/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/CAR_Public/151117.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

           Tuesday, November 17, 2015, Vol. 17, No. 229


                            Headlines


7-ELEVEN INC: "Gee" Suit Removed to Central District California
ABITBOL ITALIAN: Faces "Cabanas" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
BLUE BUFFALO: Recalls Cat Treats Due to Propylene Glycol
BLUE SHIELD: Faces "Homampour" Suit Over Unlawful Claims Handling
BRETT ANTHONY: Recalls Tofu Curry Cous Cous Products

BRETT ANTHONY: Recalls Wild Mushroom Soup Due to Chestnuts
CALAVO GROWERS: Incurred $0.2MM in Legal Costs During Fiscal Q3
CALERES INC: Has $1.5MM Class Action Reserve at August 1
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP: Faces "Kinlaw" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
CHOW LAO: Faces "Smitherman" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime

CONN'S INC: Remaining Defendants Want Securities Suit Dismissed
CORPRA CARE: Sued in Ind. Over Illegal Debt Collection Practices
CSFPDX LLC: Recalls Albacore Tuna Products Due to Clostridium
EXPERIAN NORTH: Faces "Cohen" Suit Over Alleged Data Breach
FANDUEL INC: Illegally Uses NFL Players' Name, "Garcon" Suit Says

FANDUEL INC: Illegally Uses NFL Players' Name, "Mosley" Suit Says
FARMER CREEK: Recalls Canned Albocore Tuna Due to C. botulinum
FEDEX CORPORATION: Continues to Defend Wage-and-Hour Lawsuits
FEDEX CORPORATION: $228MM Settlement Pending in California Case
FINANCIAL BUSINESS: Sued Over Illegal Debt Collection Practices

FIRST HORIZON: FTBNA Defendant in Class Action
FRANCESCA'S HOLDINGS: Stipulation of Dismissal Granted
GENERAL MILLS: Falsely Marketed Gluten Free Cheerios, Suit Says
GEO GROUP: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Consumer Reports
GIANT FOOD: Recalls Edamame Products Due to Soy

GILMORE FISH: Recalls Canned Salmon Due to Clostridium Botulinum
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Camp" Suit in Mass. Over Zofra(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Daniel" Suit Over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Davis" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Denson" Suit Over Zofran(R)

GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Kuechle" Suit over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Price" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Reynolds" Suit Over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Valenzuela" Suit Over Zofran(R)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Watkins" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)

GROWLIFE INC: Must Issue $2MM Shares for Class Action Settlement
HELADOS LA: Recalls Milk Based Ice Cream Products Due to Egg
HERR FOODS: Recalls Sour Cream and Onion Potato Chips
HERTZ LOCAL: "Fernado" Suit Removed to C. Dist. California
HIGH TECH: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Alan" Action Claims

HORMEL FOODS: Recalls Skippy(R) Reduced Fat Peanut Butter Spread
INAFFIT LLC: Recalls Natureal Light Green and Dark Green Capsules
INNOVATIVE STYLING: Falsely Marketed Hair Products, Suit Claims
KEANE GROUP: Fails to Pay Workers Overtime, "Moncrease" Suit Says
KENSINGTON PROFESSIONAL: Sued in C.D. Cal. Over Unsolicited Calls

KOZY SHACK: Recalls Salted Caramel Pudding Due to Egg
LAKEVIEW PEARL: Doesn't Properly Pay Workers, "Nguyen" Suit Says
MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces "Giglio" Suit Over Roundup(R) Herbicide
MULTI-SHOT: "Freeman" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
NATIONAL VIDEO: Recalls Rhino 7 3000 Platinum Capsules

NET 1 UEPS: S.D.N.Y. Court Dismissed Securities Class Action
NEW YORK: Dept. of Education Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime
OLD OREGON: Recalls Canned Albacore Tuna Due to C. Botulinum
OLEBOB'S SEAFOODS: Recalls Canned Tuna and Salmon Products
PARAMOUNT GOLD: 6 Actions Challenging Merger Deal Remain Open

PERU FOOD: Recalls Corn-Maiz Mote Products Due to Sulfites
PREMIERE SALES: Recalls Rhino 7 3000 Capsules Due to Desmethyl
QUEST MEDICAL: Recalls MPS Delivery Sets
REDMAN POWER: Sued in Cal. Over Redman Power Chair Design Defects
SANOFI US: Recalls Auvi-Q(R) Epinephrine Injections

SHARIFI INC: Faces "Patel" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
SOCKEYE SUZY'S: Recalls Canned Fish Products Due to Clostridium
SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Recalls Oatmeal Raisin Cookie Products
SPECIAL LOGISTICS: "Wright" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages
STOP & SHOP: Recalls Edamame Products Due to Soy

SWISHER HYGIENE: Class Action Filed Over Ecolab Sale
TATE'S BAKE: Recalls Chocolate Chip Cookies Due to Walnut
TILLY'S INC: Intends to Defend "Christiansen" Case
TILLY'S INC: Working on Potential Resolution of "Rebolledo" Case
TILLY'S INC: Intends to Defend "Whitten" Case

TILLY'S INC: Settled "Ortiz" Class Action in E.D. Cal.
TIME WARNER: MOU Reached in NY Action Related to Comcast Deal
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: Illegally Collects Debt, "Libby" Suit Says
UTI WORLDWIDE: Filed New Motion to Dismiss Class Action
VIOLIN MEMORY: Class Action in Discovery Phase

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP: Faces "Pomerantz" Suit Over Defeat Devices
WAL-MART STORES: Petition for Writ Filed in Braun/Hummel Case
WORLD VARIETY: Recalls Italian Pine Nuts Due to Salmonella
XURA INC: To Defend Against Israeli Optionholder Class Action
ZENOBIA COMPANY: Recalls Flax Seed Products Due to Salmonella


                            *********


7-ELEVEN INC: "Gee" Suit Removed to Central District California
---------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit captioned Marvin Gee, Cathy Saylor,
individually and on behalf of other members of the general public
similarly situated v. 7-Eleven Inc. and Does 1 through 100,
inclusive, Case No. BC582350, was removed from the Los Angeles
Superior Court to the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California (Western Division - Los Angeles). The District Court
Clerk assigned Case No. 2:15-cv-08513-PSG-AGR to the proceeding.

7-Eleven Inc. is a chain of retail convenience stores that
operates primarily as a franchise.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      James Reid Kristy, Esq.
      THE KRISTY LAW FIRM
      3020 Old Ranch Parkway Suite 300
      Seal Beach, CA 90740
      Telephone: (562) 799-5548
      Facsimile: (562) 799-5724
      E-mail: james@kristylaw.com

         - and -

      Kurt E. Kananen, Esq.
      HARTMANN AND KANANEN
      20750 Ventura Boulevard Suite 101
      Woodland Hills, CA 91364
      Telephone: (818) 710-0151
      Facsimile: (818) 710-0191
      E-mail: kurtkananen@sbcglobal.net

         - and -

      Yashdeep Singh, Esq.
      YASH LAW GROUP
      400 West Lambert Road Suite C
      Brea, CA 92821
      Telephone: (714) 494-6244
      Facsimile: (714) 406-0658
      E-mail: ysingh@yashlaw.com

The Defendant is represented by:

      Eric A. Welter, Esq.
      Laura Beth Thomasian, Esq.
      WELTER LAW FIRM PC
      1141 Elden Street Suite 220
      Herndon, VA 20170
      Telephone: (703) 435-8500
      Facsimile: (703) 435-8851
      E-mail: eaw@welterlaw.com
              lbc@welterlaw.com

         - and -

      Sean Francis Daley, Esq.
      WELTER LAW FIRM, P.C.
      2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 527
      Burbank, CA 91505
      Telephone: (818) 333-5016
      Facsimile: (818) 333-5017
      E-mail: sfd@welterlaw.com

         - and -

      Julie R. Trotter, Esq.
      CALL AND JENSEN
      610 Newport Center Drive Suite 700
      Newport Beach, CA 92660
      Telephone: (949) 717-3000
      Facsimile: (949) 717-3100
      E-mail: jtrotter@calljensen.com


ABITBOL ITALIAN: Faces "Cabanas" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Alberto Cabanas and other similarly-situated individuals v.
Abitbol Italian, LLC, Abitbol Wings LLC, Abitbol Midtown Wings
LLC, Bowen Abitbol, individually, Case No. 1:15-cv-24078 (S.D.
Fla., October 31, 2015, is brought against the Defendants for
failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate hotels in Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Zandro E. Palma, Esq.
      ZANDRO E. PALMA, P.A.
      9100 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1500
      Miami, FL 33156
      Telephone: (305) 446-1500
      Facsimile: (305) 446-1502
      E-mail: zep@thepalmalawgroup.com


BLUE BUFFALO: Recalls Cat Treats Due to Propylene Glycol
--------------------------------------------------------
Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd. is voluntarily recalling a limited
production of Blue Kitty Yums Chicken Recipe Cat Treats that may
contain low levels of propylene glycol, which is not permitted by
the FDA for use in cat food.

Cats reacting to high doses of propylene glycol may exhibit signs
of depression and may have a loss of coordination, muscle
twitching, and excessive urination and thirst. If your cat has
consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please
contact your veterinarian.

The affected product was distributed nationwide in the US and
Canada through pet specialty stores and e-commerce.

The product is packaged in a 2 oz., plastic stand up pouch. Only
these specific code dates of this product are involved:

  --- Blue Kitty Yums Tasty Chicken Recipe, UPC: 859610007820 -
      Best If Used By: April 24, 2016.
  --- Blue Kitty Yums Tasty Chicken Recipe, UPC: 859610007820 -
      Best If Used By: July 24, 2016.

No other BLUE pet foods or treats are involved in this recall.
The FDA tested product in response to a single consumer complaint
and found propylene glycol in one bag of our cat treats in the
impacted lot. To date we have had no other reports of incidents
related to our cat treats. Out of an abundance of caution, we are
voluntarily recalling all product manufactured in the same lot as
the subject bag.

Consumers who have purchased the product being recalled may return
it to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with
questions may contact Blue Buffalo at: 888-667-1508 from 8 AM to 5
PM Eastern Time Monday through Friday and the weekend of November
7, 2015 or by email at BlueBuffalo5883@stericycle.com for more
information.

About Blue Buffalo
Blue Buffalo, based in Wilton, CT, is a pet products company that
makes natural foods and treats for pets.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/RTPl07


BLUE SHIELD: Faces "Homampour" Suit Over Unlawful Claims Handling
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aram Homampour, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance
Company, Case No. 4:15-cv-05003-KAW (N.D. Cal., October 30, 2015)
alleges that the Defendant is engaged in a pattern of unreasonable
and egregious claims handling practices which have directly and
adversely impacted individuals suffering from
Hepatitis C, and particularly those individuals with a METAVIR
liver fibrosis staging score5 of F0, F1 or F2 on a scale F0-F46,
that seek coverage for Harvoni treatment regimens.

Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company sell
and market its insurance products to millions of consumers in
California, and across the nation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Glenn R. Kantor, Esq.
      Timothy J. Rozelle, Esq.
      KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
      19839 Nordhoff Street
      Northridge, CA 91324
      Telephone: (818) 886 2525
      Facsimile: (818) 350 6272
      E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net
              trozelle@kantorlaw.net


BRETT ANTHONY: Recalls Tofu Curry Cous Cous Products
----------------------------------------------------
Brett Anthony Foods of Elk Grove Village Illinois is recalling two
16oz containers of Tofu Curry Cous Cous Box because it may contain
undeclared peanut, egg, sulfite. People who have an allergy or
severe sensitivity to peanut, egg, sulfite run the risk of serious
or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these
products.

The Tofu Curry Cous Cous Boxes were sold by Whole Foods Market,
3135 Washtenaw Ave Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 Phone 734 975-4500

The Tofu Curry Cous Cous Box is packaged in a plastic 16oz box
labeled Whole Foods Market, Tofu Curry Cous Cous Box. Its
expiration date is 110715 located on the top of box. Only these
two boxes with the code of 110715 are affected by this recall.

NO ILLNESSES HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO DATE

The problem was discovered by a Whole Foods team member upon
receipt. The product was discovered to be labeled incorrectly
without declaring the allergen.

