfrom
Leagle.com.

Anne Dolmage, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow --
b.barnow@barnolaw.com -- Barnow and Associates, P.C., Erich Paul
Schork -- e.schork@barnowlaw.com -- Barnow and Assoc., PC,
Mitchell L. Burgess -- mitch@burgesslawkc.com -- Burgess And Lamb,
P.c., Ralph K. Phalen -- phalenlaw@yahoo.com -- Ralph K. Phalen,
Attorney At Law & Sharon Harris -- s.harris@barnowlaw.com --
Barnow & Associates, P.C..

Combined Insurance Company Of America, Defendant, represented by
Francis A Citera -- citeraf@gtlaw.com -- Greenberg Traurig, LLP.,
John F. Gibbons -- gibbonsj@gtlaw.com -- Greenberg Traurig, LLP.,
Brett Michael Doran -- doranb@gtlaw.com -- Greenbert Traurig LLP,
Michael Renee Cedillos -- cedillosm@gtlaw.com -- Greenberg Traurig
LLP, Paul Joseph Ferak -- ferakp@gtlaw.com -- Greenberg Traurig,
LLP & Ralph K. Phalen, Ralph K. Phalen, Attorney At Law.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: April 11 Oral Argument Set on Dismissal Bid
-------------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the Company's
motion to dismiss the federal shareholder securities cases is
scheduled for oral argument on April 11, 2016.

Three purported class action cases have been filed in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee;
namely, Norfolk County Retirement System v. Community Health
Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 9, 2011; De Zheng v. Community
Health Systems, Inc., et al., filed May 12, 2011; and Minneapolis
Firefighters Relief Association v. Community Health Systems, Inc.,
et al., filed June 21, 2011.

"All three seek class certification on behalf of purchasers of our
common stock between July 27, 2006 and April 11, 2011 and allege
that misleading statements resulted in artificially inflated
prices for our common stock," the Company said.

"In December 2011, the cases were consolidated for pretrial
purposes and NYC Funds and its counsel were selected as lead
plaintiffs/lead plaintiffs' counsel. In lieu of ruling on our
motion to dismiss, the court permitted the plaintiffs to file a
first amended consolidated class action complaint which was filed
on October 5, 2015.

"Our motion to dismiss was filed on November 4, 2015 and is
scheduled for oral argument on April 11, 2016. The court also
lifted the discovery stay and discovery is underway.

"We believe this consolidated matter is without merit and will
vigorously defend this case."

Community Health is one of the largest publicly-traded hospital
companies in the United States and a leading operator of general
acute care hospitals in communities across the country.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Argument in Cyber Attack Case Set for April 15
----------------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that a court set
April 15, 2016, for further argument in the class action lawsuits
related to cyber attack.

"Our computer network was the target of an external, criminal
cyber-attack that we believe occurred between April and June,
2014," the Company said.  "We and Mandiant (a FireEye Company),
the forensic expert engaged by us in connection with this matter,
believe the attacker was a foreign "Advanced Persistent Threat"
group who used highly sophisticated malware and technology to
attack our systems. The attacker was able to bypass our security
measures and successfully copy and transfer outside the Company
certain non-medical patient identification data (such as patient
names, addresses, birthdates, telephone numbers and social
security numbers), but not including patient credit card, medical
or clinical information."

"We continue to work closely with federal law enforcement
authorities in connection with their investigation and possible
prosecution of those determined to be responsible for this attack.
Mandiant has conducted a thorough investigation of this incident
and continues to advise the Company regarding security and
monitoring efforts. We are providing appropriate notification to
affected patients and regulatory agencies as required by federal
and state law. We are offering identity theft protection services
to individuals affected by this attack.

"We have incurred certain expenses to remediate and investigate
this matter, and expect to continue to incur expenses of this
nature in the foreseeable future. In addition, multiple purported
class action lawsuits have been filed against the Company and
certain subsidiaries. These lawsuits allege that sensitive
information was unprotected and inadequately encrypted by the
Company. The plaintiffs claim breach of contract and other
theories of recovery, and are seeking damages, as well as
restitution for any identity theft.

"On February 4, 2015, the United States Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation ordered the transfer of the purported
class actions pending outside of the District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama to the District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama for coordinated or consolidated
pretrial proceedings. A consolidated complaint was filed and we
filed a motion to dismiss on September 21, 2015, which was
partially argued on February 10, 2016.

"In an oral ruling from the bench, the court greatly limited the
potential class by ruling only plaintiffs with specific injury
resulting from the breach had standing to sue. Further, on
jurisdictional grounds, the court dismissed Community Health
Systems, Inc. from all non-Tennessee based cases.  Finally, the
court set April 15, 2016 for further argument on whether the
remaining plaintiffs have sufficiently stated a cause of action to
continue their cases.

"At this time, we are unable to predict the outcome of this
litigation or determine the potential impact, if any, that could
result from this litigation, but we intend to vigorously defend
these lawsuits. This matter may subject the Company to additional
litigation, potential governmental inquiries, potential
reputational damage, and additional remediation, operating and
other expenses."

Community Health is one of the largest publicly-traded hospital
companies in the United States and a leading operator of general
acute care hospitals in communities across the country.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: To Defend Against "Mounce" Class Action
---------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc. will defend itself against the
"Mounce" class action lawsuit, the Company said in its Form 10-K
Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 17, 2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

"This case is a purported class action lawsuit served on July 29,
2015, claiming our affiliated Arkansas hospitals violated payor
contracts by allegedly improperly asserting hospital liens against
third-party tortfeasors and seeking class certifications for any
similarly situated plaintiffs at any affiliated Arkansas hospital.
We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously
defend the case," the Company said.

Community Health is one of the largest publicly-traded hospital
companies in the United States and a leading operator of general
acute care hospitals in communities across the country.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Plaintiffs' Bid for En Banc Review Pending
------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs' application for an en banc review in the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit remains pending, Community Health
Systems, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

On April 30, 2012, two class action lawsuits that were brought
against Health Management Associates, Inc., or HMA, and certain of
its then executive officers, one of whom was at that time also a
director, were consolidated in the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida under the caption In Re: Health
Management Associates, Inc., et al. and three pension fund
plaintiffs were appointed as lead plaintiffs.

On July 30, 2012, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended
consolidated complaint purportedly on behalf of stockholders who
purchased HMA's common stock during the period from July 27, 2009,
through January 9, 2012. The amended consolidated complaint (i)
alleges that HMA made false and misleading statements in certain
public disclosures regarding its business and financial results
and (ii) asserts claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Among other
things, the plaintiffs claim that HMA inflated its earnings by
engaging in fraudulent Medicare billing practices that entailed
admitting patients to observation status when they should not have
been admitted at all and to inpatient status when they should have
been admitted to observation status. The plaintiffs seek
unspecified monetary damages.

On October 22, 2012, the defendants moved to dismiss the
plaintiffs' amended consolidated complaint for failure to state a
claim or plead facts required by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act. The plaintiffs filed an unopposed stipulation and
proposed order to suspend briefing on the defendants' motion to
dismiss because they intended to seek leave of court to file a
proposed second amended consolidated complaint.

On December 15, 2012, the court entered an order approving the
stipulation and providing a schedule for briefing with respect to
the proposed amended pleadings. On February 25, 2013, the
plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint, which
asserted substantially the same claims as the amended consolidated
complaint.

As of August 15, 2013, the defendants' motion to dismiss the
second amended complaint for failure to state a claim and plead
facts required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was
fully briefed and awaiting the Court's decision.

On May 22, 2014, the court granted the motion to dismiss and on
June 20, 2014 the plaintiffs appealed to the Eleventh Circuit,
where oral argument was heard on February 6, 2015. On May 11,
2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court affirmed the granting of the
motion to dismiss.

On June 11, 2015, plaintiffs filed an application for an en banc
review.

"We intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this
lawsuit. We are unable to predict the outcome or determine the
potential impact, if any, that could result from its final
resolution," the Company said.

Community Health is one of the largest publicly-traded hospital
companies in the United States and a leading operator of general
acute care hospitals in communities across the country.


CORTLAND, NY: "Locke" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
-------------------------------------------------
Ben Locke, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. The City of Cortland, Case 5:16-cv-00117-TJM-ATB
(N.D.N.Y., February 1, 2016), alleges violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act against police officers.

The City of Cortland is a government agency.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Michael J.D. Sweeney, Esq.
     GETMAN & SWEENEY, PLLC
     9 Paradise Lane
     New Paltz, NY 12561
     Tel: (845) 255-9370
     E-mail: msweeney@getmansweeney.com


CREDIT ONE: Bid for Leave to Appeal Bankruptcy Court Order Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned IN RE: ORRIN S. ANDERSON, Debtor. CREDIT ONE
FINANCIAL, Appellant, v. ORRIN S. ANDERSON, A/K/A ORINN ANDERSON,
A/K/A ORINN SCOTT ANDERSON Appellee, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated, No. 15-cv-4227 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y.), Judge
Nelson S. Roman denied the motion submitted by Credit One
Financial seeking leave to appeal a May 13, 2015 order of the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York denying its motion to strike class allegations and its motion
to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Orrin Anderson filed an Amended Class Action Complaint against
Credit One, seeking to represent a class of persons having credit
reports with remaining entries for debts discharged in a
bankruptcy action.

On March 3, 2015, Credit One filed a combined motion to compel
arbitration, to strike class allegations, and motion to dismiss
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The motions were denied
by the bankruptcy court.  Credit One appealed, as of right, the
denial to compel arbitration.  It additionally sought leave to
appeal the denials to strike allegations and dismiss for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.

On its motion to compel arbitration, Credit One additionally asked
the court to examine the following issues:

     -- whether the class action waiver contained in the parties'
        agreement disallows the class allegations;

     -- whether the bankruptcy court has subject matter
        jurisdiction to entertain a putative nationwide class
        action over non-core claims for alleged violations of the
        discharge orders of other bankruptcy courts; and

     -- whether the bankruptcy court has subject matter
        jurisdiction to award declaratory or injunctive relief or
        punitive damages for an alleged violation of the
        discharge function.

Judge Roman refused to grant pendent appellate jurisdiction on the
proposed issues after determining that these issues were not
"inextricably intertwined" with the issue of whether the
bankruptcy court should have compelled arbitration.

Judge Roman also denied Credit One's motion to certify all three
issues for interlocutory appeal upon finding that these do not
involve a controlling question of law as to which there is a
substantial ground for difference of opinion.  The judge likewise
did not find that an immediate appeal from these issues may
materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.

A full-text copy of Judge Roman's February 22, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/jXsyT0from Leagle.com.

Orrin S. Anderson, represented by Adam Reese Shaw --
ashaw@bsfllp.com -- Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP.

Orrin S. Anderson, Plaintiff, represented by George F. Carpinello
-- gcarpinello@bsfllp.com -- Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP.

Credit One Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Michael David
Slodov -- mslodov@sessions.legal -- Sessions, Fishman, Nathan &
Israel, LLC.


CS METALS: "Hernandez" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
--------------------------------------------------
TRISTAN HERNANDEZ, Individually and On behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. CS METALS, INC. and CIRO SOLACHE, Case
4:16-cv-00285 (S.D. Tex., February 3, 2016), seeks to recover
unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney's
fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendants were an enterprise engaged in interstate commerce,
operating a demolition and metal cutting business, using
interstate highways, purchasing materials through interstate
commerce, and coordinating interstate projects through interstate
telecommunications and broadband networks.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
     Vijay A. Pattisapu, Esq.
     2030 North Loop West, Suite 120
     Houston, TX 77018
     Tel: (713) 868-3388
     Fax: (713) 683-9940
     E-mail: jbuenker@buenkerlaw.com
             vijay@buenkerlaw.com


CTI BIOPHARMA: Shareholder Class Actions Filed in N.Y. and Wash.
----------------------------------------------------------------
CTI Biopharma Corp. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that similar purported class
action lawsuits entitled Ahrens v. CTI Biopharma Corp. et al, Case
No. 1:16-cv-01044 and McGlothlin v. CTI Biopharma Corp. et al,
Case No. C16-216, were filed on February 10, 2016 and February 12,
2016, respectively, in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York and the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington, respectively, on behalf of
shareholders that purchased or acquired the Company's securities
pursuant to our September 24, 2015 public offering and/or
shareholders who otherwise acquired the Company's stock between
March 4, 2014 and February 9, 2016, inclusive.

The Company said, "The complaints assert claims against the
Company and certain of our current and former directors and
officers for violations of the federal securities laws under
Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, and Sections 10 and 20 of the Exchange Act
Plaintiffs' Securities Act claims allege that the Company's
Registration Statement and Prospectus for the September 24, 2015
public offering contained materially false and misleading
statements and failed to disclose certain material adverse facts
about the Company's business, operations and prospects, including
with respect to the clinical trials and prospects for pacritinib.
Plaintiffs' Exchange Act claims allege that the Company's public
disclosures were knowingly or recklessly false and misleading or
omitted material adverse facts, again with a primary focus on the
clinical trials and prospects for pacritinib."


CUMULUS MEDIA: "Carr" Suit Moved from N.Y. Sup. Ct. to S.D.N.Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Carr v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et
al., Case No. 162043/2015, was removed from Supreme Court of the
State of New York, County of New York, to the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square). The District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-00365-JSR to the proceeding.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff has alleged unpaid
minimum wages as a result of Defendants' violations of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

Cumulus Media, Inc. is an American broadcasting company.  It owns
and operates AM and FM radio stations in the United States.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Brett R. Cohen, Esq.
          Jeffrey K. Brown, Esq.
          Michael A. Tompkins, Esq.
          One Old Country Road, Suite4 347
          Carle Place, New York 11514
          Telephone: (516) 873 9550
          E-mail: jbrown@leedsbbrownlaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Allison Elizabeth Ianni
          Brian Jeffrey Gershengorn
          OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
          1745 Broadway, 22nd Floor
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 492 2506
          Facsimile: (212) 492-2501
          E-mail: allison.ianni@ogletreedeakins.com
                  brian.gershengorn@ogletreedeakins.com


CVR PARTNERS: MOU Reached in Class Suits Over Rentech Merger
------------------------------------------------------------
CVR Partners, LP said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the parties to the
Mustard and Sloan lawsuits have entered into a memorandum of
understanding ("MOU") providing for the proposed settlement of the
lawsuits related to the Rentech Nitrogen merger.

On August 29, 2015, Mike Mustard, a purported unitholder of
Rentech Nitrogen, filed a class action complaint on behalf of the
public unitholders of Rentech Nitrogen against Rentech Nitrogen,
Rentech Nitrogen GP, Rentech Nitrogen Holdings, Inc., Rentech,
Inc., CVR Partners, DSHC, LLC, Merger Sub 1 and Merger Sub 2, and
the members of the board of directors of Rentech Nitrogen GP (the
"Rentech Nitrogen Board"), in the Court of Chancery of the State
of Delaware (the "Mustard Lawsuit"). The Mustard Lawsuit alleges,
among other things, that the consideration offered by CVR Partners
is unfair and inadequate and that, by pursuing a transaction that
is the result of an allegedly conflicted and unfair process,
certain of the defendants have breached their duties owed to the
unitholders of Rentech Nitrogen, and are engaging in self-dealing.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that the director defendants:
(i) failed to take steps to maximize the value of Rentech Nitrogen
to its public shareholders, (ii) failed to properly value Rentech
Nitrogen, and (iii) ignored or did not protect against the
numerous conflicts of interest arising out of the proposed
transaction. The Mustard Lawsuit also alleges that Rentech
Nitrogen, Rentech Nitrogen GP, Rentech Nitrogen Holdings, Inc.,
Rentech, Inc., CVR Partners, DSHC, LLC, Merger Sub 1 and Merger
Sub 2 aided and abetted the director defendants in their purported
breach of fiduciary duties.

On October 6, 2015, Jesse Sloan, a purported unitholder of Rentech
Nitrogen, filed a class action complaint on behalf of the public
unitholders of Rentech Nitrogen against Rentech Nitrogen, Rentech
Nitrogen GP, CVR Partners, Merger Sub 1 and Merger Sub 2, and the
members of the Rentech Nitrogen Board, in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California (the "Sloan
Lawsuit"). The Sloan Lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the
attempted sale of Rentech Nitrogen to CVR Partners was conducted
by means of an unfair process and for an unfair price.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that (i) Rentech Nitrogen GP and
the Rentech Nitrogen Board breached their obligations under the
partnership agreement and their implied duty of good faith and
fair dealing by causing Rentech Nitrogen to enter into the merger
agreement and failing to disclose material information to
unitholders of Rentech Nitrogen, (ii) the Rentech Nitrogen Board
violated fiduciary duties owed to the unitholders of Rentech
Nitrogen based primarily on allegations of inadequate
consideration, restrictive deal protection devices and improper
disclosure, (iii) each of the defendants aided and abetted in the
foregoing breaches described in items (i) and (ii), and (iv)
Rentech Nitrogen and the Rentech Nitrogen Board violated Sections
14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
14a-9 thereunder based on improper disclosure contained in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-206982),
which was originally filed with the SEC by CVR Partners on
September 17, 2015.

Among other remedies, the plaintiffs in these actions seek to
enjoin the mergers and seek unspecified money damages. The
lawsuits are at a preliminary state, and the outcome of any such
litigation is uncertain. An adverse ruling in these actions may
cause the mergers to be delayed or not be completed, which could
cause the Partnership not to realize some or all of the
anticipated benefits of the mergers. No amounts have been
recognized in these consolidated financial statements regarding
the lawsuits.

On February 1, 2016, the parties to the Mustard Lawsuit and the
Sloan Lawsuit entered into a memorandum of understanding ("MOU")
providing for the proposed settlement of the lawsuits. While the
defendants believe that no supplemental disclosure is required
under applicable laws, in order to avoid the burden and expense of
further litigation, they have agreed, pursuant to the terms of the
MOU, to make certain supplemental disclosures related to the
proposed mergers. The MOU contemplates that the parties will enter
into a stipulation of settlement. The stipulation of settlement
will be subject to customary conditions, including court approval
following notice to Rentech Nitrogen's unitholders.

In the event that the parties enter into a stipulation of
settlement, a hearing will be scheduled at which the United States
District Court for the Central District of California (the
"Court") will consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy
of the proposed settlement. If the proposed settlement is finally
approved by the Court, it will resolve and release all claims by
unitholders of Rentech Nitrogen challenging any aspect of the
proposed mergers, the merger agreement and any disclosure made in
connection therewith, including in the prospectus and definitive
proxy statement, pursuant to terms that will be disclosed to such
unitholders prior to final approval of the proposed settlement. In
addition, in connection with the proposed settlement, the parties
contemplate that plaintiffs' counsel will file a petition in the
Court for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses to be paid by
Rentech Nitrogen or its successor. The proposed settlement is also
contingent upon, among other things, the mergers becoming
effective under Delaware law. There can be no assurance that the
Court will approve the proposed settlement contemplated by the
MOU. In the event that the proposed settlement is not approved and
such conditions are not satisfied, the defendants will continue to
vigorously defend against the allegations in the lawsuits.

CVR Partners, LP produces and distributes nitrogen fertilizer
products, which are used primarily by farmers to improve the yield
and quality of their crops.


CVS PHARMACY: Class Cert. Bid in "St. Pierre" Suit Denied
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned BARBARA ST. PIERRE AND LYNN GUILLOTTE, ON
BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiffs, v. CVS PHARMACY INC., MASSACHUSETTS CVS PHARMACY LLC,
MASSACHUSETTS CVS PHARMACY INC., AND CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION,
Defendants, Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-13202-TSH (D. Mass.), Judge
Timothy S. Hillman denied the motion filed by Barbara St. Pierre
and Lynn Guillote to certify a class of pharmacy technicians
employed by CVS in Massachussetts.

St. Pierre and Guillote brought a putative class action against
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Massachusetts CVS Pharmacy, LLC, Massachusetts
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and CVS Caremark Corporation, alleging that
CVS failed to compensate them for their participation in required
training sessions conducted on CVS's "LearnNet" system, which is
an online training platform.  St. Pierre is currently employed by
CVS as a pharmacy technician, while Guillote was formerly employed
in the same capacity.

In July of 2014, St. Pierre and Guillote moved for the
certification of the following class: "All employees who worked
for CVS as pharmacy technicians in Massachusetts, at any time
between November 4, 2007 and the date of final judgment."

Judge Hillman, however, held that the plaintiffs have manifestly
failed to demonstrate commonality under the requirements of Rule
23(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The judge found
that St. Pierre and Guillote have submitted nothing beyond
conclusory allegations to illustrate their claim that the
violations by CVS were systemic and based on a "single company
practice" of "failing to pay proper wages to their technicians,"
which applies equally to every pharmacy technician employed by CVS
during the proposed class period.

A full-text copy of Judge Hillman's February 16, 2016 memorandum
and order is available at http://is.gd/Jwa9m3from Leagle.com.

Barbara St. Pierre, Lynn Guillotte, Plaintiffs, represented by
Kristen M. Hurley, Gordon Law Group & Philip J. Gordon, Gordon Law
Group.

CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Massachusetts CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C.,
Massachusetts CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation,
Defendants, represented by Douglas J. Hoffman --
hoffmand@jacksonlewis.com -- Jackson Lewis PC, Jeffrey S. Brody,
-- brodyj@jacksonlewis.com -- Jackson Lewis PC & Jonathan R. Shank
-- jonathan.shank@jacksonlewis.com -- Jackson Lewis PC.


DAVE & BUSTER'S: Faces Class Action Over Background Checks
----------------------------------------------------------
According to ESR News Blog Editor Thomas Ahearn,
TopClassActions.com reports that, a proposed class action lawsuit
claims that restaurant and arcade chain Dave & Buster's allegedly
disregarded the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) when
conducting background checks for employment purposes on
prospective employees.

Top Class Actions reports that lead plaintiff Joseph Alvarez
claims that two days after he accepted a job as a line cook with
Dave & Buster's in August 2015, the company rescinded the offer
based on information in his background check, according to the
FCRA class action lawsuit filed in a Florida court.

The class action lawsuit claims Dave & Buster's did not provide
Alvarez with a copy of the background check report or give him any
opportunity to review and discuss the report with the potential
employer before the job offer was revoked, in violation of the
FCRA.  According to class action lawsuit:

While the use of consumer report information for employment
purposes is not per se unlawful, it is subject to strict
disclosure and authorization requirements under the FCRA.
Defendant willfully violated these requirements in systemic
violation of plaintiff's rights and the rights of other putative
class members.

Enacted in 1970, the FCRA requires employers to provide a copy of
a background check report and information about the consumer
reporting agency (CRA) preparing the report to subjects of
reports, as well as notifying individuals if the results of their
reports will have an "adverse effect" on job offers.

Top Class Actions reports that the class action lawsuit involving
Dave & Buster's states: Defendant knew or should have known of its
legal obligations under the FCRA.  These obligations are well
established in the plain language of the statue and in the
promulgations of the Federal Trade Commission.

The FCRA class action will be open to all Class Members who were
employees and job applicants negatively of Dave & Buster's
impacted by a consumer report within the last five years.  The
plaintiff is seeking punitive damages as well as statutory damages
in the amount of $100 to $1,000 per violation.

The lawsuit is Alvarez v. Dave & Busters Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-
00252, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Florida.


DRAFTKINGS INC: "Tewes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to M.D. Ga.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Tewes v. Draftkings Inc., Case No.
SU-15-cv-3484-94, was removed from the Superior Court of Muscogee
County, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Georgia (Columbus). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No.
4:16-cv-00006-CDL to the proceeding.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiff claims that Defendants
operates Internet-based daily fantasy sports contests. Those
contests constitute alleged illegal gambling under Georgia law.
The Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendants for recovery of
gambling losses pursuant and unjust enrichment.

FanDuel operates an online fantasy sports platform that enables
users to play fantasy games and win cash prizes. The company is
based in New York, New York with an additional office in
Edinburgh, Scotland.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward A Webb, Esq.
          Matthew C Klase, Esq.
          1900 The Exchange Se Ste 480
          Atlanta, GA 30339
          Telephone: (770) 444-0773
          E-mail: eadamwebb@hotmail.com
                  matt@webbllc.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Chad Lennon, Esq.
          Frank M Lowrey IV, Esq.
          BME LAW
          1201 W Peachtree St Ste 3900
          Atlanta, GA 30309
          Telephone: (404) 881 4168
          E-mail: lennon@bmelaw.com
                  lowrey@bmelaw.com


EXPERIAN INFO: "Holt" Suit Moved from M.D. Fla. to C.D. Cal.
------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Jessica Holt v. Experian
Informations Solutions Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-00691, was
transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District
of Florida, to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California (Southern Division - Santa Ana). The District Court
Clerk assigned Case No. 8:16-cv-00027-AG-DFM to the proceeding.

Experian Info is an information services company that provides
data and analytical tools to clients around the world. It offers
credit report, credit score, credit monitoring, and identity theft
protection services to individuals; and customer acquisition,
customer management, risk management, fraud management, debt
recovery, regulatory compliance, business resources, and
consulting services to businesses. The company is based in Costa
Mesa, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Jennifer L Duffy, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF JENNIFER DUFFY APC
          28649 South Western Avenue No 6571
          San Pedro, CA 90734
          Telephone: (310) 714 9779
          Facsimile: (213) 217 5010
          E-mail: jennifer@usclassactions.com

               - and -

          Jonathan Shub, Esq.
          KOHN SWIFT AND GRAF PC
          One South Broad Street Suite 2100
          Philadelphia, PA 19107
          Telephone: (215) 238 1700
          Facsimile: (215) 238 1968
          E-mail: jshub@kohnswift.com

               - and -

          Mark S Fistos, Esq.
          Steven R Jaffe, Esq.
          FARMER JAFFE WEISSING EDWARDS FISTOS LEHRMAN PL
          425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2
          Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301
          Telephone: (954) 524 2820
          Facsimile: (954) 524 2822
          E-mail: mark@pathtojustice.com
                  steve@pathtojustice.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Christina Therese Mastrucci, Esq.
          Christopher RJ Pace, Esq.
          Jessica McGahie Sawyer, Esq.
          John A Vogt, Esq.
          Richard Joseph Grabowski, Esq.
          JONES DAY
          Brickwell World Plaza
          600 Brickell Avenue Suite 3300
          Miami, FL 33131-3072
          Telephone: (305) 714 9700
          E-mail: cmastrucci@jonesday.com
                  crjpace@jonesday.com
                  jsawyer@jonesday.com
                  javogt@jonesday.com
                  rgrabowski@jonesday.com


FANDUEL INC: "Tewes" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to M.D. Georgia
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Tewes v. FanDuel Inc., Case No.
SU15CV3483, was removed from the Superior Court of Muscogee
County, to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Georgia (Columbus). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No.
4:16-cv-00007-CDL to the proceeding.

According to the complaint, the Plaintiffs assert a common law
claim for unjust enrichment, which dictates that Defendant
disgorge all improper fees.

FanDuel operates an online fantasy sports platform that enables
users to play fantasy games and win cash prizes. The company is
based in New York, New York with an additional office in
Edinburgh, Scotland.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Edward A Webb, Esq.
          Matthew C Klase, Esq.
          WEBB KLASE & LEMOND LLC
          1900 The Exchange SE Ste 480
          ATLANTA, GA 30339
          Telephone: (770) 444-0773
          E-mail: eadamwebb@hotmail.com
                  matt@webbllc.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Eric S Fisher, Esq.
          TAYLOR ENGLISH DUMA LLP
          1600 Parkwood Circle, Suite 400
          ATLANTA, GA 30339
          Telephone: (678) 336 7238
          Facsimile: (770) 434 7376
          E-mail: efisher@taylorenglish.com


FLOYD, IN: Bid for Class Certification in "Gentry" Suit Granted
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Richard L. Young granted the motion for class certification
filed in the case captioned TABITHA GENTRY, VINCENT MINTON,
MICHAEL HERRON, ADAM WALKER, BRIAN BURGESS, ANNA CHASTAIN, and
JANELLE SOUTH, on their own behalf and on behalf of those
similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL
MILLS, Individually and in his capacity as Floyd County Sheriff,
TIFFANY FRANS, Individually, OFFICER ATHERTON, Individually, RYAN
RAINEY, Individually, and OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE, Individually,
Defendants, No. 4:14-cv-00054-RLY-TAB (S.D. Ind.).

The class action was initiated by a group of detainees who were
housed in padded isolation cells of the Floyd County Jail in
conditions they claim were unconstitutional.  The plaintiffs
sought to certify the following class for liability issues only:

     -- All inmates confined from June 12, 2013 to present in the
        Floyd County Jail who were not on a suicide watch, but
        were housed in a padded cell where they were deprived of
        clothing, bedding, and hygiene products.

The following subclass was also proposed:

     -- Those class members who were subjected to weapons
        deployment while confined and secured in the padded
        cells.

In granting the motion, Judge Henderson found that the class is
sufficiently definite to permit class certification since class
members are simply determined from their presence in the cell for
reasons other than suicide prevention.  The judge also found that
the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and
23(b)(3) are met by the proposed class of 162-plus inmates with a
common complaint on the unconstitutionality of the defendants'
"stripped out" policy or practice.

A full-text copy of Judge Young's February 16, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/orsMrTfrom Leagle.com.

TABITHA GENTRY, VINCENT MINTON, MICHAEL HERRON, ADAM WALKER, BRIAN
BURGESS, ANNA CHASTAIN, JANELLE SOUTH, Plaintiffs, represented by
Daniel J. Canon -- dan@justiceky.com -- CLAY DANIEL WALTON &
ADAMS, Theodore Wendover Walton -- ted@justiceky.com -- CLAY
FREDERICK ADAMS PLLC & Laura Elizabeth Landenwich --
laura@justiceky.com -- CLAY DANIEL WALTON & ADAMS PLC.

FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, Defendant, represented by R. Jeffrey Lowe
-- jlowe@k-glaw.com -- KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP & Richard R. Fox,
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD R. FOX.

DARRELL MILLS, TIFFANY FRANS, OFFICER ATHERTON, RYAN RAINEY,
JOHN/JANE DOE, Defendants, represented by R. Jeffrey Lowe,
KIGHTLINGER & GRAY, LLP.


FORTISS LLC: Court Compels Arbitration of "Gerton" Claims
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned DANIEL GERTON, Plaintiff, v. FORTISS, LLC,
et al., Defendants, Case No. 15-cv-04805-TEH (N.D. Cal.), Judge
Thelton E. Henderson granted in part the motion to compel
arbitration filed by Fortiss, LLC and the other defendants.

In February 2013, Daniel Gerton, a third party propositional
player of various casino games, applied for employment with
Knighted Ventures.  Knighted Ventures is a third party
propositional player service provider which provides human
staffing to gaming establishments.

Sometime in February 2013, Gerton signed Fortiss' "Employee
Release Authorization," authorizing Fortiss to procure a
background/credit report on Gerton in connection with his
prospective employment with Knighted Ventures.

On February 25, Gerton signed a stand-alone "Agreement to Mediate
and Arbitrate Disputes" where he agreed to resolve exclusively
through mediation or binding arbitration any issue between him and
Knighted Ventures which relates to his employment with the latter.

When Gerton filed a class action complaint, the defendants filed a
motion to compel arbitration.

Judge Henderson found that the arbitration agreement is valid and
enforceable despite containing an unconscionable class action
waiver provision, because the unconscionable provision can be
severed from the agreement.  He also held that Fortiss may compel
arbitration because it is an agent of Knighted Ventures and the
arbitration agreement encompasses Fortiss' pre-employment
activities since they are related to Gerton's employment.

A full-text copy of Judge Henderson's February 16, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/W4f3gtfrom Leagle.com.

Daniel Gerton, Plaintiff, represented by Joshua David Buck,
Thierman Buck LLP, Mark R. Thierman, Thierman Buck LLP & Leah L
Jones, Thierman Buck LLP.

Fortiss, LLC, Knighted Ventures, LLC, Defendants, represented by
Robert Malcolm Pattison -- pattisonr@jacksonlewis.com -- Jackson
Lewis P.C..