Consumers who have purchased the Tofu Curry Cous Cous Box are
urged to return to the place of purchase for a full refund.
Consumers with questions may contact the company at 847 272-4309,
Monday through Friday, 9:00 to 3:00 CST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/l4nWzZ


BRETT ANTHONY: Recalls Wild Mushroom Soup Due to Chestnuts
----------------------------------------------------------
Brett Anthony Foods of Elk Grove Village Illinois is recalling
109, 24oz cups of Wild Mushroom Soup because it may contain
undeclared chestnuts. People who have an allergy or severe
sensitivity to chestnuts run the risk of serious or life-
threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.
The Wild Mushroom Soup was sold by Whole Foods Markets in
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota and Nebraska.

The Wild Mushroom Soup is packaged in a plastic 24oz cup labeled
Whole Foods Market, Wild Mushroom Soup. Its expiration date is
112115 located on the bottom of the cups.

NO ILLNESSES HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO DATE

The problem was discovered by a Whole Foods team member upon
receipt. The product was discovered to be labeled incorrectly
without declaring the allergen.

Consumers who have purchased the Wild Mushroom Soup are urged to
return to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with
questions may contact the company at 847-272-4309, Monday through
Friday, 9:00 to 3:00 CST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/IpCt7M


CALAVO GROWERS: Incurred $0.2MM in Legal Costs During Fiscal Q3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Calavo Growers, Inc. incurred $0.2 million in legal expenses
related to a class action during the Company's third fiscal
quarter, Calavo revealed in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2015.

The Company said, "In January 2015, various class action lawsuits,
which have been consolidated into a single lawsuit during our
second fiscal quarter, were initiated against the company related
to the restatement of previously-issued financial statements. In
the third quarter of fiscal 2015, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, to which we filed a motion to dismiss (MTD)."

"In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the plaintiffs filed an
opposition to this MTD, to which we subsequently filed a reply to
said opposition.

"During our 3rd fiscal quarter, we incurred $0.2 million in legal
expenses related to that lawsuit. We intend to vigorously defend
ourselves against this lawsuit and we do not expect that such
legal claims and litigation will ultimately have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations."

A hearing was scheduled in October 2015 on the motion to dismiss
the consolidated class action.


CALERES INC: Has $1.5MM Class Action Reserve at August 1
--------------------------------------------------------
Caleres, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 1, 2015, that that the reserve for
the settlement in a class action as of August 1, 2015 is $1.5
million.

During 2014, the Company signed a settlement agreement to resolve
a putative class action lawsuit involving wage and hour claims in
California for an amount not to exceed $1.5 million. The court has
granted preliminary approval of the settlement, pursuant to which
the Company will pay a minimum of $1.0 million in attorneys' fees,
costs of administering the settlement and settlement payments to
class members who submit claims. A hearing for final approval of
the settlement is scheduled for the third quarter of 2015. The
reserve for this matter as of August 1, 2015 is $1.5 million.


CELLCO PARTNERSHIP: Faces "Kinlaw" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
--------------------------------------------------------------
William Kinlaw, Martine Tucker, and Richard Williston, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Cellco
Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Does 1-20, Case No. 1:15-
cv-09760 (N.D. Ill., October 30, 2015) is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Cellco Partnership owns, operates, or controls retail stores,
kiosks, and in-store locations.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ilan Chorowsky, Esq.
      Mark A. Bulgarelli, Esq.
      Elizabeth Roberson-Young, Esq.
      PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP LLC
      140 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 315
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 787-2717


CHOW LAO: Faces "Smitherman" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
--------------------------------------------------------------
Corey Smitherman v. Chow, Lao, Liew, LLC. d/b/a Hokkaido Japanese
Steak and Sushi Bar, Case No. 2:15-cv-01950-JHE (N.D. Ala.,
October 30, 2015) is brought against the Defendants for failure to
pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a Japanese Steak and Sushi Bar
employing servers at 607 15th Street East, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
35401.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq.
      Daniel E. Arciniegas, Esq.
      L. William Smith, Esq.
      WIGGINS, CHILDS, PANTAZIS, FISHER, & GOLDFARB LLC
      The Kress Building
      301 19th Street North
      Birmingham, AL 35203
      Telephone: (205) 314-0500
      Facsimile: (205) 254-1500
      E-mail: jgoldfarb@wigginschilds.com
              dea@wigginschilds.com
              jsmith@wigginschilds.com


CONN'S INC: Remaining Defendants Want Securities Suit Dismissed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Conn's, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2015, that the remaining
defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the Securities Class
Action Litigation.

The Company said, "We and two of our current executive officers
are defendants in a consolidated securities class action lawsuit
pending in the Southern District of Texas, In re Conn's Inc.
Securities Litigation, Cause No. 14-CV-00548 (the "Consolidated
Securities Action"). The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Securities
Action allege that the defendants made false and misleading
statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts about
our business, operations, and prospects. They allege violations of
sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and seek to certify a class
of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired
Conn's common stock and/or call options, or sold/wrote Conn's put
options between April 3, 2013 and December 9, 2014. The complaint
does not specify the amount of damages sought."

"On June 30, 2015, the Court held a hearing on the defendants'
motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. At the hearing, the Court
dismissed Brian Taylor, a former executive officer, and certain
other aspects of the complaint. The Court ordered plaintiffs to
further amend their complaint in accordance with its ruling, and
the plaintiffs filed their Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint
on July 21, 2015. The remaining defendants filed a motion to
dismiss on August 28, 2015.

"The defendants intend to vigorously defend against all of these
claims. It is not possible at this time to predict the timing or
outcome of any of this litigation."


CORPRA CARE: Sued in Ind. Over Illegal Debt Collection Practices
----------------------------------------------------------------
Susan Almond, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Corpra Care, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-01727 (S.D. Ind.,
October 30, 2015) seeks to stop the Defendant's unfair and
unconscionable means to collect a debt.

Corpra Care, Inc. owns and operates a medical billing service
company located at 1011 S Texas 6 # 309, Houston, TX 77077.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Angie K. Robertson, Esq
      Mary E. Philipps, Esq.
      David J. Philipps, Esq.
      PHILIPPS AND PHILIPPS, LTD.
      9760 S. Roberts Road, Suite One
      Palos Hills, IL 60465
      Telephone: (708) 974-2900
      Facsimile: (708) 974-2907
      E-mail: angie@philippslegal.com
              mephilipps@aol.com
              davephilipps@aol.com

         - and -

      John Thomas Steinkamp, Esq.
      JOHN T. STEINKAMP AND ASSOCIATES
      5218 S. East Street, Suite E1
      Indianapolis, IN 46227
      Telephone: (317) 780-8300
      Facsimile: (317) 217-1320
      E-mail: steinkamplaw@yahoo.com


CSFPDX LLC: Recalls Albacore Tuna Products Due to Clostridium
-------------------------------------------------------------
CSFPDX LLC of Garibaldi, Oregon is voluntarily recalling ALL CS
Fishery Wild Albacore Tuna with any codes starting with "OC",
canned by a third party, Skipanon Brand Seafoods LLC, because it
has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a
bacterium which can cause life-threatening illness or death.
Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does not
look or smell spoiled.

Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

This recall only affects the CS Fishery Wild Albacore Tuna in
cans, net weight 64 oz. (4 lbs.), code OCK 16APR2017 (can be found
on either the bottom or on top of the can),which we purchased from
Skipanon Brand Seafoods LLC. Our other canned seafood products,
including 7.5 oz. canned premium Wild Line Caught Albacore Tuna,
are not affected by this recall.

The recalled product was sold to consumers at our retail location
or distributed to retail stores and wholesalers in Oregon. The
last date of distribution of recalled products was September 2015.

There have been no reported cases of illnesses associated with our
product to date.

Consumers who have purchased recalled CS Fishery Wild Albacore
Tuna, 64 oz. cans, are urged to destroy or return it to the firm
for a full refund.

If you have any questions, please call CSFPDX at 503-609-0071
between the hours of 9 am and 4 pm PST, Monday-Friday.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/WOq3XF


EXPERIAN NORTH: Faces "Cohen" Suit Over Alleged Data Breach
-----------------------------------------------------------
Aaron R. Cohen v. Experian North America, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-
09738 (N.D. Ill., October 30, 2015) arises out of the massive hack
on Experian's servers that compromised the sensitive data of T-
Mobile's customers and individuals who applied for credit with T-
Mobile.

Experian North America, Inc. ranks in the top three consumer
credit reporting agencies in the United States with annual sales
of more than $2 billion.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Carol V. Gilden, Esq.
      COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
      190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1705
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 357-0370
      Facsimile: (312) 357-0369
      E-mail: cgilden@cohenmilstein.com

         - and -

      Andrew N. Friedman, Esq.
      Douglas J. McNamara, Esq.
      Sally M. Handmaker, Esq.
      COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
      1100 New York Ave. NW
      Suite 500, West Tower
      Washington, DC 20005
      Telephone: (202) 408-4600
      E-mail: afriedman@cohenmilstein.com
              dmcnamara@cohenmilstein.com
              shandmaker@cohenmilstein.com


FANDUEL INC: Illegally Uses NFL Players' Name, "Garcon" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre Garcon, individually and on behalf of all those similarly
situated v. Fanduel Inc., Case No. 8:15-cv-03324-PJM (D. Md.,
October 30, 2015) alleges that the Defendant illegally uses
National Football League players' names and likenesses in its
television and online advertisements and in the operation of its
daily fantasy sports gaming products.

Fanduel Inc. is a Delaware corporation, based in New York
City, New York, that has created what is essentially its own
series of interactive online simulation games.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Brian A. Glasser, Esq.
      Thanos Basdekis, Esq
      BAILEY & GLASSER LLP
      1054 31st Street, Suite 230
      Washington, DC 20007
      Telephone: (202) 463-2101
      Facsimile: (202) 463-2103
      E-mail: bglasser@baileyglasser.com
              tbasdekis@baileyglasser.com

         - and -

      Joseph F. Murray, Esq.
      Brian K. Murphy, Esq.
      Geoffrey J. Moul, Esq.
      MURRAY MURPHY MOUL + BASIL LLP
      1114 Dublin Road
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 488-0400
      Facsimile: (614) 488-0401
      E-mail: murray@mmmb.com
              murphy@mmmb.com
              moul@mmmb.com


FANDUEL INC: Illegally Uses NFL Players' Name, "Mosley" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Mosley and Danny Dahl, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Fanduel, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:15-
cv-00912 (M.D. Cal., October 30, 2015) alleges that the Defendant
illegally uses National Football League players' names and
likenesses in its television and online advertisements and in the
operation of its daily fantasy sports gaming products.

Fanduel Inc. is a Delaware corporation, based in New York
City, New York, that has created what is essentially its own
series of interactive online simulation games.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jean Sutton Martin, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF JEAN SUTTON MARTIN PLLC
      2018 Eastwood Road, Suite 225
      Wilmington, NC 28403
      Telephone: (910) 292-6676
      E-mail: jean@jsmlawoffice.com

         - and -

      John A. Yanchunis, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP
      201 North Franklin Street 7th Floor
      Tampa, FL 33602
      Telephone: (813) 223-5505
      E-mail: jyanchunis@forthepeople.com


FARMER CREEK: Recalls Canned Albocore Tuna Due to C. botulinum
--------------------------------------------------------------
Farmer Creek of Cloverdale, OR is voluntarily recalling canned
albacore tuna with the Farmer Creek brand label with any codes
starting with "OC" because it has the potential to be contaminated
with Clostridium botulinum, a bacterium that can cause life-
threatening illness or death. Consumers are warned not to use the
product even if it does not look or smell spoiled.
Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

There have been no reported cases of illness to date.

All products were sold to consumers from our farm stand and
farmers markets in Oregon. The last date of distribution of
recalled products was September 2015. Affected production codes
include any codes starting with "OC". The code can be found either
on the bottom or on top of the can. Recalled product is packaged
in metal cans with net weight of 6oz.

This voluntary recall was initiated after we were notified that
our products were possibly under-processed. The problem was
discovered during an inspection at Skipanon Brand Seafoods LLC by
the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Consumers are advised to destroy recalled product.

If you have any questions, please contact Farmer Creek by email to
porterrockproducts@gmail.com

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/RZjnlQ


FEDEX CORPORATION: Continues to Defend Wage-and-Hour Lawsuits
-------------------------------------------------------------
FedEx Corporation said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 31, 2015, that the Company continues
to defend so-called wage-and-hour lawsuits.

"We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits containing various
class-action allegations of wage-and-hour violations," the Company
said. "The plaintiffs in these lawsuits allege, among other
things, that they were forced to work "off the clock," were not
paid overtime or were not provided work breaks or other benefits.
The complaints generally seek unspecified monetary damages,
injunctive relief, or both. We do not believe that a material loss
is reasonably possible with respect to any of these matters."


FEDEX CORPORATION: $228MM Settlement Pending in California Case
---------------------------------------------------------------
The parties in the independent contractor lawsuits in California
against FedEx Ground have reached an agreement to settle the
matter for $228 million, and the deal is pending court approval,
FedEx Corporation said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 31, 2015.

FedEx Ground is involved in numerous class-action lawsuits
(including 25 that have been certified as class actions),
individual lawsuits and state tax and other administrative
proceedings that claim that the company's owner-operators should
be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors.

Most of the class-action lawsuits were consolidated for
administration of the pre-trial proceedings by a single federal
court, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Indiana. The multidistrict litigation court granted class
certification in 28 cases and denied it in 14 cases. On December
13, 2010, the court entered an opinion and order addressing all
outstanding motions for summary judgment on the status of the
owner-operators (i.e., independent contractor vs. employee).

"In sum, the court ruled on our summary judgment motions and
entered judgment in favor of FedEx Ground on all claims in 20 of
the 28 multidistrict litigation cases that had been certified as
class actions, finding that the owner-operators in those cases
were contractors as a matter of the law of 20 states," the Company
said. The plaintiffs filed notices of appeal in all of these 20
cases. The Seventh Circuit heard the appeal in the Kansas case in
January 2012 and, in July 2012, issued an opinion that did not
make a determination with respect to the correctness of the
district court's decision and, instead, certified two questions to
the Kansas Supreme Court related to the classification of the
plaintiffs as independent contractors under the Kansas Wage
Payment Act. The other 19 cases that are before the Seventh
Circuit were stayed pending a decision of the Kansas Supreme
Court.

On October 3, 2014, the Kansas Supreme Court determined that a 20
factor right to control test applies to claims under the Kansas
Wage Payment Act and concluded that under that test, the class
members were employees, not independent contractors. The case was
subsequently transferred back to the Seventh Circuit, where both
parties made filings requesting the action necessary to complete
the resolution of the appeals. The parties also made
recommendations to the court regarding next steps for the other 19
cases that are before the Seventh Circuit. FedEx Ground requested
that each of those cases be separately briefed given the potential
differences in the applicable state law from that in Kansas.

"During the second quarter of 2015, we established an accrual for
the estimated probable loss in the Kansas case that was required
to be recognized pursuant to applicable accounting standards. This
amount was immaterial," the Company said.

On July 8, 2015, the Seventh Circuit issued an order and opinion
confirming the decision of the Kansas Supreme Court, concluding
that the class members are employees, not independent contractors.
Additionally, the Seventh Circuit referred the other 19 cases to a
representative of the court for purposes of setting a case
management conference to address briefing and argument for those
cases.

The multidistrict litigation court remanded the other eight
certified class actions back to the district courts where they
were originally filed because its summary judgment ruling did not
completely dispose of all of the claims in those lawsuits. Three
of these matters settled for immaterial amounts and have received
court approval. One of the cases is currently pending in the
Eastern District of Arkansas. Another case was appealed to the
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals where the court reversed the
class-wide summary judgment decision on May 28, 2015 and remanded
the case for trial, holding that there are disputed issues of fact
as to whether the class members are employees or independent
contractors. Two cases in Oregon and one in California were
appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where the court
reversed the district court decisions and held that the plaintiffs
in California and Oregon were employees as a matter of law and
remanded the cases to their respective district courts for further
proceedings.

"In the first quarter of 2015, we recognized an accrual for the
then-estimated probable loss in those cases that was required to
be recognized pursuant to applicable accounting standards. This
amount was immaterial," the Company said.

In June 2015, the parties in the California case engaged in
mediation and reached an agreement to settle the matter for $228
million, and in the fourth quarter of 2015 the Company increased
the accrual to that amount. The settlement agreement is pending
court approval.

In the Oregon cases, material exposure above the accrued amount is
reasonably possible.

"We continue to evaluate what facts may arise in the course of
discovery and what legal rulings the courts may render and how
these facts and rulings might impact FedEx Ground's loss," the
Company said. "For a number of reasons, we are not currently able
to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss in excess of the
amount accrued. The number and identities of plaintiffs in these
lawsuits are uncertain, as they are dependent on how the class of
full-time drivers is defined and how many individuals will qualify
based on whatever criteria may be established. In addition, the
parties have conducted only very limited discovery into damages,
which could vary considerably from plaintiff to plaintiff and be
dependent on evidence pertaining to individual plaintiffs, which
has yet to be produced in the cases. Further, the range of
potential loss could be impacted substantially by future rulings
by the court, including on the merits of the claims, on FedEx
Ground's defenses, and on evidentiary issues."

With respect to the matters that are pending outside of Oregon, it
is reasonably possible that potential loss in some of these
lawsuits or changes to the independent contractor status of FedEx
Ground's owner-operators could be material. "Similar to our
analysis of loss contingency in the Oregon cases, we continue to
evaluate what facts may arise in the course of discovery and what
legal rulings the courts may render and how these facts and
rulings might impact FedEx Ground's loss," the Company added.

The Company also said it is defending contractor-model cases that
are not or are no longer part of the multidistrict litigation.

"These cases are in varying stages of litigation, and we do not
expect to incur a material loss in any of these matters,"
according to the Company.  "Adverse determinations in matters
related to FedEx Ground's independent contractors, could, among
other things, entitle certain of our owner-operators and their
drivers to the reimbursement of certain expenses and to the
benefit of wage-and-hour laws and result in employment and
withholding tax and benefit liability for FedEx Ground, and could
result in changes to the independent contractor status of FedEx
Ground's owner-operators in certain jurisdictions. We believe that
FedEx Ground's owner-operators are properly classified as
independent contractors and that FedEx Ground is not an employer
of the drivers of the company's independent contractors."


FINANCIAL BUSINESS: Sued Over Illegal Debt Collection Practices
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Moore, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc., Case
No. 1:15-cv-01728 (S.D. Ind., October 30, 2015), seeks to stop the
Defendant's unfair and unconscionable means to collect a debt.

Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. operates a federal
bond and collection service company.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Angie K. Robertson, Esq
      Mary E. Philipps, Esq.
      David J. Philipps, Esq.
      PHILIPPS AND PHILIPPS, LTD.
      9760 S. Roberts Road, Suite One
      Palos Hills, IL 60465
      Telephone: (708) 974-2900
      Facsimile: (708) 974-2907
      E-mail: angie@philippslegal.com
              mephilipps@aol.com
              davephilipps@aol.com

         - and -

      John Thomas Steinkamp, Esq.
      JOHN T. STEINKAMP AND ASSOCIATES
      5218 S. East Street, Suite E1
      Indianapolis, IN 46227
      Telephone: (317) 780-8300
      Facsimile: (317) 217-1320
      E-mail: steinkamplaw@yahoo.com


FIRST HORIZON: FTBNA Defendant in Class Action
----------------------------------------------
First Horizon National Corporation said in its Form 8-K Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19,
2015, that First Tennessee Bank National Association ("FTBNA") is
a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit concerning
overdraft fees charged in connection with debit card transactions.
A key claim is that the method used to order or sequence the
transactions posted each day was improper.

The case is styled as Hawkins v. First Tennessee Bank National
Association, before the Circuit Court for Shelby County,
Tennessee, Case No. CT-004085-11.  The plaintiff seeks actual
damages of at least $5 million, unspecified restitution of fees
charged, and unspecified punitive damages, among other things.
FHN's estimate of reasonably possible loss for this matter is
subject to significant uncertainties regarding: whether a class
will be certified and, if so, the definition of the class; claims
as to which no dollar amount is specified; the potential remedies
that might be available or awarded; the ultimate outcome of
potentially significant motions such as motions to dismiss, or for
summary judgment; and the incomplete status of the discovery
process.


FRANCESCA'S HOLDINGS: Stipulation of Dismissal Granted
------------------------------------------------------
Francesca's Holdings Corporation said in its Form 10-Q Report
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9,
2015, for the quarterly period ended August 1, 2015, that the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted a stipulation
of voluntary dismissal, which withdrew the appeal in a
consolidated class action with prejudice.

On September 27, 2013 and November 4, 2013, two purported class
action lawsuits entitled Ortuzar v. Francesca's Holdings Corp., et
al. and West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund v. Francesca's
Holdings Corp., et al. were filed in the United States District
Court for the  Southern District of New York against the Company
and certain of its current and former directors and officers for
alleged violations of the federal securities laws arising from
statements in certain public disclosures regarding the Company's
current and future business and financial  condition.

On December 19, 2013, the Court consolidated the actions and
appointed Arkansas Teacher Retirement System as lead plaintiff. On
March 14, 2014, lead plaintiff filed a consolidated class action
complaint purportedly on behalf of shareholders that purchased or
acquired the Company's publicly traded common stock between July
22, 2011 and September 3, 2013 against the Company and certain of
its current and former directors and officers.

The consolidated complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11,
12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 for allegedly false
and misleading statements in the Company's public disclosures
concerning, among other things, the Company's relationship with
certain vendors. The lawsuit sought damages in an unspecified
amount.

On May 13, 2014 the defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated
complaint. By Order and Judgment entered April 1, 2015, the Court
granted defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissed the
consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and closed
the case.

On April 29, 2015, the lead plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit of the Court's
judgment dismissing the consolidated complaint. On June 12, 2015,
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted the
parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal, which withdrew the
appeal with prejudice.


GENERAL MILLS: Falsely Marketed Gluten Free Cheerios, Suit Says
---------------------------------------------------------------
Keri Van Lengen and Deborah Nava, on behalf of themselves, and a
class of similarly situated persons v. General Mills, Inc., et
al., Case No. 2:15-cv-02262-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal., October 30, 2015)
arises out of the Defendants' alleged deceptive, unfair and false
advertising and merchandising practices regarding its "Gluten
Free" Cheerios and Honey Nut Cheerios.

General Mills, Inc. is a manufacturer and marketer of branded
consumer foods sold through retail stores.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      C. Brooks Cutter, Esq.,
      John R. Parker, Jr., Esq.
      CUTTER LAW P.C.
      401 Watt Avenue
      Sacramento, CA 95864
      Telephone: (916) 290-9400
      Facsimile: (916) 669-4499
      E-mail: bcutter@cutterlaw.com
              jparker@cutterlaw.com


GEO GROUP: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Consumer Reports
------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Keels, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. The Geo Group, Inc. and Accurate Background, Inc.,
Case No. 1:15-cv-06261-CBA-SMG (E.D.N.Y., October 30, 2015) is
brought against the Defendants for violation of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act, specifically by using consumer reports to make
adverse employment decisions without first providing the applicant
who is the subject of the report with sufficient and timely
notification of its intent to take an adverse action, a copy of
the report, and a summary of the applicants' rights under the
FCRA.

The Geo Group, Inc. is in the business of incarceration, operating
private, for-profit prisons throughout the world.

Accurate Background, Inc. provides background checks to
approximately 6,500 corporate clients.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ossai Miazad, Esq.
      Christopher M. McNerney, Esq.
      OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
      3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Telephone: (212) 245-1000
      Facsimile: (646) 509-2060


GIANT FOOD: Recalls Edamame Products Due to Soy
-----------------------------------------------
GIANT Food Stores, LLC and MARTIN'S Food Markets announced it
removed from sale Nature's Promise Organic Edamame products
because they contain soy, which is not listed on the ingredient
label.

These products are safe to consume for individuals who do not
suffer from a soy allergy.

The following products are included in this recall:

Nature's Promise Organic Shelled Edamame, 16 oz., UPC 68826712764
Nature's Promise Organic Edamame in Pod, 16 oz., UPC 68826702124

GIANT/MARTIN'S has received no reports of illnesses to date.
People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to soy may run
the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they
consume these products. Symptoms of food allergies typically
appear from within a few minutes to two hours after a person has
eaten the food to which he or she is allergic. Allergic reactions
can include: hives; flushed skin or rash; tingling or itchy
sensation in the mouth; face, tongue, or lip swelling; vomiting
and/or diarrhea; abdominal cramps; coughing or wheezing; dizziness
and/or lightheadedness; swelling of the throat and vocal cords;
difficulty breathing; loss of consciousness.
Customers who have purchased these products should discard any
unused portions and bring their purchase receipt to GIANT/MARTIN'S
for a full refund.