GARMIN LTD: Still Faces "Katz" Class Action
-------------------------------------------
Garmin Ltd. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2015, that no class has been certified at this
time in the case, Andrea Katz, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, v. Garmin Ltd. and Garmin International, Inc.

On December 18, 2013, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin Ltd. in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.  The lead
plaintiff was Andrea Katz, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated.  The class of plaintiffs that Andrea Katz
purported to represent includes all individuals who purchased any
model of Forerunner watch in the State of Illinois and the United
States. Plaintiff asserted claims for breach of contract, breach
of express warranty, breach of implied warranties, negligence,
negligent misrepresentation, and violations of Illinois statutory
law. Plaintiff alleged that Forerunner watch bands have an
unacceptable rate of failure in that they detach from the watch.
Plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, prejudgment
interest, costs, and attorneys' fees, and injunctive relief.

On January 29, 2014 the court dismissed the lawsuit without
prejudice. On January 30, 2014, the plaintiff re-filed the lawsuit
with the same claims for relief as the earlier action and adding
an additional claim for unjust enrichment.  On February 4, 2014,
the court ordered the case to be transferred to the United States
District Court for the District of Utah.  The plaintiff
voluntarily dismissed the case filed in Illinois and, on March 6,
2014, she refiled the lawsuit in the District Court for the
District of Utah with the same claims, but with additional claims
for violations of the Utah Consumers Sales Practice Act, Lanham
Act, and Utah Truth in Advertising Act.  The relief she requested
is the same.

On March 31, 2014, Garmin filed a motion to transfer the venue of
the Utah action back to the Northern District of Illinois.  On
October 21, 2014, the United States District Court for the
District of Utah denied Garmin's motion to transfer venue. On
December 26, 2014, Garmin filed a motion to dismiss certain counts
of the complaint.

On April 16, 2015 the court granted Garmin's motion in part and
dismissed with prejudice (i) Mr. Katz's (but not Mrs. Katz's)
claim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, (ii)
the plaintiffs' Lanham Act claim, (iii) the plaintiffs' negligence
claim and (iv) the plaintiffs' negligent misrepresentation claim.
No class has been certified at this time.

Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of
this litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our
operating results, liquidity or financial position, Garmin
believes that the claims in this lawsuit are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend this action.

For over 25 years, Garmin Ltd. and subsidiaries (together, the
"Company") has pioneered new Global Positioning System (GPS)
navigation and wireless devices and applications that are designed
for people who live an active lifestyle.


GARMIN LTD: Summary Judgment Motion Pending in "Meyers" Action
--------------------------------------------------------------
Garmin Ltd. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2015, that the Company's motion for summary
judgment remains pending in the case, Brian Meyers, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated, v. Garmin
International, Inc. Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.

On August 13, 2013, Brian Meyers filed a putative class action
complaint against Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. and
Garmin Ltd. in the United States District Court for the District
of Kansas. Meyers alleges that lithium-ion batteries in certain
Garmin products are defective and alleges violations of the Kansas
Consumer Protection Act, breach of an implied warranty of
merchantability, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of
express warranty and also requests declaratory relief that the
batteries are defective and must be covered by Garmin's
warranties. The complaint seeks an order for class certification,
a declaration that the batteries are defective, an order of
injunctive relief, payment of damages in an unspecified amount on
behalf of a putative class of all purchasers of certain Garmin
products, and an award of attorneys' fees.

On September 18, 2013 the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Garmin
Ltd. as a defendant without prejudice. On October 18, 2013 the
plaintiff filed an amended class action complaint. On November 1,
2013 the remaining Garmin defendants filed a motion to dismiss all
counts of the complaint for failure to state a claim on which
relief can be granted.

On January 24, 2014, the Court granted the motion to dismiss in
part and denied it in part, dismissing the count for declaratory
relief and the prayer for a declaration that the batteries are
defective, but allowing the case to proceed on other substantive
counts.

On March 17, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file
a second amended complaint, and plaintiff filed his second amended
complaint that same day. On April 7, 2015, Garmin filed an
opposition to plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second
amended complaint. On April 28, 2015 the court granted plaintiff's
motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.  On May 11,
2015 the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On July
10, 2015 Garmin filed its opposition to the motion for class
certification. On September 11, 2015, the plaintiff filed a reply
to Garmin's opposition to the motion for class certification. On
September 24, 2015, Garmin filed a motion for leave to file a
surreply.

No class has been certified at this time, and Garmin believes that
its defenses to Plaintiff's motion for class certification are
meritorious and that no class will be certified.

On November 24, 2015 Garmin filed a motion for summary judgment.
On December 15, 2015 the plaintiff filed his opposition to
Garmin's summary judgment motion and on December 30, 2015 Garmin
filed its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment.

"Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of
this litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our
operating results, liquidity or financial position, Garmin
believes that the claims in this lawsuit are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend this action," the Company said.

For over 25 years, Garmin Ltd. and subsidiaries (together, the
"Company") has pioneered new Global Positioning System (GPS)
navigation and wireless devices and applications that are designed
for people who live an active lifestyle.


GEICO: "Griffith" Suit Moved from Super. Ct. to N.D. California
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Griffith v. Government Employees
Insurance Company et al., Case No. CGC 15-549126, was removed from
the San Francisco Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for
the Northern District of California (San Francisco). The District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 3:16-cv-00112-CRB to the proceeding.

GEICO Corporation, through its subsidiaries, offers property,
vehicle, and casualty insurance products and services. The company
was founded in 1978 and is based in Washington, District of
Columbia. GEICO Corporation operates as a subsidiary of National
Indemnity Company. The Company is headquartered at Wasington D.C.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Rosemary M. Rivas, Esq.
          FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP
          One California Street, Suite 900
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 398 8700
          Facsimile: (415) 398 8704
          E-mail: rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com

               - and -

          Christopher E Terrill, Esq.
          FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP
          1 California Street, Suite 900
          San Francisco, CA 94111
          Telephone: (415) 398 8700
          Facsimile: (415) 398 8704

               - and -

          Marc Lawrence Godino, Esq.
          GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
          1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 201 9150
          Facsimile: (310) 201 9160
          E-mail: mgodino@glancylaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Steven H. Frankel, Esq.
          DENTON US LLP
          525 Market Street, 26th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94105-2708
          Telephone: (415) 882 5000
          Facsimile: (415) 882 0300
          E-mail: steven.frankel@dentons.com

               - and -

          Laura Leigh Geist, Esq.
          DENTONS US LLP
          525 Market Street, 26th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94105
          Telephone: (415) 882 5000
          Facsimile: (415) 882 0300
          E-mail: laura.geist@dentons.com


GENERAL ELECTRIC: Appliance Park Fire Class Action Can Proceed
--------------------------------------------------------------
Erica Peterson, writing for WFPL, reports that a circuit court
judge in Louisville is allowing a class-action lawsuit against
General Electric over a 2015 fire at Appliance Park to move
forward.

Judge Susan Schultz Gibson issued the order Feb. 24.

On April 3, 2015, Building 6 at Appliance Park went up in flames,
blanketing the surrounding neighborhood in smoke.  Residents were
told to shelter-in-place, and in the weeks following the fire,
three neighbors filed a lawsuit on behalf of themselves and their
neighbors, alleging property damage from the particulate matter.

GE and Derby Industries -- the contractor which leased Building 6
-- sought to block the lawsuit from becoming a class-action
complaint.  But the judge noted that the plaintiffs haven't moved
to certify a class yet, so it would be premature to act.

The plaintiffs are represented by Louisville law firm Jones Ward.

"Jones Ward PLC won a victory for those families in Jefferson
County harmed by the GE warehouse fire, the largest fire in
Louisville history," the company posted on Facebook.  "GE's
lawyers attempted to have the entire case thrown out of court and
all class-action allegations dismissed.  The court denied their
motions and we are excited to move forward with recovering full
and fair compensation for those harmed by the fire."

A spokeswoman for GE said the company had not seen Judge Gibson's
order, and could not comment at this time.


GOPRO INC: "Van Meerbeke" Suit Alleges Securities Act Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
RENE VAN MEERBEKE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, v. GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS D. WOODMAN, JACK R.
LAZAR and ANTHONY J. BATES, Case 3:16-cv-00598-RS (N.D. Cal.,
February 4, 2016), was filed on behalf of all persons who
purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of
GPRO from July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive,
against GPRO and certain of its officers and/or directors for
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

GoPrO Inc. is a consumer electronics company primarily selling
mountable, wearable cameras and related accessories designed for
active or challenging physical environments, including, for
example, cameras mounted on musical instruments during concerts or
worn by athletes during sporting events.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Shawn A. Williams
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     Post Montgomery Center
     One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Tel: 415/288-4545
     Fax: 415/288-4534
     E-mail: shawnw@rgrdlaw.com


GRAIN PROCESSING: Iowa Court Certifies Emissions Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rebecca Campbell, writing for Legal Newsline, reports that an Iowa
court recently certified the class in a toxic tort class action
lawsuit covering around 4,000 residents who alleged property
damage due to air emissions from a nearby corn milling plant.

Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification in Muscatine
County District Court seeking to certify a class of residents who
lived within 1.5 miles of the Grain Processing Corporation's
facility and alleged lost-use-and-enjoyment damages as a result of
emissions from the defendant's corn milling plant.

The motion was granted by the court in October on the basis that
the plaintiffs had met the requirements necessary to certify a
class in Iowa.

Daniel Krainin -- dkrainin@bdlaw.com -- principal at Beveridge &
Diamond, said the implications of this case are quite significant.

"The case runs counter to a trend over the past few years in which
courts have been reluctant to certify proposed classes of toxic
tort plaintiffs," Mr. Krainin said.

In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a trial court's
certification of a class of more than one million women who worked
for Wal-Mart in the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes decision.  It
found that the differences in the facts and circumstances
surrounding the plaintiffs' allegations relating to gender-based
discrimination, compensation and promotion found that the group
was not suitable for a class action.

"Since that decision, lower courts have generally been reluctant
to certify proposed toxic tort classes due to the differences
among class members in their alleged exposures, damages and
causation issues," Mr. Krainin said.

In the Iowa case, the trial court found enough commonality with
the evidence presented to certify two classes of approximately
4,000 residents living near the grain processing facility.

The court found that the defendant's conduct raised issues such as
whether it employed antiquated pollution control technology and
whether the defendant knew that it was creating a problem for
residents.

The court also found that the residents had proposed a manageable
and efficient plan for adjudicating their claims by outlining
various stages of litigation that would resolve specific questions
of fact. They also relied upon models to determine how emissions
affected them.

"The decision is contrary to what most courts have done lately in
similar toxic tort cases, but the decision may be distinguishable
from those in many other cases based on certain unique aspects of
Iowa law," Mr. Krainin said.

"The expert air dispersion modeling testimony that the plaintiffs
relied upon showed how they believed emissions from the facility
affected the surrounding residents."

Despite the fact that the case has yet to reach a point where the
residents have provided evidence quantifying their alleged
damages, Mr. Krainin believes that damages could reach into the
millions.

"Given that the classes certified by the trial court consist of
approximately 2,000 households or approximately 4,000 individuals,
it is likely that the plaintiffs will collectively seek many
millions of dollars in damages from the defendant,"
Mr. Krainin said.

In November, Grain Processing Corp. filed an appeal.  It has yet
to be fully briefed.

The Iowa Supreme Court had ruled in 2014 that the Clean Air Act
was not preempted by Iowa common law claims, striking a blow to
the defendants who were seeking to limit the scope of toxic tort
claims based on air emissions.


GREAT AMERICAN LIFE: "Goertzen" Suit Moved to N.D. California
-------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Goertzen v. Great American Life
Insurance Company, Case No., RG15796703 was removed from the
Alameda County Superior Court, to the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California (Oakland). The District Court
Clerk assigned Case No. 4:16-cv-00240-YGR to the proceeding.

The Complaint alleges that the notices that Great American
provided to annuity purchasers aged 60 years and older regarding
surrender charges and the applicable "free look" period did not
comply with section 10127.13 and 10127.10 of the California
insurance Code. The Plaintiff contends that the imposition of
surrender charges on putative class members is unlawful.

Great American Life Insurance Company offers life, annuity, long-
term care, and Medicare supplement products. Great American Life
Insurance Company was formerly known as FN Life Insurance Company.
The company was founded in 1959 and is based in Cincinnati, Ohio
with a branch office in Singapore. Great American Life Insurance
Company operates as a subsidiary of Great American Financial
Resources, Inc.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ingrid M. Evans, Esq.
          Michael Aaron Levy, Esq
          THE EVANS LAW FIRM
          3053 Fillmore Street, #236
          San Francisco, CA 94123
          Telephone: (415) 441 8669
          Facsimile: (888) 891 4906
          E-mail: ingrid@evanslaw.com
                  michael@evanslaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Thomas A. Evans, Esq.
          REED SMITH LLP
          101 Second Street, Suite 1800
          San Francisco, CA 94612
          Telephone: (415) 659 4773
          Facsimile: (415) 391 8269
          E-mail: tevans@reedsmith.com


HHC TRS FP PORTFOLIO: "Membrives" Suit Moved to E.D.N.Y.
--------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Membrives v. HHC TRS FP Portfolio
LLC et al., Case No. 607828/2015, was removed from the Supreme
Court of the State of NY, County of Nassau, to the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New York (Central Islip). The
District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:16-cv-00277-SJF-AKT to
the proceeding.

HHC TRS FP Portfolio LLC is headquartered in the United States.
The company's line of business includes operating public hotels
and motels.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brett R. Cohen, Esq.
          Jeffrey Kevin Brown, Esq.
          Michael Alexander Tompkins, Esq.
          LEEDS BROWN LAW, P.C.
          One Old Country Road, Suite 347
          Carle Place, NY 11514
          Telephone: (516) 873 9550
          Facsimile: (516) 747 5024
          E-mail: bcohen@leedsbrownlaw.com
                  jbrown@leedsbrownlaw.com
                  mtompkins@leedsbrownlaw.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Aaron Warshaw, Esq.
          Brian Jeffrey Gershengorn, Esq.
          OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
          1745 Broadway, 22nd Floor
          New York, NY 10019
          Telephone: (212) 492 2500
          Facsimile: (212) 492 2501
          E-mail: aaron.warshaw@ogletreedeakins.com
                  brian.gershengorn@ogletreedeakins.com


HONEYWELL INT'L: Sued Over Hoosick Falls Water Contamination
------------------------------------------------------------
Lynzi DeLucci, writing for WCAX.com, reports that there's an
update on the toxic water issue out of Hoosick Falls, New York.  A
New York City law firm has filed a federal class-action suit
against two companies the state says could be responsible for the
toxic chemical contamination in the village's water supply.

Environmental activist Erin Brockovich spoke to a worried crowd at
Bennington College in January about the contaminated water in
nearby Hoosick Falls.  She promised her help if necessary and now,
she and the law firm she works for are delivering on that promise.

"However I can help facilitate or having a plan to get back here,
if you're not getting some results quickly, so at least we can
test some wells and start giving you some answers now," said
Ms. Brockovich.

Ms. Brockovich spoke those words to Hoosick Falls residents
regarding their water, now proven to be contaminated with a
chemical called PFOA.  Ms. Brockovich is a consumer advocate for
New York City law firm Weitz and Luxenberg who filed a lawsuit on
Feb. 24 against two corporations based in Hoosick Falls, Honeywell
International and Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics for negligence
related to PFOA in the water.  State regulators have identified
the businesses as potentially responsible for the toxic
contamination.

Hoosick Falls mayor David Borge says he's aware of Weitz and
Luxenberg's involvement.

"We're not focusing on lawsuits at all, we've been focusing our
efforts on finding clean water as quickly as possible, and that is
starting to happen, and that's where our efforts have been," said
Mayor David Borge.

Mr. Borge says the filtration system in town is moving along with
much progress.  A temporary granular activated carbon filter is
being utilized with new water going into the main.  A permanent
fix, however, is still a way down the road.

"We're not advising people to drink the water as of yet, and I
want to be very clear about that, we still have several steps to
take.  But we are going to be clearing the lines over the next
week or two and that will eliminate or minimize the PFOA that's in
the water," said Mr. Borge.

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics responded to our request for an
interview with a statement saying, "We respect the right of
individuals to pursue their claims in a court of law.  Saint-
Gobain has, and will continue to work with the local, state and
federal agencies to investigate the source of the PFOA in the
drinking water."

The village expects a permanent GAC filtration system which will
be funded by Saint-Gobain to be done in October, and bottled water
will be provided until then.  As for right now, the Department of
Health will be conducting testing on several water samples going
through the temporary system to make sure PFOA is no longer
present.


HUMANA INC: MOU Reached in Aetna Merger Litigation
--------------------------------------------------
Humana Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2015, that a memorandum of understanding has
been reached to settle the litigation related to the Aetna merger.

The Company said, "On July 2, 2015, we entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger, which we refer to in this report as the Merger
Agreement, with Aetna Inc. and certain wholly owned subsidiaries
of Aetna Inc."

"On October 19, 2015, our stockholders approved the adoption of
the Merger Agreement at a special stockholder meeting. Also on
October 19, 2015, the holders of Aetna outstanding shares approved
the issuance of Aetna common stock in the Merger at a special
meeting of Aetna shareholders.

In connection with the Merger, three putative class action
complaints were filed by purported Humana stockholders challenging
the Merger, two in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Kentucky
and one in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The
complaints are captioned Solak v. Broussard et al., Civ. Act. No.
15CI03374 (Kentucky state court), Litwin v. Broussard et al., Civ.
Act. No. 15CI04054 (Kentucky state court) and Scott v. Humana Inc.
et al., C.A. No. 11323-VCL (Delaware state court). The complaints
name as defendants each member of Humana's board of directors,
Aetna, and, in the case of the Delaware complaint, Humana. The
complaints generally allege, among other things, that the
individual members of our board of directors breached their
fiduciary duties owed to our stockholders by entering into the
Merger Agreement, approving the mergers as contemplated by the
Merger Agreement, and failing to take steps to maximize the value
of Humana to our stockholders, and that Aetna, and, in the case of
the Delaware complaint, Humana aided and abetted such breaches of
fiduciary duties.

"In addition, the complaints allege that the merger undervalues
Humana, that the process leading up to the execution of the Merger
Agreement was flawed, that the members of our board of directors
improperly placed their own financial interests ahead of those of
our stockholders, and that certain provisions of the Merger
Agreement improperly favor Aetna and impede a potential
alternative transaction. Among other remedies, the complaints seek
equitable relief rescinding the Merger Agreement and enjoining the
defendants from completing the mergers as well as costs and
attorneys' fees.

"On August 20, 2015, the parties in the Kentucky state cases filed
a stipulation and proposed order with the court to consolidate
these cases into a single action captioned In re Humana Inc.
Shareholder Litigation, Civ. Act. No. 15CI03374.

"On October 9, 2015, solely to avoid the costs, risks, and
uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any
liability or wrongdoing, we and the other named defendants in the
Merger Litigation signed a memorandum of understanding, which we
refer to as the MOU, to settle the Merger Litigation. Subject to
court approval and further definitive documentation in a
stipulation of settlement that will be subject to customary
conditions, the MOU resolved the claims brought in the Merger
Litigation and provided that we would make certain additional
disclosures related to the proposed mergers. The MOU further
provided for, among other things, dismissal of the Merger
Litigation with prejudice and a release and settlement by the
purported class of our stockholders of all claims against the
defendants and their affiliates and agents in connection with the
Merger Agreement and transactions and disclosures related to the
Merger Agreement. The asserted claims will not be released until
such stipulation of settlement receives court approval. The
foregoing terms and conditions will be defined by the stipulation
of settlement, and class members will receive a separate notice
describing the settlement terms and their rights in connection
with the approval of the settlement.

"In connection with the settlement, the parties contemplate that
plaintiffs' counsel will file a petition for an award of
attorneys' fees and expenses. We will pay or cause to be paid any
court awarded attorneys' fees and expenses. There can be no
assurance that the parties will ultimately enter into a
stipulation of settlement or that a court will approve such
settlement even if the parties were to enter into such
stipulation. In such event, the proposed settlement as
contemplated by the MOU may be terminated. Because the MOU
contemplates that the Kentucky court will be asked to approve the
settlement, the plaintiffs have already withdrawn the Delaware
case.

Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, Humana Inc. and its
subsidiaries is a health and well-being company focused on making
it easy for people to achieve their best health with clinical
excellence through coordinated care.


HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES: Still Defends MERSCORP Litigation
--------------------------------------------------------
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated said in its Form 10-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17,
2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the
Company's bank unit is a defendant in an action filed on January
17, 2012 against MERSCORP, Inc. and numerous other financial
institutions that participate in the mortgage electronic
registration system (MERS). The putative class action was filed on
behalf of all 88 counties in Ohio. The plaintiffs allege that the
recording of mortgages and assignments thereof is mandatory under
Ohio law and seek a declaratory judgment that the defendants are
required to record every mortgage and assignment on real property
located in Ohio and pay the attendant statutory recording fees.
The complaint also seeks damages, attorney's fees and costs.
Huntington filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which has been
fully briefed, but no ruling has been issued by the Geauga County,
Ohio Court of Common Pleas. Similar litigation has been initiated
against MERSCORP, Inc. and other financial institutions in other
jurisdictions throughout the country, however, the Bank has not
been named a defendant in those other cases.


HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES: Still Defends "Powell" Litigation
--------------------------------------------------------
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated said in its Form 10-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17,
2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the
Company's bank unit still defends Powell v. Huntington National
Bank.

The Bank is a defendant in a putative class action filed on
October 15, 2013. The plaintiffs filed the action in West Virginia
state court on behalf of themselves and other West Virginia
mortgage loan borrowers who allege they were charged late fees in
violation of West Virginia law and the loan documents. Plaintiffs
seek statutory civil penalties, compensatory damages and
attorney's fees. The Bank removed the case to federal court,
answered the complaint, and, on January 17, 2014, filed a motion
for judgment on the pleadings, asserting that West Virginia law is
preempted by federal law and therefore does not apply to the Bank.
Following further briefing by the parties, the federal district
court denied the Bank's motion for judgment on the pleadings on
September 26, 2014. On June 8, 2015, the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals granted the Bank's motion for an interlocutory appeal of
the district court's decision. The matter was briefed and oral
argument held, but after the oral argument, the Fourth Circuit
dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted and remanded the
case back to the district court for further proceedings


IDS PROPERTY: Suit by MSPA Claims 1 Moved to S.D. Florida
---------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. IDS Property
Casualty Insurance Company, Case No. 15-27940-CA-01, was removed
from the 11th Judicial Circuit Court In Miami Dade, to the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami). The
District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-20223-UU to the
proceeding.

According to the complaint, IDS Property was a primary payer
obligated to pay for medical treatment for a Medicare enrollee,
who is allegedly also an insured of IDS Property and for which
FHCP had allegedly paid Medicare benefits. The Plaintiff alleges
FHCP has a statutory and regulatory right, to recover and be
reimbursed by IDS Property for double the amounts FHCP paid for
treatment of the insured/enrollee.

IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, a foreign profit
corporation, provides property and casualty insurance brokerage
services. The company offers home and auto insurance, as well as
long term care insurance and disability income insurance. The
company was formerly known as Wisconsin Employers Casualty Company
and changed its name in 1986. IDS Property Casualty Insurance
Company is based in De Pere, Wisconsin. IDS Property Casualty
Insurance Company operates as a subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial
Inc. The Company is headquartered at De Pere, Wisconsin.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Brian Phillip Cournoyer, Esq.
          5000 SW 75th Ave #400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 479 0828
          E-mail: bcournoyer@msprecovery.com

               - and -

          Christine Marie Lugo, Esq.
          5000 S.W. 75th Avenue, Suite 400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 614-2222
          E-mail: clugo002@fiu.edu

               - and -

          Eric Michael Fresco, Esq.
          2921 SW 132 Avenue
          Miami, FL 33175
          Telephone: (786) 314-4106
          E-mail: fresco.eric@gmail.com

               - and -

          Frank Carlos Quesada, Esq.
          MSP RECOVERY LAW FIRM
          5000 SW 75th Avenue, Suite 400, Suite 400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 614 2222
          Facsimile: (866) 582 0907
          E-mail: fquesada@msprecovery.com

               - and -

          Gino Moreno, Esq.
          LA LEY LAW FIRM
          5000 SW 75th Avenue, Suite 400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 614-2222
          E-mail: gmoreno@msprecovery.com

               - and -

          Gustavo Javier Losa, Esq.
          JOHN H. RUIZ, P.A.
          4182 SW 74 Court
          Telephone: Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone (305) 614 2222
          E-mail: glosa@lawofficeslaley.com

               - and -

          John Hasan Ruiz, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF LA LEY CON JOHN H. RUIZ
          5000 SW 75th Ave, Suite 400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 614 2222
          Facsimile: (866) 582 0907
          E-mail: fquesada@msprecovery.com

               - and -

          Rebecca Rubin-del Rio, Esq.
          JOHN H RUIZ PA
          5040 NW 7th Street, Suite PH1
          Miami, FL 33126
          E-mail: rdelrioruizlaw@aol.com

               - and -

          Timothy J Van Name, Esq.
          MSP RECOVERY
          5000 SW 75th Avenue, Suite 400
          Miami, FL 33155
          Telephone: (305) 905 6365
          Facsimile: (305) 614 2233
          E-mail: tvanname@att.net

The Defendant is represented by:

          Christen Elizabeth Luikart, Esq.
          MURPHY & ANDERSON, P.A.
          1501 San Marco Blvd.
          Jacksonville, FL 32207
          Telephone: (904) 598 9282
          Facsimile: (904) 598 9283
          E-mail: cluikart@murphyandersonlaw.com

               - and -

          Niels Patrick Murphy, Esq.
          MURPHY & ANDERSON, P.A.
          1501 San Marco Blvd.
          Jacksonville, FL 32207
          Telephone: (904) 598 9282
          Facsimile: (904) 598 9283
          E-mail: nmurphy@murphyandersonlaw.com

               - and -

          Nicole Tucker Melvani, ESQ.
          MURPHY , ANDERSON, P.A.
          1501 San Marco Boulevard
          Jacksonville, FL 32207
          Telephone: (904) 380 8088
          E-mail: nmelvani@murphyandersonlaw.com


INTERNAP CORP: Court Dismisses Stockholder Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------
Internap Corporation said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the parties to a class
action lawsuit have filed a stipulation of dismissal, which the
Court granted.

"On September 18, 2015, a purported stockholder filed a putative
class action complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton County of
the State of Georgia against us, the current members of our board
of directors and Jefferies Finance LLC ("Jefferies")," the Company
said.  "The complaint was captioned Grisolia v. Internap Corp., et
al., Case No. 2015cv265926 (Ga. Sup. Ct.) and alleged, among other
things, that the members of our board of directors breached their
fiduciary duties, and that Jefferies aided and abetted such
breaches, in connection with the credit agreement described in
this filing. The complaint alleged that the credit agreement
contained a so-called "dead hand proxy put" provision that (a)
defined the election of a majority of directors whose initial
nomination arose from an actual or threatened proxy contest to be
an event of default that triggers the lenders' right to accelerate
payment of the debt outstanding under the credit agreement; and
(b) thereby allegedly coerced stockholders and entrenched the
members of our board of directors. The Plaintiff further claimed
that Jefferies aided and abetted the alleged breach of fiduciary
duties by including the provisions in the credit agreement and
encouraging our board of directors to accept them. The complaint
sought, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief, as
well as an award of costs and disbursements, including attorneys'
and experts' fees."

"On October 30, 2015, we, along with our lenders, amended the
credit agreement to remove the provision which was the subject of
the litigation. The parties have agreed that the amendment moots
the Plaintiff's claims. The parties filed a stipulation of
dismissal and, on January 28, 2016, the court entered an order
dismissing the case.

"We recorded $0.4 million as litigation expense in "General and
administrative" in the accompanying statements of operations and
comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2015."

Internap provides high-performance, hybrid Internet infrastructure
services that make customers' applications faster and more
scalable.


J&F ANALYSTS: "Romero" Must Prove More Plaintiffs Want to Opt In
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned JOSE ROMERO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J&F
ANALYSTS INC.; dba THE BREAKFAST PLACE, et al., Defendants, Civil
Action No. 4:15-CV-00790 (S.D. Tex.), Judge Melinda Harmon gave
the plaintiffs Jose Romero and Ximena Romero 20 days to show there
are other plaintiffs willing to opt in to the action before ruling
on their motion for conditional certification as collective
actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

A lawsuit for alleged FLSA violations was filed against J&F
Analysts, Inc., John Irwin, Sr., Debra Irwin, and John Irwin, Jr.
by their former employees, Jose and Ximena Romero.  The Romeros
then asked the court to conditionally certify their proposed
classes for collective action under FLSA.  The proposed classes
include all current and former (1) cooks and (2) food servers who
have worked for the defendants in the last three years.  However,
in support of their motion, the Romeros provided only their
individual affidavits and various other exhibits, but included no
names, affidavits, or opt-in notices from other potential
plaintiffs.

Judge Harmon held that, because no potential plaintiffs were
identified by name, no affidavits by these co-workers were
submitted, and there is not even a statement in the Romeros'
affidavits that they believe such individuals would be interested
in joining the lawsuit, she cannot conclude that the Romeros have
satisfied their burden to show that other similarly situated
plaintiffs want to opt in.  The judge thus allowed the Romeros an
opportunity to correct their deficiency by giving them 20 days to
present evidence that at least a few other plaintiffs from each
proposed class want to join the suit.

A full-text copy of Judge Harmon's February 16, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/iJoDxzfrom Leagle.com.

Jose Romero, Ximena Romero, Plaintiffs, represented by Michael A
Starzyk, Starzyk and Assoc PC.

J&F Analysts Inc, Debra Lee Irwin, John Irwin, Jr., Defendants,
represented by William J Cronin, Attorney at Law.


J&R CARE: Faces "Powell" Suit for Alleged FLSA Violation
--------------------------------------------------------
SONIA POWELL and other similarly situated individuals, v. J&R CARE
FINDERS INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, CELECIA GAYNOR,
individually, and TANIQUE CUNNINGHAM, individually, Case No: CACE-
16-001477 (Fla. Cir., 17th Judical Circuit in and for Broward
Country, January 26, 2016), seeks damages exceeding $15,000
excluding attorneys' fees or costs for unpaid wages under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

J&R Care Finders provides direct in-home care for adult and senior
clients in the comfort and convenience of their own homes.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Anthony M. Georges-Pierre, Esq.
     REMER & GEORGES-PIERRE, PLLC
     44 West Flagler St., Suite 2200
     Miami, FL 33130
     Tel: (305) 416-5000
     Fax: (305) 416-5005


KELLY SERVICES: Settlement Reached in "Hillston" Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Services, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended January 3, 2016, that Kelly and plaintiffs in a
class action lawsuit have agreed to settle the case.

The Company is a party to a pending nationwide class action
lawsuit entitled Hillson et.al. v Kelly Services. The suit alleges
that current and former temporary employees of Kelly Services are
entitled to monetary damages for violation of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act requirement that the notice and disclosure form
provided to employees for purposes of conducting a background
screening be a standalone document.

On January 16, 2016, Kelly and plaintiffs agreed to settle the
case. The parties still must agree to the settlement structure and
secure court approval of the settlement. In light of amounts
previously expensed and anticipated recoveries from third parties,
Kelly recorded an accrual in the fourth quarter of $4.1 million to
reflect the expected cost of the tentative settlement.

Founded by William R. Kelly in 1946, Kelly Services(R) has
developed innovative workforce solutions for customers in a
variety of industries throughout the Company's 69-year history.