Consumers looking for additional information on the recall may
call GIANT/MARTIN'S Customer Service at 1-888-814-4268 for more
information. Customers can also visit the GIANT or MARTIN'S
websites.

GIANT/MARTIN'S is committed to helping its customers save money,
save time and eat well. Founded in 1923 in Carlisle, Pennsylvania,
GIANT/MARTIN'S operates nearly 200 grocery stores in Pennsylvania,
Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia, under the names of GIANT
Food Stores and MARTIN'S Food Markets. GIANT/MARTIN'S employs more
than 33,000 associates and is a division of Ahold USA. In addition
to working with hundreds of local and regional organizations
annually, GIANT/MARTIN'S has a long-standing focus on efforts to
eradicate hunger and improve the quality of life for children.
GIANT/MARTIN'S is one of the top ten fund-raisers in the country
for local Children's Miracle Network hospitals. The company was
also recognized as 2015 Chain Retailer of the Year by Grocery
Headquarters. For more information visit the GIANT or MARTIN'S
websites. Find GIANT and MARTIN'S on Facebook and on Twitter
@GiantFoodStores or @MartinsFoodMkts.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/UHqMfY


GILMORE FISH: Recalls Canned Salmon Due to Clostridium Botulinum
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gilmore Fish of Dallesport, Washington is voluntarily recalling
ALL canned (Gourmet smoked Columbia sturgeon, fresh packed Pacific
salmon, gourmet smoked Chinook salmon), Gilmore Fish brand, with
any codes starting with "OC" because it has the potential to be
contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a bacterium that can
cause life-threatening illness or death. Consumers are warned not
to use the product even if it does not look or smell spoiled.

Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

There have been no reported cases of illness to date.

All products were sold to consumers from retail stores in
Dallesport, Washington. The last date of distribution of recalled
products was September 2015. Affected production codes include any
codes starting with "OC". The code can be found on either at the
bottom or on top of the can. Recalled products are packaged in
metal cans with net weight 5 oz. or 7 oz. cans.

  Product Name                       Net Weight   UPC
  ------------                       ----------   ---
  Gourmet Smoked Columbia Sturgeon   5 oz.        none
  Smoked Wine Maple Salmon           5 oz.        none
  Smoked Chinook Salmon              7 oz.        none

This voluntary recall was initiated after the company was notified
that its products were possibly under-processed by its contract
manufacturer. The problem was discovered during an inspection at
Skipanon Brand Seafoods LLC by the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).

Consumers are advised to destroy or return recalled product to
Gilmore Fish Smokehouse for a refund.

If you have any questions, please contact Gilmore Fish Smokehouse
at 509-767-1650 between 10am and 6pm PST, Monday-Friday or by
email to gilmorefish@gmail.com.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/l3yIsR


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Camp" Suit in Mass. Over Zofra(R)
---------------------------------------------------------
Stephanie Camp, individually and on behalf of her children
D.C. and R.C., minors v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-
13683-FDS (D. Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for
compensatory and punitive damages, and such other relief deemed
just and proper arising from the injuries to D.C. and R.C. as a
result of their prenatal exposures to the generic bioequivalent
form of the prescription drug Zofra(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Daniel" Suit Over Zofran(R)
---------------------------------------------------
Kimberly Daniel, individually and on behalf of her son T.D., a
minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-13681-FDS (D.
Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for compensatory and
punitive damages and such other relief deemed just and proper
arising from the injuries to T.D. as a result of his prenatal
exposures to the generic bioequivalent form of the prescription
drug Zofran(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Davis" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Davis, individually and on behalf of her daughter B.D., a
minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-13682-FDS (D.
Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for compensatory and
punitive damages and such other relief deemed just and proper
arising from the injuries to B.D. as a result of his prenatal
exposures to the generic bioequivalent form of the prescription
drug Zofran(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Denson" Suit Over Zofran(R)
---------------------------------------------------
Laporsha Denson, individually and on behalf of her son C.D., a
minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-13684-FDS (D.
Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for compensatory and
punitive damages and such other relief deemed just and proper
arising from the injuries to C.D. as a result of his prenatal
exposures to the generic bioequivalent form of the prescription
drug Zofran(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Kuechle" Suit over Zofran(R)
----------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth Kuechle and Shawn Kuechle, individually and on behalf of
their daughter P.K., a minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No.
1:15-cv-13685-FDS (D. Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for
compensatory and punitive damages, and such other relief deemed
just and proper arising from the injuries to P.K. as a result of
her prenatal exposures to the generic bioequivalent form of the
prescription drug Zofran(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Price" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Cali Price, individually and on behalf of her son C.P., a minor v.
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-13686-FDS (D. Mass., October
29, 2015) is an action for compensatory and punitive damages, and
such other relief deemed just and proper arising from the injuries
to C.P. as a result of his prenatal exposures to the generic
bioequivalent form of the prescription drug Zofran(R), also known
as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Reynolds" Suit Over Zofran(R)
-----------------------------------------------------
Christine Reynolds, Individually and as Parent and Natural
Guardian of B.R., a Minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 2:15-
cv-01951-VEH (N.D. Ala., October 30, 2015) is an action for
compensatory and punitive damages, equitable relief, and such
other relief deemed just and proper arising from the injuries to
B.R. as a result of her prenatal exposures to the generic
bioequivalent form of the prescription drug Zofran(R), also known
as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jonathan W. Gathings, Esq.
      JONATHAN W. GATHINGS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
      3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 112
      Birmingham, AL 35216
      Telephone: (205) 324-4418
      Facsimile: (205) 324-5240
      E-mail: jonathan@jonathanwgathings.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Valenzuela" Suit Over Zofran(R)
-------------------------------------------------------
Danetta Valenzuela and Brian Valenzuela, individually and on
behalf of their daughter B.V., a minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC,
Case No. 1:15-cv-13689-FDS (D. Mass. October 29, 2015) is an
action for compensatory and punitive damages, and such other
relief deemed just and proper arising from the injuries to B.V. as
a result of her prenatal exposures to the generic bioequivalent
form of the prescription drug Zofran(R), also known as
ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GLAXOSMITHKLINE: Faces "Watkins" Suit in Mass. Over Zofran(R)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bridgit Watkins, individually and on behalf of her son B.W., a
minor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-13690-FDS (D.
Mass., October 29, 2015) is an action for compensatory and
punitive damages and such other relief deemed just and proper
arising from the injuries to B.W. as a result of his prenatal
exposures to the generic bioequivalent form of the prescription
drug Zofran(R), also known as ondansetron.

Zofran is a prescription drug that helps prevent and mitigate
nausea and vomiting.

Glaxosmithkline, LLC operates a pharmaceutical company which has
identified its principal place of business in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Dougherty, Esq.
      Robert K. Jenner, Esq.
      Kathleen Kerner, Esq.
      JANET, JENNER & SUGGS, LLC
      31 St. James Avenue, Suite 365
      Boston, MA 02116
      Telephone: (617) 933-1265
      Facsimile: (410) 653-9030
      E-mail: kdougherty@myadvocates.com
              rjenner@myadvocates.com
              kkerner@myadvocates.com

         - and -

      Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq.
      Caitlin M. Moyna, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      485 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (646) 722-8500
      Facsimile: (646) 722-8501
      E-mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com
              cmoyna@gelaw.com

         - and -

      M. Elizabeth Graham, Esq.
      Thomas V. Ayala, Esq.
      Stephanie E. Smiertka, Esq.
      GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
      123 Justison Street
      Wilmington, DE 19801
      Telephone: (302) 622-7000
      Facsimile: (302) 622-7100
      E-mail: egraham@gelaw.com
              tayala@gelaw.com
              ssmiertka@gelaw.com


GROWLIFE INC: Must Issue $2MM Shares for Class Action Settlement
----------------------------------------------------------------
GrowLife, Inc. is obligated to issue $2 million in common stock or
approximately 115.1 million shares related to the settlement of
the consolidated securities class action and derivative action
lawsuits filed against the Company in United States District
Court, Central District of California, GrowLife, Inc. said in its
Form 10-K Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 30, 2015, for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2014.

Beginning on April 18, 2014, three class action lawsuits alleging
violations of federal securities laws were filed against us in
United States District Court, Central District of California (the
"Court"). At a hearing held on July 21, 2014, the three class
action lawsuits were consolidated into one case with Lawrence
Rosen as the lead plaintiff (the "Consolidated Class Action,"
styled Romero et al. vs. GrowLife et al.). On May 15, 2014 and
August 4, 2014, respectively two shareholder derivative lawsuits
were filed against us with the Court (the "Derivative Actions").
On October 20, 2014, AmTrust North America, our insurer, filed a
lawsuit contesting insurance coverage on the above legal
proceedings.

On January 20, 2015, the Court ordered all of the above actions
stayed pending completion of mediation of the dispute.  The
parties then worked diligently to finalize settlement
documentation on the above actions.  On April 27, 2015, the Court
preliminarily approved the proposed settlement of the Consolidated
Class Action.

On June 1, 2015, the Court preliminarily approved the proposed
settlement of the Derivative Actions pursuant to a proposed
stipulated settlement agreement.  On August 3, 2015, the Court
entered a Final Order and Judgment resolving the Consolidated
Class Action litigation in its entirety.  The Consolidated Class
Action was thereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and
without costs.

On August 10, 2015, pursuant to a settlement by and between the
Company and AmTrust North America, AmTrust's lawsuit contesting
insurance coverage of the Consolidated Class Action and Derivative
Actions was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to a
Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice executed
by and between AmTrust and the Company.

On August 17, 2015, the Court entered a Final Order and Judgment
resolving the Derivative Actions in their entirety.  The
Derivative Actions were thereby dismissed in their entirety with
prejudice.  As a result, all litigation is resolved in full at
this time.


HELADOS LA: Recalls Milk Based Ice Cream Products Due to Egg
------------------------------------------------------------
Helados La Tapatia, Inc., of Fresno, California, is voluntarily
recalling 13 milk based ice cream products manufactured during the
limited time frame of October 8, 2015, through October 16, 2015,
(see separate UPC Inventory list provided herewith for detailed
description) due to the inclusion of egg and soy ingredients which
were not identified on product packaging and which are potential
allergens to some people. The products were distributed to select
retail stores in a limited area of Northern California. The
products are sold under the brand name of Helados La Tapatia.

Helados La Tapatia is also voluntarily recalling its 4oz Cookies
"n" Cream bar due to the undeclared Wheat and Soy and the 4oz
Granola bar due to undeclared Almonds and Soy. These products were
distributed in Arizona, California, Nevada, and Washington. The
products are sold under the brand name of Helados La Tapatia.

People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to soy, eggs and
almonds run the risk of a serious life-threatening allergic
reaction if they consume these products.

No illnesses or adverse reactions have been reported to date. The
recall was the result of a routine inspection program by the U.S.
FDA.

A separate UPC Inventory of the products and their UPC codes is
provided.

The production and distribution of the identified products have
been suspended until accurate labeling for the products is
achieved. Consumers who have purchased the Helados La Tapatia
products are urged to return the products to the place of purchase
for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-559-441-1105
Monday through Friday, 6:00a.m. - 5:00p.m. (PDT); Saturday,
9:00a.m. - 5:00p.m. (PDT). Consumers can also contact the company
at helatapatia@sbcqlobal.net.

  3oz Milk Bar
  ------------
  Product                  UPC Codes
  -------                  ---------
  Strawberry N Cream       6 34242 20001 2
  Coconut                  6 34242 20002 9
  Chocolate                6 34242 20003 6
  Banana                   6 34242 20004 3
  Vanilla                  6 34242 20005 0
  Cookies N Cream          6 34242 20010 4
  Esquimal                 6 34242 20012 8
  Coffee                   6 34242 20013 5
  Pina Colada              6 34242 20014 2
  Pecan                    6 34242 20007 4
  Rice                     6 34242 20008 1

4oz Milk Bar
------------
Product                   UPC Codes
-------                   ---------
Cookies N Cream           6 34242 60007 2
Granola                   6 34242 60012 6

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/iVZNfg


HERR FOODS: Recalls Sour Cream and Onion Potato Chips
-----------------------------------------------------
Herr Foods Inc. has initiated a voluntary recall of certain bags
of its 1.875 oz. Sour Cream and Onion Potato Chip due to a
packaging error that incorrectly states that the product is gluten
free.

While the back panel of the package complies with U.S. Food & Drug
Administration (FDA) label regulations by listing "Wheat" in the
ingredient statement as well as "Contains Wheat" in its related
allergen statement, the front panel of the package erroneously
features the words "Gluten Free." Gluten is the protein that
naturally occurs in wheat, rye, barley, and crossbreeds of these
grains. Most people can eat gluten, but in people with celiac
disease, gluten intake gradually damages the intestines, prevents
the absorption of vitamins and minerals, and can lead to other
health problems. Symptoms can include diarrhea, fatigue,
headaches, abdominal pain, brain fog, rashes, nausea, vomiting,
and other reactions. Herr's has not received any reported
illnesses to date.

Herr's Sour Cream & Onion Potato Chips, 1.875 oz. bags only, were
distributed nationwide through retail stores, distributors, and
internet sales. These products were sold as individual bags. No
other bag sizes of Herr's Sour Cream 'N Onion Chips are involved
with this recall. No other Herr's products are involved with this
recall.

  Product Name/      Code Date          UPC No.        Herr's
  Description        ---------          -------        Product
  -----------                                          Code
                                                       -------

  1.875 oz. Herr's   January 02, 2016,  72600 00061    122
  Sour Cream &       up to and
  Onion Potato       including January
  Chips              30, 2016

The packages are a green metallic color bag with a red Herr's logo
at the top center of the package. The lot number is located at the
upper right hand corner on the front of the package below the
statement "Guaranteed Fresh Until". The UPC number is located at
the lower right hand corner of the back panel of the package.
Herr Foods announced the recall to prevent consumers who are
allergic or sensitive to gluten from consuming this product.
Consumers with wheat allergies, celiac disease or gluten
intolerance should not consume them and should return them to the
retailer where they were purchased for a full refund. Herr Foods
and other retailers are removing recalled product from the
retailers' shelves. As a result, consumers can be assured that all
other Herr's products that remain on-shelf are safe and not
subject to this recall. Consumers with questions may call 1-800-
523-5030. Live assistance is available 9am- 5pm EST, Monday thru
Friday.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/OCfrBP


HERTZ LOCAL: "Fernado" Suit Removed to C. Dist. California
----------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit entitled Trevine Fernando, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Hertz Local
Edition Corporation and Does 1-50, inclusive, Case No. BC592709,
was removed from Los Angeles Court to the U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California (Western Division - Los
Angeles). The District Court Clerk assigned Case No. 2:15-cv-
08510-CAS-RAO to the proceeding.

The Plaintiff asserts labor-related claims.

Hertz Local Edition Corporation is in the business of providing
local and insurance replacement rentals.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      James R. Hawkins, Esq.
      Gregory E. Mauro, Esq.
      JAMES HAWKINS APLC
      9880 Research Drive Suite 200
      Irvine, CA 92618
      Telephone: (949) 387-7200
      Facsimile: (949) 387-6676
      E-mail: james@jameshawkinsaplc.com
              greg@jameshawkinsaplc.com


HIGH TECH: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Alan" Action Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jason Alan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. High Tech Funding, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-08528 (C.D.
Cal., October 30, 2015) seeks to stop the Defendant's practice of
placing unsolicited calls to consumers cellular telephone.

High Tech Funding, LLC operates a lending firm in California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
      Suren N. Weerasuriya, Esq.
      Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
      324 S. Beverly Dr., #725
      Beverly Hills, CA 90212
      Telephone: (877) 206-4741
      Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
      E-mail: tfriedman@attorneysforconsumers.com
              sweerasuriya@attorneysforconsumers.com
              abacon@attorneysforconsumers.com


HORMEL FOODS: Recalls Skippy(R) Reduced Fat Peanut Butter Spread
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hormel Foods Sales LLC is voluntarily recalling 153 cases, or
1,871 total pounds, of a single code date of SKIPPY(R) Reduced Fat
Creamy Peanut Butter Spread, due to the possibility that some jars
may contain small pieces of metal shavings which were discovered
on an in-line magnet check during routine cleaning. Foodborne
objects that are greater than 7mm in length may cause injury such
as severe choking with airway obstruction, gastrointestinal
peroration or secondary infection. The recalled product is limited
to 16.3 ounce jars with a "Best If Used By" date of DEC1416LR1
with a package UPC code of 37600-10500. The code date is located
on top of the lid. A photo of the product and "Best If Used By"
date appears below. Recalled product was sent to distribution
centers for Publix, Target and Walmart located in Georgia,
Virginia, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina, Delaware and
Arkansas.

The company is issuing the recall to ensure that consumers are
made aware of the potential hazard. No reports have been received
to date of any consumer injuries or complaints.

No other sizes, varieties or other packaging configurations of
SKIPPY(R) brand peanut butter or peanut spreads are included in
this recall.

If a consumer has this product, they should return it to the store
where purchased for an exchange or call Hormel Foods Customer
Relations at 1-866-475-4779, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Central Time, excluding holidays.

This recall is being initiated out of an abundance of caution and
with the knowledge of the US Food and Drug Administration.

The Plaintiff is represented by:
http://is.gd/iQ9AnB


INAFFIT LLC: Recalls Natureal Light Green and Dark Green Capsules
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Inaffit, LLC is voluntarily recalling all lots of Natureal light
green and dark green capsules to the consumer level after FDA
laboratory testing found Natureal to contain sibutramine.
Sibutramine is an appetite suppressant that was withdrawn from the
U.S. market in October 2010. Sibutramine is known to substantially
increase blood pressure and/or pulse rate in some patients and may
present a significant risk for patients with a history of coronary
artery disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias or stroke.
This undeclared ingredient makes this product an unapproved new
drug for which safety and efficacy have not been established. This
product may also interact in life-threatening ways with other
medications a consumer may be taking.

The product is used as a weight loss dietary supplement and is
packaged in clear bottle with light green and dark green capsules.
The affected Natureal product includes lots Manufactured 3/12/2015
Expiration Date 3/11/2017 which have been distributed from the
Natureal office, 14707 South Dixie Highway, Suite 213, Palmetto
Bay, FL 33176 and nationwide to consumers via internet
www.naturealfls.com.

Inaffit, LLC is notifying its customers by Email and is arranging
for return. Consumers who are currently in possession of recalled
Natureal light green and dark green capsules should stop using the
product and discard. Inaffit, LLC switched to a U.S. Food and Drug
Administration Registered Facility to manufacture their dietary
supplements and changed the Natureal packaging to a clear bottle
with clear capsules.

Consumers with questions regarding this recall can contact
Inaffit, LLC by email at returns@naturealfls.com. Consumers should
contact their physician or healthcare provider if they have
experienced any problems that may be related to taking or using
this drug product.

Adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of
this product may be reported to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event
Reporting program either online, by regular mail or by fax.

Complete and submit the report Online:
www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htmdisclaimer icon
Regular Mail or Fax: Download form
www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htmdisclaimer icon
or call 1-800-332-1088 to request a reporting form, then complete
and return to the address on the pre-addressed form, or submit by
fax to 1-800-FDA-0178.

This voluntary recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/71O4rA


INNOVATIVE STYLING: Falsely Marketed Hair Products, Suit Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gina Kilpela, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated v. Innovative Styling Options, Inc., and
Zotos International, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-02464-H-JMA (S.D.
Cal., October 30, 2015) arises out of the Defendants' alleged
false and misleading claims that the ISO Maintamer Straightening
System hair product is safe and "Damage-Free" when used in
uncolored, coarse, thick and frizzy hair.

Innovative Styling Options, Inc. is a professional hair product
brand owned by Zotos that markets and sells the ISO Maintamer
Straightening System.

Zotos International, Inc. is a leading professional beauty company
that manufactures its beauty products in New York.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Todd D. Carpenter, Esq.
      CARPENTER LAW GROUP
      402 West Broadway 29th Floor
      San Diego, CA 92101
      Telephone: (619)347-3517
      E-mail: Todd@Carpenterlawyers.com


KEANE GROUP: Fails to Pay Workers Overtime, "Moncrease" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Moncrease, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated v. Keane Group, LLC, et al., Case No. 5:15-cv-00951 (W.D.
Tex., October 30, 2015) is brought against the Defendants for
failure to pay overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of
40 hours per week.

Keane Group, LLC owns and operates an energy services company
located at 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Josh Sanford, Esq.
      SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC
      One Financial Center
      650 South Shackleford Road, Suite 411
      Little Rock, AR 72211
      Telephone: (501) 221-0088
      Facsimile: (888) 787-2040
      E-mail: josh@sanfordlawfirm.com


KENSINGTON PROFESSIONAL: Sued in C.D. Cal. Over Unsolicited Calls
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Weisberg, individually and on behalf of all similarly
situated v. Kensington Professional and Associates LLC, Case No.
2:15-cv-08532 (C.D. Cal., October 30, 2015) seeks to stop the
Defendant's practice of placing unsolicited calls to consumers
cellular telephone.

Kensington Professional and Associates LLC is a business engaged
in interstate commerce in California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Todd M. Friedman, Esq.
      Suren N. Weerasuriya, Esq.
      Adrian R. Bacon, Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
      324 S. Beverly Dr., #725
      Beverly Hills, CA 90212
      Telephone: (877) 206-4741
      Facsimile: (866) 633-0228
      E-mail: tfriedman@attorneysforconsumers.com
              sweerasuriya@attorneysforconsumers.com
              abacon@attorneysforconsumers.com


KOZY SHACK: Recalls Salted Caramel Pudding Due to Egg
-----------------------------------------------------
Kozy Shack Enterprises LLC is recalling one lot of Kozy Shack(R)
Indulgent Recipe(TM) Pudding in a Salted Caramel cardboard sleeve
because it may contain Vanilla Bean Pudding cups, which contain
egg. The Salted Caramel cardboard sleeve does not include egg in
the ingredient statement. People who have an allergy or severe
sensitivity to eggs run the risk of serious or life-threatening
allergic reaction if they consume these products.

The recalled product was distributed through retail stores in the
following states: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Idaho,
Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Nevada, North Carolina, New
Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Utah, Virginia and Washington.

The product was sold at the following stores: Albertsons;
Bashas/Western Produce; Bozzutos, Inc.; C&S Tops WNY WHS
Lancaster; C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.; C&S AWI; C&S AWI
Robesonia;, C&S S&S Freetown; Delhaize America Distribution;
Delhaize America Schodack-Dairy; General Dairy Deli, Inc.;
Greensboro Perishable Facility; Harris Teeter, Inc.; Ingles
Markets, Inc.; Kroger FRYS; Kroger Smith, Ralph's Grocery Co.,
Demoulas Markets, Meijer, Inc., Merchants Distributors, Inc.,
Raleys Distribution Center; SaveMart Supermarkets; Safeway NASC,
Save Mart Supermarkets, Sherwood Food Distributors, Slater Bros,
Spartan Nash; Supervalu, Inc., Target; Wakefern Food Corp, Wal-
Mart; Wegman's Food Markets, Inc., Weis Markets, and Winco
Holdings, Inc.

The product is sold as four individual cups with a cardboard
sleeve wrapped around the four cups. The sleeve will be labeled as
Kozy Shack(R) Indulgent Recipe(TM) Salted Caramel Pudding. The
four cups in the package could contain Kozy Shack(R) Indulgent
Recipe(TM) Vanilla Bean Pudding.

Affected product contains a Salted Caramel cardboard sleeve wrap
with a Use By Date of 11/30/2015. Consumers can also look for the
UPC code on the cardboard sleeve. If consumers have removed the
pudding cups from the cardboard sleeve, they can look for the lot
number on the individual pudding cups.

Cardboard sleeve description:
UPC code: 73491.09240
Use by date: 11/30/2015

Individual pudding cup description:
Lot number: 31908940

No illnesses have been reported with the product.

Consumers who have purchased this product can return it to the
place of purchase for a full refund. Kozy Shack will work with
stores to retrieve the product.