LCC INTERNATIONAL: Faces "Torgerson" FLSA Suit in Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON, BRYON HUGHES,
MOSES BOYE-DOE on Behalf of Themselves, and All Others Similarly
Situated, v. LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and
KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL AND DAN MOSS, Case 4:16-cv-
00088-BCW (W.D. Mo., February 3, 2016), seeks to recover from
Defendants alleged unpaid overtime compensation, interest,
liquidated damages, attorneys' fees and costs, injunctive and
declaratory relief enjoining Plaintiff from further violations of
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Defendant LCC was engaged in the business of providing wireless
voice and data engineering services to the telecommunications
industry including deployment services, such as site acquisition,
design, and construction, equipment installation, commissioning,
and integration; in connection with such business, Defendant LCC
provides such services to wireless operators and vendors and
enterprise clients across the United States and worldwide.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

     Gregory P. Goheen, Esq.
     Robert L. Turner, IV, Esq.
     McANANY, VAN CLEAVE & PHILLIPS, P.A.
     10 E. Cambridge Circle Drive, Suite 300
     Kansas City, KS 66103
     Tel: (913) 371-3838
     Fax: (913) 371-4722
     E-mail: ggoheen@mvplaw.com
             rturner@mvplaw.com


LINKEDIN CORP: Court Okays Class Action Settlement in "Perkins"
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned PAUL PERKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant, Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK (N.D.
Cal.), Judge Lucy H. Koh issued an order granting the plaintiffs'
motion for final approval of a proposed class action settlement,
as well as the class counsel's motion for approval of attorney's
fees, costs, and incentive awards.

A class action settlement was proposed between individual and
representative plaintiffs Paul Perkins, Pennie Sempell, Ann
Brandwein, Erin Eggers, Clare Connaughton, Jake Kushner, Natalie
Richstone, Nicole Crosby, and Leslie Wall, and the class they
represent, and the defendant LinkedIn Corporation.  The class
counsel also filed a motion for approval of attorney's fees,
costs, and class representative awards.  LinkedIn did not oppose
either motion.

After the Final Approval Hearing held on February 11, 2016, Judge
Koh found that the settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable.
The judge was satisfied that the settlement was reached after
arm's length negotiations and was not a product of fraud,
overreaching, or collusion among the parties.  Judge Lucy also
found that the settlement provides the class with timely and
certain recovery, and also provides for non-monetary relief that
benefits millions of class members, including those who did not
submit a claim form.  Moreover, the judge also found that the
settlement provides for meaningful consideration -- a total of $13
million where the class size is approximately 20.8 million.  Judge
Koh further stated that the extent of discovery completed and the
stage of proceedings, the views of the plaintiffs' counsel, and
the reaction of the class members, weigh in favor of final
approval.  Out of 20.8 million class members, only 86 individuals
objected to the settlement, and only 145 class members opted out.
Judge Koh overruled objections to the settlement and the
settlement relief.

Judge Koh also found that the notice plan was fully implemented
and complies with both due process and Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 23(c)(2)(B).  Finally, the judge also determined that
the distribution plan is fair, reasonable and adequate.

As to the class counsel's motion, Judge Koh found that the class
counsel's request for $3,250,000 in attorney's fees and for
incentive awards of $1,500 for each class representative is
reasonable.

A full-text copy of Judge Koh's February 16, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/e2gN42from Leagle.com.

Paul Perkins, Pennie Sempell, Clare Connaughton, Plaintiffs,
represented by Larry C. Russ -- lruss@raklaw.com -- Russ August &
Kabat, Daniel Paul Hipskind -- dph@bergerhipskind.com -- Berger &
Hipskind LLP, Melissa Ann Gardner -- mgardner@kchb.com -- Lieff
Cabraser Heimann Bernstein, LLP, Michael W. Sobol --
msobol@lchb.com -- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Nathan
Daniel Meyer -- nmeyer@raklaw.com -- Russ, August and
Kabat,Nicholas Diamand -- ndiamand@lchb.com -- Lieff Cabraser
Heimann and Bernstein LLP, Dorian Seawind Berger --
dsb@bergerhipskind.com -- Berger & Hipskind LLP & Larry Craig Russ
-- lruss@raklaw.com -- Russ August Kabat.

Ann Brandwein, Erin Eggers, Leslie Wall, Plaintiffs, represented
by Larry C. Russ, Russ August & Kabat, Daniel Paul Hipskind,
Berger & Hipskind LLP, Melissa Ann Gardner, Lieff Cabraser Heimann
Bernstein, LLP, Michael W. Sobol, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Nicholas Diamand, Lieff Cabraser Heimann and
Bernstein LLP, Dorian Seawind Berger, Berger & Hipskind LLP &
Larry Craig Russ, Russ August Kabat.

Jake Kushner, Nicole Crosby, Plaintiffs, represented by Dorian
Seawind Berger, Berger & Hipskind LLP, Melissa Ann Gardner, Lieff
Cabraser Heimann Bernstein, LLP,Michael W. Sobol, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Nicholas Diamand, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann and Bernstein LLP.

Natalie Richstone, Plaintiff, represented by Dorian Seawind
Berger, Berger & Hipskind LLP, Melissa Ann Gardner, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann Bernstein, LLP,Michael W. Sobol, Lieff Cabraser Heimann &
Bernstein, LLP, Nathan Daniel Meyer, Russ, August and Kabat &
Nicholas Diamand, Lieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP.

LinkedIn Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jerome Cary Roth -
- jerome.roth@mto.com -- Munger Tolles & Olson LLP & Rosemarie
Theresa Ring, Esq. -- rose.ring@mto.com -- Munger, Tolles & Olson
LLP.

Hannah Tanner, Defendant, represented by Steven F. Helfand --
helfandlaw@helfandlaw.com -- Helfand Law Offices.

Branton Lea, Respondent, represented by James C. Shah, Shepherd,
Finkelman, Miller and Shah, LLP & Nicholas Diamand, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann and Bernstein LLP.

Mary Means, Fletcher 417 2nd Street, Suite 204 Eureka, CA 707-502-
2642, Objector, represented by Frederic Ray Fletcher.

Dan Brown, Objector, represented by Alan J Sherwood, Law Office of
of Alan J. Sherwood.

Susan House, represented by Joseph Darrell Palmer.

Kin Wah Kung, Miscellaneous, Pro Se.


LVNV FUNDING: Bid for Class Certification in "Shular" Suit Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned MONTE L. SHULAR, On Behalf of Himself and
All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. LVNV FUNDING LLC and
MICHAEL J. SCOTT, PC, Defendants, Civil Action No. H-14-3053 (S.D.
Tex.), District Judge Sim Lake denied the motion for class
certification filed by Monte L. Shular.

Shular brought an action against LVNV Funding LLC and Michael J.
Scott, PC for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act and the Texas Debt Collection Act.  Shular alleged
that LVNV attempted to collect debts it purportedly obtained from
Conn Appliances, Inc. although LVNV was not an assignee of such
debts and, therefore, was not entitled to collect.

Shular then filed a motion seeking class certification for "All
individuals subject to debt collection by LVNV Funding, LLC
between November 8, 2012, and June 1, 2015, in connection with
debt originally owned and purportedly purchased from Conn
Appliances, Inc. (Class Period) and transferred as a part of the
November 8, 2012 assignment and sale by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., Sherman Originator III, LLC, Sherman Originator, LLC and
LVNV Funding, LLC."  Shular also sought appointment as Class
Representative and appointment of his counseel as class counsel.

Judge Lake denied Shular's motion after finding that Shular failed
to establish any of the four requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) on
numerosity, commonality, typicality and adequacy.  Further, Judge
Lake also determined that Shular likewise failed to establish the
requirements under Rule 23(b) on predominance and superiority.

A full-text copy of Judge Lake's February 18, 2016 memorandum
opinion and order is available at http://is.gd/m5O7Oyfrom
Leagle.com.

Monte L Shular, Plaintiff, represented by Sammy Ford, IV, Abraham
Watkins Nichols Sorrels Agosto & Friend.

LVNV Funding, LLC, Michael J Scott PC, Defendants, represented by
Robbie LuAnn Malone, Robbie Malone PLLC.


M&T BANK: 3rd Cir. Says Claims in "Cunningham" Suit Untimely
------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned JUDITH CUNNINGHAM; FREDERICK D. DEIMLER,
III; CAROL VANOVER, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Appellants, v. M&T BANK CORP.; M&T BANK; M&T
MORTGAGE REINSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE
CORP.; GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, No. 15-1412 (3rd
Cir.), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit affirmed
the decision of the district court granting summary judgment for
the defendants M&T Bank Corporation, M&T Bank, and M&T Mortgage
Reinsurance Company (collectively, "M&T").

Plaintiffs Judith Cunningham, Frederick Deimler III, and Carol
Vanover filed a putative class action complaint, claiming to
represent a nationwide class of homeowners who were victims of a
captive reinsurance scheme perpetrated by M&T.  The complaint
alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
("RESPA") and unjust enrichment.  The lawsuit, however, was filed
several years after RESPA's one-year statute of limitations had
expired.

The district court granted summary judgment for M&T, explaining
that the plaintiffs' claims were untimely and not subject to
equitable tolling.  The court had found that none of the
plaintiffs exercised reasonable diligence in investigating any
potential claims under RESPA.

On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's
decision and held that the plaintiffs failed to present sufficient
evidence to support their claim of fraudulent concealment by M&T
as basis for tolling.

A full-text copy of the Third Circuit's February 19, 2016 opinion
is available at http://is.gd/mfier7from Leagle.com.

Counsel for Appellants:

     Edward W. Ciolko, Esq.
     Terence S. Ziegler, Esq.
     Donna S. Moffa, Esq.
     Natalie Lesser, Esq.
     Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check
     280 King of Prussia Road
     Radnor, PA 19087
     E-mail: eciolko@ktmc.com
             tziegler@ktmc.com
             nlesser@ktmc.com

Counsel for Appellees:

     David J. Bird, Esq.
     Reed Smith
     225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200
     Pittsburgh, PA 15222

          - and -

     Andrew J. Soven, Esq.
     Reed Smith
     1717 Arch Street
     Three Logan Square, Suite 3100
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     E-mail: asoven@reedsmith.com


MAXLINEAR INC: Settlement of Merger Class Action Still Pending
--------------------------------------------------------------
MaxLinear, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that a proposed settlement of
the Delaware class actions related to the Entropic Communications
merger remains pending.

Beginning on February 9, 2015, eleven stockholder class action
complaints (captioned Langholz v. Entropic Communications, Inc.,
et al., C.A. No. 10631-VCP (filed Feb. 9, 2015); Tomblin v.
Entropic Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10632-VCP (filed Feb. 9,
2015); Crill v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No.
10640-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Wohl v. Entropic Communications,
Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10644-VCP (filed Feb. 11, 2015); Parshall
v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10652-VCP
(filed Feb. 12, 2015); Saggar v. Padval, et al., C.A. No. 10661-
VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Iyer v. Tewksbury, et al., C.A. No.
10665-VCP (filed Feb. 13, 2015); Respler v. Entropic
Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10669-VCP (filed Feb. 17,
2015); Gal v. Entropic Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No.
10671-VCP (filed Feb. 17, 2015); Werbowsky v. Padval, et al., C.A.
No. 10673-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015); and Agosti v. Entropic
Communications, Inc., C.A. No. 10676-VCP (filed Feb. 18, 2015))
were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware on
behalf of a putative class of Entropic Communications, Inc.
stockholders.

The complaints name Entropic, the board of directors of Entropic,
MaxLinear, Excalibur Acquisition Corporation, and Excalibur
Subsidiary, LLC as defendants. The complaints generally allege
that, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Entropic by
MaxLinear, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties to Entropic stockholders by, among other things,
purportedly failing to take steps to maximize the value of
Entropic to its stockholders and agreeing to allegedly preclusive
deal protection devices in the merger agreement. The complaints
further allege that Entropic, MaxLinear, and/or the merger
subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual defendants in the
alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The complaints seek,
among other things, an order enjoining the defendants from
consummating the proposed transaction, an order declaring the
merger agreement unlawful and unenforceable, in the event that the
proposed transaction is consummated, an order rescinding it and
setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages to the class,
imposition of a constructive trust, damages, and/or attorneys'
fees and costs.

On March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Ankur Saggar, Jon Werbowsky, and
Angelo Agosti filed an amended class action complaint. Also on
March 27, 2015, plaintiffs Martin Wohl and Jeffrey Park filed an
amended class action complaint. On April 1, 2015, plaintiff Mark
Respler filed an amended class action complaint.
On April 16, 2015, the Court entered an order consolidating the
Delaware actions, captioned In re Entropic Communications, Inc.
Consolidated Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 10631-VCP (the
"Consolidated Action"). The April 16, 2015 order appointed
plaintiffs Rama Iyer and Jon Werbowsky as Co-Lead Plaintiffs and
designated the amended complaint filed by plaintiffs Ankur Saggar,
Jon Werbowsky, and Angelo Agosti as the operative complaint (the
"Amended Complaint").

The Amended Complaint names as defendants Entropic, the board of
directors of Entropic, the Company, Excalibur Acquisition
Corporation, and Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC. The Amended Complaint
generally alleges that, in connection with the proposed
acquisition of Entropic by the Company, the individual defendants
breached their fiduciary duties to Entropic stockholders by, among
other things, purportedly failing to maximize the value of
Entropic to its stockholders, engaging in a purportedly unfair and
conflicted sale process, agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal
protection devices in the merger agreement, and allegedly
misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose all material
information in connection with the proposed transaction. The
Amended Complaint further alleges that the Company and the merger
subsidiaries aided and abetted the individual defendants in the
alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The Amended Complaint
seeks, among other things: an order declaring the merger agreement
unlawful and unenforceable, an order rescinding, to the extent
already implemented, the merger agreement, an order enjoining
defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, imposition
of a constructive trust, and attorneys' and experts' fees and
costs.

On April 24, 2015, the parties to the Consolidated Action entered
into a memorandum of understanding regarding a proposed settlement
of the Delaware actions. The proposed settlement is subject to
negotiation of the settlement papers by the parties and is subject
to court approval after notice and an opportunity to object is
provided to the proposed settlement class. There can be no
assurance that the parties will reach agreement regarding the
final terms of the settlement agreement or that the Court of
Chancery will approve the settlement.

The Company is a provider of radio frequency, or RF, and mixed-
signal integrated circuits for cable and satellite broadband
communications, the connected home, and for data center, metro,
and long-haul fiber networks.


MDL 1775: No Conflict of Interest for Kaplan Fox, Judge Says
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky denied a motion filed by the defendants
Air China Ltd., Air China Cargo Company Ltd., Air India, Air New
Zealand Ltd., Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Nippon Cargo
Airlines Company Ltd., Polar Air Cargo, Inc., Polar Air Cargo LLC,
and Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. to disqualify the law firm
of Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer from representing the plaintiffs in the
case captioned IN RE AIR CARGO SHIPPING SERVICES ANTITRUST
LITIGATION M.D.L. No. 1775, No. 06-MD-1775 (E.D.N.Y.).

Kaplan Fox is one of four firms actively providing counsel to the
plaintiffs pursuant to Judge Pohorelsky's Practice and Procedure
Order Number 2 appointing a member of the firm, Robert Kaplan,
Esq., as Co-Lead Counsel along with three other attorneys for the
now-certified class of plaintiffs.

The motion rests on the fact that George F. Hritz, Esq., an
attorney who at one time represented former co-defendants Air
Canada and AC Cargo LP in the case, has joined Kaplan Fox as Of
Counsel. The movants contend that his association with Kaplan Fox
has created a conflict of interest that bars Kaplan Fox from
continuing to represent the plaintiffs. They were concerned of the
possibility that Kaplan Fox will use confidential information that
Hritz learned as a result of his involvement with the defendants
under a joint defense agreement.

George F. Hritz, Esq., then a member of the law firm of Hogan &
Hartson, entered a notice of appearance on behalf of Air Canada
and AC Cargo LP in October 2006.

Judge Pohorelsky denied the motion because the movants have not
provided proof that Hritz's recent association with Kaplan Fox
raises any risk of trial taint, much less trial taint significant
enough to warrant disqualification of the firm.

A full-text copy of Judge Pohorelsky's February 23, 2016 opinion
and order is available at http://is.gd/P8TDDVfrom Leagle.com.

Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, In Re,
represented by Besrat J. Gebrewold, Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll
PLLC, Allan Steyer -- asteyer@steyerlaw.com -- Steyer Lowenthal
Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP, Craig C. Corbitt --
ccorbitt@zelle.com -- Zelle Hofmann Voelbel Mason & Gette, LLP,
Douglas A Millen -- dmillen@fklmlaw.com -- FREED KANNER LONDON &
MILLEN LLC, Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP, Francis O. Scarpulla,
Zelle Hofmann Voelbel Mason & Gette, LLP, Gerald J. Rodos --
grodos@barrack.com -- BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE, Henry P. Gonzalez,
Rodriguez O'Donnell Ross Gonzalez & Williams,Jeffrey B. Gittleman
-- jgittleman@barrack.com -- Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Joel C.
Meredith, Meredith & Associates, Lisa M. Port -- lport@barrack.com
-- Barrack, Rodos & Bacine & Steven J. Greenfogel, Meredith Cohen
Greenfogel & Skirnick.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-888, ABM International, Inc. v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., Plaintiff, represented by
Robert N. Kaplan -- rkaplan@kaplanfox.com -- Kaplan, Kilsheimer &
Fox, LLP, Gary L. Specks -- gspecks@kaplanfox.com -- Kaplan Fox &
Kilsheimer, LLP,Gregory K. Arenson -- garenson@kaplanfox.com --
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer --
hscherrer@hausfeld.com -- Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman --
hsalzman@robinskaplan.com -- Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP,
Jason A. Zweig, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Lawrence Walner
-- walner@walnerlawfirm.com -- The Walner Law Firm, Ltd., Melinda
R. Coolidge -- mcoolidge@hausfeld.com -- Hausfeld LLP & Richard J.
Kilsheimer -- rkilsheimer@kaplanfox.com -- Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., Plaintiff, represented by Robert
N. Kaplan, Kaplan, Kilsheimer & Fox, LLP, Gary L. Specks, Kaplan
Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP &
Richard J. Kilsheimer, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British
Airways et al, Plaintiff, represented by David Jaroslawicz,
Jaroslawicz & Jaros, Christopher Lovell, Lovell Stewart Halebian
LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-725, Animal Land, Inc. v. Air
Canada et al, Plaintiff, represented by Eric J. Belfi, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gary B. Friedman, Friedman Law Group LLP,
Jeffrey J. Corrigan, Spector, Roseman & Kodroff, P.C., Mark
Reinhardt, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield,Garrett D. Blanchfield,
Reinhardt, Wendorf & Blanchfield, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox
& Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-776, Adams v. British Airways et
al, Plaintiff, represented by Gina Marie Tufaro, Horwitz,Horwitz &
Paradis,Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co.
v. Air Canada et
al, Plaintiff, represented by Tracey L. Kitzman, Friedman Law
Group, LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-830, Rock International Transport,
Inc. v. Air Canada et al, Plaintiff, represented by Mac I. Gross,
Pomerantz, Levy, Haudek, Black, & Grossman, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-981, Global Apparels Kenya EPZ,
Ltd. v. British Airways PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig
L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Steven M. Steingard, Kohn, Swift & Graf,
PC.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-980, Mamlaka Video v. Air Canada
et al, Plaintiff, represented by Marvin Srulowitz, Robert S.
Kitchenoff, Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher, Steven A. Asher,
Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP & Mindee J. Reuben, Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher LLC.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-982, ACS Associates USA, Inc. v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by
Robert A. Skirnick, Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, P.C.,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-997, Spitz v. Air France-KLM et
al, Plaintiff, represented by Roger J. Bernstein, Law Offices of
Roger Bernstein, Esq., Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff
LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc.
v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Plaintiff, represented by Barbara Louise
Lyons, (no Longer with)Cotchett Pitre Simon and mcCarthy, Bruce L.
Simon, Pearson Simon Soter Warshaw & Penny LLLP, Clifford H.
Pearson, Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, Esther L. Klisura, Cotchett
Pitre Simon and McCarthy, Gary S. Soter, Pearson Soter Warshaw and
Penny, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP &Steven N. Williams,
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3185, Niagara Frontier
Distribution, Inc. v. Air France ADS, Plaintiff, represented by
Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP,Andrew Bullion, Hausfeld LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Paul T. Gallagher,
Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3188, Superior Jewelry Co. v. Air
France ADS, Plaintiff, represented by Gerald J. Rodos, BARRACK,
RODOS & BACINE,Jeffrey B. Gittleman, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine,
Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox
& Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3189, Smith v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Allan Steyer, Steyer
Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP, Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Michael P. Lehmann, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Jon T.
King, The Furth Firm LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP,Robert
A. Skirnick, Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, P.C. & Thomas
P. Dove, The Furth Firm LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3190, International Sea & Air
Shipping Corp. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff,
represented by Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3191, American Flower Brokers v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3192, Topp, Inc. v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP, Kevin B. Love, Hanzman Criden Love, P.A. &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3193,Bacchus Technologies, LLC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3194, Lionheart Group, Inc. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Howard Mitchell
Bushman, Harke & Clasby, Lance August Harke, Harke & Clasby LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3195 Sisimizi, Ltd. v. Air France-
KLM, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony F. Fata, Miller, Faucher
and Cafferty, LLP,Jennifer Winter Sprengel, Miller, Faucher and
Cafferty, LLP, Marvin A. Miller, Miller Law LLC, Patrick Edward
Cafferty, Miller, Faucher and Cafferty, LLP, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Imtiaz A.
Siddiqui, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3196, Blumex USA, Inc. v. Air
Canada, Plaintiff, represented by Jayne A. Goldstein, Shepherd
Finkelman Miller & Shah LLP, Lee Albert, Mager & Goldstein LLP,
Mary Jane Fait, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLC,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Mary Jane Edelstein-Fait, Wolf Haldenstein Adler
Freeman & Herz LLC & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3197, Zucker's Gifts, Inc. v.
Scandinavian Airlines Systems, Plaintiff, represented by Alberto
Rivas, Lite DePalma Greenberg & Rivas, LLC, Allyn Zissel Lite,
Lite, DePalma, Greenberg and Rivas, LCC, Austin B. Cohen, Levin,
Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Howard J. Sedran, Levin,
Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Joseph J. DePalma, Lite DePalma
Greenberg, LLC & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1432, Thule, INC. et al v. Air
Canada et al, Plaintiff, represented by J. Douglas Richards,
Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP, Michael C. Spencer,
Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP., Ryan G. Kriger, Milberg
Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1641, Sul-American Export, Inc. v.
Air France ADS et al, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew Powers
McCahill, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, Roger J. Bernstein, Law
Offices of Roger Bernstein, Esq., Charles Goodwin, Berger &
Montague, P.C., Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,
Eric Cramer, Berger & Montague, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1734, Gold Eye Distributors, Inc.
v. Air France ADS et al, Plaintiff, represented by Roger J.
Bernstein, Law Offices of Roger Bernstein, Esq., Craig L Briskin,
Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1011, JCK Industries, Inc. v.
British Airways, PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge Grindal
Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2501, Rakoff v. British Airways
PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig L Briskin, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3211, Jain v. Virgin Atlantic
Airways, Ltd. et al, Plaintiff, represented by David E. Kovel,
Kirby McInerney LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v.
Air France-KLM et al, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher
Lovell, Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP, Benjamin Delalio Bianco,
Meister Seeling & Fein LLP,Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow &
Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP, Imtiaz A. Siddiqui, Cotchett, Pitre &
McCarthy, LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1941, Fayazi v. British Airways
PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Delalio Bianco,
Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow &
Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1061, Benchmark Export Services,
INC. v. British Airways et al, Plaintiff, represented by Bernard
Persky, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow &
Rudoff LLP, Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1503, Rosetti Handbags and
Accessories, Ltd. v. Air France ADS et al, Plaintiff, represented
by Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Craig L
Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Michael McLellan, Finkelstein Thompson
LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1655, Rapps v. British Airways PLC
et al, Plaintiff, represented by G. Martin Meyers, Law Offices of
G. Martin Meyers, P.C., Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gary
M. Meyers, Law Offices of G. Martin Meyers, P.C., Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1710, La Regale Limited v. British
Airways PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP &Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2157, Perlman v. British Airways
PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig L Briskin, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2203, Young v. British Airways PLC
et al, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2223, Malooly v. British Airways
PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig L Briskin, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2260, Antell v. British Airways
PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig L Briskin, Labaton
Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2427, Eurotrendz v. British
Airways PLC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig L Briskin,
Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-3294, Purolite Company v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory
K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2203, Young v. British Airways PLC
et al, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister
Seeling & Fein LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff
LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-1106, JSL Carpet Corp. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin
Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Craig L Briskin,
Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2740, Hirschbein v. British
Airways PLC et al,
Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling
& Fein LLP, Craig L Briskin, Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3295, Finegan v. British Airways
et al, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister
Seeling & Fein LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3207, Paul Murphy v. Air France-
KLM, et al., Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan,
Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Imtiaz A. Siddiqui,
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3971, Lozen International LLC v.
Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al, Plaintiff, represented by Joshue
Piovia-Scott, Randall R. Renick Law Offices, Randall R Renick,
Randall R. Renick Law Offices,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3972, Brian Fridman v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG et al, Plaintiff, represented by Joshue Piovia-Scott,
Randall R. Renick Law Offices, Patrick McNicholas, McNicholas &
McNicholas, Randall R Renick, Randall R. Renick Law Offices,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3973, Around the World Apparel,
Inc v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al, Plaintiff, represented by
Joshue Piovia-Scott, Randall R. Renick Law Offices, Randall R
Renick, Randall R. Renick Law Offices, Sarina M Hinson, Garcia Law
Firm, Stephen M Garcia, Garcia Law Firm, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3974, Woodrow Clark v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG et al, Plaintiff, represented by Brian Barry, Brian
Barry Law Offices, Jill Levine Betts, Brian Barry Law Offices,
Kathleen Langan, Brian Barry Law Offices, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3975 Y. Hata & Co., LTD vs. Air
France ADS et al, Plaintiff, represented by Curtis Brooks Cutter,
Kershaw Cutter & Ratinoff LLP, Mark J. Tamblyn, Wexler Wallace
LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3976, Lynn Culver v. Air Canada et
al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein,
Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3977, Jeni Redmond v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, INC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul T. Gallagher,
Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3978, JSNP, INC v. ACE Aviation
Holdings, INC., Plaintiff, represented by Paul T. Gallagher,
Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Benjamin Delalio
Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox
& Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3979, FTS International Express
INC v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by
Paul T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C.,
Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3980, Linkal Coporation v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul T.
Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M. Pollard,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard
A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P. &
W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3981, International Orchids
Imports v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff,
represented by Paul T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld &
Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Lisa M. Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal
Nauen, P.L.L.P. & W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3983, Kathleen Enterprises, INC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul
T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory
K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3984, Flowers by Fletcher, INC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul
T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory
K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3985, Harry Okabe Flowers v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Paul T.
Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M. Pollard,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard
A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P. & W. Joseph
Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3986, TGIS Flowers INC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Timothy D.
Battin, Strauss & Boies, LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3987, Creative Spirit LLC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M. Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P. & W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal
Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3988, RBX INDUSTRIES, INC v. AC
Cargo et al, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-4012, Aleph Wines Corporation v.
British Airways et al, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel E. Becnel,
Jr., Becnel Law Firm, LLC, Joseph Preston Strom, Jr., Strom Law
Firm, Mario A Pacella,Matthew B. Moreland, Becnel Law Firm, LLC,
Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3989 J.A. Transport INC v. ACE
Aviation Holdings et al, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP,Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling &
Fein LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary
K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller
& Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3990, Caribe Air Cargo, INC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan
Watson Cuneo, Cuneo, Gilbert & LaDuca LLP, Benjamin Delalio
Bianco, Meister Seeling & Fein LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan,
Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3991, Leis By Ron, INC. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Benjamin Delalio Bianco, Meister Seeling &
Fein LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi
M. Silton, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi
LLP, Lisa M. Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal
Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen,
P.L.L.P. & W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3992, Sangean America v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Michael P. Lehmann, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory
K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi
LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Robert A. Skirnick,
Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, P.C., Thomas P. Dove, The
Furth Firm LLP & W. Timothy Needham, Janssen, Malloy, Needham,
Morrison, Reinholtsen & Crowley.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-4008, Funke Design Biuld, Inc. v.
AMR Corporation et al, Plaintiff, represented by Kathleen Chavez,
Chavez Law Firm, P.C., Robert Foote, Foote, Meyers, Mielke &
Flowers, LLC, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP, Mark A. Bulgarelli, Keaton & Associates, P.C.
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-4009, R.I.M. Logistics, Ltd. v.
Scandinavian Airline Systems et al, Plaintiff, represented by
Alberto Rivas, Lite DePalma Greenberg & Rivas, LLC, Allyn Zissel
Lite, Lite, DePalma, Greenberg and Rivas, LCC, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-4010, CID Marketing & Promotion
Inc. v. AMR Corporation et al, Plaintiff, represented by Dawn M.
Tancredi, Law Offices of Dawn M. Tancredi, Joe R. Whatley, Jr.,
Whatley Drake & Kallas LLC, Richard P. Rouco, Quinn Connor Weaver
Davies & Rouco, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One of more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3993, Alluvion Inc. v. ACE
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory
K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3994, Ralph Olarte v. ACE Aviation
Holdings, et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Daniel M. Cohen, Cueno Gilbert & LaDuca,
LLP.

One or more plaintiffs in 06-cv-3995, Capogiro LLC v. ACE Aviation
Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3996, Kenneth Y. Ibara, etc. v.
ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3997, Floral Network LLC, etc v.
ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Heidi M. Silton,
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Lisa M.
Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, P.L.L.P.
& W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3998, Tropic Fish & Vegetable
Center, Inc. v. ACE AviationHoldings, Inc., et al.,, Plaintiff,
represented by Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Heidi M. Silton, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Lisa M. Pollard, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.,
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, R. Reid LeBeau, II, Lockridge
Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge Grindal
Nauen, P.L.L.P. & W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen
P.L.L.P..

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3999, Delinear,Inc. v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG., et al.,, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda
R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Terry Gross, Gross & Belsky LLP.

Marc Seligman, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Kenneth
Gilman, Gilman and Pastor, LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-04586,Paradiso, Inc. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by Sutton
Keany, Jenner & Block LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-4586, Paradiso, Inc. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by Craig C.
Corbitt, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel Mason & Gette, LLP, Francis O.
Scarpulla, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel Mason & Gette, LLP, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5200, Katie Tice vs. ACE Aviation
Holdings et al, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Bullion, Hausfeld
LLP, Daniel Gustafson, Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Daniel C. Hedlund,
Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Dennis Stewart, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP,
Donald L. Perelman, Fine, Kaplan and Black, Gary B. Friedman,
Friedman Law Group LLP, Joseph Goldberg, Freedman Boyd Daniels
Hollander Goldberg & Cline, P.A.,Matthew L. Garcia, Freedman Boyd
Daniels Hollander & Goldberg, P.A.,Michael J. Flannery, The David
Danis Law Firm, P.C., Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Noah
Shube, Paul T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll,
P.L.L.C., Stephanie L. Dieringer, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5203, Association des Utilisateurs
du Transport de Fret v. ACE Aviation Holdings et al, Plaintiff,
represented byAndrew Bullion, Hausfeld LLP, Daniel Gustafson,
Gustafson Gluek PLLC,Daniel C. Hedlund, Gustafson Gluek PLLC,
Dennis Stewart, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, Donald L. Perelman,
Fine, Kaplan and Black, Gary B. Friedman, Friedman Law Group LLP,
Joseph Goldberg, Freedman Boyd Daniels Hollander Goldberg & Cline,
P.A., Matthew L. Garcia, Freedman Boyd Daniels Hollander &
Goldberg, P.A., Michael J. Flannery, The David Danis Law Firm,
P.C., Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Noah Shube, Paul T.
Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Stephanie
L. Dieringer, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, Won K. Lee, Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld
LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5202, SGS Logistics Services, INC
v. ACE Aviation Holdings et al, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew
Bullion, Hausfeld LLP, Daniel Gustafson, Gustafson Gluek PLLC,
Daniel C. Hedlund, Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Dennis Stewart, Hulett
Harper Stewart LLP, Donald L. Perelman, Fine, Kaplan and Black,
Gary B. Friedman, Friedman Law Group LLP, Joseph Goldberg,
Freedman Boyd Daniels Hollander Goldberg & Cline, P.A., Matthew L.
Garcia, Freedman Boyd Daniels Hollander & Goldberg, P.A.,Michael
J. Flannery, The David Danis Law Firm, P.C., Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Noah Shube, Paul T. Gallagher, Cohen, Milstein,
Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Stephanie L. Dieringer, Hulett Harper
Stewart LLP, Douglas A Millen, FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Steven A. Kanner,
FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC.