Consumers with questions can contact Kozy Shack Customer Service
at 877-585-2365 on Mondays between 9 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. CST and on
Tuesdays through Fridays from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. CST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/elcVdB


LAKEVIEW PEARL: Doesn't Properly Pay Workers, "Nguyen" Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Phuong Nguyen, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Lakeview Pearl, LLC, China Ruby, Inc. and Cheng Chiu,
Case No. 2:15-cv-05645 (E.D. Lo., October 30, 2015) is brought
against the Defendants for failure to pay minimum wage and
overtime pay as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants own and operate an Asian fusion bistro located in
New Orleans, Louisiana.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jessica M. Vasquez, Esq.
      Laura Catlett, Esq.
      VASQUEZ LAW OFFICE
      650 Poydras Street, Ste. 1414
      New Orleans, LA 70130
      Telephone: (504) 571-9582
      Facsimile: (504) 684-1449
      E-mail: jvasquez@vasquezlawoffice.com
              LauraLCatlettLaw@gmail.com


MONSANTO COMPANY: Faces "Giglio" Suit Over Roundup(R) Herbicide
---------------------------------------------------------------
Emanuel Richard Giglio v. Monsanto Company and John Does 1-50,
Case No. 3:15-cv-02279-BTM-NLS (S.D. Cal., October 9, 2015) is an
action for damages as a direct and proximate result of the
Defendants' negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the
design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting,
marketing, advertising, distribution, labeling, and sale of the
herbicide Roundup(R), containing the active ingredient glyphosate.

Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology
corporation based in St. Louis, Missouri. It is the world's
leading producer of glyphosate.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Aimee H. Wagstaff, Esq.
      Kathryn M. Forgie, Esq.
      ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, PC
      7171 West Alaska Drive
      Lakewood, CO 80226
      Telephone: (720) 255-7623
      Facsimile: (303) 376-6361
      E-mail: aimee.wagstaff@andruswagstaff.com
              kathryn.forgie@andruswagstaff.com

         - and -

      Vance R. Andrus, Esq.
      David J. Wool, Esq.
      ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, PC
      7171 West Alaska Drive
      Lakewood, Colorado 80226
      Telephone: (720) 255-7623
      Facsimile: (303) 376-6361
      E-mail: vance.andrus@andruswagstaff.com
              david.wool@andruswagstaff.com


MULTI-SHOT: "Freeman" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shawn Freeman, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Multi-Shot, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-01425-MRH
(W.D. Penn., October 30, 2015) seeks to recover unpaid overtime
wages and damages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Multi-Shot, LLC is a nationwide oilfield services with significant
completion and land drilling operations throughout the United
States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Joshua P. Geist, Esq.
      GOODRICH & GEIST, P.C.
      3634 California Ave.
      Pittsburgh, PA 15212
      Telephone: (412) 766-1455
      Facsimile: (412) 766-0300
      E-mail: josh@goodrichandgeist.com

         - and -

      Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
      Andrew Dunlap, Esq.
      Lindsay R. Itkin, Esq.
      Jessica M. Bresler, Esq.
      FIBICH, LEEBRON, COPELAND, BRIGGS & JOSEPHSON
      1150 Bissonnet St.
      Houston, TX 77005
      Telephone: (713) 751-0025
      Facsimile: (713) 751-0030
      E-mail: mjosephson@fibichlaw.com
              adunlap@fibichlaw.com
              litkin@fibichlaw.com
              jbresler@fibichlaw.com

         - and -

      Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Esq.
      BRUCKNER BURCH, P.L.L.C.
      8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500
      Houston, TX 77046
      Telephone: (713) 877-8788
      Facsimile: (713) 877-8065
      E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com


NATIONAL VIDEO: Recalls Rhino 7 3000 Platinum Capsules
------------------------------------------------------
National Video Supply located in Santa Clarita, California is
voluntarily recalling the following product to the consumer level:
RHINO 7 3000 Platinum Capsules packaged in single 1 count blister
hang tab cards with UPC # 700729253748 ALL LOT NUMBERS WITHIN
EXPIRY. Lot numbers are located on the back top right of the (1)
count and on the side of the 6 count bottles. FDA analysis found
these products to contain undeclared desmethyl carbondenafil and
dapoxetine. Desmethyl carbondenafil is a phosphodiesterase PDE-5
inhibitor which is a class of drugs used to treat male erectile
dysfunction, making these products unapproved new drugs.
Dapoxetine is an active ingredient not approved by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA).
Desmethyl carbondenafil may pose a threat to consumers because
this PDE-5 inhibitor may interact with nitrates found in some
prescription drugs (such as nitroglycerin) and may lower blood
pressure to dangerous levels that can be life threatening.
Consumers with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or
heart disease often take nitrates.

Dapoxetine has not been approved by the FDA and therefore its
safety or efficacy has not been established. Chemically,
dapoxetine belongs to a class of drugs known as selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to treat depression.
Studies have shown that antidepressants increase the risk of
suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young
adults when compared to placebo. Therefore, consuming these
products presents a health risk which could be life threatening.

National Video Supply has not received a report of any adverse
events associated with these products.

These products are marketed as dietary supplements for sexual
enhancement and packaged in single 1 count blisters and 6 count
bottles and distributed to retail stores nationwide. National
Video has discontinued sales of these products.

National Video Supply has notified its customers of this voluntary
recall via e-mail and phone. Consumers that purchased these
products from National Video Supply should stop using them
immediately and can return the products to: 21100 Centre Pointe
Park Way, Santa Clarita, Ca. 91350

Consumers with questions regarding this recall can contact
National Video Supply by Telephone at 800-586-1915 Consumers
should contact their physician or healthcare provider if they have
experienced any problems that may be related to taking or using
these products. Consumers can report adverse reactions or quality
control problems to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting
program online, by regular mail, or by fax as follows:

Complete and submit reporting form online at
http://www.fda.gov/MedWatch/report.htm;or
Mail or fax reporting form. Download form at
http://www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htmor call 1-800-332-1088 to
request a reporting form. Complete and return to the address on
the pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-1078.
This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration.


NET 1 UEPS: S.D.N.Y. Court Dismissed Securities Class Action
------------------------------------------------------------
Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. (NasdaqGS: UEPS; JSE: NT1) ("Net1")
announced on Sept. 17 that the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York has dismissed the purported
securities class action litigation originally filed on December
24, 2013, against Net1, its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief
Financial Officer.

"We are pleased with the Court's decision and believe that its
opinion confirms our assertion that this case was without any
merit," said Dr. Serge C.P. Belamant, Net1's Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer.

The Court's order allows the plaintiff to file a further amended
complaint on or before October 16, 2015, failing which the action
may be dismissed with prejudice.

Net1 provides alternative payment systems that leverage its
Universal Electronic Payment System ("UEPS") or utilize its
proprietary mobile technologies. The Company operates market-
leading payment processors in South Africa and the Republic of
Korea.

UEPS permits the Company to facilitate biometrically secure, real-
time electronic transaction processing to unbanked and under-
banked populations of developing economies around the world in an
online or offline environment. Net1's UEPS/EMV solution is
interoperable with global EMV standards that seamlessly enable
access to all the UEPS functionality in a traditional EMV
environment. In addition to payments, UEPS can be used for
banking, healthcare management, payroll, remittances, voting and
identification.

Net1's mobile technologies include its proprietary mobile payments
solution - MVC, which offers secure mobile-based payments, as well
as mobile banking and prepaid value-added services in developed
and emerging countries. The Company intends to deploy its varied
mobile solutions through its ZAZOO business unit, which is an
aggregation of innovative technology companies and is based in the
United Kingdom.

Net1 has a primary listing on the NASDAQ and a secondary listing
on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.


NEW YORK: Dept. of Education Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cynthia McCray v. The City of New York Department of Education and
Carmen Farina, Case No. 1:15-cv-08553 (S.D.N.Y., October 30, 2015)
seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages,
statutory penalties, and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

The City of New York Department of Education is the largest system
of public schools in the United States, which consists of over
1,700 schools that serve about 1.1 million students each year.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Fausto E. Zapata Jr., Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICES OF FAUSTO E. ZAPATA JR.
      277 Broadway, Suite 206
      New York, NY 10007
      Telephone: (212) 766-9870
      Facsimile: (212) 766-9869
      E-mail: fz@fzapatalaw.com


OLD OREGON: Recalls Canned Albacore Tuna Due to C. Botulinum
------------------------------------------------------------
Old Oregon Smokehouse of Rockaway, Oregon is voluntarily recalling
ALL canned Albacore tuna with any codes starting with "OC" because
it has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium
botulinum, a bacterium which can cause life-threatening illness or
death. Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does
not look or smell spoiled.
Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

The recalled product was sold to consumers from our retail stores
in Tillamook, Oregon or Rockaway, Oregon. The last date of
distribution of recalled product was September 2015.

Affected production codes include any codes starting with "OC".
The code can be found on either the bottom or on top of the can.
Recalled products are packaged in metal cans with net weight 6 oz.

  Product Name       Net Weight    UPC
  ------------       ----------    ---
  Albacore Tuna      6 oz.         none

There have been no reported cases of illnesses associated with our
product to date.

This voluntary recall was initiated after we were notified that
our product was possibly under-processed by our contract
manufacturer. The problem was discovered during an inspection at
Skipanon Brand Seafoods LLC by the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).

Consumers who have purchased recalled canned Albacore tuna are
urged to destroy or return it to the firm for a full refund.

If you have any questions, please call Old Oregon Smokehouse at
503-355-2817 between the hours of 9 am and 3 pm PST, Monday-
Friday.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/vfFrmx


OLEBOB'S SEAFOODS: Recalls Canned Tuna and Salmon Products
----------------------------------------------------------
OleBob's Seafoods of Ilwaco WA is voluntarily recalling ALL canned
tuna and canned salmon products with a code starting with "OC"
because it has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium
botulinum, a bacterium that can cause life-threatening illness or
death. Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does
not look or smell spoiled.

Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

** There have been no reported cases of illness to date. **

All products were sold under the OleBob's Seafoods label to
consumers from our retail store in Ilwaco, WA, and sold to
internet consumers from the website www.olebobs.comdisclaimer
icon. The dates of distribution of recalled products were May
2014-September 2015. Affected cans have the letters "OC" stamped
on either the bottom or the top of the can.

OleBob's canned salmon and tuna products were made by Skipanon
Brand Seafoods and this voluntary recall was initiated after we
were notified that our products were possibly under-processed. The
problem was discovered during an inspection at Skipanon Brand
Seafoods LLC by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Consumers are advised to discard or return recalled product to
OleBob's Seafoods for a refund.

OleBob's Seafoods
360-642-4332, 10am-5pm Thursday-Monday
seafood@olebobs.com

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/uyrKFO


PARAMOUNT GOLD: 6 Actions Challenging Merger Deal Remain Open
-------------------------------------------------------------
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. said in its Form 10-K Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2015,
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, that the Company will
continue to defend six putative stockholder class action suits
brought by purported stockholders of PGSC, challenging a proposed
merger deal.

Since the announcement of the merger of Paramount Gold and Silver
Corp. ("PGSC") and Coeur Mining, Inc. ("Coeur"), on December 17,
2014, the Company, PGSC, members of PGSC's board, Coeur, and
Hollywood Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub") have been named as
defendants in six putative stockholder class action suits brought
by purported stockholders of PGSC, challenging the proposed Merger
(the "Complaints"). The Complaints were filed in the Court of
Chancery in the State of Delaware (Fernando Gamboa v. Paramount
Gold and Silver Corp., et al., No.: 10499; Jerry Panning v.
Paramount Gold and Silver Corp., et al., No.: 10507; Jonah Weiss
v. Christopher Crupi, et al., No.: 10517; Justin Beaston v.
Paramount Gold and Silver Corporation, et al., No.: 10538; Rob
Byers v. Christopher Crupi, et al., No.: 10551; James H. Alston v.
Paramount Gold and Silver Corp., et al., No.: 10531.

The plaintiffs generally claim that the PGSC board members
breached their fiduciary duties to PGSC stockholders by: (i)
authorizing the merger with Coeur for what the plaintiffs asserts
is inadequate consideration and pursuant to an allegedly
inadequate process, and (ii) failing to disclose sufficient
information in its Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission to allow the shareholders to make an informed vote. The
plaintiffs also claim that the Company, PGSC, Coeur, and Merger
Sub aided and abetted the other defendants' alleged breach of
duties. In the Complaints, the plaintiffs seek, among other
things, to enjoin the merger, rescind the transaction or obtain
rescissory damages if the merger is consummated, obtain other
unspecified damages and recover attorneys' fees and costs. The
merger was consummated on April 17, 2015.

"We, PGSC, members of PGSC board, Coeur, and Merger Sub deny any
wrongdoing and are vigorously defending all of the actions," the
Company said.


PERU FOOD: Recalls Corn-Maiz Mote Products Due to Sulfites
----------------------------------------------------------
Peru Food Imports Inc. of Fairview, NJ is recalling Peru Food Mote
Corn-Maiz Mote, Lot #38-16 because it may contain undeclared
sulfites. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to
sulfites run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic
reaction if they consume these products. The consumption of 10
milligrams of sulfites per serving has been reported to elicit
severe reactions in some asthmatics. Anaphylactic shock could
occur in certain sulfite sensitive individuals upon ingesting 10
milligrams or more of sulfites.
No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this
problem.

The recalled Peru Food Mote Corn-Maiz Mote was distributed in 15
oz plastic bags, Item # 51962, Expiration Date: 04/30/2016, UPC #
8 12125 00962 8. The product was distributed to NY and CT through
supermarkets.

The recall was initiated after routine sampling by New York State
Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Inspectors and
subsequent analysis by the Department's food laboratory personnel
revealed the presence of undeclared sulfites on the label.

Consumers who have purchased Peru Food Mote Corn-Maiz Mote should
return it to the place of purchase. Consumers with questions may
contact the company at 201-941-3400. Monday through Friday, 9 am
to 5 pm EST.


PREMIERE SALES: Recalls Rhino 7 3000 Capsules Due to Desmethyl
--------------------------------------------------------------
Premiere Sales Group of Santa Clarita, California is voluntarily
recalling the following product to the consumer level: RHINO 7
3000 capsules packaged in a bottle containing six (6) capsules
UPC: 616453150126 ALL LOT NUMBERS WITHIN EXPIRY and Rhino 7
Platinum 3000 Capsules packaged in a single (1) blister packs hang
card count UPC: 700729253748 ALL LOT NUMBERS WITHIN EXPIRY. Lot
numbers are on the back top right of the (1) count and on the side
of the (6) count bottle.  FDA analysis found these products to
contain undeclared desmethyl carbondenafil and dapoxetine.
Desmethyl carbondenafil is a phosphodiesterase PDE-5 inhibitor
which is a class of drugs used to treat male erectile dysfunction,
making these products unapproved new drugs.  Dapoxetine is an
active ingredient not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA).

Desmethyl carbondenafil may pose a threat to consumers because
this PDE-5 inhibitor may interact with nitrates found in some
prescription drugs (such as nitroglycerin) and may lower blood
pressure to dangerous levels that can be life threatening.
Consumers with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or
heart disease often take nitrates.

Dapoxetine has not been approved by the FDA and therefore its
safety or efficacy has not been established. Chemically,
dapoxetine belongs to a class of drugs known as selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to treat depression.
Studies have shown that antidepressants increased the risk of
suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young
adults when compared to placebo. Therefore, consuming these
products presents a health risk which could be life threatening.

Premiere Sales has not received a report of any adverse events
associated with these products.

These products are marketed as dietary supplements for sexual
enhancement and packaged in (6) count bottle and (1) count hanging
card and distributed to consumers nationwide. Premiere Sales Group
has discontinued sales of these products.

Premiere Sales Group has notified its customers of this voluntary
recall via e-mail and phone.  Consumers that purchased these
products from Premiere Sales Group should stop using them
immediately and can return the products to : Premiere Sales Group,
21446 Golden Triangle Rd., Santa Clarita, CA 91350

Consumers with questions regarding this recall can contact
Premiere Sales Group by telephone at 888-550-8621 between (Monday
through Friday 7:30am to 4:00pm Pacific Standard Time Consumers
should contact their physician or healthcare provider if they have
experienced any problems that may be related to taking or using
these products. Consumers can report adverse reactions or quality
control problems to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting
program online, by regular mail, or by fax as follows:

Complete and submit reporting form online at
http://www.fda.gov/MedWatch/report.htm;or
Mail or fax reporting form. Download form at
http://www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htmor call 1-800-332-1088 to
request a reporting form. Complete and return to the address on
the pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-1078.
This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/CHwMeO


QUEST MEDICAL: Recalls MPS Delivery Sets
----------------------------------------
Quest Medical, Inc. initiated a nationwide recall of Myocardial
Protection System (MPS) Delivery Sets, Models 5001102, 5001102-AS,
and 7001102 of specified lots. The product(s) have been found to
intermittently exhibit a seal failure during use, which
potentially could result in patient blood loss.

There are no other recalls related to this product.

Consumers who have the applicable lots of the MPS Delivery Set(s)
should cease use of the affected lots and contact Quest Medical,
Inc. to return the product and request replacement. Additionally,
consignees are being notified via written correspondence.

Recalled Product(s) were manufactured from May 2015 to September
2015 and distributed from June 2015 to September 2015.

The following models/UDI/ID numbers are subject to the recall:

  --- MPS(R) Delivery Sets - Recall

  Device Name   MPS Delivery Set   MPS Delivery Set   MPS Low
  -----------   w/arrest agent     with 6 ft.         Volume
                and additive       delivery           Delivery
                cassettes, heat    tubing             Set
                exchanger & 10
                ft. delivery
                tubing
  Device Model  5001102            5001102-AS         7001102
  ------------
  UDI           00634624501126     00634624521124     0063462-
  ---                                                 4701120

  Affected      0491795E04,        0492205E03         0492765E07
  Lots          0492175E04,        0493695U04
  --------      0492185E06,        0494485U07
                0492195E06,        0495525G02
                0492615E06,        0497265S02
                0492625E08,
                0492635E08,
                0489905Y04,
                0490245Y06,
                0493075U02,
                0493085U02,
                0493435U04,
                0493675U04,
                0493685U07,
                0494465U07,
                0494475U09,
                0494855G01,
                0495215U11,
                0495225U11,
                0495505G02,
                0495515G02,
                0496535G08,
                0496875G08,
                0496885G08,
                0497245S02

The affected product lot information can be identified by product
labeling on shipper and individual sterile trays.

Quest Medical, Inc. voluntarily recalled the applicable lots of
MPS Delivery Sets after becoming aware of complaints alleging
patient blood loss from the device during use. Quest Medical, Inc.
has notified the FDA of this action.

The identified lots of MPS Delivery sets have shown a possible
seal failure along the blood source channel of main pump cassette,
resulting in blood loss from the bypass circuit and interruption
of cardioplegia solution delivery. The firm has received twenty
(20) complaints alleging this seal failure which have resulted in
16 instances of patient blood loss during surgery. There have been
no reports of patient injuries as a result of the alleged issue to
date. The firm has reported these events via the FDA MEDWATCH
program.

Quest Medical, Inc. is notifying its distributors and customers by
certified letter/return receipt and is arranging for return and
replacement of all recalled product(s).

Consumers with questions may contact the company via telephone at
1-800-627-0226 Monday through Friday between the hours of 9am and
5pm (CT). Consumer may also contact the company via e-mail at
custserv@questmedical.com.

Adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of
this product may be reported to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event
Reporting program either online, by regular mail or by fax.

Complete and submit the report Online:
www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm
Regular Mail or Fax: Download form
www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htm or call 1-800-332-1088 to
request a reporting form, then complete and return to the address
on the pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-0178


REDMAN POWER: Sued in Cal. Over Redman Power Chair Design Defects
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Falko Forbrich v. Redman Power Chair, LLC, et al., Case No.
BC597194 (Cal. Super. Ct., October 9, 2015) is an action for
damages as a direct and proximate result of the Defendants'
negligent and wrongful conduct in connection with the design,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution of Redman Power Chair,
that lacked protection of the joystick and controls to prevent
complex fractures of both legs.

Redman Power Chair, LLC is in the business of manufacturing,
engineering and distributing standing wheelchairs, including
Redman Power Chair 107-ZRX, Black Hawk Series.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Eustace De Saint Phalle, Esq.
      Michael E. Gatto, Esq.
      RAINS LUCIA STERN, PC
      220 Montgomery Street, 15th Floor
      San Francisco, CA 94104
      Telephone: (415) 341-9341
      Facsimile: (925) 609-1690
      E-mail: PersonalInjuiyGroup@RLSlawyers.com

         - and -

      David C. Anderson, Esq.
      Audrey C. Seegel, Esq.
      ANDERSON LAW
      711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220
      San Francisco, CA 94102
      Telephone: (415) 395-9898
      Facsimile: (415) 395-9839
      E-mail: mark@andlaw.eu
              audrey@andlaw.eu


SANOFI US: Recalls Auvi-Q(R) Epinephrine Injections
---------------------------------------------------
Sanofi US is voluntarily recalling all Auvi-Q(R) (epinephrine
injection, USP). The recall involves all Auvi-Q currently on the
market and includes both the 0.15 mg and 0.3 mg strengths for
hospitals, retailers and consumers. This includes lot numbers
2081278 through 3037230, which expire October 2015 through
December 2016.The products have been found to potentially have
inaccurate dosage delivery, which may include failure to deliver
drug.

If a patient experiencing a serious allergic reaction (i.e.,
anaphylaxis) did not receive the intended dose, there could be
significant health consequences, including death because
anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition. As of
October 26, 2015, Sanofi has received 26 reports of suspected
device malfunctions in the US and Canada. None of these device
malfunction reports have been confirmed. In these reports,
patients have described symptoms of the underlying
hypersensitivity reaction. No fatal outcomes have been reported
among these cases.

Auvi-Q (epinephrine injection, USP) is used to treat life-
threatening allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) in people who are at
risk for or have a history of these reactions. Auvi-Q is packaged
with two active devices and one trainer device in a corrugate box.
Auvi-Q was distributed throughout the United States via
wholesalers, pharmacies and hospitals. All Auvi-Q is being
recalled.

Sanofi US is notifying its distributors and customers who include
doctors, pharmacies, wholesalers and other customers in the supply
chain by letter, fax, email and phone calls and is arranging for
return and reimbursement of all recalled products.

Customers with questions regarding this recall can go to www.Auvi-
Q.com and call 1-877-319-8963 or 1-866-726-6340 Monday through
Friday 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET for information about how to return
their Auvi-Q devices. Customers may also email cs@sanofi.com.
Sanofi US will provide reimbursement for out of pocket costs
incurred for the purchase of new epinephrine auto-injectors with
proof of purchase. In addition, if you purchased Auvi-Q at a cost
that exceeds the cost of your replacement device, Sanofi will
compensate you for the difference, with proof of original and
replacement product purchases.

Customers should immediately contact their healthcare provider
(HCP) for a prescription for an alternate epinephrine auto-
injector. In the event of a life-threatening allergic reaction
(anaphylaxis), patients should only use their Auvi-Q device if
another epinephrine auto-injector is not available, and then call
911 or local medical emergency services. Customers should contact
their physician or HCP if they have experienced any problems that
may be related to taking or using this drug product.

Adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of
this product may be reported to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event
Reporting program either online, by regular mail or by fax.

Complete and submit the report Online:
www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm
Regular Mail or Fax: Download form
www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htm or call 1-800-3321088 to request
a reporting form, then complete and return to the address on the
pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-0178
This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration.
Sanofi US is committed to patient safety and the quality of Auvi-
Q, and will continue to work closely with customers and regulatory
authorities to resolve this issue in a timely manner.

Important Safety Information
Auvi-Q is for immediate self (or caregiver) administration and
does not take the place of emergency medical care. Seek immediate
medical treatment after use. Each Auvi-Q contains a single dose of
epinephrine. Auvi-Q should only be injected into your outer thigh.
DO NOT INJECT INTO BUTTOCK OR INTRAVENOUSLY. If you accidentally
inject Auvi-Q into any other part of your body, seek immediate
medical treatment. Epinephrine should be used with caution if you
have heart disease or are taking certain medicines that can cause
heart-related (cardiac) symptoms.

If you take certain medicines, you may develop serious life-
threatening side effects from epinephrine. Be sure to tell your
doctor about all the medicines you take, especially medicines for
asthma. Side effects may be increased in patients with certain
medical conditions, or who take certain medicines. These include
asthma, allergies, depression, thyroid disease, Parkinson's
disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease.

The most common side effects may include increase in heart rate,
stronger or irregular heartbeat, sweating, nausea and vomiting,
difficulty breathing, paleness, dizziness, weakness or shakiness,
headache, apprehension, nervousness, or anxiety. These side
effects go away quickly, especially if you rest.