Marc Seligman, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea L. Hertzfeld,
Hausfeld LLP,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.
W.I.T. Entertainment, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Andrea L.
Hertzfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

Produce Solution, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Anthony D.
Shapiro, Rohan, Goldfarb Rafel & Shapiro, P.S., Andrea L.
Hertzfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox &
Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP.

CTO-3, One or more Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Clinton
A. Krislov, Krislov & Associates, LTD, William Joel Vander Vliet,
Krislov & Associates, LTD, Andrea L. Hertzfeld, Hausfeld LLP,
Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

All Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Besrat J. Gebrewold,
Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Gwendolyn R. Giblin, Gold
Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP,Jay L. Himes, Labaton Sucharow LLP,
Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP,Robert N. Kaplan, Kaplan,
Kilsheimer & Fox, LLP, Thomas C. Bright, Gold Bennett Cera &
Sidener LLP, Brent W. Landau, Hausfeld LLP, Daniel A. Small, Cohen
Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, David Yautian Hwu, Saveri & Saveri,
Inc., Douglas J. McNamara, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll
PLLC,Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Gregory
Scott Asciolla, Labaton Sucharow, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Howard J.
Sedran, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Jill S. Abrams, Keith J.
Verrier, Levin Fishbein Sedran & Berman, Meegan F. Hollywood,
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld
LLP, Steven A. Kanner, FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC & William
P. Butterfield, Hausfeld LLP.

Lynn Culver, Plaintiff, represented by Brian N. Toder, Chestnut &
Cambronne, P.A., Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.


One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5454, TNT Freight Management
Holding AB, v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc.,, Plaintiff,
represented by Andrew Bullion, Hausfeld LLP, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP &Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5453, Volvo Logistics AB, v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc.,, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew
Bullion, Hausfeld LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5452, Volvo Parts AB, v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Bullion,
Hausfeld LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5478, H&M Hennes & Maurtiz AB, v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew
Bullion, Hausfeld LLP, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP,Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller &
Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5481, Ikea Services AB, v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew Bullion,
Hausfeld LLP,Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Michael D. Hausfeld,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-5486, Deutscher Speditions Und
Logistikverband E.V., v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc, Plaintiff,
represented byAndrew Bullion, Hausfeld LLP, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge,
Hausfeld LLP.

CTO-4, One or More Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Donald
Chidi Amamgbo, Amamgbo & Associates, Judith Blackwell, Blackwell &
Blackwell,Lawrence Dumzo Nwajei, Law Offices of Nwajei & Company,
Reginald Von Terrell, The Terrell Law Group, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

DJ Fashions, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Edward M. Jofee,
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP,Kenneth N. Wolf, Sandler, Travis &
Rosenberg, P.A., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Michelle L. Stopka, Sandler Travis &
Rosenberg & Robert J. Becerra, Sandler Travis & Rosenberg.

Alfred Angelo, inc., Plaintiff, represented by Edward M. Jofee,
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Hollis L. Salzman, Robins
Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Kenneth N. Wolf, Sandler, Travis &
Rosenberg, P.A., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Michelle L. Stopka, Sandler Travis &
Rosenberg & Robert J. Becerra, Sandler Travis & Rosenberg.

Crismina Garments, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Kenneth N. Wolf,
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Edward M. Jofee, Sandler,
Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Melinda
R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Michelle L. Stopka, Sandler Travis &
Rosenberg & Robert J. Becerra, Sandler Travis & Rosenberg.

Angeles Garments, Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Hollis L.
Salzman, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, Kenneth N. Wolf,
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Edward M. Jofee, Sandler,
Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP, Melinda
R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Michelle L. Stopka, Sandler Travis &
Rosenberg & Robert J. Becerra, Sandler Travis & Rosenberg.

Foreign Purchaser Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Hilary K
Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP & Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by
Christopher Lovell, Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP, Douglas J.
McNamara, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Hilary K Scherrer,
Hausfeld LLP, Imtiaz A. Siddiqui, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP
& Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

One or more Plaintiffs in 08-cv-308, Goldway Trading Corp v.
Korean Air Lines Co., LTD et al, Plaintiff, represented by Melinda
R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

08 CV 0425 JG, One or More Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by
Howard J. Sedran, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Martin J.
Flannery, Pattison & Flannery, Hilary K Scherrer, Hausfeld LLP,
Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP & Noah Shube.

One or more Plaintiffs in 1:08-cv-42, Precision Associates, Inc et
al v. Panalpina World Transport Holding LTD, Plaintiff,
represented byChristopher Lovell, Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP,
Imtiaz A. Siddiqui, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

Member Of PltffClass Schenker, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by
James Joseph Calder, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP & Melinda R.
Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

Animal Land, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Eugene A. Spector,
Spector, Roseman & Kodroff, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP &
William Caldes, Spector, Roseman Kodroff & Willis, P.C..

One or more Plaintiffs in 1:09-cv-01172-FB-SMG MacDonald v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Plaintiff, represented by J.
Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC & Melinda
R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP.

Richard Smith, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

One or More Plaintiffs in 1:10-cv-00639-JG -VVP Benchmark Export
Services et al v. China Airlines, Ltd. et al, Plaintiff,
represented by Austin B. Cohen, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman,
Brent W. Landau, Hausfeld LLP,Charles Sweedler, Levin Fishbein,
Sedran & Berman, Daniel M. Cohen, Cueno Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP,
Eric E. Castelblanco, Gary L. Specks, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer,
LLP, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,Gregory
Scott Asciolla, Labaton Sucharow, Hollis L. Salzman, Robins Kaplan
Miller & Ciresi LLP, Howard J. Sedran, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran &
Berman,Jay L. Himes, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Jon P. Axelrod, Dewitt
Ross & Stevens S.C., Mark S. Goldman, Goldman Scarlato & Karon,
P.C., Michael Goldberg, Glancy Binknow & Goldberg LLP, Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Noah Shube, Robert N. Kaplan, Kaplan,
Kilsheimer & Fox, LLP, Thomas Bright, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener
LLP, Todd E. Palmer, Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C. & William P.
Butterfield, Hausfeld LLP.

Benchmark, Plaintiff, represented by Austin B. Cohen, Levin,
Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Brent W. Landau, Hausfeld LLP, Eric E
Castelblanco, Eric E Castelblanco Law Offices, Gary L. Specks,
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP,Howard J. Sedran, Levin, Fishbein,
Sedran & Berman, Lori S Brody, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP,
Michael M Goldberg, Glancy Binkow and Goldberg LLP, Michael D.
Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP, Thomas Bright, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener
LLP, William P. Butterfield, Hausfeld LLP, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Larry McDevitt, The Van Winkle Law
Firm,Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Nathaniel L. Orenstein,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo & Peter A. Pease,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

FTS International Express, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Austin
B. Cohen, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Larry McDevitt, The Van Winkle Law
Firm, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Nathaniel L. Orenstein,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo & Peter A. Pease,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

JSNP, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Austin B. Cohen, Levin,
Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Larry McDevitt, The Van Winkle Law
Firm, Nathaniel L. Orenstein, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt
& Pucillo & Peter A. Pease, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt &
Pucillo.

Olarte Transport Service, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Austin
B. Cohen, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Larry McDevitt, The Van Winkle Law
Firm, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Nathaniel L. Orenstein,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo & Peter A. Pease,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

R.I.M. Logistics, Ltd, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K.
Arenson, Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Larry McDevitt, The Van
Winkle Law Firm, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Nathaniel L.
Orenstein, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo & Peter
A. Pease, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

S.A.T. Sea & Air Transport, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Austin
B. Cohen, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Gregory K. Arenson,
Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Larry McDevitt, The Van Winkle Law
Firm, Melinda R. Coolidge, Hausfeld LLP, Nathaniel L. Orenstein,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo & Peter A. Pease,
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

Volvo North America Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Austin B.
Cohen, Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Larry McDevitt, The Van
Winkle Law Firm,Nathaniel L. Orenstein, Berman DeValerio Pease
Tabacco Burt & Pucillo &Peter A. Pease, Berman DeValerio Pease
Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.

Schenker AG, Plaintiff, represented by James Joseph Calder, Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP, Mary Ellen Hennessy, Katten Muchin Rosenman
LLP &Sheldon T. Zenner, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd, Plaintiff, represented by Rebecca R.
Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP & Philip J.
O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Yamaha Motor Corporation U.S.A., Plaintiff, represented by Rebecca
R. Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP & Philip J.
O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Plaintiff,
represented by Rebecca R. Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone &
Beato LLP & Philip J. O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone &
Beato LLP.

Yamaha Jet Boat Manufacturing U.S.A. (a.k.a Tennessee Watercraft
Inc.), Plaintiff, represented by Rebecca R. Anzidei, Stein
Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP & Philip J. O'Beirne, Stein
Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Yamaha Motor Powered Products Co., Ltd, Plaintiff, represented by
Rebecca R. Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP &
Philip J. O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Yamaha Motor Engineering Co. Ltd.,, Plaintiff, represented by
Rebecca R. Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP &
Philip J. O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

I-Pulse Co., Ltd, Plaintiff, represented by Philip J. O'Beirne,
Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Sunward International Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Philip J.
O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Yamaha Motor Distribution Latin America, Plaintiff, represented by
Rebecca R. Anzidei, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP &
Philip J. O'Beirne, Stein Mitchell Muse Cipollone & Beato LLP.

Acushnet Company, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Aisin World Corp. Of America, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Alcoa Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP,Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

American Showa, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

ANN, INC., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP,Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

AT&T Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP,Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Robert Bosch LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

BSH Home Appliances Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel
A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Bridgestone Americas Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Brookstone, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Centric Group LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Church & Dwight Co. Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Clark Equipment Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

The Clorox Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Euromarket Designs Inc. d/b/a Crate & Barrel, Plaintiff,
represented byDaniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E.
Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

D&M Holdings Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Daifuku America Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Dana Holding Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

E.I. Du Pont DE Nemours & Company, Plaintiff, represented by
Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma
Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Energizer Holdings Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Gadot America, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

General Electric Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

General Mills Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

General Motors Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Gymboree Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Hanwha Group, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Harrington Hoists Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

The Hershey Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

HMSHost Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Ingram Micro Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Kawasaki Motor Corp., U.S.A., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Kenda Rubber Industrial Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel
A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Kia Motors America, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Louis Vuitton North America Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel
A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Mahle Filter Systems North America, Plaintiff, represented by
Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma
Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Mazak Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Milliken & Company, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc., Plaintiff, represented by
Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma
Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Mitutoyo America Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Motorola Mobility Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Navistar International Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by
Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma
Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Nestle USA Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Newell Rubbermaid, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Old Comp Inc. Fka CompUSA, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel
A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Owens & Minor Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Piolax Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring
LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Pokemon Company International, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

RadioShack Corp., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Rexnord Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Rich Products Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Ricoh Americas Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Rockwell Automation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by
Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma
Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Sears Holdings Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Sephora USA, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Siemens Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Staples Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP,Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Suzuki Motor of America Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Synnex Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Teijin Holdings USA, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A.
Sasse, Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton,
Crowell & Moring.

Ten Thousand Villages, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Valeo Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse, Crowell &
Moring LLP,Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

Visteon Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Webgistix Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell &
Moring.

Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel A. Sasse,
Crowell & Moring
LLP, Deborah E. Arbabi & Emma Burton, Crowell & Moring.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-888, ABM International, Inc. v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., Defendant, represented by Gary
A. MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker
& Hostetler LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Charles Simpson,
Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP,James Calderwood, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP & Richard J. Kilsheimer, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer
LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., Defendant, represented by Gary A.
MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker &
Hostetler LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Charles Simpson,
Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP,James Calderwood, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-706, Fleurchem, Inc. v. British
Airways et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-725 Animal Land, Inc. v. Air
Canada et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler
LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP & Patrick J. Bonner, Freehill, Hogan & Mahar.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-776, Adams v. British Airways et
al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton
Boggs US LLP,Edward A. Wallace, Wexler Wallace LLP, Kenneth A.
Wexler, The Wexler Firm & Mark J. Tamblyn, Wexler Wallace LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co.
v. Air Canada et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler
LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP,Charles Simpson, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-830, Rock International Transport,
Inc. v. Air Canada et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A.
MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-981, Global Apparels Kenya EPZ,
Ltd. v. British Airways PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv- 980, Mamlaka Video v. Air Canada
et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs
US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
Warren Rubin, Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross, P.C., Jeff J.
VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon
Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-982, ACS Associates USA, Inc. v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Robert A. Skirnick,
Meredith Cohen Greenfogel & Skirnick, P.C. & Eric S. Berman,
Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-997, Spitz v. Air France-KLM et
al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs
US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP &
Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc.
v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Defendant, represented by James
Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Stacie D. Yee, Squire Sanders &
Dempsey, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP &
Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3185, Niagara Frontier
Distribution, Inc. v. Air France ADS, Defendant, represented by
James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman,
Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3188, Superior Jewelry Co. v. Air
France ADS, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3189, Smith v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3190, International Sea & Air
Shipping Corp. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Defendant,
represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP &
Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3191, American Flower Brokers v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey
LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3192, Topp, Inc. v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3193, Bacchus Technologies, LLC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey
LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3194, Lionheart Group, Inc. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by Abbott B.
Lipsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, Alan M. Wiseman, Covington & Burling
LLP, Andrew Mark Kofsky, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Benedict Paul
Kuehne, Sal & Kuehne, Charles E. Koob, Simpson, Thacher &
Bartlett, Chriss S. Coutroulis, Carlton Fields, Christian Reginald
Bartholomew, Morgan Lewis & Bockius,Christopher Stephen Carver,
Akerman Senterfitt, Daryl Andrew Libow, Sullivan & Crimwell, David
Earle Vann, Jr., Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, Eric Mahr, Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Francis Byrne Geary, Jr., Fowler
White Boggs Banker, George D. Ruttinger, Crowell & Moring
LLP,Harvey Wolkoff, Ropes & Gray LLP, Hillarie Bass, Greenberg
Trauig, James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Jeffrey
Blumenfeld, Crowell and Moring, John R. Fornaciari, Baker &
Hostetler LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, Kenneth P. Ewing, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Lawrence Dean
Silverman, Akerman Senterfitt, Margaret M. Zwisler, Latham &
Watkins LLP, Meredith Reade Miller, Temple University,Michael
Rasnick, Shearman & Sterling, Pamela G. Levinson, Akerman
Senterfitt, Rachel Z. Stutz, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
LLP,Stephen Fishbein, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Thomas Kevin
Spencer, Steptoe & Johnson, William King Hill, Bilzin Sumberg
Baena Price & Axelrod,William Karas, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Eric
S. Berman, Howrey LLP &Thomas Roy Spencer, Thomas R. Spencer PA.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3195, Sisimizi, Ltd. v. Air
France-KLM, Defendant, represented by Clark Steven Tomashefsky,
Jenner & Block, LLC,Francis Anthony Citera, Greenberg Traurig,
LLP, James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Matthew B.
Mock, Schiff Hardin LLP & Timothy Bunker Hardwicke, Latham &
Watkins, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3196, Blumex USA, Inc. v. Air
Canada, Defendant, represented by Andrew Stanley Marovitz, Mayer,
Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP, Clark Steven Tomashefsky, Jenner & Block,
LLC, Francis Anthony Citera, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman
Sobol Shapiro LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP & Jolyon
Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1432, Thule, INC. et al v. Air
Canada et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler
LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
Michael C. Spencer, Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP., Robert
M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt
& Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1641, Sul-American Export, Inc. v.
Air France ADS et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1734, Gold Eye Distributors, Inc.
v. Air France ADS et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1011, JCK Industries, Inc. v.
British Airways, PLC et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A.
MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2501, Rakoff v. British Airways
PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3211, Jain v. Virgin Atlantic
Airways, Ltd. et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v.
Air France-KLM et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler
LLP & Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1941, Fayazi v. British Airways
PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1061, Benchmark Export Services,
INC. v. British Airways et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1503, Rosetti Handbags and
Accessories, Ltd. v. Air France ADS et al, Defendant, represented
by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Mila Bartos,
Finkelstein Thompson.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv1655, Rapps v. British Airways PLC
et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton
Boggs US LLP,Richard A. Rothman, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP & Eric
S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1710, La Regale Limited v. British
Airways PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Rachel Z. Stutz, Wilmer Cutler
Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP,Stephen Weissman, Baker Botts LLP,
William Karas, Steptoe & Johnson LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2157, Perlman v. British Airways
PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2203, Young v. British Airways PLC
et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton
Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2223, Malooly v. British Airways
PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2427, Eurotrendz v. British
Airways PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3294, Purolite Company v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1106, JSL Carpet Corp. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al, Defendant, represented by Gary A.
MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2260, Antell v. British Airways
PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2740, Hirschbein v. British
Airways PLC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Eric S. Berman, Howrey LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3207, Paul Murphy v. Air France-
KLM, et al., Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP, John R. Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler LLP &
Robert M. Disch, Baker & Hostetler LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3971, Lozen International LLC v.
Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP &Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3972, Brian Fridman v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP,James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3973, Around the World Apparel,
Inc v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al, Defendant, represented by
James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Charles Simpson,
Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood, Zuckert,
Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP &Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3974, Woodrow Clark v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP,James Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger,
LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3975 Y. Hata & Co., LTD v. Air
France ADS et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, Jay E. Smith, Steptoe & Johnson &
Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3976, Lynn Culver v. Air Canada et
al, Defendant, represented by Gary A. MacDonald, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs
US LLP, John M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James
Calderwood, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, Jeff J.
VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon
Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3977, Jeni Redmond v. Ace Aviation
Holdings, INC et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick,
Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3978, JSNP, INC v. ACE Aviation
Holdings, INC, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3979, FTS International Express
INC v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by
Gary A. MacDonald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, John
M. Nannes, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Charles
Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Calderwood,
Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP, Jeff J. VanHooreweghe, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP & Jolyon Silversmith, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3980, Linkal Coporation v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.
One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3981, International Orchids
Imports v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant,
represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3983, Kathleen Enterprises, INC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3984, Flowers by Fletcher, INC v.
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3985, Harry Okabe Flowers v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3986, TGIS Flowers INC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3987, Creative Spirit LLC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3988, RBX INDUSTRIES, INC v. AC
Cargo et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-4012, Aleph Wines Corporation v.
British Airways et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP, John C Moylan, III, Wyches
Burgess Freeman and Parham &Matthew T Richardson, Wyches Burgess
Freeman and Parham.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3989 J.A. Transport INC v. ACE
Aviation Holdings et al, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3990, Caribe Air Cargo, INC v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3991, Leis By Ron, INC. v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3992, Sangean America v. Ace
Aviation Holdings, INC et al, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-4008, Funke Design Biuld, Inc. v.
AMR Corporation et al, Defendant, represented by Andrew Stanley
Marovitz, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP, Francis Anthony Citera,
Greenberg Traurig, LLP & James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US
LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-4009, R.I.M. Logistics, Ltd. v.
Scandinavian Airline Systems et al, Defendant, represented by
James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-4010, CID Marketing & Promotion
Inc. v. AMR Corporation et al, Defendant, represented by Daryl
Andrew Libow, Sullivan & Crimwell, James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP, James R. Warnot, Jr., Linklaters LLP, John
David Lovi, Steptoe & Johnson LLP,Michael Lyle, Weil Gotshal &
Manges LLP, Michael L. Martinez, Crowell & Moring LLP & Richard J.
Favretto, Mayer, Brown, Rowe and Maw LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3993, Alluvion Inc. v. ACE
Aviation Holdings., et al.,, Defendant, represented by James
Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Rachel Z. Stutz, Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3994, Ralph Olarte v. ACE Aviation
Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP & Daniel M. Cohen, Cueno Gilbert
& LaDuca, LLP.

One or more Defendants in Capogiro LLC v. ACE Aviation Holdings,
Inc., et al.,, Defendant, represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire
Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3996, Kenneth Y. Ibara, etc. v.
ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Defendant, represented by
James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3997, Floral Network LLC, etc. v.
ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Defendant, represented by
James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3998, Tropic Fish & Vegetable
Center, Inc. v. ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc., et al.,, Defendant,
represented by James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3999, Delinear, Inc. v. Deutsche
Lufthansa AG, et al.,, Defendant, represented by James Vernon
Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US LLP.

Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Defendant, represented by Christopher
William Carrion, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Rachel
Z. Stutz, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP & Robert Bell,
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

Lufthansa Cargo AG, Defendant, represented by Christopher William
Carrion, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Rachel Z. Stutz,
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP & Robert Bell, Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Defendant, represented by
Andrew H. Marks, Crowell and Moring, Christopher William Carrion,
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Rachel Z. Stutz, Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP & Robert Bell, Wilmer Cutler
Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

Air France, Defendant, represented by Brenda D. DiLuigi,
Linklaters LLP,Ivan Miguel Morales, Linklaters, James R. Warnot,
Jr., Linklaters LLP,Jeffery Paul Commission, Linklaters, Marc
Serge Lanoue, Linklaters LLP,Ruth E. Harlow, Linklaters & Thomas
A. McGrath, Linklaters LLP.

Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE Ltd., Defendant, represented by
Margaret M. Zwisler, Latham & Watkins LLP, Ashley M. Bauer, Latham
& Watkins,Catherine E. Palmer, Latham & Watkins LLP, Charles R.
Price, Latham & Watkins LLP, Jason D. Cruise, Latham & Watkins,
LLP & William R. Sherman, Latham & Watkins LLP.

Singapore Airlines, Ltd., Defendant, represented by Margaret M.
Zwisler, Latham & Watkins LLP, Ashley M. Bauer, Latham & Watkins,
Catherine E. Palmer, Latham & Watkins LLP, Charles R. Price,
Latham & Watkins LLP,Jason D. Cruise, Latham & Watkins, LLP &
William R. Sherman, Latham & Watkins LLP.

SAS AB dba SAS Cargo Group, Defendant, represented by George D.
Ruttinger, Crowell & Moring LLP.

SAS AB, Defendant, represented by George D. Ruttinger, Crowell &
Moring LLP.
SAS Cargo Group A/S, Defendant, represented by George D.
Ruttinger, Crowell & Moring LLP.

Cargolux Airlines International SA, Defendant, represented by
Stephen Fishbein, Shearman & Sterling LLP.

Korean Airlines Company Ltd., Defendant, represented by Jeremy P.
Evans, Paul Hastings.

One or More Defendants, Defendant, represented by David E.
Everson, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP & Patricia Konopka, Stinson
Morrison Hecker LLP.

Air China Limited, Defendant, represented by George N. Tompkins,
III, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, George N.
Tompkins, Jr., Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Ian
Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Margaret Elliott, Wilson Elser
Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes &
Thornburg LLP.

Air China Cargo Company Limited, Defendant, represented by George
N. Tompkins, Jr., Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP,
George N. Tompkins, III, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker
LLP, Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Margaret Elliott, Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes &
Thornburg LLP.

Airways Corporation of New Zealand Limited d/b/a Airways New
Zealand, Defendant, represented by Michael J. Holland, Condon &
Forsyth, LLP &Roderick D. Margo, Condon & Forsyth LLP.

Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane S.P.A., Defendant, represented by
Richard A. Walker, Kaplan, Massamillo, & Andrews, LLC.

Ethiopian Airlines Corporation, Defendant, represented by Michael
R. Atadika, ATADIKA & ATADIKA.

Martinair Holland N.V., Defendant, represented by Cory J.
Skolnick, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Daniel G. Swanson, Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP,David Jarrett Arp, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
& Reid J Allred, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Qantas Airways Limited, Defendant, represented by William T.
Miller, Baker & Miller PLLC & Alice Glass, Baker & Miller PLLC.

Thai Airways International Public Co Ltd, Defendant, represented
by Mark S. Priver, Ohashi & Priver, Rowan D. Wilson, Cravath,
Swaine & Moore & John E. Ohashi, Ohashi & Priver.

Polar Air Cargo, Inc., Defendant, represented by Harvey Wolkoff,
Ropes & Gray LLP, David A. Young, Ropes & Gray LLP & Gregory L.
Demers, Ropes & Gray LLP.

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Harvey Wolkoff, Ropes & Gray LLP, David A. Young, Ropes & Gray
LLP, Gregory L. Demers, Ropes & Gray LLP, Ian Simmons, O'Melveny &
Myers LLP & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes & Thornburg LLP.

Asiana Airlines, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin
Bradshaw, O'Melveny & Myers, Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP,
Kenneth R. O'Rourke, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Angela Wilks,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP,Courtney C. Byrd, O'Melveny & Myers LLP,
Julia Schiller, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Robert Ennis, O'Melveny &
Myers LLP, Scott Hammack, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Scott Schaeffer,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP & Stephen McIntyre, O'Melveny & Myers LLP.

All Nippon Airways Co Ltd., Defendant, represented by Alysia A.
Solow, Constantine Cannon LLP, Charles Simpson, Zuckert, Scoutt &
Rasenberger, LLP & Stephen S Anderson, Constantine Cannon LLP.

Nippon Cargo Airlines Co. Ltd., Defendant, represented by John R.
Fornaciari, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers
LLP &Robert J. Brookhiser, Baker & Hostetler LLP.

Thule, INC., Defendant, represented by Michael C. Spencer, Milberg
Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP..

Thule AB, Defendant, represented by Michael C. Spencer, Milberg
Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP..

One or more Defendants in 1:08-cv-42, Precision Associates, Inc et
al v. Panalpina World Transport Holding LTD, Defendant,
represented by Breon S. Peace, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
LLP, Ethan E. Litwin, Howrey LLP & Scott James Splittgerber,
Clifford Chance US LLP.

Air New Zealand Limited, Defendant, represented by Bradley R.
Love, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Kendall Millard, Barnes & Thornburg
LLP, Michael J. Holland, Condon & Forsyth, LLP, Ian Simmons,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP,Jean Cooper Rose, Condon & Forsyth, LLP,
Jerry L. Beane, Andrews Kurth LLP, Leasa Woods Anderson, Barnes &
Thornburg LLP, Lynne M. Fischman Uniman, Andrews & Kurth L.L.P,
Meena T. Sinfelt, Barnes & Thornburg LLP,Roscoe C Howard, Barnes &
Thornburg LLP & Sheron Korpus, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman
LLP.

Korean Airlines Co., Ltd., Defendant, represented by Barry G.
Sher, Paul Hastings LLP, Jeremy P. Evans, Paul Hastings, John
Clayton Everett, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Kevin C. Logue, Paul
Hastings LLP, William Albert Novomisle, Paul Hastings LLP, Ian
Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP & Kevin C. McCann, Paul Hastings
Janofsky & Walker LLP.

Korean Airlines Co., Ltd, Defendant, represented by Barry G. Sher,
Paul Hastings LLP, Jeremy P. Evans, Paul Hastings & Kevin C.
Logue, Paul Hastings LLP.

Eurotrendz, Defendant, represented by Joseph Gentile, Sarraf
Gentile LLP.

Bruce McCaffrey, Defendant, represented by William T. Miller,
Baker & Miller PLLC.

China Airlines, LTD., Defendant, represented by Ian Simmons,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP & James Vernon Dick, Squire Patton Boggs US
LLP.

Eva Airways Corporation, Defendant, represented by James Howard
Mutchnik, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers
LLP,Jason Y. Kelly, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Mark F. Schottinger,
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Tammy Ann Tsoumas, Kirkland & Ellis LLP &
David Ian Horowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

Jean Charles Foucault, Defendant, represented by Martin
Flumenbaum, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison & Roberto
Finzi, Paul, Weiss,Rifkind Wharton & Garrison.

Bram Graber, Defendant, represented by Michael D. Schissel, Arnold
& Porter LLP.

Malaysian Airline System Bhd, Defendant, represented by Ann-
Kathryn R. Tria, McBreen & Senior, David A. Senior, McBreen &
Senior & Matthew Weston, McBreen & Senior.

Volvo Logistics AB, Defendant, represented by Austin B. Cohen,
Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Brent W. Landau, Hausfeld LLP,
Charles Sweedler, Levin Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Daniel M.
Cohen, Cueno Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP, Thomas Bright, Gold Bennett
Cera & Sidener LLP, Todd E. Palmer, Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C. &
William P. Butterfield, Hausfeld LLP.

Air India, Defendant, represented by E. Christopher Murray, Ruskin
Moscou Faltischek, P.C., Gregory Jared Kowalsky, Ruskin Moscou
Faltischek, P.C.,Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Jennifer
Leigh Hartmann, Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., Natasha A
Moskvina, Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes
& Thornburg LLP.

Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., Defendant, represented by Gregory
L. Demers, Ropes & Gray LLP, Harvey Wolkoff, Ropes & Gray LLP, Ian
Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers LLP & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes &
Thornburg LLP.

Polar Air Cargo, LLC, Defendant, represented by David A. Young,
Ropes & Gray LLP, Harvey Wolkoff, Ropes & Gray LLP, Ian Simmons,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP & Roscoe C Howard, Barnes & Thornburg LLP.

Panalpina Inc., Interested Party, represented by Kenneth I.
Schacter, Bingham McCutchen LLP.

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Interested Party, represented by
Nicole Isobel Hyland, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz.

US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, US Department of
Justice, Antitrust Division 450 5th Street, NW Suite 11300
Washington, DC 20530 202-616-2371, Intervenor, represented by
William M Martin, Department of Justice & Jason D. Jones,
Department of Justice.

Brickman Concerts Inc., Objector, represented by John Jacob Pentz,
III, John J. Pentz, Esq..

I.O.D. Group LLC, Objector, represented by John Jacob Pentz, III,
John J. Pentz, Esq..


MDL 2179: B3 Claims v. Clean-Up Responders Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned IN RE: OIL SPILL by the OIL RIG "DEEPWATER
HORIZON" in the GULF OF MEXICO, on APRIL 20, 2010, SECTION: J.
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL CASES IN PLEADING BUNDLE B3, MDL No.
2179 (E.D. La.), Judge Carl J. Barbier ordered that all B3 claims
against the Clean-Up Responder defendants are dismissed with
prejudice, whether be joinder in the B3 Master Complaint,
individual complaint, or otherwise, with the exception of the
claims asserted by the 11 plaintiffs listed on section E of
Exhibit 2 of the Joint Report.

A "B3" Master Complaint was filed by the plaintiffs' Steering
Committee which concerns claims relating to post-explosion clean-
up efforts, including personal injury and/or medical monitoring
claims for exposure or other injury occurring after the explosion
and fire that occurred on the Deepwater Horizon rig on April 20,
2010.

Various Clean-Up Responder defendants moved for summary judgment,
seeking dismissal with prejudice and arguing, among other things,
that they were entitled to derivative immunity under the Clean
Water Act ("CWA") and because the claims conflict with the
comprehensive federal response schemes set forth in the CWA, the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990, and the National Contingency Plan
("NCP").

Addressing the motions for summary judgment, Judge Barbier stated
that the Clean-Up Responder defendants would be entitled to
derivative immunity for the actions that are subject of the B3
Master Complaint if they acted pursuant to the direction of the
federal government during the Deepwater Horizon response.

On July 17, 2014, the judge issued Pretrial Order No. 57 ("PTO
57"), formally establishing the B3 protocol, to give the
plaintiffs the opportunity to come forward with specific evidence,
should they have any, demonstrating that the actions of the Clean-
Up Responder defendants were not performed "pursuant to the
authorization, direction, and ultimate control of the federal
government."  The plaintiffs were provided with sufficient time to
submit the requisite disclosures.  A total of 102 questionnaires
were received in connection with PTO 57.

Judge Barbier dismissed with prejudice the claims of the
plaintiffs who did not submit a questionnaire, or who have
submitted "blank" or "incomplete" questionnaires, and thus
indicating that they do not have any specific information or
evidence that would raise a genuine issue of material fact
material to the pending motions for summary judgment.