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription
drugs.
In the US, contact the FDA by visiting www.fda.gov/medwatch or
call 1-800-FDA-1088.

Sanofi, an integrated global healthcare leader, discovers,
develops and distributes therapeutic solutions focused on
patients' needs. Sanofi has core strengths in the field of
healthcare with seven growth platforms: diabetes solutions, human
vaccines, innovative drugs, consumer healthcare, emerging markets,
animal health and the new Genzyme. Sanofi is listed in Paris
(EURONEXT: SAN) and in New York (NYSE: SNY).

Sanofi is the holding company of a consolidated group of
subsidiaries and operates in the United States as Sanofi US. For
more information on Sanofi US, please visit http://www.sanofi.us
and http://www.news.sanofi.us/social-mediaor call 1-800-981-2491.

This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as
amended. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not
historical facts. These statements include projections and
estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding
plans, objectives, intentions and expectations with respect to
future financial results, events, operations, services, product
development and potential, and statements regarding future
performance. Forward-looking statements are generally identified
by the words "expects", "anticipates", "believes", "intends",
"estimates", "plans" and similar expressions. Although Sanofi's
management believes that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned
that forward-looking information and statements are subject to
various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to
predict and generally beyond the control of Sanofi, that could
cause actual results and developments to differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-
looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties
include among other things, the uncertainties inherent in research
and development, future clinical data and analysis, including post
marketing, decisions by regulatory authorities, such as the FDA or
the EMA, regarding whether and when to approve any drug, device or
biological application that may be filed for any such product
candidates as well as their decisions regarding labelling and
other matters that could affect the availability or commercial
potential of such product candidates, the absence of guarantee
that the product candidates if approved will be commercially
successful, the future approval and commercial success of
therapeutic alternatives, the Group's ability to benefit from
external growth opportunities, trends in exchange rates and
prevailing interest rates, the impact of cost containment policies
and subsequent changes thereto, the average number of shares
outstanding as well as those discussed or identified in the public
filings with the SEC and the AMF made by Sanofi, including those
listed under "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements" in Sanofi's annual report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2014. Other than as required by
applicable law, Sanofi does not undertake any obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking information or statements.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/k3Pdy1


SHARIFI INC: Faces "Patel" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
------------------------------------------------------------
Jigar Patel, Palak Patel, Kanu Patel, Veena Patel, Payal Patel and
Shreepal Patel v. Ashish Shah, Anthony Sharifi, Sharifi, Inc.
d/b/a Subway No. 2437, and Eat Fresh Inc. d/b/a as Subway No.
37436, Case No. 5:15-cv-01959-MHH (N.D. Ala., October 30, 2015) is
brought against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages
for work more than 40 hours in a given workweek.

The Defendants own and operate Subway Restaurants in Alabama.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Teri Ryder Mastando, Esq.
      Eric J. Artrip, Esq.
      MASTANDO & ARTRIP, LLC
      301 Washington St., Suite 302
      Huntsville, AL 35801
      Telephone: (256) 532-2222
      Facsimile: (256) 513-7489
      E-mail: teri@mastandoartrip.com
              artrip@mastandoartrip.com


SOCKEYE SUZY'S: Recalls Canned Fish Products Due to Clostridium
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sockeye Suzy's Fish Co. of White Swan, Washington is voluntarily
recalling ALL canned catfish, salmon, sturgeon, and walleye with
any codes starting with "OC", sold under brand Sockeye Suzy Fish,
because it has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium
botulinum, a bacterium that can cause life-threatening illness or
death. Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does
not look or smell spoiled.

Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause
the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision
and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing,
weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation
may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems
should seek immediate medical attention.

All products were sold to consumers from our store and distributed
to retail stores and wineries in Washington. The last date of
distribution of recalled products was September 2015.

The affected OC code can be found on either the bottom or on top
of the can. Recalled products are packaged in metal cans with net
weight of 6 oz.

  Product Name      Brand               Net Wt.   UPC
  ------------      -----               -------   ---
  Fancy Chinook     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67292 6
  Fancy Spring      Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67412 8
  Chinook
  Peppered &        Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67282 7
  Smoked Chinook
  Peppered &        Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67302 2
  Smoked Chinook
  Peppered &        Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67212 4
  Smoked Coho
  Peppered &        Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67332 9
  Smoked Steelhead
  Peppered &        Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67232 2
  Smoked Sockeye
  Smoked Catfish    Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67252 0
  Smoked Chinook    Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67282 7
  Smoked Chinook    Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67212 4
  Smoked Chinook    Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67302 2
  Smoked Coho       Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67222 3
  Smoked Garlic     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67322 0
  Chinook
  Smoked Garlic     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67362 6
  Steelhead
  Smoked Jalapeno   Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67312 1
  Chinook
  Smoked Jalapeno   Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67392 3
  Spring Chinook
  Smoked Jalapeno   Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67272 8
  Sturgeon
  Smoked Jalapeno   Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67352 7
  Steelhead
  Smoked Sockeye    Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67242 1
  Smoked Spring     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67402 9
  Chinook
  Smoked Spring     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67382 4
  Chinook
  Smoked Spring     Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67372 5
  Chinook
  Smoked Steelhead  Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67342 8
  Smoked Sturgeon   Sockeye Suzy Fish   6 oz.     7 48252 67262 9
  Smoked Walleye   Sockeye Suzy Fish    6 oz.     7 94504 39610 2

There have been no reported cases of illnesses associated with our
products to date.

The recalled canned seafood products were made by Skipanon Brand
Seafoods LLC and this voluntary recall was initiated after we were
notified that that our products were possibly under- processed.
The problem was discovered during an inspection at Skipanon Brand
Seafoods LLC by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Consumers who have purchased recalled canned seafood products are
urged to destroy or return it to the firm for a full refund.

If you have any questions, please call Sockeye Suzy's Fish Co. at
509-731-0688 between the hours of 9 am and 4 pm PST, Monday-
Friday, or send email to suzylumley@yahoo.com.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/X4X1L1


SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS: Recalls Oatmeal Raisin Cookie Products
------------------------------------------------------------
Southeastern Grocers announced an immediate recall of 12-count,
18-count, and 20-count Bakery Oatmeal Raisin Cookies and Bakery
Variety Pack Cookies, along with 36-count and 48-count Bakery
Cookie Platters in all Harveys and select Winn-Dixie stores in
Florida and Georgia.

According to the supplier of the oatmeal raisin cookie dough, the
reason for the recall is that the product is mislabeled. The
product contains walnuts, an allergen, which is undeclared on the
packaging label. Out of an abundance of caution, consumers who
have an allergy or severe sensitivity to walnuts are urged not to
consume the products and return them to the stores for a full
refund. To receive the refund, customers may present proof of
purchase through a receipt or the product-packaging label.

The products have a sell-by date of Oct. 28, 2015 through Nov. 11,
2015 with UPC codes of 00207995000002, 00267987000007,
00209699000005, 00209700000000, 00267982000002, 00209701000009,
00269736000009 and 0020755000003. To our knowledge, Harveys and
Winn-Dixie stores have received no reports of any issues
associated with consumption of this product at this time.

For the safety of customers, Harveys and Winn-Dixie are
immediately removing the 12-count, 18-count, and 20-count Bakery
Oatmeal Raisin Cookies and Bakery Variety Pack Cookies, along with
the 36-count and 48-count Bakery Cookie Platters from the bakery
departments of all Harveys stores throughout Florida, Georgia and
South Carolina, along with Winn-Dixie stores throughout Florida
and Georgia in the following counties:

Florida:

Alachua
Baker
Bradford
Citrus
Clay
Columbia
Duval
Jefferson
Levy
Leon
Madison
Marion
Nassau
Putnam
St. Johns
Sumter
Suwannee
Taylor
Wakulla
Georgia:
Camden
Glynn
Lowndes

The recall does not affect Winn-Dixie stores in Alabama,
Louisiana, Mississippi or any BI-LO stores.
Customers with questions about the recalled products may contact
the Southeastern Grocers Customer Call Center toll free at 866-
946-6349, Mon. - Fri., 8 a.m. - 6 p.m. EDT, and Sat., 8 a.m. - 4
p.m. EDT.

Southeastern Grocers, LLC, parent company and home of BI-LO,
Harveys and Winn-Dixie grocery stores, is the fifth-largest
supermarket chain in the U.S. and the second-largest supermarket
in the Southeast based on store count. The company employs more
than 66,000 associates who serve customers in approximately 756
grocery stores, 145 liquor stores and 504 in-store pharmacies
throughout the seven southeastern states of Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina and South
Carolina. BI-LO, Harveys and Winn-Dixie are well-known and well-
respected regional brands with deep heritages, strong neighborhood
ties, proud histories of giving back, talented and loyal
associates, and strong commitments to providing the best possible
quality and value to customers. For more information, please visit
www.bi-lo.comdisclaimer icon,
www.harveyssupermarkets.comdisclaimer icon and
www.winndixie.comdisclaimer icon.

SPECIAL LOGISTICS: "Wright" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wright, both individually and, in addition, on behalf of
other similarly situated employees v. Special Logistics Portland,
LLC, and Peoplease LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-02058-BR (D. Oreg.,
October 30, 2015) seeks to recover unpaid wages and damages
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Special Logistics Portland, LLC operates a commercial freight
delivery service company headquartered at 10001 N. Rivergate
Blvd., Portland, OR 97203.

Peoplease LLC operates an employee leasing firm focused on the
transportation and logistics industry.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jon M. Egan, Esq.
      JON M. EGAN, PC
      547 Fifth Street
      Lake Oswego, OR 97034-3009
      Telephone: (503) 697-3427
      Facsimile: (866) 311-5629
      E-mail: Jegan@eganlegalteam.com


STOP & SHOP: Recalls Edamame Products Due to Soy
------------------------------------------------
The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC announced it removed from
sale Nature's Promise Organic Edamame products because they
contain soy, which is not listed on the ingredient label. These
products are safe to consume for individuals who do not suffer
from a soy allergy.

The following products are included in this recall:

Nature's Promise Organic Shelled Edamame, 16 oz., UPC 68826712764
Nature's Promise Organic Edamame in Pod, 16 oz., UPC 68826702124

Stop & Shop has received no reports of illnesses to date. People
who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to soy may run the risk
of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume
these products. Symptoms of food allergies typically appear from
within a few minutes to two hours after a person has eaten the
food to which he or she is allergic. Allergic reactions can
include: hives; flushed skin or rash; tingling or itchy sensation
in the mouth; face, tongue, or lip swelling; vomiting and/or
diarrhea; abdominal cramps; coughing or wheezing; dizziness and/or
lightheadedness; swelling of the throat and vocal cords;
difficulty breathing; loss of consciousness.
Customers who have purchased these products should discard any
unused portions and bring their purchase receipt to Stop & Shop
for a full refund.

Consumers looking for additional information on the recall may
call Stop & Shop Customer Service at 1-800-767-7772 for more
information. Customers can also visit the Stop & Shop website at
stopandshop.com

The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC employs over 59,000
associates and operates 395 stores throughout Massachusetts,
Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York and New Jersey. The company
helps support local communities fight hunger, combat childhood
cancer and promote general health and wellness - with emphasis on
children's educational and support programs. In its commitment to
be a sustainable company, Stop & Shop is a member of the U.S.
Green Building Council and EPA's Smart Way program and has been
recognized by the EPA for the superior energy management of its
stores. Stop & Shop is an Ahold company. To learn more about Stop
& Shop, visit www.stopandshop.com or www.facebook.com/stopandshop.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/UHqMfY


SWISHER HYGIENE: Class Action Filed Over Ecolab Sale
----------------------------------------------------
Swisher Hygiene Inc. said in its Form 8-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2015, that a
derivative lawsuit seeking to be certified as a class action was
filed against Swisher Hygiene Inc. ("Swisher"), the members of the
Swisher board of directors, individually, and Ecolab Inc.
("Ecolab") in connection with the proposed sale of all of the
assets primarily used in Swisher's chemical service, wholesale and
hygiene businesses (in each case outside of Canada) to Ecolab
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement by and between Swisher and
Ecolab dated August 12, 2015 (the "Purchase Agreement").

Swisher believes the claims alleged by the plaintiff are without
merit and it intends to vigorously defend against them.

The lawsuit was filed on September 11, 2015.  The lawsuit seeks to
be certified as a class was filed in the General Court of Justice,
Superior Court Division, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (the
"Court") by Malka Raul, derivatively