Judge Barbier also held that the plaintiffs who submitted
disclosure pursuant to PTO 57 but did not opt out of the
previously approved Medical Benefits Settlement are barred from
pursuing their B3 claims, and as such, their claims were also
dismissed with prejudice.

Judge Barbier reserved judgment in connection with 11 plaintiffs
who have provided a timely written response to all of the
questions posed in the questionnaire.

A full-text copy of Judge Barbier's February 16, 2016 order and
reasons is available at http://is.gd/5USLvMfrom Leagle.com.

Plaintiff, Plaintiff, represented by James P. Roy --
jimr@wrightroy.com -- Domengeaux, Wright, Roy & Edwards & Stephen
J. Herman -- sherman@hhklawfirm.com -- Herman, Herman, Katz &
Cotlar, LLP.

Marine Spill Response Corporation, Defendant, represented by Alan
Mark Weigel -- aweigel@blankrome.com -- Blank Rome LLP.

Airborne Support, Inc., Airborne Support International Inc,
Defendants, represented by Francis Xavier Neuner, Jr. --
fneuner@neunerpate.com -- NeunerPate, Ben Louis Mayeaux --
bmayeaux@neunerpate.com -- NeunerPate & Jed M. Mestayer --
jmestayer@neunerpate.com -- NeunerPate.

Dynamic Aviation Group Inc, Defendant, represented by Leo Raymond
McAloon, III -- lmcaloon@glllaw.com -- Gieger, Laborde &
Laperouse, LLC & Michael D. Cangelosi -- mcangelosi@glllaw.com --
Gieger, Laborde & Laperouse, LLC.

International Air Response Inc, Defendant, represented by Kevin
Richard Tully -- krtully@christovich.com -- Christovich & Kearney,
LLP & Howard Carter Marshall -- hcmarshall@christovich.com --
Christovich & Kearney, LLP.

Lane Aviation, Defendant, represented by George Edmond Crow --
george@aerolaw.com -- Law Office of George E. Crow.

National Response Corporation, Defendant, represented by Michael
J. Lyle, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Eric C. Lyttle,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Patrick Edward O'Keefe,
Montgomery Barnett, Philip S. Brooks, Jr., Montgomery Barnett &
Sylvia E. Simson, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.

DRC Emergency Services, LLC, Defendant, represented by Harold J.
Flanagan, Flanagan Partners, LLP, Andy Joseph Dupre, Flanagan
Partners, LLP, Sean Patrick Brady, Flanagan Partners, LLP &
Stephen M. Pesce, Chevron USA, Inc..

Lynden Inc., Defendant, represented by Howard Carter Marshall,
Christovich & Kearney, LLP & Kevin Richard Tully, Christovich &
Kearney, LLP.

Tiger Rentals Ltd., Modern Group GP-SUB Inc., Modern Group Ltd.,
Defendants, represented by John Emerson Galloway, Galloway,
Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith & Cherrell Simms Taplin, City
Attorney's Office.

Defendant, Defendant, represented by David J. Beck, Beck, Redden &
Secrest, LLP, Deborah DeRoche Kuchler, Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner
& Richeson, LLC, Don Keller Haycraft, Liskow & Lewis, Donald E.
Godwin, Godwin Lewis PC, J. Andrew Langan, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP,
Kerry J. Miller, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, Ky
E. Kirby, Bingham McCutchen, LLP,Michael J. Lyle, Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Phillip A. Wittmann, Stone, Pigman,
Walther, Wittmann, LLC.

O'Brien's Response Management L.L.C., Defendant, represented by
Michael J. Lyle, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Eric C.
Lyttle, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Patrick Edward
O'Keefe, Montgomery Barnett, Philip S. Brooks, Jr., Montgomery
Barnett & Sylvia E. Simson, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
LLP.

Federal Government Interests, Interested Party, represented by R
Michael Underhill, U. S. Department of Justice.

State Interests, Interested Party, represented by Luther J
Strange, III, Attorney General's Office.

Lynn C Greer, Interested Party, represented by Lynn C Greer,
BrownGreer PLC.


MDL 2591: Parties Directed to Name Special Master by March 11
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thousands of lawsuits have been filed in various federal and state
courts arising from Syngenta's development and sale of corn seeds
containing genetically modified traits known as MIR 162 and Event
5307 (used in products called Viptera and Duracade) before China's
approval to import corn with that trait.  Some 800 federal cases
are pending in a multidistrict litigation proceeding in the United
States District Court for the District of Kansas, captioned In re
Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2591, before
U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum and U.S. Magistrate Judge
James P. O'Hara.  Lead counsel in those cases seek to certify a
national class action which would include virtually every corn
farmer in America.

Three additional federal actions, involving more than 2,800
plaintiffs, are pending in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Illinois before U.S. District Judge David
R. Herndon. Approximately 2,375 cases, involving over 20,000
plaintiffs, are pending in the Fourth Judicial District of
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and consolidated before Judge Thomas
M. Sipkins in a case captioned In re Syngenta Litigation, No. 27-
cv-15-3785. In addition, about 200 cases are pending in the
Illinois First Judicial Circuit Court before Judge Brad K. Bleyer.

With counsel having been informed in advance, the presiding judges
in these cases have conferred informally and determined that it
would be beneficial to appoint a Special Master at the expense of
the parties to vigorously and systematically explore settlement of
all the cases in all of the courts in which they are pending at
the same time those cases proceed toward trial on a traditional
litigation track.  Accordingly, by March 11, 2016, counsel for all
parties in these cases are ordered to confer in good faith and
then provide input to the Courts on appointment of a single
Special Master.  If all of the parties cannot agree on a proposed
Special Master, then for each of the Courts up to three
nominations may be provided by plaintiffs as a group, up to three
nominations may be submitted by all of the Syngenta defendants as
a group, and ADM and Cargill (who are uniquely situated) may make
one joint nomination. All nominations must include a statement of
the candidate's experience, qualifications, and billing rates.
Thereafter, the Courts will decide upon appointment of the Special
Master.

The Order dated Feb. 25 was signed by District Judge David R.
Herndon.  A copy of that Order is available at http://is.gd/HjiwGx
from Leagle.com.

The case is, IN RE SYNGENTA MASS TORT ACTIONS, No. 3:15-cv-01374-
DRH (S.D. Ill.).  The Order Relates to Poletti et al. v. Syngenta
AG et al. 01221-DRH Brase Farms, Inc. et al. v. Syngenta AG et al.
No. 3:15-cv-01374-DRH Wiemers Farms, Inc. et al v. Syngenta AG et
al. No. 3:15-cv-01379-DRH

Plaintiffs Brase Farms, Inc., et al., are represented in the case
by:

     James G. Onder, Esq.
     Michael J. Quillin, Esq.
     William W. Blair, Esq.
     Onder, Shelton, O'Leary & Peterson, LLC
     110 E. Lockwood Ave
     St. Louis, MO 63119
     Tel: 314-963-9000
          1-800-RX-WATCH
     E-mail: onder@onderlaw.com
             quillin@onderlaw.com
             blair@onderlaw.com

          - and -

     Christopher B. Hood, Esq.
     W. Lewis Garrison, Jr., Esq.
     William L. Bross, Esq.
     Heninger, Garrison & Davis, LLC
     2224 1st Avenue North
     Birmingham, Alabama 35203
     Tel: (205) 326-3336
     Fax: (205)-326-3332
     E-mail: chood@hgdlawfirm.com
             wlgarrison@hgdlawfirm.com
             wlbross@hgdlawfirm.com

Syngenta AG, Defendant, represented by Syngenta AG, PRO SE; and
Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Defendant, represented by Syngenta
Crop Protection AG, PRO SE.

Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta
Biotechnology, Inc., and Syngenta Seeds, Inc., represented by:

     Edwin John U, Esq.
     Michael D. Jones, Esq.
     Patrick F. Philbin, Esq.
     Ragan Naresh, Esq.
     Kirkland & Ellis LLP
     655 Fifteenth Street, N.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20005-5793
     E-mail: edwin.u@kirkland.com
             michael.jones@kirkland.com
             patrick.philbin@kirkland.com
             ragan.naresh@kirkland.com

          - and -

     Jordan Heinz, Esq.
     Kirkland & Ellis LLP
     300 North LaSalle
     Chicago, IL 60654
     E-mail: jordan.heinz@kirkland.com

          - and -

     Michael J. Nester, Esq.
     Donovan Rose Nester PC
     Address: 201 S Illinois St
     Belleville, IL 62220
     Tel: 618-212-6500


MDL 2657: "Martinez" Suit vs. GSK Consolidated in Boston
--------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Martinez v. DiMaria et al., Case
No. 1:15-cv-02811, was transferred from the U.S. District Court
for the District of Colorado, to the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts (Boston). The District Court Clerk
assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-10060-FDS to the proceeding.

According to the complaint, this suit arose due to Defendants'
alleged failure to provide accurate disclosures of all material
information before Plaintiff and her providers transacted to use
GSK's Zofran product.

Zofran is a powerful drug developed by GSK to treat only those
patients who were afflicted with the most severe nausea imaginable
-- that suffered as a result of chemotherapy or radiation
treatments in cancer patients.

GlaxoSmithKline is a Delaware corporation, and is based in
Wilmington, Delaware. The company, through its division Cerenex
Pharmaceuticals, authored original package insert and labeling for
Zofran, including warnings and precautions attendant to its use.

The Martinez case is being consolidated with MDL 2657 in re:
Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation. The MDL was
created by Order of the United States Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation on November 13, 2015. It consists of
factual questions arising from allegations that Zofran and its
generic equivalent, a prescription medication for the treatment of
nausea, causes birth defects in children when their mothers ingest
the drug while pregnant. In its November 13, 2015 Order, the MDL
Panel found that the actions in this litigation involve common
questions of fact, and that centralization in the District of
Massachusetts will serve the convenience of the parties and
witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the
litigation. Presiding Judge in the MDL is Hon. F. Dennis Saylor
IV, United States District Judge. The lead case is Lead case:
1:15-md-02657-FDS.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Julia T. Thompson, Esq.
          SCHOENWALD & THOMPSON, LLC
          8300 Sheridan Blvd., Apt 25A
          Westminster, CO 80033

The Defendant is represented by:

          Richard L. Murray Jr., Esq.
          HALL & EVANS, LLC-DENVER
          1001 17th Street, Suite 300
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (303) 628 3300
          Facsimile: (303) 628 3368
          E-mail: murrayr@hallevans.com

               - and -

          Daniel E. Rohner, Esq.
          MOYE, GILES, O'KEEFE, VERMEIRE & GORRELL, LLP
          1225 Seventeenth Street, 29th Floor
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (303) 292-2900


MDL 2672: N.D. Cal. Judge Enters Discovery Schedule
---------------------------------------------------
District Judge Charles R. Breyer on Feb. 25 issued a series of
pretrial orders in the case, IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL
No. 2672 CRB (JSC)(N.D. Cal.), including PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 9:
Discovery Schedule, a copy of which is available at
http://is.gd/6bSvfdfrom Leagle.com.

The MDL proceeding relates to more than 600 actions which have
been filed in (or removed to) federal court against Volkswagen
Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, Audi of America,
Inc., Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Porsche
Leasing LTD, Porsche Financial Services, Inc., and affiliated
entities.  The actions concern 2.0 and 3.0 liter diesel engines
that allegedly are out of compliance with federal, state and/or
local statutes and emissions regulations, including the federal
Clean Air Act. These cases were centralized in this district as In
re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and
Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672.

A separate MDL was initially created entitled In re: Porsche
"Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No. 2683. However, all of the cases within MDL No.
2683 have since been transferred to this MDL Proceeding, and MDL
No. 2683 has been closed.

Pretrial Order No. 9 provides that:

     -- Defendants Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC,
Audi AG, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG, and Porsche Cars North
America, Inc. shall answer, move to dismiss or otherwise respond
to the United States' January 4, 2016 complaint on or before April
15, 2016.

     -- Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, Volkswagen Liaison Counsel and
Porsche Liaison Counsel shall meet and confer regarding a schedule
for responding to the Master Consolidated Complaint(s) (MCC)
following the filing and review of the MCC.

The Order also directs the Defendants, the United States, and the
plaintiffs named in the MCC to exchange initial disclosures under
Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 26 on or before April 6, 2016.  By May 9, 2016,
the parties will meet and confer regarding joint stipulations of
fact.

The Order also sets deadlines for document productions and written
discovery requests.


MDL 2672: Court Sets Protocol for Common Benefit Work & Expenses
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Charles R. Breyer on Feb. 25 issued a series of
pretrial orders in the case, IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL
No. 2672 CRB (JSC)(N.D. Cal.), including PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 11:
PROTOCOL FOR COMMON BENEFIT WORK AND EXPENSES, a copy of which is
available at http://is.gd/c6f1P6from Leagle.com.

The MDL proceeding relates to more than 600 actions which have
been filed in (or removed to) federal court against Volkswagen
Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, Audi of America,
Inc., Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Porsche
Leasing LTD, Porsche Financial Services, Inc., and affiliated
entities.  The actions concern 2.0 and 3.0 liter diesel engines
that allegedly are out of compliance with federal, state and/or
local statutes and emissions regulations, including the federal
Clean Air Act. These cases were centralized in this district as In
re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and
Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672.

A separate MDL was initially created entitled In re: Porsche
"Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No. 2683. However, all of the cases within MDL No.
2683 have since been transferred to this MDL Proceeding, and MDL
No. 2683 has been closed.

Through Pretrial Order No. 11, the Court adopts guidelines for the
management of case-staffing, timekeeping, cost reimbursement, and
related common benefit issues. The recovery of common benefit
attorneys' fees and cost reimbursements will be limited to
"Participating Counsel." "Participating Counsel" shall be defined
as Lead Counsel and members of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
(along with members and staff of their respective firms), any
other counsel authorized by Lead Counsel to perform work that may
be considered for common benefit compensation, and/or counsel who
have been specifically approved by this Court as Participating
Counsel prior to incurring any such cost or expense.

"Common Benefit Work" includes all work done and expenses incurred
that inure to the common benefit of Plaintiffs in this MDL.

Pretrial Order No. 11 outlines compensable and noncompensable
work.  It also sets protocols for submission of time and expenses.


MDL 2672: Court Sets Protocol for Handling Classified Info
----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Charles R. Breyer on Feb. 25 issued a series of
pretrial orders in the case, IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL
No. 2672 CRB (JSC)(N.D. Cal.), including PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 12:
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, a copy of which is available at
http://is.gd/1DycZofrom Leagle.com.

The MDL proceeding relates to more than 600 actions which have
been filed in (or removed to) federal court against Volkswagen
Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, Audi of America,
Inc., Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Porsche
Leasing LTD, Porsche Financial Services, Inc., and affiliated
entities.  The actions concern 2.0 and 3.0 liter diesel engines
that allegedly are out of compliance with federal, state and/or
local statutes and emissions regulations, including the federal
Clean Air Act. These cases were centralized in this district as In
re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and
Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672.

A separate MDL was initially created entitled In re: Porsche
"Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No. 2683. However, all of the cases within MDL No.
2683 have since been transferred to this MDL Proceeding, and MDL
No. 2683 has been closed.

Disclosure and discovery activity in this Action are likely to
involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private
information for which special protection from public disclosure
and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this Action
may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate to and
petition the Court to enter a Stipulated Protective Order.

The purpose of Pretrial Order No. 12 is to facilitate the
production of discovery material, facilitate the prompt resolution
of disputes over confidentiality and privilege, protect material
to be kept confidential and/or privileged, and ensure that
protection is afforded only to material entitled to such
treatment, pursuant to the Court's inherent authority, its
authority under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26, the judicial opinions
interpreting such Rules, and any other applicable law.  Pretrial
Order No. 12 provides that a Party may produce, in response to a
valid discovery request, otherwise discoverable information in its
possession, custody or control that is Confidential or Highly
Confidential, and that information will be handled in accordance
with the procedures set forth in the Order.


MDL 2672: Order on Coordination with State Court Cases Entered
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Charles R. Breyer on Feb. 25 issued a series of
pretrial orders in the case, IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL
No. 2672 CRB (JSC)(N.D. Cal.), including PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 13:
Coordination Order, a copy of which is available at
http://is.gd/j0Y8dMfrom Leagle.com.

Pretrial Order No. 13 relates to ALL ACTIONS (except securities
fraud cases).

The MDL proceeding relates to more than 600 actions which have
been filed in (or removed to) federal court against Volkswagen
Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, Audi of America,
Inc., Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Porsche
Leasing LTD, Porsche Financial Services, Inc., and affiliated
entities.  The actions concern 2.0 and 3.0 liter diesel engines
that allegedly are out of compliance with federal, state and/or
local statutes and emissions regulations, including the federal
Clean Air Act. These cases were centralized in this district as In
re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and
Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672.

A separate MDL was initially created entitled In re: Porsche
"Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No. 2683. However, all of the cases within MDL No.
2683 have since been transferred to this MDL Proceeding, and MDL
No. 2683 has been closed.

Numerous similar Clean Diesel Cases, involving the same types of
claims against the same defendants based upon purchases or leases
of the same vehicles, are also pending in various state courts
throughout the country.  The filing of the federal and state court
cases began around the same time, starting in September of 2015.
The pendency of these cases is likely to expend significant
resources of many state courts and result in unnecessary
duplication of effort, subjection of parties and non-parties to
multiple proceedings, and inconsistent obligations with respect to
the same subject matter.

As the Manual for Complex Litigation notes, "[s]tate and federal
judges, faced with the lack of a comprehensive statutory scheme,
have undertaken innovative efforts to coordinate parallel or
related litigation." MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION (FOURTH) Sec.
20.31 (2015). This Court's goal is to engage in a cooperative
effort to coordinate, to the extent practicable, parallel and
overlapping proceedings in the federal and state cases, in order
to reduce costs and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.

To that end, Order No. 13 sets forth procedures that will apply in
the federal MDL Proceeding in order to facilitate, to the maximum
extent possible, coordination with parallel State Court "Clean
Diesel" cases. This order applies to all cases that are today or
in the future become part of the MDL Proceeding, and it binds all
parties and their counsel in all such cases, including all
attorneys appointed by this Court to leadership positions in the
MDL Proceeding, except for the United States and the Government
Coordinating Counsel.

The Order is not intended to prescribe how parallel State Court
"Clean Diesel" cases should proceed, because this Court has no
desire to do so and, in any event, lacks the authority to do so.
However, the Court strongly believes that coordination of
discovery and scheduling will promote judicial economy, and
welcomes the opportunity to communicate with any state court about
issues of common interest, including coordination of the
proceedings and discovery, in similar "Clean Diesel" cases.

Among others, Order No. 13 directs Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel,
following consultation with the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, to
nominate, within 7 days of the entry of this Order, an attorney to
act as Plaintiffs' State Court Liaison Counsel. Membership on
Plaintiffs' Steering Committee is a preferred qualification for
service as Plaintiffs' State Court Liaison Counsel.  The Order
sets forth the responsibilities of the parties' State Court
Liaison Counsel.  The State Court Liaison Counsel for private
plaintiffs and defendants shall reasonably seek to coordinate
discovery in the MDL Proceeding with discovery in the State Court
"Clean Diesel" cases, in order to enhance efficiency and avoid
undue duplication of effort and unwarranted expense.


MEKRUTH INC: Violates N.Y. Minimum Wage Act, "Seeley" Suit Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
Tashel Seeley Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. Mekruth Inc., Case No: 150686 (N.Y.Sup., January 27,
2016), was filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and a class of other
similarly situated current and former hourly employees who worked
for Defendant: 1) in its restaurant; and 2) and worked a spread of
hours of more than ten (10) hours in a day; that she and they are
allegedly entitled to an extra hour of pay for each such day
pursuant to New York Minimum Wage Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Abdul K. Hassan, Esq.
     ABDUL HASSAN LAW GROUP, PLLC,
     215-28 Hillside Avenue
     Queens Village, NY 11427
     Tel: 718-740-1000
     Fax: 718-740-2000
     E-mail: abdul@abdulhassan.com


MERCEDES-BENZ USA: Court Rules on Bids to Dismiss "Ferrari" Suit
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted in part and denied
in part with leave to amend, the motions to dismiss the case
captioned STEVE FERRARI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA,
LLC, et al., Defendants, Case No. 15-CV-4379 YGR (N.D. Cal.).

A putative class action was brought against Autobahn, Inc., David
Ahlheim, and Sonic Automotive Inc. (collectively, "Autobahn"), and
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ("MBUSA"), alleging claims for: (1)
violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 1961 et seq., the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"); California
Business & Professions Code section 17500, the False Advertising
Law ("FAL"); intentional misrepresentation; fraudulent
concealment; negligent misrepresentation; violation of California
Business & Professions Code section 17200, the Unfair Competition
Law ("UCL"); and negligence.  Autobahn and MBUSA separately filed
their motions to dismiss.

Judge Rogers found that the plaintiffs failed to state the
required elements of a RICO claim against both the Autobahn
defendants and MBUSA.  Further, the judge also found that the
plaintiffs have likewise failed to allege the state law claims
against MBUSA.  Moreover, while the plaintiffs have set forth
minimally sufficient allegations on their state law claims against
Autobahn, Judge Rogers encouraged the plaintiffs to amend their
claims against these defendants as well, to eliminate redundant or
wholly conclusory allegations and to streamline the pleading so
that it states the claims with precision and economy, eliminating
extraneous or irrelevant allegations.

A full-text copy of Judge Rogers' February 18, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/izMk8ffrom Leagle.com.

Steve Ferrari, Mike Keynejad, Hooshang Jowza, Celseo Frazao,
Renuka NARAYAN, Gertrud FRANKRONE, Ernest Salinas, Kalkhusan
Sareen, Hossein Jalali, Ron Wolfe, Sohrab Rahimzadeh, Fred Grant,
Ester Grant, Vincent Leung, Ken Wong, Jessica Langridge, Tony
Nicolosi, Donald Lyang, Artur Semichev, Plaintiffs, represented by
Herman Franck, Franck and Associates.

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Defendant, represented by Robert B. Hawk
-- robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan Lovells US LLP.

AUTOBAHN, INC., David Ahlheim, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC., Defendants,
represented by Bruce Grant Nye -- bnye@adamsnye.com -- Adams Nye
Becht LLP & Georges A. Haddad -- ghaddad@adamsnye.com -- Adams Nye
Becht LLP.


MONTREAL INSTITUTE: Settles Sexual Abuse Class Action for $21.6MM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Francois Gloutnay, writing for Catholic News Service, reports that
about 150 former pupils and boarders of the former Montreal
Institute for the Deaf who were sexually abused between 1940 and
1982 will share US $21.6 million after their class action was
settled.

The record amount includes $14.4 million the Clerics of St.
Viateur, whose members worked at the institute, agreed to pay in
November.

A second settlement, totaling $7.2 million, was reached Feb. 10
with the Raymond-Dewar Institute, the name for the Montreal
Institute for the Deaf as of 1984.

Superior Court Judge Eva Petras approved the settlements in mid-
February and asked attorney Andre Forget, a former judge at
Quebec's Court of Appeal, to review the victims' claims.  Forget
was the court's assessor during other class actions against the
Brothers of the Holy Cross and the Redemptorists that were settled
in recent years.

The settlement is "by far the most important sum ever paid in
Quebec for sex abuse against minors," said a statement released by
Kugler Kandestin, the law firm representing the victims.

Officials with the Clerics of St. Viateur, known as the
Viatorians, declined comment on the settlements.  The order also
refused to disclose the canonical status of congregation members
named in the lawsuit.

In November, Fr. Nestor Fils-Aime, the order's superior, said his
congregation would "have to submit itself to stringent financial
sacrifices to pay the agreed sums."

Meanwhile, the order released the 2014 update of its 28-page
policy regarding sexual misconduct within the community.

The lawsuit first filed in 2012 included the names of 27 priests
and brothers of the congregation.  A seven-page table inserted
into the court record associated the initials of the victims with
the names of the 24 brothers and three priests accused of sexually
abusing the minors. One of the priests named was identified by 24
victims.


NATIXIS FUNDING: Settles Bid-Rigging Class Action for $30MM
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jack Casey, writing for The Bond Buyer, reports that six broker-
dealers and investment providers have agreed to pay $103.35
million in preliminary settlements of charges by issuers and state
attorneys general that they engaged in bid-rigging and price
fixing for municipal investment products and derivatives.

The proposed money to be paid is a result of a coordinated effort
by 22 attorneys general along with the city of Baltimore and the
Central Bucks School District in Pennsylvania, which are leaders
of a class action suit with numerous issuers.  The litigation has
been ongoing since about 2008.

About $100.5 million of the preliminary settlement amounts come
from the issuer class action litigation and includes all six
firms.  The rest comes from preliminary settlements with the
attorneys general and only concerns two firms, New York-based
Natixis Funding Corp. and French multinational company Societe
Generale.

Of the six proposed settlements, UBS AG agreed to pay the most --
$32 million in the class action litigation.  Natixis and Societe
Generale agreed to pay about $30 million and $26.75 million,
respectively, with $28.45 million and $25.41 million of those
amounts, resulting from the class action litigation.

The remaining three firms involved in only the class action
litigation are Minneapolis-based Piper Jaffray & Co., which would
pay $9.75 million, London-based National Westminster Bank, which
would pay $3.5 million, and Kansas City, Mo-based George K. Baum &
Co., which would pay $1.4 million.

The proposed class action settlements are subject to preliminary
approval by Judge Victor Marrero, who sits on the U. S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan.  The
documents will then be circulated among the issuers in the class
action suit to gather their comments.  If, after receiving
comments from the class participants, Judge Marrero gives final
approval to the six settlements, it will bring an end to more than
eight years of litigation that began when a large number of
issuers filed actions that were then consolidated with several
lead plaintiffs in the New York district court.

Lawyers for the issuers either could not be reached for comment or
declined to comment.

However, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who
announced the attorneys general portion of the settlement, said
the attorneys general "will not tolerate this type of misconduct
at any level, especially as [they] work to restore public faith in
[their] economic institutions."  He added that he will continue to
hold responsible any firms at fault to ensure that the marketplace
operates honestly and fairly.

The preliminary settlements follow others in the same class action
litigation under which five firms paid a total of $125 million.
JPMorgan Chase paid $44.58 million, the most of the firms in these
five prior settlements.  The other four firms that previously
settled include Morgan Stanley, GE Funding Capital Market Services
Inc., Bank of America, and Wachovia Bank, which is now Wells Fargo
& Co.

The probes of bid rigging and price fixing involving guaranteed
investment contracts and other investments of muni bond proceeds
began in November 2006 and involved the U.S. Department of
Justice's antitrust division, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
the Internal Revenue Service's criminal division, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

In the middle of that month, the U.S. Marshalls, helping with the
investigations, raided the offices of at least two GIC brokers,
CDR Financial Products, in Beverly Hills, Calif., and Investment
Management Advisory Group, Inc., in Pottstown, Pa.

After that several broker-dealers and muni investment providers,
as well as their employees, began receiving subpoenas requesting
documents and other information.

Eventually, the attorneys general joined the probes and lawyers in
private practice filed class action suits on behalf of issuers.

Municipalities, school districts, and nonprofit organizations that
issue munis often reinvest their proceeds or work with firms to
enter into contracts to hedge interest rate risk.  The
investigations uncovered anticompetitive and fraudulent conduct
involving individuals at a number of large financial institutions
with municipal securities business.  The federal agencies found
that broker-dealers and investment product providers rigged the
bidding process for those products so that issuers did not
necessarily get the best prices for them.

The investigations led to numerous lawsuits and enforcement
actions by the issuers, attorneys general, and federal regulators
against the firms and individuals.  Bank of America, UBS,
JPMorgan, Wachovia, and GE previously agreed to pay a total of
more than $740 million as a result of Justice Department
investigations, according to documents.

Additionally, at least 17 individuals associated with the broker-
dealers and investment providers were either convicted or pleaded
guilty as a result of the DOJ investigations, the records show.


NCL CORP: Faces "Crankshaw" Suit for Alleged FLSA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------
HILDE CRANKSHAW, on behalf of herself and others similarly
situated, v. NCL CORPORATION LTD., a Foreign Corporation, NCL
(BAHAMAS) LTD., a Bermuda Company, PRESTIGE CRUISE SERVICES LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company, PRESTIGE CRUISE HOLDINGS,
INC., a Foreign Corporation, and PRESTIGE CRUISES INTERNATIONAL,
INC., a Foreign Corporation, Case 1:16-cv-20415-DPG (S.D. Fla.,
February 4, 2016), was filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and other
current and former employees of Defendants similarly situated as
"Personal Vacation Consultants," a/k/a Sales Representatives,
however variously titled, for overtime compensation and other
relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants have owned and/or operated a business specializing
in the sale and provision of cruise services with call centers at
multiple locations including but not necessarily limited to in
Miami and Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Keith M. Stern, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF KEITH M. STERN, P.A.
     2300 Glades Road, Suite 360W
     Boca Raton, FL 33431
     Tel: (561) 299-3703
     Fax: (561) 288-9031
     E-mail: employlaw@keithstern.com

        - and -

     Robert S. Norell, Esq.
     ROBERT S. NORELL, P.A.
     300 N.W. 70th Avenue, Suite 305
     Plantation, FL 33317
     Tel: (954) 617-6017
     Fax: (954) 617-6018
     E-mail: rob@floridawagelaw.com


NEW AGE DENTAL: "Yadegar" Suit Alleges Conspiracy to Fix Prices
---------------------------------------------------------------
NAGHMEH YADEGAR, D.D.S., INC. d/b/a NEW AGE DENTAL on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated, v. PATTERSON COMPANIES,
INC., HENRY SCHEIN, INC., and BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY, Case
1:16-cv-00591 (E.D.N.Y., February 4, 2016), arises from an alleged
antitrust conspiracy among Defendants to eliminate competition and
to raise, fix, stabilize or maintain prices for dental supplies
and dental equipment sold to customers in the U.S.

The Defendants sell dental supplies and equipment to dentists,
including sales to dentists in the Eastern District of New York.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Robert N. Kaplan, Esq.
     Richard J. Kilsheimer, Esq.
     Jason Uris, Esq.
     KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
     850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 687-1980
     Fax: (212) 687-7714
     E-mail: rkaplan@kaplanfox.com
             rkilsheimer@kaplanfox.com
             juris@kaplanfox.com


NEWELL RUBBERMAID: "Hirsch" Suit Seeks to Halt Jarden Acquisition
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vincent A. Hirsch, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. James E. Lillie, Martin E.
Franklin, Ian G.H. Ashken, Michael S. Gross. Robert L. Wood, Irwin
D. Simon, William P. Lauder, Ros L'Esperance, Peter A. Hochfelder,
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., NCPF Acquisition Corp. I and NCPF
Acquisition Corp. II, Defendants, Case No. 9:16-cv-80258-KLR (S.D.
Fla., February 24, 2016), wants to prevent the consummation of
Newell's proposed acquisition of Jarden Corporation.

The lawsuit says the Proxy statement misrepresents and/or omits
material information necessary for Jarden stockholders to make an
informed decision whether to vote in favor of the Proposed
Acquisition.

Non-Defendant Jarden is a Delaware corporation with principal
executive offices located at 1800 North Military Trail, Boca
Raton, Florida. The Company operates in three primary business
segments: Branded Consumables, Consumer Solutions and Outdoor
Solution.

Defendant James E. Lilie ("Lillie") is Jarden's Chief Executive
Officer since June 2011 and a director since 2011. Lilie secured
for Mariposa Capital, LLC ("Mariposa Capital") company he
controls, an advisory agreement with Newell following the close of
the Proposed Acquisition.

Defendant Franklin is Jarden's Executive Chairman of the Board
since June 2011 and director since June 2011. Franklin secured for
Mariposa Capital, a company he controls, an advisory agreement
with Newell and he will join the board of directors of the
Combined Company following the close of the Proposed Acquisition.

Defendant Ian G.H. Ashken ("Ashken") is Jarden's Vice Chairman of
the Board since September 2001; President since March 2014 and
director since June 2001; Jarden's Chief Financial Officer ("CFO")
from September 2001 to June 2014; Secretary from September 2001 to
February 2007. Ashken controls the Mariposa Capital with Newell
agreement and join the board of directors of the Combined Company
following the close of the Proposed Acquisition.

Defendant Michael S. Gross ("Gross") is Jarden's Lead Independent
Director since April 2012 and a director since March 2007. In
connection with the Proposed Acquisition, Defendant Gross agreed
to sell the Company to Newell in order to secure liquidity for his
Jarden shares.

Defendant Robert L. Wood ("Wood") is Jarden director since
February 2000. Wood agreed to sell the Company to Newell in order
to secure liquidity for his Jarden shares.

Defendant Irwin D. Simon ("Simon") is a Jarden director since May
2002; Lead Independent Director from at least April 2004 to at
least April 2011. In connection with the Proposed Acquisition,
Defendant Simon agreed to sell the Company to Newell in order to
secure liquidity for his Jarden shares.

Defendant William P. Lauder ("Lauder") is a Jarden director since
2011 and agreed to sell the Company to Newell in order to secure
liquidity for his Jarden shares.

Defendant Ros L'Esperance ("L'Esperance") is a Jarden director
since March 2014. L'Esperance secured the engagement of UBS as
Jarden's financial advisor through which she directly benefited as
UBS's Head of Corporate Client Solutions and secured continued
employment for herself and will join the board of directors of the
Combined Company following the close of the Proposed Acquisition.

Defendant Peter A. Hochfelder ("Hochfelder") is a Jarden director
since June 2015. In connection with the Proposed Acquisition,
defendant agreed to sell the company to Newell in order to secure
liquidity for his Jarden shares.

Defendant Newell is a Delaware corporation with principal
executive offices located at Three Glenlake Parkway, Atlanta,
Georgia. Defendant Newell is a global marketer of consumer and
commercial products in five segments: Writing, Home Solutions,
Tools, Commercial Products and Baby & Parenting. Upon completion
of the Proposed Acquisition, Newell will change its name to Newell
Brands Inc.

Defendant Merger Sub I is a Delaware corporation a wholly-owned
subsidiary of defendant Newell. Upon completion of the Proposed
Acquisition, defendant will merge with and into Jarden and cease
its separate corporate existence.

Defendant Merger Sub 2 is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-
owned subsidiary of defendant Newell. Upon completion of the
merger between defendant Merger Sub 1 and Jarden, defendant Merger
Sub 2 will merge with and into Jarden, with defendant Merger Sub 2
continuing as the surviving corporation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Stuart A. Davidson, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
     Email: sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com

          - and -

     David T. Wissbroecker, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
     655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Tel: 619/231-1058
     Fax: 619-231-7423
     Email: dwissbroecker@rgrdlaw.com

          - and -

     Brian J. Robbins, Esq.
     Stephen J. Oddo, Esq.
     Robbins Arroyo LLP
     600 B Street, Suite 1900
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Tel: 619/525-3990
     Fax: 619/525-3991
     Email: brobbins@robbinsarroyo.com
            soddo@robbinsarroyo.com


NEWELL RUBBERMAID: Robbins Geller Files Securities Class Action
---------------------------------------------------------------
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP on Feb. 24 announced that a class
action has been commenced in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida on behalf of stockholders of
Jarden Corporation on December 14, 2015, in connection with the
proposed acquisition of Jarden by Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
("Newell") and its affiliates NCPF Acquisition Corp. I ("Merger
Sub 1") and NCPF Acquisition Corp. II ("Merger Sub 2") (the
"Proposed Acquisition").

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no
later than 60 days from February 24, 2016.  If you wish to discuss
this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your
rights or interests, please contact plaintiff's counsel,
Darren Robbins of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058,
or via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com

Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as
lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to
do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges Jarden's Board of Directors (the "Board"),
Newell, Merger Sub 1 and Merger Sub 2 with violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act").  Jarden is a global
consumer products company that offers a portfolio of over 120
brands sold through a variety of distribution channels, including
club, department store, drug, grocery, mass merchant, sporting
goods, and specialty retailers, as well as directly to consumers.

On December 14, 2015, Newell and Jarden announced that the Board
had agreed to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant
to which: (i) Merger Sub 1 will be merged with and into Jarden,
with Jarden surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newell; and
(ii) immediately thereafter, Jarden will be merged with and into
Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2 continuing as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Newell (the "Combined Company") following the close
of the transaction.  On the day the Proposed Acquisition was
announced, the consideration to be received by Jarden stockholders
had a nominal value of $60.03 per share, consisting of $21 in cash
and a fixed exchange ratio of 0.862 shares of Newell common stock.

On January 13, 2016, defendants filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-4 with the SEC.  On February 17, 2016, defendants filed
Amendment No. 1 to that Registration Statement (hereafter, the
"Proxy").  The complaint alleges that in contravention of Sections
14(a) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act, the Proxy, which recommends that
Jarden stockholders vote in favor of the Proposed Acquisition,
omits and/or misrepresents material information concerning: (i)
the Company's flawed and self-serving sales process; (ii) the free
cash flow projections provided by Jarden's management and relied
on by Barclays Capital Inc. ("Barclays") and Centerview Partners
LLC in performing their discounted cash flow valuation analyses;
(iii) Barclays' and UBS Securities LLC's conflicts of interest;
(iv) Jarden's contributions to the Combined Company; and (v) the
Board's consideration of Jarden's standalone value.  The
misrepresented and/or omitted information is material to
shareholders' decision on whether to vote in favor of the Proposed
Acquisition.

Plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive and equitable relief on
behalf of holders of Jarden stock on December 14, 2015.  The
plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive
experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions
involving financial fraud.

Robbins Geller, with 200 lawyers in ten offices, represents U.S.
and international institutional investors in contingency-based
securities and corporate litigation.  The firm has obtained many
of the largest securities class action recoveries in history and
was ranked first in both the amount and number of shareholder
class action recoveries in ISS's SCAS Top 50 report for 2014.


NU SKIN: In Mediation to Resolve Suit Over Regulatory Probe
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the parties in a
class action lawsuit are currently engaged in mediation.

The Company said it is currently being sued in a purported class
action lawsuit and derivative claim relating to negative media and
regulatory scrutiny regarding its business in Mainland China and
the associated decline in its stock price.  Beginning in January
2014, six purported class action complaints were filed in the
United States District Court for the District of Utah. In May
2014, the court consolidated the various purported class actions,
appointed State-Boston Retirement System as lead plaintiff in the
consolidated action and appointed the law firm Labaton Sucharow as
lead counsel for the purported class in the consolidated action.
In June 2014, a consolidated class action complaint was filed.

"In February 2015, the court denied our motion to dismiss the
case," the Company said.  "The consolidated class action complaint
purports to assert claims on behalf of certain of our stockholders
under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b-5 thereunder against Nu Skin Enterprises, Ritch N. Wood,
and M. Truman Hunt and to assert claims under Section 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Messrs. Wood and Hunt."

"The consolidated class action complaint alleges that, inter alia,
we made materially false and misleading statements regarding our
sales operations in and financial results derived from Mainland
China, including purportedly operating a pyramid scheme based on
illegal multi-level marketing activities. The parties are engaging
in a mediation process in an effort to resolve this matter.

"We believe the claims are without merit, but we have entered into
this process in an effort to avoid potentially lengthy, costly,
distracting and time- consuming litigation."

Founded more than 30 years ago, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops
and distributes innovative consumer products, offering a
comprehensive line of premium-quality beauty and wellness
solutions in 54 markets worldwide.


OCH-ZIFF CAPITAL: Court Narrows Claims in "Menaldi" Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned ARTHUR MENALDI, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. OCH-ZIFF CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, DANIEL S. OCH, JOEL M. FRANK, and MICHAEL
COHEN, Defendants, No. 14-CV-3251 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y.), Judge J. Paul
Oetken granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss
filed by Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC, its Chief
Executive Officer Daniel Och, and its Chief Financial Officer Joel
Frank.  The judge also granted a separate motion to dismiss filed
by Michael Cohen, a former Och-Ziff employee who managed Och-
Ziff's African investments.

An action was brought on behalf of a putative class of investors
who purchased securities in Och-Ziff between February 9, 2012 and
August 22, 2014.  The complaint alleged that Och-Ziff, Och, Frank
and Cohen violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by
misleading investors about an investigation by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice into Och-Ziff's
investments in Africa.

Three claims were asserted: (1) a securities fraud claim pursuant
to Exchange Act section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(b) against all
defendants except Cohen; (2) a scheme liability claim pursuant to
Exchange Act section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) against all
defendants; and (3) a control person claim pursuant to Exchange
Act section 20(a) against all defendants except Och-Ziff.

Separate motions to dismiss were filed on March 16, 2015.

Judge Oetken dismissed the Rule 10b-5(b) claim against Cohen in
its entirety.  As to Och-Ziff, Och, and Frank, Judge Oetken
dismissed the Rule 10b-5(b) claim insofar as it relies on a duty
to disclose uncharged wrongdoing, but denied the motion to dismiss
insofar as Rule 10b-5(b) violations were alleged with respect to
statements about pending regulatory proceedings.

Judge Oetken dismissed the scheme liability claim as to all
defendants.  The control liability claim was dismissed as to
Cohen, but Judge Oetken denied the motion to dismiss as to alleged
section 20(a) violations by Och and Frank.

A full-text copy of Judge Oetken's February 17, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/aKeIiafrom Leagle.com.

Ralph Langstadt, Julie Lemond, Lead Plaintiffs, represented by
Jeremy Alan Lieberman -- jalieberman@pomlaw.com -- Pomerantz LLP,
Phillip C. Kim -- pkim@rosenlegal.com -- The Rosen Law Firm P.A.,
Emma Gilmore -- egilmore@pomlaw.com -- Pomerantz LLP & Sara Esther
Fuks, Milberg LLP.

Arthur Menaldi, Plaintiff, represented by Jeremy Alan Lieberman,
Pomerantz LLP, Michele S. Carino  - mcarino@pomlaw.com --
Pomerantz LLP & Tamar Aliza Weinrib -- taweinrib@pomlaw.com --
Pomerantz LLP.

Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC, Joel M. Frank, Daniel S.
Och, Defendants, represented by Robert F. Serio --
rserio@gibsondunn.com -- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP & Aric Hugo
Wu -- awu@gibsondunn.com -- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.


OISHI HIBACHI: "Jolly" Suit Moved from Pulaski Court to E.D. Ark.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit titled Jolly et al. v. Chi et al., Case
No. 60CV-15-05003, was removed from the Pulaski County Circuit
Court, to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Arkansas (Little Rock). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No.
4:16-cv-00009-DPM to the proceeding.

The Plaintiffs brought this suit as a result of Defendants'
policies in violation of the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act and the
Fair Labor Standards Act. The Plaintiffs are not compensated at a
minimum of $7.50 per hour.

The Defendants own and/or operate several restaurants in Pulaski
County, including Oishi Hibachi (formerly Cafe 5501 and formerly
R.J. Tao).

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Joshua Sanford, Esq.
          Stephen Rauls, Esq.
          SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC
          One Financial Center
          650 S. Shackleford Road, Suite 411
          Little Rock, AR 72211
          Telephone: (501) 221 0088
          Facsimile: (888) 787 2040
          E-mail: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com
                  steve@sanfordlawfirm.com

The Defendants are represented by:

          Allen C. Dobson, Esq.
          Shelley L. Fleisch-Djurica, Esq.
          BAXTER, JEWELL & DOBSON, P.A.
          Information Way, Suite 210
          Little Rock, AR 72202
          Telephone: (501) 664 9555
          Facsimile: (501) 664 9559
          E-mail: adobson@bjd-law.com
                  sdjurica@bjd-law.com


ORBITAL SERVICES: "Farias" Suit Seeks Unpaid Overtime
-----------------------------------------------------
Andy Farias, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated
persons, the Plaintiffs v.  Orbital Services, Inc., M&C Global,
Inc., First Quality Car Detail, Inc. Felipe Garia,, Paul Bachet,
McCall-SB, Inc., d/b/a Advantage BMW of Clear Lake, Sonic
Advantage PA, L.P., d/b/a Porsche of West Houston and Clear Lake
Infinity, L.P., d/b/a Clear Lake Infinity, the Defendants, Case
No.  4:16-cv-0489 (S.D. Tex, February 24, 2016), seeks to recover
unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorney's
fees.

Plaintiffs accused the Defendants for Violation of Fair Labor
Standard Act of 1938 (FLSA) by nonpayment of hours worked over 40
hours per week.

Orbital Services, Inc., is a Taxes Corporation, engaged in
commerce or in the production of goods for commerce and had gross
annual revenues in excess of $500,000.00. Orbital may be served
through its registered agent, Carlos Vargas at 5343 E. 5th Street,
Katy, Texas 77493 or wherever he may be found.

Defendant, M&C Global, Inc. ("M&C") is a Texas Corporation, had
gross annual revenues in excess of $500,000.00 and may be served
through its registered agent, Paul Bachet, 2909 Hayes Road #805,
Houston, Texas 77082 or wherever he may be found.

Defendant, First Quality Car Detail, Inc., ("First Quality") is a
Texas Corporation and had gross annual revenues in excess of
$500,000.00. First Quality may be served through its registered
agent, Felipe Garcia, 3990 Vitruvian Way, Apt. 564, Addison, Texas
75001-4478 or wherever he may be found.

Defendant, Felipe Garcia ("Garcia") is an individual resident of
the State of Texas and all relevant times an enterprise engaged in
commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. Garcia may be
served at 3990 Vitruvian Way, Apt. 564, Addison, Texas 75001-4478
or wherever he may be found.

Defendant, Paul Bachet ("Bachet") is an individual resident of the
State of Texas. All relevant times an enterprise engaged in
commerce or in the production of goods for commerce and had gross
annual revenues in excess of $500,000.00. Bachet may be served at
2909 Hayes Road #805, Houston, Texas 77082 or wherever he may be
found.

Defendant, McCall-SB, Inc., d/b/a Advantage BMW of Clear Lake
("McCall") is a Delaware corporation. McCall was at all relevant
times an enterprise engaged in commerce, had gross annual revenues
in excess of $500,000.00 and may be served through its registered
agent, Capitol Corporation Services, Inc., 2-6 E. 9th Street,
Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701.

Defendant Sonic Advantage PA, LP, d/b/a Porsche of West Houston,
("Sonic") is a Texas limited partnership. Sonic was at all times
an enterprise engaged in commerce, had gross annual revenues in
excess of $500,000.00 and may be served through its registered
agent, CT Corporation System, 1919 Bryan Street, Suite 900,
Dallas, Texas 75201.

Defendant Clear Lake Infiniti, LP, d/b/a Clear Lake Infiniti,
("Clear Lake"), is a Texas limited partnership. Clear Lake was at
all relevant times an enterprise engaged in commerce and had gross
annual revenues in excess of $500,000.00. Clear Lake may be served
through its registered agent, Fred E. Hass, 20400 1-45 North,
Spring, Texas 77373

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
     Vijay Pattisapu, Esq.
     THE BUENKER LAW FIRM
     2030 North Loop West, Suite 120
     Houston, TX 77018
     Telephone: 713-868-3388
     Facsimile: 713-683-9940


PANERA BREAD: To Defend Against Wage & Hour Class Actions
---------------------------------------------------------
Panera Bread Company said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 29, 2015, that the Company is prepared
to defend against class action lawsuits filed against one of its
subsidiaries.

The Company said, "On July 2, 2014, a purported class action
lawsuit was filed against one of our subsidiaries by Jason
Lofstedt, a former employee of one our subsidiaries. The lawsuit
was filed in the California Superior Court, County of Riverside.
The complaint alleges, among other things, violations of the
California Labor Code, failure to pay overtime, failure to provide
meal and rest periods, and violations of California's Unfair
Competition Law. The complaint seeks, among other relief,
collective and class certification of the lawsuit, unspecified
damages, costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, and such
other relief as the Court might find just and proper. In addition,
more recently, several other purported class action lawsuits based
on similar claims and seeking similar damages were filed against
the subsidiary: on October 30, 2015 in the California Superior
Court, County of San Bernardino by Jazmin Dabney, a former
subsidiary employee; on November 3, 2015, in the United States
District Court, Eastern District of California by Clara
Manchester, a former subsidiary employee; and on November 30, 2015
in the California Superior Court, County of Yolo by Tanner
Maginnis, a current subsidiary assistant manager.

"We believe our subsidiary has meritorious defenses to each of the
claims in these lawsuits and we are prepared to vigorously defend
the allegations therein.  There can be no assurance, however, that
our subsidiary will be successful, and an adverse resolution of
any one of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position and results of operations in
the period in which one or all of these lawsuits are resolved.  We
are not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if
any, related to the lawsuits."

Panera Bread Company and its subsidiaries is a national bakery-
cafe concept with 1,972 Company-owned and franchise-operated
bakery-cafe locations in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and
Ontario, Canada.


PARAMOUNT PICTURES: N.Y. Workers File Action Over Unpaid Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
BelowtheLine reports that at a press conference on Feb. 24 in
Manhattan, over 100 primarily African-American and Hispanic,
New York City-based film and television studio workers announced
that they are launching a class action lawsuit over unpaid wages.

The workers were joined by their attorney James Vagnini --
jvagnini@vkvlawyers.com -- of the law firm Valli, Kane, & Vagnini.
The plaintiffs have worked on a variety of blockbuster films and
hit TV series shot on-location in the city, including American
Hustle, Focus, Ted 2, Train Wreck and The Wolf of Wall Street.
These local residents worked in production crews for Paramount,
Warner Bros., Lionsgate, Sony Pictures and Universal Studios. They
are suing for unpaid wages, claiming that they worked around-the-
clock on multi-million dollar budget films without being properly
paid.

Films shot in New York inject $8.7 billion dollars a year into the
city economy and create tens of thousands of jobs.  There are
several programs available to film and television production
companies in the form of tax credits and sales tax exemptions as
an incentive for Hollywood studios to film in and around New York
City.  This suit alleges that while many studios take advantage of
the incentives, they do not pay workers the wages they are
entitled to.


PELLA CORP: Bid for Summary Judgment Denied in "Conlay" Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned TANYA and GARY CONLAY, on behalf of
themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. PELLA CORPORATION, Defendant, Nos. 2:14-mn-00001-
DCN, 2:14-cv-00539-DCN (D. S.C.), District Judge David C. Norton
denied the motion for summary judgment filed by Pella Corporation.

Tanya and Gary Conlay sued Pella for design defect and
construction defect under the Louisiana Products Liability Act in
connection with the damaged Pella windows that they purchased in
conjunction with the construction of their home in April 2000.

Pella filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the
Conlays' claims must be dismissed because they are barred by the
applicable statute of limitations.  The Conlays' claims under the
Louisiana Products Liability Act are subject to a one-year
prescriptive period.  The parties dispute when the Conlays
discovered the defect on the windows to start the prescriptive
period.

In denying Pella's motion for summary judgment, Judge Norton held
that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the
Conlays had sufficient knowledge to start the running of the
prescriptive period.

A full-text copy of Judge Norton's February 18, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/xffjJ7from Leagle.com.

Plaintiffs Tanya Conlay, Gary Conlay, represented by Andrew Allen
Lemmon -- andrew@lemmonlawfirm.com -- Lemmon Law Firm, Gary E
Mason, Mason Law Firm, Jonathan Shub, Scott A George --
sgeorge@seegerweiss.com -- Seeger Weiss, Daniel K Bryson --
dan@wbmllp.com -- Whitfield Bryson & Mason LLP, Irma L. Netting --
irma@lemmonlawfirm.com -- Lemmon Law Firm, Matthew E Lee --
matt@wbmllp.com -- Whitfield Bryson and Mason & Richard J
Arsenault, Neblett Beard and Arsenault.

Defendant Pella Corporation, represented by David C Coons --
david.coons@arlaw.com -- Adams and Reese, G Mark Phillips --
mark.phillips@nelsonmullins.com -- Nelson Mullins Riley and
Scarborough, Gregory F Rouchell -- gregory.rouchell@arlaw.com --
Adams and Reese, Michael Tucker Cole --
mike.cole@nelsonmullins.com -- Nelson Mullins Riley and
Scarborough, Terry Christovich Gay -- tcgay@christovich.com --
Christovich & Kearney, LLP, Albert K Gasperecz --
kirk.gasperecz@arlaw.com -- Adams and Reese, James A O'Neal,
Faegre & Benson LLP, John P. Mandler -- john.mandler@faegrebd.com
-- Faegre, Baker Law Firm - Minneapolis Office, Kevin L Morrow --
kevin.morrow@faegrebd.com -- Faegre Baker Daniels, Kevin Richard
Tully -- krtully@christovich.com -- Christovich & Kearney,
LLP,Mark J Winebrenner -- joe.winebrenner@faegrebd.com -- Faegre
Baker Daniels, Oscar M. Gwin, IV -- omgwin@christovich.com --
Christovich & Kearney, LLP & Shane A Anderson --
shane.anderson@faegrebd.com -- Faegre Baker Daniels.


PENNYMAC LOAN: Faces "Cooper" Suit Over Force-Placed Insurance
--------------------------------------------------------------
GARY COOPER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC; QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, QBE FIRST INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., and PRAETORIAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, Case 1:16-cv-20413-JEM (S.D. Fla., February 4,
2016), seeks to redress injuries resulting directly from mortgage
lenders' and servicers' alleged force-placed insurance practices.

PennyMac services residential mortgage loans in Florida and
throughout the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Adam M. Moskowitz, Esq.
     Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti, Esq.
     Rachel Sullivan, Esq.
     Robert J. Neary, Esq.
     KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON LLP
     2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor
     Coral Gables, FL 33134
     Tel: (305) 372-1800
     Fax: (305) 372-3508
     E-mail: amm@kttlaw.com
             tr@kttlaw.com
             rs@kttlaw.com
             rn@kttlaw.com

        - and -

     Lance A. Harke, Esq.
     Sarah Engel, Esq.
     Howard M. Bushman, Esq.
     HARKE CLASBY & BUSHMAN LLP
     9699 NE Second Avenue
     Miami Shores, FL 33138
     Tel: (305) 536-8220
     Fax: (305) 536-8229
     E-mail: lharke@harkeclasby.com
             sengel@harkeclasby.com
             hbushman@harkeclasby.com

        - and -

     Aaron S. Podhurst, Esq.
     Peter Prieto, Esq.
     Matthew Weinshall
     PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
     City National Bank Building
     25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
     Miami, FL 33130
     Tel: 305-358-2800
     Fax: 305-358-2382
     E-mail: apodhurst@podhurst.com
             pprieto@podhurst.com
             mweinshall@podhurst.com


POPULAR COMMUNITY: Court Narrows Claims in "Valle" Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Anil C. Singh granted in part and denied in part the motion
to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") in the case
captioned JOSEFINA VALLE and WILFREDO VALLE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. POPULAR
COMMUNITY BANK f/k/a BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA a/k/a BANCO
POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, Defendant, Docket No. 653936/2012, Motion
Seq. No. 005 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.).

A purported class action was brought against Popular Community
Bank, also known as Banco Popular North America ("BPNA"),
challenging the bank's overdraft policies.  The SAC alleged that
BPNA engaged in the following deceptive conduct in violation of
General Business Law ("GBL") section 349: (1) reordering customer
withdrawals to create or maximize overdraft charges; (2) providing
inaccurate account information in response to plaintiffs' balance
inquiries; and (3) failing to disclose, prior to the completion of
a transaction, that an ATM withdrawal or debit card transaction
would cause the account to be overdrawn.

BPNA moved to dismiss the SAC which asserts causes of action for
breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and
violations of GBL section 349.  By stipulation, the first cause of
action was voluntarily discontinued, with prejudice, leaving only
the claim under GBL section 349.

Judge Singh granted the motion to dismiss the GBL section 349
claim to the extent it is premised on BPNA providing the
plaintiffs with false balance information prior to December 31,
2010 because, according to the SAC, BPNA began providing false
balance information "on or after December 31, 2010," and the
plaintiffs did not allege that this practice cause them injury
prior to that date.

The portion of the GBL section 349 claim relating to false balance
information was also dismissed by Judge Sing as time-barred to the
extent it relates to overdraft fees incurred more than three years
before September 10, 2014, the date of filing of the proposed SAC.

The motion to dismiss was otherwise denied.

A full-text copy of Judge Singh's February 18, 2016 ruling is
available at http://is.gd/2J8cePfrom Leagle.com.


PORSCHE AUTOMOBIL: Bid to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas Okayed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned In re Ex Parte Application of Porsche
Automobil Holding SE for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1782
Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings,
No. 15-mc-417 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.), District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
granted Porsche Automobil Holding SE's motion to compel compliance
with issued subpoenas, and consequently, denied the motion to
quash the subpoenas.

Porsche has been sued in a number of cases in Germany for
allegedly making misrepresentations and engaging in marketing
manipulation in connection with its 2008 investment in Volkswagen,
AG.

Some of the German plaintiffs sought to establish a so-called
"model case" under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act.
Porsche has advanced the defense that some or all of the cases
against it are time barred, but the German court has indicated
that Porsche must name the exact press article known to each
plaintiff and establish that such party has known about this press
release.

Porsche then sought to secure evidence under Section 1782 of the
Judicial Code from persons who are found or residing in the United
States for use in the foreign tribunal.  Subpoenas have been
issued to eight recipients, all plaintiffs or affiliates of
plaintiffs in the German action.  The subpoenaed parties, and
several of their affiliates, moved to quash the subpoenas.
Porsche filed a cross-motion to compel compliance.

All parties agree that Porsche has satisfied all of the statutory
prerequisites to relief under Section 1782.  However, Judge Kaplan
modified the subpoenas somewhat to reduce any burden that
compliance otherwise might impose.

A full-text copy of Judge Kaplan's February 18, 2016 memorandum
opinion is available at http://is.gd/prIL7vfrom Leagle.com.

In Re, Porsche Automobil Holding SE, represented by Robert Joseph
Giuffra, Jr. -- giuffra@sullcrom.com -- Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP,
George Robert Painter, IV, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, John Lehman
Warden -- wardenj@sullcrom.com -- Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP &
Suhana S. Han -- hans@sullcrom.com -- Sullivan and Cromwell, LLP.

Movants FVP Master Fund, L.P., FVP US-Q, LP, Tremblant
Concentrated Fund LP, Tremblant Concentrated Master Fund LP,
Tremblant Partners LP, Tremblant Super Concentrated Fund Ltd.,
Tremblant-Trident Partners LP, Tremblant-Trident Partners Ltd.,
and Respondents FVG GP, LLC, Firefly Value Partners, L.P., Marble
Arch Investments, LP, Marble Arch Investments GP, LLC, Tremblant
Capital LP, Tremblant-Trident Capital LP, Tremblant-Trident
Holdings LLC, and Tremblant Holdings LLC, represented by Ralph M.
Stone -- rstone@lawssb.com -- Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP & Susan M.
Davies -- sdavies@lawssb.com -- Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP.


PORT RESOURCES: "Giguere" Suit Claims FLSA, Labor Laws Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID GIGUERE, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. PORT RESOURCES INC., Case 2:16-cv-00058-NT
(D. Me., February 4, 2016), alleges that the Defendant violated
the Fair Labor Standards Act and Maine labor laws guaranteeing
prompt payment of wages.

Defendant Port Resources manages and provides staffing for 24
group homes and supervised apartments serving nearly 100 clients
in residential neighborhoods across southern Maine.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Andrew Schmidt, Esq.
     Peter Mancuso, Esq.
     Andrew Schmidt Law, PLLC
     97 India St.
     Portland, Maine 04101


PRICELINE GROUP: Facing 40 Cases Over Travel Transaction Taxes
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Priceline Group Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2016, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the Company and
certain third-party online travel companies ("OTCs") are involved
in approximately 40 lawsuits, including certified and putative
class actions, brought by or against U.S. states, cities and
counties over issues involving the payment of travel transaction
taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes,
etc.). Generally, the complaints allege, among other things, that
the OTCs violated each jurisdiction's respective relevant travel
transaction tax ordinance with respect to the charge and
remittance of amounts to cover taxes under each law.

The Company believes that the laws at issue generally do not apply
to the services it provides, namely the facilitation of travel
reservations, and, therefore, that it does not owe the taxes that
are claimed to be owed. However, the Company has been involved in
this type of litigation for many years, and state and local
jurisdictions where these issues have not been resolved could
assert that the Company is subject to travel transaction taxes and
could seek to collect such taxes, retroactively and/or
prospectively.

From time to time, the Company has found it expedient to settle,
and may in the future agree to settle, claims pending in these
matters without conceding that the claims at issue are meritorious
or that the claimed taxes are in fact due to be paid.

Priceline Group provides consumers, travel service providers and
restaurants with leading travel and restaurant reservation and
related services.


QUESTAR CORP: Faces Class Actions by Teamsters and Senatori
-----------------------------------------------------------
Questar Corporation, Questar Gas Company and Questar Pipeline
Company said in their Form 10-K Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2015, that on February 8, 2016, Plaintiffs
filed this class action in the Third District Court in Salt Lake
City, Utah, Teamsters Local 456 Pension Fund and Teamsters Local
456 Annuity Fund v. Questar Board of Directors, Questar
Corporation and Dominion Corporation. Another class action, Eric
Senatori v. Dominion Resources, Questar Board of Directors and
Questar Corporation was filed in the Third District Court in Salt
Lake City, Utah on February 17, 2016.

In these cases the Plaintiffs claim that the defendants breached
their fiduciary duty of loyalty and due cause owed to the
Plaintiffs thereby failing to maximize the value of Questar to its
public stockholders. Plaintiffs demand injunction and monetary
relief by enjoining Defendants from proceeding with the Proposed
Merger and awarding monetary damages.

Questar is a Rockies-based integrated natural gas holding company
with three principal complementary lines of business operated
through wholly-owned subsidiaries:

   * Questar Gas provides retail natural gas distribution in Utah,
Wyoming and Idaho.

   * Wexpro Company (Wexpro) develops and produces natural gas
from cost-of-service reserves for Questar Gas customers.

   * Questar Pipeline operates interstate natural gas pipelines
and storage facilities in the western United States and provides
other energy services.

Questar is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Shares of
Questar common stock trade on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE:STR).


R.J. REYNOLDS: Proved Prudence in Divestiture of Nabisco Funds
--------------------------------------------------------------
A suit was brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") alleging that R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. (collectively,
"RJR") breached their fiduciary duties in managing the R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Capital Investment Plan.

Senior District Judge N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. previously determined
that, under the ERISA prudence standard, RJR breached its
fiduciary duty of procedural prudence to investigate the
investment decision to eliminate units of the NGH Common Stock
Fund and the Nabisco Common Stock Fund (collectively, the "Nabisco
Funds") from the Plan.  Nevertheless, Judge Tilley found that RJR
met its burden to show that removing these funds from the Plan
effective January 30, 2000 was an objectively prudent decision.

On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the holdings that RJR
breached its duty of procedural jurisprudence and therefore bore
the burden of proof as to causation.  However, the Fourth Circuit
found that the district court did not apply the correct legal
standard in determining RJR's liability, reversed the judgment,
and remanded.

On remand, and after reviewing all of the relevant evidence as
part of his totality-of-the-circumstances inquiry, Judge Tilley
determined that RJR has shown by a preponderance of the evidence
that a prudent fiduciary would have decided to divest the Nabisco
Funds at the time and in the manner that RJR did.

A full-text copy of Judge Tilley's February 18, 2016 memorandum
opinion is available at http://is.gd/6gmBLpfrom Leagle.com.

The case is captioned RICHARD G. TATUM, individually and on behalf
of a class of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al. Defendant, No. 1:02CV00373
(M.D.N.C.).

RICHARD G. TATUM, Plaintiff, represented by J. GRIFFIN MORGAN --
jgmorgan@emplawfirm.com -- ELLIOT MORGAN PARSONAGE, PLLC, JAMES M.
FINBERG -- jfinberg@altshulerberzon.com -- ALTSHULER BERSON LLP,
JEFFREY LEWIS -- jlewis@kellerrohrback.com -- KELLER ROHRBACK
L.L.P., ROBERT M. ELLIOT -- rmelliot@emplawfirm.com -- ELLIOT
MORGAN PARSONAGE, P.A., CATHA A. WORTHMAN, LEWIS FEINBERG LEE
RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C., DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON, LIEFF, CABRASER,
HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP, HELEN L. PARSONAGE, ELLIOT MORGAN
PARSONAGE, PLLC & KELLY M. DERMODY -- kdermody@lchb.com -- LIEFF,
CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP.

NOVANT HEALTH, INC., Witness, represented by REGINALD F. COMBS --
rfc@rfcpc.com -- REGINALD F. COMBS, P.C..

RJR PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, RJR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE,
Defendants, represented by ADAM H. CHARNES --
acharnes@kilpatricktownsend.com -- KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP, DANIEL R. TAYLOR, JR. -- dantaylor@kilpatricktownsend.com --
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, L.L.P., THURSTON H. WEBB --
twebb@kilpatricktownsend.com -- KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON,
LLP & TONYA R. DEEM, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP.

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC. and R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO
COMPANY, Defendants, represented by ADAM H. CHARNES, KILPATRICK
TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP, DANIEL R. TAYLOR, JR., KILPATRICK
TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, L.L.P., CHAD DWIGHT HANSEN --
chadhansen@kilpatricktownsend.com -- KILPATRICK TOWNSEND &
STOCKTON, LLP, JAMES J. HEFFERAN, JR., KILPATRICK TOWNSEND &
STOCKTON LLP, THURSTON H. WEBB, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON,
LLP & TONYA R. DEEM, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP.


RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT: "Mosquea" Suit Alleges FLSA Violation
-------------------------------------------------------------
VICTORIANO MOSQUEA and ABEL NUNEZ, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, v. RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT (NY), INC .,
EMERALD 2727 UNIVERSE LLC, AQUA 2734 CLAFLIN LLC, AQUA 3065 GC
LLC, AQUA 3400 TRYON LLC, AQUA 680 E235 LLC, IVORY 3045 GRAND
CONCOURSE CORP., IVORY 3780 BRONX BLVD. CORP., and ANDREWS 102
LLC, Case 1:16-cv-00830-UA (S.D.N.Y., February 3, 2016), is a
civil action for damages and equitable relief based upon alleged
violations by the Defendants of the Plaintiffs' rights guaranteed
to them by the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime provisions, the
New York Labor Law's wage.

Residential Management (NY), Inc. is a property management
business. It manages residential buildings owned by other
entities.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Francisco Castillo, Esq.
     CASTILLO STEPHENS LLP
     305 Broadway, Suite 1200
     New York, NY 10007
     Tel: (212) 385-1400
     Fax: (212)385-1401
     E-mail: cslawyers@attorney1.com


S.W. COWBOY: Court Rules on Summary Judgment Bids in "Kubiak"
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned DAVID KUBIAK, individually and on behalf of
all other similarly situated employees, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
S.W. COWBOY, INC., a Florida Corporation, d/b/a Saltwater Cowboys,
et al., Defendants, Case No. 3:12-cv-1306-J-34JRK (M.D. Fla.),
District Judge Marcia Morales Howard denied the plaintiffs' motion
for summary judgment and granted, in part, and denied, in part the
defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Saltwater Cowboys and Creekside Dinery are seafood restaurants in
St. Augustine, Florida.  The plaintiffs were all servers at one or
both of the restaurants between 2006 and 2013.

A complaint was filed against the owners of these restaurants
alleging that the defendants owed the plaintiffs back pay for the
difference between their wage and the full minimum wage because
the defendants operated an invalid tip pool, thereby precluding
them from using the tip credit to satisfy their minimum-wage
obligations.

The defendants sought entry of summary judgment as to all claims
raised in the third amended complaint.  The defendants further
asserted that even if any claims survive summary judgment, the
defendants cannot be held individually liable because they had no
involvement in the day-to-day operations of the restaurants.

The plaintiffs also sought entry of summary judgment in their own
favor as to Count VI.

Judge Howard denied the defendants' motion as to Counts I, II, IV,
and V of the complaint, upon finding that a genuine factual
dispute exists as to whether the plaintiffs participated in the
Kitchen Tip Pool voluntarily or if such participation was
mandatory.

Judge Howard, however, granted the defendants' motion as to the
claims set forth in Counts III and VI, and denied the plaintiffs'
motion as to Count VI.  Judge Howard held that, because any
plaintiff who voluntarily contributed to the Kitchen Tip Pool
"retained" his tips within the meaning of section 203(m), what
happened to those contributions thereafter, and whether it was in
line with the plaintiffs' subjective intent, has no effect on the
defendants' compliance with their obligations under the Fair Labor
Standards Act and the Florida Minimum Wage Act.  As such, the
judge concluded that the defendants were not prohibited from
taking the tip credit as to the servers.

Judge Howard also found that the defendants are entitled to
summary judgment as to the plaintiffs' claims in Counts VII and
VIII.  Here, plaintiffs Jason Crowling and Joseph Keating alleged
that the defendants retaliated against them for participating in
the lawsuit.  Judge Howard found that Keating failed to establish
an adverse employment action, and that Crowling has not come
forward with sufficient evidence against the defendants' proffered
reasons for investigating and terminating him.

Finally, Judge Howard found that a genuine dispute exists as to
the degree of control the defendants exercised over the
restaurants' operations and over the servers.  Thus, the judge
held that the defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on
this basis.

A full-text copy of Judge Howard's February 18, 2016 order is
available at http://is.gd/5585zMfromLeagle.com.

Plaintiffs David Kubiak, Jason Crowling, and Joseph Keating, are
represented by Benjamin L. Williams, Law Offices of Benjamin Lee
Williams & Mitchell L. Feldman, Feldman Law Group P.A..

Plaintiffs Steven Patterson, Matthew Dillon, William Jeffrey
Little, Jose Farino, Michael Hoolahan, and Richard Harvey, are
represented by Benjamin L. Williams, Law Offices of Benjamin Lee
Williams.

Defendants S.W. Cowboy, Inc., Creekside Dinery Inc., Peter Lawlor,
Scott Singleton, William White, Terry Richardson, Rochell
Drovillard, and Judy Wegner represented by Kevin D. Johnson --
kjohnson@tsghlaw.com -- Thompson, Sizemore, Gonzalez & Hearing,
PA, LaKisha M. Kinsey-Sallis -- lkinseysallis@tsghlaw.com --
Thompson, Sizemore, Gonzalez & Hearing, PA & Marquis W. Heilig --
mheilig@tsghlaw.com -- Thompson, Sizemore, Gonzalez & Hearing, PA.


SATYAM: 2nd Cir. Unseals Bernstein Litowitz Kickback Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Alison Frankel, writing for Reuters, reports that a complaint asks
whether the renowned plaintiffs' firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger &
Grossmann pay a private lawyer in Mississippi $112,500 in order to
secure its client relationship with the Mississippi attorney
general's office, where her husband worked?

The kickback allegation comes from a 2014 racketeering and breach
of contract complaint by Bruce Bernstein, who spent four years as
of counsel at Bernstein Litowitz.  The lawyer claimed that
Bernstein Litowitz hired Jackson, Mississippi, solo practitioner
Vaterria Martin to act as local counsel in a securities class
action in which Mississippi's employee pension fund was the lead
plaintiff against Satyam, the Indian technology company.
Ms. Martin was supposedly paid $112,500 for unnecessary and
unusable work -- and that fee, according to Bernstein, was not
disclosed to the federal judge overseeing the Satyam case.

Bruce Bernstein claimed he eventually learned that Ms. Martin was
married to a lawyer in the Mississippi AG's office, which selects
the plaintiffs' firms hired to represent the state's public
pension fund in securities class actions.  Miss PERS, as the
pension fund is known, is a longtime Bernstein Litowitz client and
a frequent lead plaintiff in shareholder suits.
Mr. Bernstein asserted that Bernstein Litowitz partners told him
to stop asking questions about the ethics of Mr. Martin's fee. One
prominent partner allegedly said, "Do you ever want us to work
with Mississippi again?"

Bruce Bernstein's claims are unproven allegations, as the 2nd U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals emphasized in an opinion on Feb. 24
disclosing the case, which had been litigated pseudonymously and
under seal.  Bernstein Litowitz has called the onetime of counsel
a "disgruntled former employee" who asserted "sensational,
unfounded accusations" to extort a payment from the firm.
Bernstein Litowitz name partner Max Berger told me in an email
that his firm is well known for its high ethical standards and
integrity.  "I can assure you no case and no amount of money would
ever get us to deviate from our standards," Mr. Berger said.

Regardless of the merits of Bruce Bernstein's allegations,
Bernstein Litowitz did not want its former employee's case to
become public, not least because the firm said Bernstein was
exposing client communications.  Two weeks after the lawyer filed
a sealed complaint in federal court in Manhattan -- and a day
before the temporary seal was set to expire -- Bernstein Litowitz
reached a confidential settlement with Bernstein.  The firm and
its former of counsel asked U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni to
close the case file and leave the complaint permanently sealed.

She said no, sending Bernstein Litowitz to the 2nd Circuit on
appeal. (The appeal was captioned "ABC v. DEF.") Judges Amalya
Kearse, Jose Cabranes and John Walker held that the public
interest in the case's kickback allegations far outweighs
Bernstein Litowitz's "weak private interest" in keeping the case
sealed.

"As the district court noted, the complaint alleges that
defendants, as counsel for a state employees' pension fund that
was a lead plaintiff in a major securities class action,
'regularly engage in a kickback scheme with the Mississippi
Attorney General's Office, a public entity whose constituents
might otherwise be in the dark about the arrangement,'" wrote
Judge Walker.  "Whether true or not, this allegation would
naturally be of legitimate interest to the public (especially
those who contribute to and receive payments from MPERS) and to
federal courts in the future (e.g., those considering whether to
name BLB&G as lead class counsel or find MPERS to be an adequate
class representative in future class actions)."

Hard to argue with that, though you can understand why Bernstein
Litowitz and its counsel, Gregory Joseph of Joseph Hage Aaronson,
might wish otherwise.  As of mid-afternoon on Feb. 24,
Bruce Bernstein's complaint and Judge Caproni's unsealing opinion
remained unavailable on Pacer, as were substantive filings in the
appellate record.  Vaterria Martin did not respond to my phone
message requesting comment.  A representative for Mississippi
Attorney General Jim Hood said the former Bernstein Litowitz
lawyer's allegations "are untrue and we give them no merit."

But based on the 2nd Circuit opinion and a Bernstein Litowitz
brief before Judge Caproni, here's what we know about Bruce
Bernstein and his claims.  Before Mr. Bernstein joined Bernstein
Litowitz, he represented a Merck investor who was, along with a
Bernstein Litowitz client, co-lead plaintiff in a long-running
securities case over Merck's Vioxx disclosures. (Bernstein
previously worked at Milberg and Marc Dreier's ill-fated firm.) By
hiring Bernstein as of counsel, Bernstein Litowitz consolidated
its lead in the Merck case.

Bruce Bernstein also worked on the class action against Satyam, in
which Bernstein Litowitz was co-lead counsel with Grant &
Eisenhofer and two other firms. He signed class counsel's fee
petition in the Satyam case, which requested an award of 17
percent of the $125 million settlement.  The petition did not
disclose any fee-sharing agreement between Bernstein Litowitz and
Mississippi lawyer Vaterria Martin.  In late 2011, Bruce Bernstein
raised concerns within the firm about Ms. Martin's fees.  He also
allegedly questioned why Bernstein Litowitz had engaged lawyers in
Mississippi, whom Bernstein considered unqualified, to work on the
Merck case.

Mr. Bernstein took his allegations of impropriety to the U.S.
Attorney's office in Manhattan in December 2011. A year later, he
resigned from Bernstein Litowitz.  Two years after that, he sued,
claiming he was hounded out of the firm because his ethical
concerns rankled partners.

Bernstein Litowitz maintains there was nothing at all improper
about the firm's hiring of Ms. Martin, its disclosures in Satyam
or its employment of Bernstein.  According to the firm's filing,
the Mississippi AG's office had an entirely ethical policy of
encouraging outside counsel to use Mississippi lawyers.  Bernstein
Litowitz did not disclose Martin's work in the Satyam fee
application, the firm said, because there was no need to do so.
Rules governing practices in the Southern District of
New York had recently changed to eliminate required disclosure of
fee-sharing agreements and the judge overseeing the Satyam case
understood that lead counsel intended to allocate fees to other
firms.

Bernstein Litowitz said that its payment to Martin came out of its
share of the fee award, so Satyam investors weren't affected by
it.  Despite the innuendos of its onetime of counsel, Bernstein
Litowitz said, its fee disclosures were proper and correct.  Bruce
Bernstein, according to the firm, was continuing to allege they
were not because he wanted more money from his former employer.

The 2nd Circuit opinion notes the rule change on fee-sharing
disclosure but carefully avoids taking sides in the now-settled
case. Prosecutors have not taken any public action in response to
Bruce Bernstein's allegations, which he reported more than four
years ago.

Both Mr. Bernstein and the firm signed statements when they
settled Bernstein's suit in early 2015.  The Bernstein Litowitz
statement said the firm's "negative assertions" about its former
employee were made in the litigation context and that when he
worked at the firm, Bernstein was "intelligent, dedicated and
maintained the highest degree of integrity."  In his statement,
Bernstein said that after interviewing witnesses and reviewing
documentation, he and his lawyer believed there were
"insurmountable factual and legal challenges" to his racketeering
claim.

Mr. Bernstein, who now works as a trial lawyer in the Justice
Department's civil division in New York City, declined to comment.
Mr. Bernstein's counsel is Justin Sher of Sher Tremonte.


SERVICE CORP: "Samborsky" Claims Sent to Arbitration
----------------------------------------------------
Service Corporation International said in its Form 10-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18,
2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the claims
in the case, Charles Samborsky, et al, individually and on behalf
of those persons similarly situated, v. SCI California Funeral
Services, Inc., et al ; Case No. BC544180; in the Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Central
District-Central Civil West Courthouse, have been sent to
arbitration.

This lawsuit was filed in April 2014 against an SCI subsidiary and
purports to have been brought on behalf of employees who worked as
family service counselors in California since April 2010. The
plaintiffs allege causes of action for various violations of state
laws regulating wage and hour pay. The plaintiffs seek unpaid
wages, compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys' fees and
costs, interest, and injunctive relief. The claims have been sent
to arbitration.

"We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this
lawsuit," the Company said.

Service Corporation is North America's largest provider of
deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries unequaled in geographic scale and reach.


SERVICE CORP: "Moulton" Case to Continue v. Stewart Enterprises
---------------------------------------------------------------
Service Corporation International said in its Form 10-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18,
2016, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the case,
Karen Moulton, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc., Service Corporation
International and others; Case No. 2013-5636; in the Civil
District Court Parish of New Orleans, will continue against
Stewart Enterprises.

The Company said, "This case was filed as a class action in June
2013 against SCI and our subsidiary in connection with SCI's
proposed acquisition of Stewart Enterprises, Inc. The plaintiffs
allege that SCI aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duties by
Stewart Enterprises and its board of directors in negotiating the
combination of Stewart Enterprises with a subsidiary of SCI. The
plaintiffs seek damages concerning the combination. We filed
exceptions to the plaintiffs' complaint that were granted in June
2014. Thus, subject to appeals, SCI will no longer be party to the
suit. The case will continue against our subsidiary Stewart
Enterprises and its former individual directors. We cannot
quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of
damages."

Service Corporation is North America's largest provider of
deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries unequaled in geographic scale and reach.


SISTAR BEAUTY: Settles Overtime Suit; Class Notice Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned SHADIA SMITH, LYNDSY JONES, LaSHEAR ALLEN,
JAKIA NEELEY and TSEDKEYAH PITTMAN on behalf of themselves and all
other plaintiffs similarly situated known and unknown, Plaintiffs,
v. SISTAR BEAUTY CORPORATION and SANG W. LEW Defendants, Case No.
15 cv-3359 (N.D. Ill.), the parties have filed an agreed motion
before the Honorable Court of Judge James B. Zagel for entry of
judgment in favor of the class and for notice.

The case is a collective action and class action that was
initiated on April 16, 2015 against the defendants Sistar Beauty
Corporation and Sang W. Lew for alleged claims under the Fair
Labor Standards Act and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law.  The class
was certified by the court on October 27, 2015.

The Defendants tendered to Class Counsel employment records that
purport to show the overtime hours worked by the Plaintiffs and
the Class. Based upon these records, counsel for the Defendants
and Class Counsel have come to an agreement as to the Defendants'
overtime obligations as to each Plaintiff and Class Member. Each
Class Member who did not turn in the Opt-In form will receive:

     (a) 100% of their unpaid overtime compensation owed; plus
     (b) interest at a rate of 2% per month for every month the
         overtime was unpaid through March 31, 2016.

Each named Plaintiff and Class Member who turned in the Opt-In
form will receive:

     (a) 100% of their unpaid overtime compensation owed; plus
     (b) liquidated damages equal to the amount of unpaid
         overtime compensation, plus
     (c) interest at a rate of 2% per month through March 31,
         2016.

No attorneys' fees will be taken out of the Class recovery.

Class Members will have the option to opt out of this case.

A full-text copy of the agreed motion for entry of judgment in
favor of the class and for notice is available at
http://is.gd/boJoGsfrom Leagle.com.

Shadiya Smith, Lyndsy Jones, LaShear Allen, Tsedkeyah Pittman,
Jakia Neeley, Plaintiffs, represented by Kimberly A. Hilton, The
Fish Law Firm, P.C. & David J. Fish, The Fish Law Firm, P.C..

Sistar Beauty Corporation, Sang W. Lew, Defendants, represented by
John Norman Walker, Waveland Law Group.


SOUTHERN RESPONSE: High Court Tosses Policyholders' Class Action
----------------------------------------------------------------
Edwin Mitson, writing for NBR, reports that the High Court in
Christchurch has rejected an attempt by a group of Southern
Response policyholders to bring a class action against the Crown-
owned insurance company for breach of contract, saying their
claims are too varied.

The 46 claimants had similar insurance policies and are in dispute
with Southern Response over Canterbury earthquakes damage to their
homes.

Southern Response was established following the quake on February
22 2011, when insurance company AMI decided it didn't have
sufficient reserve funds or reinsurance to cover its liability.
The Crown injected $500 million, AMI was restructured, and its
day-to-day insurance business sold to Australian insurance group
IAG.  Its liability from the Canterbury earthquakes transferred to
Southern Response.

The policyholders are part of a group of 2587 claimants who have
yet to resolve their claims with Southern Response.  The claimants
alleged Southern Response systematically underestimated relevant
costs and the scope of the work required on their homes.

They accuse it of mischaracterizing policy options and setting out
conditions inconsistent with the terms of the policy.  They also
argued Southern Response had failed to meet the policy requirement
that the home be returned to "as new" status and employed
inadequate repair techniques.

However, Justice Cameron Mander ruled that the individuals' claims
were too varied to be a representative action:

"While it is undisputed that policyholders are in conflict with
Southern Response, the range of issues that potentially arise as
between the policyholder and the insurance company vary as widely
from a denial by Southern Response to any liability in the absence
of the policyholder's claim being over the statutory cap to
disputes regarding the scope of works and standard and value of
reinstatement, repair or replacement."

He said the group needed to find a central issue or issues common
to its membership and clearly articulate the unifying foundation
issue.


STRIPE INC: Faces "Weisberg" TCPA Suit in California
----------------------------------------------------
DAVID WEISBERG v. STRIPE INC., Case 3:16-cv-00584 (N.D. Cal.,
February 3, 2016), seeks damages, injunctive relief, and any other
available legal or equitable remedies, resulting from the alleged
illegal actions of STRIPE, INC., in negligently and knowingly
contacting Plaintiff on Plaintiff's cellular telephone, in
violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Defendant provides payment processing services for websites
and mobile apps to tens of thousands of consumer nationwide.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Joseph Miskabi, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH MISKABI, APC
     8730 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 310
     Beverly Hills, CA 90211
     Tel: 424-245-5740
     Fax: 866-202-9176
     E-mail: joseph@miskabilaw.com


TAKATA CORP: "Francis" Suit Removed to D. Virgin Islands
--------------------------------------------------------
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.,
Inc. removed to the United States District Court of the Virgin
Islands the case, Milton Francis, Charline Cypre and Jatin
Chugani, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated
in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Plaintiffs v. Takata Corporation, TK
Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc., Honda Motor Co., LTD.,
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation,
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering &
Manufacturing North America, Inc., Defendants, Civil No. 660/2015,
in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.  The case was
assigned Case No. 2016-CV-11 by the D. V.I. court.

The complaint seeks an order directing the Defendants to repair
class members' vehicles and for injunctive relief.

Under the Class Action Fairness Act, the removal is proper if the
total amount in the controversy exceeds $5 million. The amount is
determined by aggregating the claims of individual class members.

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. is a California corporation with
its principal place of business in California

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., is a California corporation with its
principal place of business in California

The Plaintiff is presented by:

     J. Russell B. Pate, Esq.
     THE PATE LAW FIRM
     11A Norre Gade, 2nd Floor
     P.O. Box 890
     St. Thomas, USVI 00804
     E-mail: Pate@SunLawVI.com

The Defendant is presented by:

     Daryl C. Barnes, Esq.
     BARNES & BENOIT, LLP
     1134 King Street, 2nd Floor
     Christiansted, VI 00820
     Tel: 340-773-2785
     Fax: 340-773-5427


THERATECHNOLOGIES: SCC Trilogy Class Action Rulings at Issue
------------------------------------------------------------
Julius Melnitzer, writing for Lexpert Magazine, reports that
plaintiffs seeking leave to file secondary-market securities class
actions in Canada will face a steeper incline than they have in
the past.  For this, they can thank the Supreme Court of Canada's
December decisions in a trilogy of securities class action cases:
CIBC v. Green, Silver v. IMAX and Trustees v. Celestica, all
emanating from the Ontario Court of Appeal.

While the trilogy dealt mainly with the limitation period under s.
138.3 of Ontario's Securities Act, the determinations on the leave
issue will have by far the most lasting impact.  Perhaps most
importantly, the trilogy harmonized the test for leave throughout
Canada.  In a country where jurisdictional and carriage issues
pertaining to class actions continue to perplex the judiciary,
certitude in any area of the law is more than welcome.

For years the courts had gone back and forth on the issue.  In
February 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal stated that the
statutory test, which requires "a reasonable possibility that the
plaintiff will succeed at trial," was a "relatively low
threshold."

Two months later, the SCC threw more than a little water on that
fire in Theratechnologies v. 121851 Canada.  Dealing with the Q
u‚bec equivalent of the Ontario test, the high court ruled that
leave was intended to be a "meaningful screening mechanism"
designed to prevent "costly strike suits with little chance of
success."  Accordingly, plaintiffs had to show more than a mere
possibility of success, as some courts had held; rather, the test
required "a reasonable or realistic chance that the action will
succeed."  The test, therefore, necessitated a preliminary
assessment of the merits of the claims based on a review of the
evidence as well as the law.

Theratechnogies, then, put some substance into the standard that
plaintiffs must meet to satisfy the leave threshold for filing a
securities class action, putting businesses in a much better
position to avoid undue exposure to dubious secondary-market
cases.

"The fact that there is an arguable chance of success is no longer
sufficient to obtain leave," said Pierre Lefebvre of Fasken
Martineau Dumoulin LLP, who with colleague Philippe Charest-
Beaudry represented the defendant Theratechnologies. "There must
be a determination of whether success is a reasonable prospect --
and that changes the whole dimension of the leave test."

Doubt remained, however, as to whether Theratechnologies applied
across Canada.  "That doubt is gone," says Andrea Laing, who with
colleagues Nigel Campbell -- nigel.campbell@blakes.com -- and Ryan
Morris -- ryan.morris@blakes.com -- of Blake, Cassels & Graydon
LLP in Toronto represented Celestica.  "The trilogy supports a
robust interpretation of the leave standard throughout Canada,
including a realistic review of the evidence and meaningful legal
analysis."

Critics have argued that the SCC's interpretation of the rule
could result in unnecessarily complex, costly and lengthy leave
proceedings.  But Alan D'Silva -- adsilva@stikeman.com -- of
Stikeman Elliott LLP in Toronto argues that a hearing with a
merits component comports with the legislative intent.  "When the
Canadian Securities Administrators invoked the need for a leave
test, they were definitely thinking of a hearing on the merits,"
he says. "But that doesn't mean each leave hearing will involve a
full-out, extensive evidentiary record, because each case will be
different."


THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT: Faces "Matthews" Investors Lawsuit
-----------------------------------------------------------
SCOTT MATTHEWS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, v. THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT LLC; THIRD AVENUE TRUST; M.J.
WHITMAN LLC; MARTIN J. WHITMAN; DAVID M. BARSE; JACK W. ABER;
WILLIAM E. CHAPMAN, II; LUCINDA FRANKS; EDWARD J. KAIER; MARVIN
MOSER; ERIC RAKOWSKI; MARTIN SHUBIK; CHARLES C. WALDEN; VINCENT J.
DUGAN; W. JAMES HALL III; MICHAEL BUONO; THOMAS LAPOINTE;
NATHANIEL KIRK; EDWIN TAI; and JOSEPH ZALEWSKI;
Case 2:16-cv-00770 (C.D. Cal., February 3, 2016), was filed on
behalf of persons who purchased Institutional and Investor class
shares of Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund and TFCVX during the
period from March 1, 2013 to December 10, 2015).

Defendant Third Avenue Trust is an open-end management investment
company that consists of different investment series, including
Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jennifer Pafiti, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     468 North Camden Drive
     Beverly Hills, CA 90210
     Tel: (818) 532-6499
     E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com

        - and -

     Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq.
     J. Alexander Hood II, Esq.
     POMERANTZ, LLP
     600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 661-1100
     Fax: (212) 661-8665
     E-mail: jalieberman@pomlaw.com
             ahood@pomlaw.com

        - and -

     Patrick V. Dahlstrom, Esq.
     POMERANTZ LLP
     Ten South La Salle Street, Suite 3505
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Tel: (312) 377-1181
     Fax: (312) 377-1184
     E-mail: pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com


TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS: Bid to Certify Class in "Dartell" Granted
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned ROBIN JOACHIM DARTELL, et al., Individually
and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v.
TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No.
14-3620 (D.N.J.), Judge Madeline Cox Arleo granted the motion for
class certification filed by plaintiffs Obasi Investment Limited,
Jingli Shao, Robin Dartell, Lixin Wu, and Jason Helton.

A case was filed concerning allegedly false statements and
material omissions contained in Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s
registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with
its initial public offering on January 24, 2011.

The class representatives who sought class certification all
purchased shares of Tibet during the proposed class period
extending from January 24, 2011, the date of Tibet's
misstatements, to April 3, 2012, when Tibet stock halted trading
on NASDAQ and the stock plummeted in value.

It was undisputed that the plaintiffs are numerous and that the
evidence of the relevant disputes is predominantly common.
However, defendants Acquavella, Chiarelli, Shuster, Berkower &
Co., LLP, L. McCarthy Downs III, and Hayden Zou opposed the
motion.

The defendants challenged the typicality of the proposed class
representatives because the latter cannot trace their shares to
Tibet's initial public offering and because they purchased their
shares after purported corrective disclosures on February 17, 2012
and February 27, 2012.

Judge Arleo held that neither of these arguments preclude class
certification because the plaintiffs provided an alternate class
representative -- proposed lead plaintiff Sean Carithers who
purchased 6,000 shares of Tibet stock in the initial public
offering directly from Anderson & Strudwick -- to which these
arguments do not apply.

The defendants also opposed certification of particular proposed
class representatives because the timing of their purchase, their
performance in depositions, and a variety of credibility issues
preclude them from adequately representing the class.

Judge Arleo rejected the defendants' adequacy challenge, finding
that none of these issues are substantial enough to preclude any
of the class representatives from effectively representing the
class.

A full-text copy of Judge Arleo's February 22, 2016 opinion is
available at http://is.gd/Sns962from Leagle.com.

Robin Joachim Dartell, Plaintiff, MING YANG, LEE FISHMAN, Consol
Plaintiffs, represented by ERICA L. STONE -- estone@rosenlegal.com
-- THE ROSEN LAW FIRM PA & LAURENCE M. ROSEN --
lrosen@rosenlegal.com -- THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, PA.

Sterne Agee Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by RICHARD JON
DAVIS -- rdavis@maynardcooper.com -- MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C..

Hayden Zou, Defendant, represented by SCOTT CARGILL --
scargill@lowenstein.com.

MCCARTHY DOWNS III, Defendant, represented by ROBERT J. BRENER --
robert.brener@leclairryan.com -- LeClairRyan.

ACQUAVELLA, CHIARELLI, SHUSTER, BERKOWER & CO., LLP, Defendant,
represented by NICOLE B. LIEBMAN -- nicole.liebman@wilsonelser.com
-- WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP.

HSBC BANK USA, NA, Respondent, represented by LOUIS SMITH --
smithlo@gtlaw.com -- GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP.


TIME INC: Subscriptions Through 3rd Party Not Covered by VRPA
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned ROSE COULTER-OWENS, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TIME, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, Case No. 12-CV-14390 (E.D.
Mich.), Judge George Caram Steeh granted the motion for summary
judgment filed by Time, Inc. but denied its motion to stay.  The
judge also denied Rose Coulter-Owens' motion for summary judgment.

A putative class action under Michigan's Video Rental Privacy Act
("VRPA") was filed alleging that Time improperly disclosed the
private information of people who subscribed to its magazines,
TIME, Fortune, and Real Simple, through third-party websites.  The
complaint also alleged unjust enrichment under Michigan law.

Judge Steeh held that Coulter-Owens has Article III standing and
that his court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case.

Time argued that none of the proposed class members, including
Coulter-Owens, purchased magazines directly from Time, and, thus,
the magazine subscriptions do not constitute "at retail" purchase
under the VRPA.  Coulter-Owens countered that there need not be a
direct sale from Time to a customer for the sale to be considered
"at retail" under the VRPA.  On this matter, Judge Steeh held that
under the ordinary and plain reading of the term "at retail,"
magazine subscription purchases from a third-party, such as the
purchases involved in this case, are not encompassed by the
statute.

Judge Steeh also held that Time is entitled to summary judgment on
the unjust enrichment claim because Coulter-Owens has not offered
any evidence that establishes an unjust retention of benefits by
Time.

As to Time's motion to stay until the United States Supreme Court
issues its decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins on whether a
statutory injury is sufficient to allege an injury-in-fact for
purposes of Article III standing, Judge Steeh saw no reason to
wait for the Supreme Court to issue an opinion in Spokeo given
that there is no certainty that Spokeo is going to have an impact
on the case.

Finally, Judge Steeh declined to certify any questions to the
Michigan Supreme Court because he has already addressed the
statutory interpretation questions on the VRPA.

A full-text copy of Judge Steeh's February 16, 2016 opinion and
order is available at http://is.gd/kDEF92from Leagle.com.

Susan Fox, Plaintiff, represented by Henry M. Scharg, James
Dominick Larry -- nlarry@edelson.com -- Edelson P.C. & Ari J.
Scharg -- ascharg@edelson.com -- Edelson P.C..

Rose Coulter-Owens, Plaintiff, represented by Ari J. Scharg,
Edelson P.C., Benjamin Scott Thomassen -- bthomassen@edelson.com -
- Edelson PC, John C. Ochoa, SmithAmundsen LLC, Mark S. Eisen --
meisen@sheppardmullin.co -- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
& James Dominick Larry, Edelson P.C..

Time, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jeffrey G. Landis --
jeff@zwillgen.com -- ZWILLGEN PLLC,Marc J. Zwillinger --
marc@zwillgen.com -- Zwillgen, PLLC, Arthur Thomas O'Reilly --
aoreilly@honigman.com -- Honigman, Miller, Jacob A. Sommer --
jake@zwillgen.com -- Zwillgen, PLLC & Robert M. Jackson --
rjackson@honigman.com -- Honigman, Miller.


TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: "Lopez" Suit Alleges TCPA Violation
-------------------------------------------------------
YVONNE LOPEZ individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., Case 2:16-cv-00210-KJM-EFB
(E.D. Cal., February 3, 2016), seeks damages and any other
available legal or equitable remedies resulting from the alleged
illegal actions of Transworld Systems, Inc. in negligently,
knowingly, and/or willfully contacting Plaintiff on Plaintiff's
cellular telephone in violation of the Telephone Consumer
Protection.

Transworld Systems, Inc. is a business that loans money to
consumers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
     Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
     324 S. Beverly Dr., #725
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212
     Tel: 877-206-4741
     Fax: 866-633-0228
     E-mail: tfriedman@attorneysforconsumers.com
             abacon@attorneysforconsumers.com


TRAVELPORT WORLDWIDE: Files Motion to Dismiss "Gordon" Case
-----------------------------------------------------------
Travelport Worldwide Limited said in its Form 10-K Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the defendants
have filed a motion to dismiss the "Gordon" consumer antitrust
class action.

The Company said, "On July 14, 2015 and July 17, 2015, two
purported class action lawsuits were filed against us, Amadeus and
Sabre in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (Gordon et al. v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A.,
Amadeus North America, Inc., Amadeus Americas, Inc., Sabre
Corporation f/k/a Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Holdings
Corporation, Sabre GLBL Inc., Sabre Travel International Limited,
Travelport Worldwide Limited, and Travelport LP d/b/a Travelport
and Kolman et al. v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A., Amadeus North
America, Inc., Amadeus Americas, Inc., Sabre Corporation f/k/a
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre GLBL
Inc., Sabre Travel International Limited, Travelport Worldwide
Limited, and Travelport LP d/b/a Travelport)."

"On August 14, 2015, the Kolman case was voluntarily dismissed
without prejudice, leaving only the Gordon case in which an
amended complaint was filed on October 2, 2015 (the "Amended
Complaint"). The Amended Complaint alleges violations of the
Sherman Act, state antitrust laws and state consumer protection
laws by defendants beginning in 2006.

"In particular, the plaintiffs claim there was a conspiracy among
us and the other defendants to maintain higher fees and restrict
competition for airfare bookings that prevents airline
discounting. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief under federal
antitrust law and damages in connection with their state law
claims.

"On January 15, 2016, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss
that, if successful, would result in a full dismissal of the
plaintiffs' claims.

"At this time, the outcome of the Gordon lawsuit cannot be
determined, but we believe the plaintiffs' claims are without
merit, and we intend to defend the claims vigorously; however, we
believe the plaintiffs will request damages that would be material
to us if there was an adverse ruling against us."

Travelport is a travel commerce platform providing distribution,
technology, payment, mobile and other solutions for the $8
trillion global travel and tourism industry.  The Company
facilitates travel commerce by connecting the world's leading
travel providers, such as airlines and hotel chains with online
and offline travel agencies and other travel buyers in the
Company's proprietary business-to-business ("B2B") travel commerce
platform (Travel Commerce Platform).


TRINITY INDUSTRIES: Court Denies Bid to Dismiss St. Clair Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge David R. Herndon denied the motion filed by Trinity
Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC to dismiss the
case captioned ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND MACON COUNTY,
ILLINOIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER COUNTIES IN THE
STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiffs, v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., AND
TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, LLC, Defendants, No. 14-1320-DRH (S.D.
Ill.).

A first amended class action complaint was filed against the
Trinity defendants relating to the sale of unsafe and unapproved
ET-Plus guardrail end terminal that has been sold and installed as
a safety device on the roads and highways of the counties in
Illinois.

The Trinity defendants moved for dismissal for failure to state a
claim and because the statute of limitations bars the counties'
claims.

Judge Herndon found that the counties have stated a plausible
cause of action against the Trinity defendants at this stage of
litigation, and that there are "enough facts to raise a reasonable
expectation that discovery will reveal evidence" supporting the
counties' claims.  Judge Herndon also found that the claims are
not time-barred.

A full-text copy of Judge Herndon's February 18, 2016 memorandum
and order is available at http://is.gd/1XDipufrom Leagle.com.

Macon County, Illinois, Plaintiff, represented by David I. Cates -
- dcates@cateslaw.com -- Cates Mahoney, LLC, Eric D. Holland --
eholland@allfela.com -- Holland, Groves, Philip E. Proud --
pproud@allfela.com -- Holland, Groves, et al., Randall Seth
Crompton -- scrompton@allfela.com -- Holland, Groves, et al.,
Christopher Ellis -- cellis@brelaw.com -- Bolen, Robinson, et al.,
Ryan J. Mahoney -- rmahoney@cateslaw.com -- Cates Mahoney, LLC &
Shane M. Mendenhall -- smendenhall@brelaw.com -- Bolen, Robinson,
et al..

St. Clair County, Plaintiff, represented by Eric D. Holland,
Holland, Groves, Philip E. Proud, Holland, Groves, et al., Randall
Seth Crompton, Holland, Groves, et al., Shane M. Mendenhall,
Bolen, Robinson, et al. & David I. Cates, Cates Mahoney, LLC.

Trinity Industries Inc., Trinity Highway Products LLC, Defendants,
represented by Michael J. Nester, Donovan Rose Nester PC, Nicholas
J. Lamb -- nlamb@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn - St.
Louis, MO, Elizabeth M. Dulong Scott, Akin, Gump et al., Jessica
Greenwood -- jgreenwood@akingump.com -- Akin, Gump et al, Mark A.
Beatty -- mbeatty@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn, Michelle
A Reed -- reed@akingump.com -- Akin, Gump et al. & Roman P. Wuller
-- rwuller@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn.


TRUMP UNIVERSITY: Trump Named on Witness List in Fraud Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Isikoff, writing for Yahoo Politics reports that this
spring, just as the GOP nomination battle enters its final phase,
frontrunner Donald Trump could be forced to take time out for some
unwanted personal business: He's due to take the witness stand in
a federal courtroom in San Diego, where he is being accused of
running a financial fraud.

In court filings on Feb. 19, lawyers for both sides in a long-
running civil lawsuit over the now defunct Trump University named
Trump on their witness lists.  That makes it all but certain that
the reality-show star and international businessman will be forced
to be grilled under oath over allegations in the lawsuit that he
engaged in deceptive trade practices and scammed thousands of
students who enrolled in his "university" courses in response to
promises he would make them rich in the real estate market.

Although the case has been winding its way through the courts for
the past five years -- and Mr. Trump has denied all wrongdoing --
the final pretrial conference is now slated for May 6, according
to the latest pleadings in the case.  No trial date has been set,
but the judge has indicated his interest in moving the case
forward, the pleadings show.

"This is pretty amazing," said Scott Reed, a veteran Republican
Party consultant, about Trump's upcoming due date in federal
court.  "Usually, you clean this stuff up before you run for
president."

Mr. Trump's new lead lawyer in the case, Daniel Petrocelli, best
known for representing one of the slain murder victims in a civil
suit against O.J. Simpson, did not respond to emailed questions
about Trump's upcoming testimony, including how long he expects
his client to be on the witness stand.

As noted by Yahoo News, the Trump University case has already
intruded on Trump's political schedule.  On Dec. 10, 2015, during
a day he was making international headlines over his pledge to ban
Muslim immigrants from the United States, Mr. Trump managed to
escape any press attention and give a closed-door pretrial
deposition in the case, according to court filings reviewed by
Yahoo News.  Exactly what he said in the deposition remains under
seal, but lawyers for Tarla Makaeff, a California yoga instructor
who is the lead plaintiff in the case, cited portions of his
testimony (blacked out in her pleadings) to support their
contention that Mr. Trump has threatened to ruin her financially
for bringing the lawsuit and that she needs protection from his
"retaliation."

But the upcoming civil trial could be a much bigger burden on
Trump's time.  If it takes place in May, that would put it in the
middle of the final phase of the GOP primary schedule: Nebraska
and West Virginia vote on May 10, Oregon on May 17, and Washington
state on May 24.  Then on June 7, the biggest prize of all: the
California primary (with 172 delegates at stake).
New Jersey, Montana, New Mexico and South Dakota vote the same
day.

While it is unclear how long the trial over Trump University will
take, both sides have submitted lengthy witness lists: 72
individuals have been identified as prospective witnesses by the
two sides.  The case shows little sign of being settled.
Mr. Trump just last December hired Petrocelli, a master litigator,
and he recently identified 965 trial exhibits he expects to use at
trial, including PowerPoint presentations, course curriculums,
emails, letters, videos and other material. Picking jurors who
have neutral views on Trump could present another time-consuming
hurdle.

The core case revolves around the operations of a school Trump
launched in 2005 with a promotional You Tube video, as well as ads
that proclaimed, "I can turn anyone into a successful real estate
investor, including you," "Are YOU My Next Apprentice?" and "Learn
from my handpicked experts how you can profit from the largest
real estate liquidation in history."  The plaintiffs, former
students at Trump University, allege they were misled into maxing
out their credit cards and paying up to $60,000 in fees for
seminars in hotel ballrooms and "mentoring" by Mr. Trump's "hand-
picked" real estate experts.  The lawsuit against the school,
which is no longer in business, alleges the seminars turned into
little more than an "infomercial" and the Trump mentors offered
"no practical advice" and "mostly disappeared."  New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman filed a separate suit in 2013 alleging
fraud on the part of the "university," which was never an
accredited institution and awarded no degrees.


UNITED STATES: Faces Class Suit Over Risk Corridor Payments
-----------------------------------------------------------
Health Republic Insurance Company and on behalf of itself and all
others similarly situated, the Plaintiffs v. The United States of
America, the Defendant, Case No. 1:16-cv-00259-MMS (Fed. U.S.,
February 24, 2016), seeks full payment of the risk corridor
payments it is entitled to under the Affordable Care Act and the
Government currently owes.

A "risk corridor" is a program designed to mitigate risk for
participants in a new insurance market by limiting both
unexpectedly high gains and losses.  Modeled after a similar
program enacted as part of the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act that was signed into law in
2003 under President George W. Bush, the Affordable Care Act's
risk corridor program helped entice insurers to participate by
offering Qualified Health Plans ("QHPs") on the ACA's new
insurance exchanges.1 Section 1342 of the Affordable Care Act
contained two related mandatory terms for all QHP issuers: (1) any
QHP issuer/insurer agreeing to operate on an exchange would
receive compensation from the Government if its losses exceeded a
certain defined amount due to high utilization and high medical
costs; and (2) the QHP issuers/insurers were required to pay the
government a percentage of any profits they made over similarly-
defined amounts.

Defendant is the Government, acting through the Center for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and United States Department of
Health & Human Services.

Plaintiff is represented by:

     Stephen Swedlow, Esq.
     QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
     500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450
     Chicago, IL 60661-2510
     Telephone: (312) 705-7400
     Facsimile: (312) 705-7401

          - and -

     J.D. Horton, Esq.
     Adam B. Wolfson, Esq.
     865 S. Figueroa Street
     Los Angeles, CA 90017
     Telephone: (213) 443-3000
     Facsimile: (213) 443-3100


VISTAS INT'L: "Rodriguez" Suit Seeks Unpaid OT Wages
----------------------------------------------------
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ and other similarly situated individuals, v.
VISTAS INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALITY LLC d/b/a Ocean Spray Hotel and
MAURICIO NOVOA a/k/a Mauricio Nuvoa and FRANCIS HAWLEY, Case 1:16-
cv-20404-RNS (S.D.Fla., February 4, 2016), seeks to recover money
damages for alleged unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

A hospitality management company of the Americas that specializes
in the ownership, management and development of hotels, resorts
and related commercial real estate.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     R. Martin Saenz, Esq.
     SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC
     20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800
     Aventura, FL 33180
     Tel: (305) 503-5131
     Fax: (888) 270-5549
     E-mail: msaenz@saenzanderson.com


VOLKSWAGEN AG: Faces Emission Class Actions in California
---------------------------------------------------------
William Boston, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reports that
attorneys filed proposed class-action suits in a U.S. District
Court in California against Volkswagen AG, alleging the German car
maker engaged in widespread fraud in marketing its vehicles in the
U.S., citing federal laws used to curb racketeering.

The civil filings, on behalf of more than half a million U.S. car
owners and dealers, begins what is likely to be a long and
potentially expensive series of court proceedings against
Volkswagen.  The world's second-largest auto maker has admitted to
using so-called defeat devices to manipulate U.S. emissions tests
of its diesel-powered cars.

The consolidated complaints come weeks after U.S. District Judge
Charles Breyer named a committee of 22 plaintiffs' lawyers, led by
well-known class-action lawyer Elizabeth Cabraser, to steer the
litigation.  They pull from accusations already made in about 500
lawsuits filed nationwide.  The judge, who scheduled a hearing for
Feb. 25, has yet to approve class-action status for the suits.

The company separately faces potential U.S. regulatory fines of up
to $46 billion and is under criminal investigation in Germany and
elsewhere.  No criminal charges have been filed.

"This case arises out of one of the most brazen corporate crimes
in history, a cautionary tale about winning at any cost," the
plaintiffs claim in documents filed on Feb. 22 with the federal
court in San Francisco.  "Volkswagen cheated its way to the top of
the automotive food chain and spared no victim along the way."

A spokesman for Wolfsburg, Germany-based Volkswagen said the
filing was expected and that the company wouldn't comment on the
allegations.

The complaints allege that Volkswagen, its Audi and Porsche units,
and company executives including former Chief Executive Martin
Winterkorn and his successor, Matthias Mller, and auto supplier
Robert Bosch GmbH, violated federal statutes against racketeering.

The suits allege Volkswagen knowingly rigged diesel vehicles in
the U.S. to pass emissions tests.  The defeat device reduced
emissions control during normal road use, allowing the company to
spew toxic tailpipe emissions as much as 40 times the legal limit.

The plaintiffs argue that while Volkswagen was cheating on
emissions tests, it was also spending huge sums on advertising for
its "clean diesel" technology, allowing the company to grab as
much as 70% of the nascent diesel-engine market in the U.S.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs argue that the advertising and other
promises made to customers and dealers that their diesel engines
offered low emissions, high performance and fuel economy
constitute deliberate fraud.

Attorneys allege that Volkswagen engaged in a conspiracy to commit
the fraud with its units Volkswagen Group of America, Audi,
Porsche and supplier Robert Bosch.

A Bosch spokesman declined to comment.  The company has denied any
involvement in the alleged fraud, saying it sold an engine control
unit to Volkswagen, but that Volkswagen was responsible for
calibrating the unit.

Volkswagen has hired attorney Kenneth Feinberg to try to work out
a settlement outside of the California litigation with U.S. car
owners' claims resulting from the emissions-cheating scandal.  He
has worked as mediator on a number of high-profile compensation
cases in the past, including funds for victims of September 11
terrorist attacks, BP PLC Deepwater Horizon oil disaster and
defective General Motors Co. cars.


VONS COMPANIES: "Moreno" Suit Removed to C.D. California
--------------------------------------------------------
J. Moreno, A. Baltazar and J. Costello, individually and on behalf
all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. The Vons Companies,
Inc. and Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants, has been removed
from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Riverside (Case No. RIC 1601315, February 2, 2016), to the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California (Case No.
2:16-cv-1270, February 24, 2016).

The Complaint asserts the following claims for relief: (1) of the
California Labor Code Sections 510 and 1194 and IWC Wage Order 7,
Failure to Pay Minimum Wage and Overtime Compensation; (2) Failure
to Provide Meal Breaks, California Labor Code Sections 226.7, 512
and IWC Wage Order 7; (3) Section 203 of the California Labor
Code, Continuing Wages; (4) California Labor Code Sec. 226,
Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements; (5) California Labor
Code Sec. 1174 and IWC Wage Order 7, Failure to Maintain Accurate
Payroll Records; (6) Cal. Bus & Prof. Code Sections 17200 et seq.
- Restitution; (7) California Labor Code Sec. 221, Improper
Deductions From Wages; and, (8) Fair Labor Standards Act, 29
U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., Overtime and Liquidated Damages.

The Defendant is represented by:

     R. Brian Dixon, Esq.
     Michael F. McCabe, Esq.
     LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
     650 California Street, 20th Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
     Telephone: 415-433-1940
     Facsimile: 415-399-8490
     Email: bdixon@littler.com
            mmccabe@littler.com


WAL-MART STORES: Faces Fraud Class Action Over Parmesan Cheese
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jef Feeley, writing for Bloomberg.com, reports that Wal-Mart
Stores Inc. was accused in a lawsuit of defrauding customers by
selling Parmesan cheese touted as pure that contained wood pulp as
filler.

The world's largest retailer stocked its New York stores' shelves
with containers labeled "100% Grated Parmesan Cheese," but tests
showed Wal-Mart's Great Value brand contained as much as 10
percent cellulose, a wood based anti-clumping agent, according to
a complaint filed on Feb. 23 in Manhattan federal court.

Customer Marc Moschetta said in the lawsuit he wouldn't have
bought the cheese if he'd been aware that "the 100% representation
was false and mis-characterized the amount and percentage of
Parmesan cheese in the container."

"We take this matter seriously," Randy Hargrove, a spokesman for
Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart, said in an e-mailed
statement.  "We will review the allegations once we have received
the complaint and will respond appropriately with the court."

Independent Tests

The suit follows a Bloomberg News investigation that asked an
independent laboratory to test store-bought Parmesan cheese for
wood-pulp content.

The tests found Essential Everyday 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese,
from Jewel-Osco, contained 8.8 percent cellulose, while
Wal-Mart's brand registered 7.8 percent. Whole Foods 365 brand
didn't list cellulose as an ingredient on the label, but still
tested at 0.3 percent.  Kraft Heinz Co.'s Parmesan had 3.8 percent
of the filler.

Mr. Moschetta is seeking class-action status for the fraud claims,
which would allow shoppers across the country to band together to
press claims against Wal-Mart.  He says other reviews of Wal-
Mart's house brand Parmesan cheese found higher pulp content than
Bloomberg's tests.

A California consumer filed a similar case against Kraft in
San Francisco federal court.  Samantha Lewin alleged that the
company's misrepresentations led shoppers to pay a premium for the
millions of containers sold.

The New York case is Moschetta v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.,
16-cv-1377, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
(Manhattan).  The California case is Lewin v. Kraft Heinz Foods
Co., 16-cv-823, U.S. District Court, Northern District of
California (San Francisco)


WASTE MANAGEMENT: Awaits Approval of Deffenbaugh Case Settlement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Waste Management, Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that the Company is awaiting
court approval of the settlement of class actions against
Deffenbaugh Disposal, Inc.

On March 26, 2015, the Company acquired Deffenbaugh. In May 2012
and December 2013, Deffenbaugh was named as a defendant in
purported class actions filed in the United States District Court
for the District of Kansas. These cases pertained to fuel,
environmental and base rate charges included on invoices,
generally alleging that such charges were not properly disclosed,
were unfair or were contrary to the customer service contracts.

"We have agreed on settlement terms for both cases," the Company
said. "We submitted a request for preliminary court approval
during the fourth quarter of 2015 and are awaiting action on our
request. The anticipated settlements will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows."

Waste Management is North America's leading provider of
comprehensive waste management environmental services.


WATTS WATER: To Pay $4.1 Million Portion of Settlement
------------------------------------------------------
Watts Water Technologies has reached an agreement in principle to
settle all claims in the class action cases captioned Ponzo v.
Watts Regulator Co. and Klug v. Watts Regulator Co., matters
pending in the United States District Courts for the District of
Massachusetts and District of Nebraska, respectively, Watts Water
said in its Form 8-K Report filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 17, 2016.

As disclosed in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 27, 2015, the Ponzo and Klug matters were each
brought as putative nationwide class actions seeking to recover
damages and other relief based on the alleged failure of water
heater connectors and FloodSafe connectors,  respectively.  The
total settlement amount is $14 million, of which Watts is expected
to be responsible for $4.1 million as its portion of the
settlement.   The settlement is subject to the completion of a
final written settlement agreement, preliminary court approval,
and final court approval after a fairness hearing.


XO COMMUNICATIONS: Faces Class Action Over Termination Fees
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Karmasek, writing for Legal Newsline, reports that Chicago
plaintiffs firm filed a class action lawsuit against a
telecommunications company it previously contracted with, arguing
it charged the law firm "unlawful and unconscionable" termination
fees.

Plaintiff Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP, a plaintiffs
firm that typically represents investors, employees, consumers and
companies in complex civil litigation, filed its lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Feb. 17.

In its 16-page complaint, Cafferty Clobes alleges defendant XO
Communications Services Inc. -- formerly known as Nextlink
Communications, Concentric Network Corporation and Allegiance
Telecom Inc. -- charged it and similarly situated customers
unlawful early termination fees in violation of the Illinois
Automatic Contract Renewal Act, or ACRA, and the state Consumer
Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, or ICFA.

XO, according to its website, owns and operates one of the largest
Ethernet and IP networks in the United States.

"XO failed to disclose the renewal terms clearly and conspicuously
in either the contracts or its monthly invoices, failed to notify
its customers in writing of the automatic renewal, and charged
unlawful and excessive termination fees designed to act as a
penalty," the law firm alleges.

In June 2005, Cafferty Clobes -- at the time known as Miller
Faucher & Cafferty LLP -- contracted with XO for local and long
distance telephone service.

The contract was signed, on behalf of the firm, by then-office
manager, Anne Jewell. Jewell left the firm in 2006.

Under the contract, the start of service date was July 7, 2005 for
a three-year term.

The contract included a provision stating that XO would inform its
customer, in writing, prior to the expiration of the initial term
or applicable renewal terms, that if no action is taken by the
customer prior to the expiration of the term, the agreement will
automatically renew.

Accordingly, the contract renewed pursuant to its terms on
July 7, 2008; July 7, 2011; and July 7, 2014.

But at no point did XO provide any notice, written or otherwise,
to the firm that the contract had actually renewed on these dates,
Cafferty Clobes alleges in its complaint.

"Nor did XO provide adequate notice, in accordance with the
Contract terms, that the Contract would renew prior to these
dates," the lawsuit states.

The firm also alleges that nowhere do its monthly invoices
identify the date upon which the customer's current service term
will expire -- only "boilerplate" language.

Cafferty Clobes contends the lack of specifics leave the burden on
the customer to both identify the date and determine whether
cancellation is required, if it elects to do so.

The law firm moved its offices in downtown Chicago last year. XO
was unable to provide telephone services at the firm's new
address, prompting the firm to terminate its contract and making a
"termination charge" payment of $1,000 to the company.

Shortly thereafter -- and notwithstanding Cafferty Clobes' payment
of the termination charge -- XO allegedly demanded the firm pay an
additional $9,000 in liquidated damages due to its early
termination of the contract.

"To date, Plaintiff has refused to pay this unlawful and excessive
penalty," the firm's lawsuit states. "As a result, Plaintiff
continues to be harassed by debt collectors hired by XO."

Cafferty Clobes is seeking to represent a nationwide class of all
current and former XO customers who entered into contracts with XO
containing an automatic renewal clause and were charged early
termination fees.

The Chicago office of Lite DePalma Greenberg LLC is representing
the plaintiff.


YRC WORLDWIDE: Trial in Bryant Holdings Case Begins on June 6
-------------------------------------------------------------
YRC Worldwide Inc. said in its Form 10-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2016, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, that a district court has set
a trial on the individual claims in the Bryant Holdings Securities
Litigation beginning June 6, 2016.

The Company said, "On February 7, 2011, a putative class action
was filed by Bryant Holdings LLC in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Kansas on behalf of purchasers of our common stock
between April 24, 2008 and November 2, 2009, inclusive (the "Class
Period"), seeking damages under the federal securities laws for
statements and/or omissions allegedly made by us and the
individual defendants during the Class Period which plaintiffs
claimed to be false and misleading."

"The individual defendants are former officers of our Company. No
current officers or directors were named in the lawsuit. The
parties participated in voluntary mediation between March 11, 2013
and April 15, 2013. The mediation resulted in the execution of a
mutually acceptable settlement agreement by the parties.
Plaintiffs' fourth motion to approve settlement was denied by the
district court in October 2015, and the Company continues to
consider all options going forward. Substantially all of the
payments contemplated by the settlement would be covered by our
liability insurance. The self-insured retention on this matter has
been accrued.

"On March 4, 2015, the district court set the case for trial on
the individual claims beginning June 6, 2016."

YRC Worldwide Inc. is a holding company that, through wholly owned
operating subsidiaries and its interest in a Chinese joint
venture, JHJ International Transportation Company, Ltd ("JHJ"),
offers its customers a wide range of transportation services.  YRC
is one of the largest, most comprehensive less-than-truckload
("LTL") networks in North America with local, regional, national
and international capabilities.


* Dilapidated Legal Regime Impacts Ride-Sharing Pioneers
--------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Fisher, writing for Forbes, reports that as the "gig"
economy becomes more ingrained in our lives, innovation in the
21st century workplace is increasingly constrained by a
dilapidated 20th century legal regime.  Exhibits A and B: class
action lawsuits in California against Lyft and Uber.  Although
Uber has "verbed" itself faster than any company since Google, the
awkward mismatch between the last century's laws and this
century's needs of workers, consumers, and entrepreneurs looms
like a giant pothole in the ride-sharing pioneers' freeway
forward.

The primary bone of contention is Lyft's and Uber's treatment of
their drivers as independent contractors.  California law looks
askance at the very concept of independent contractors; the Golden
State's statutory presumption is that anyone working for another
is an employee.  Another headwind for Lyft and Uber is the federal
Department of Labor's 2015 administrative interpretation on
application of federal wage and hour law to employees
misclassified as independent contractors.  The feds find that
misclassified employees miss out on overtime, minimum wage,
unemployment insurance and workers compensation. Government loses
tax revenue. It's not hard to see why government objects.

Yet many workers seem willing to reject government protections and
prefer independent contractor status. Freedom to set one's own
hours, take jobs (or rides) they want to take and reject those
they don't, and to pursue other educational or career
opportunities are the primary benefits.  Hence, the overwhelming
popularity of Lyft and Uber, for drivers and riders alike.

So what goes wrong? Well, maybe nothing for the vast majority of
drivers, but all it takes is one enterprising lawyer to file a
suit, or one employee to file a claim for unemployment or for
unpaid wages.  One California administrative judge found that an
Uber driver who applied for unemployment was an employee because
Uber was in the business of providing transportation services,
Uber exerted "a distinct and strong right to control" the manner
and means by which the service was provided, controlled the
compensation, and had the right to terminate the relationship at
will.  In one wage case, a California Labor Commissioner hearing
officer rejected Uber's argument that it was merely providing a
"neutral technological platform" to allow drivers and riders to
transact the business of transportation, noting that where the
work done is an "integral part" of the regular business of the
employer, and when the worker does not furnish an independent
business or professional service, employment will be found.

Inevitably, administrative claims were followed by class action
lawsuits.  In Lyft's, both Lyft and the employees filed separate
motions for summary judgment, asking the court to rule as a matter
of law based on agreed-upon facts that they were either employees
or independent contractors.  The court could do neither. It found
the drivers did not look like employees because they can work as
much or as little as they want, and can schedule driving around
their other activities.  It also found they didn't look like
independent contractors, because they lack special skills, the
ability to negotiate with clients to get paid for those skills,
and they aren't doing something tangential to Lyft's operations;
meanwhile, Lyft controls how they work, how much they get paid,
and can end the relationship whenever it wants.  After a lengthy
discussion, the court concluded it could not rule either way.
Instead, it sent the case to a jury, which "will be handed a
square peg and asked to choose between two round holes."  The
court suggested a distinction could be drawn based on number of
hours driven, or perhaps a third category of workers could be
created.  The court lamented California's "outmoded test" and the
lack of legislation to resolve the quandary.


* Financial Sector Securities Class Action Downtrend to Continue
----------------------------------------------------------------
Shawn Hough, Esq. -- shough@bakerlaw.com -- of BakerHostetler, in
an article for JDSupra, reports that 2015 was a busy, fast-paced
year for securities class action filings.

According to a report published by NERA Economic Consulting, 234
federal securities class action complaints were filed in 2015.
This is the highest number of filings since 2008 and marks an 8
percent increase over 2014.

The 2015 median time between the end of the alleged class period
and the filing of complaints is also notable: a record-setting 11
days, down approximately 40 percent from 2014.  The median class
period was also the shortest in the past decade, falling to 310
days.

What's behind the uptick in filings? One reason is an increase in
the number of cases filed against foreign-domiciled companies.
While 2015 did not approach 2011's record-setting 23.9 percent of
filings against foreign companies, 2015 ended with 14.8 percent of
filings against foreign companies, the highest since 2011. Another
reason for the spike is an increase in the number of filings
related to the technology sector: 2015 saw about 1 out of 5
filings directed at the technology sector, a more than 90 percent
increase over 2014.

One outlier was the financial services sector, which actually saw
a significant decrease in new securities filings.  Filings against
financial services firms amounted to 12 percent of the total in
2015, down from 19 percent in 2014 and down from a whopping 50
percent in 2008 at the height of the financial crisis.

The 234 federal securities class action complaints filed in 2015
fall into two main categories: cases alleging violations of Rule
10b-5, Section 11 or Section 12 (182), and merger objection cases
(43).

The average settlement in 2015 was $7 million. The largest
settlement of the year was paid by American International Group,
Inc., in the amount of $970.5 million.

"As we move into 2016, the downward trend in securities class
actions against financial sector companies will likely continue as
cases related to the financial crisis are resolved. If current
trends hold, there will be a greater number of filings against
nonfinancial and foreign companies," BakerHostetler's Hough said.


* MCPA, Lawmakers Join Suit v. Flushable Wipes Manufacturers
------------------------------------------------------------
Katherine Johnson, writing for ABC5Eyewitness News, reports that
nine cities and government agencies in Minnesota and Wisconsin
have signed onto a class-action lawsuit, demanding that
manufacturers of flushable wipes pay for damages to sewer and pipe
infrastructure.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is asking the state to step
in and require those companies to change the labels and stop
advertising wipes as "flushable."

Little Dylan Tuttle is extremely independent.  However, at just
18-months-old, he still needs some help.

His mother, Meaghan, says he requires about six wipes a day to
feel his best.

"We actually just switched to cloth diapers in January and
switched to flushable wipes in January," she said.

It was an effort to become more environmentally conscious and
reduce landfill waste, Meaghan said.

Many Minnesotans are like Meaghan.  We read the label and assume
the wipe is biodegradable.

What Meaghan didn't know is that those wipes end up in sewage
grates, caught in pipes, clogging lines and costing cities
thousands of dollars to reverse the damage.

"It's a money problem, it's a maintenance problem," said
Dave Verhasselt, with the MPCA.

Mr. Verhasselt says the agency is working with lawmakers this
session to wipe words like "flushable" and "sewer safe" off those
labels.

The League of Minnesota Cities also supports the push, which would
require any and all manufacturers who want to sell their wipes in
the state to include "do not flush" on the packaging.
"The idea is to get people to understand that these products are
really not meant to go down the toilet," Mr. Verhasselt said. "You
should put as little down the drain as possible just because it
produces maintenance and clogging problems."

Meaghan trusted the packaging.

"If I'm being misled, just because of a label, then I'm going to
be disappointed," she said.

Now she says she'll toss Dylan's wipes in the trash.  With her
second due in April, she'll have enough to worry about without
adding clogs and backups to her already busy life.

City workers in Minnetonka have to clear wipes from pumps every
three days and major clogs still happen about eight to 10 times a
year.  It costs as much as $1,500 to clean out a clogged pump.
More cities are joining a class-action lawsuit the city of Wyoming
filed against flushable wipes manufacturers in August.  Cities and
entities included in the lawsuit are the Village of Holmen,
Wisconsin, Elk River, Mankato, Perham, Princeton, Fergus Falls,
the Sauk Centre Public Utilities Commission and the Chisago Lakes
Joint Sewage Treatment Commission.


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *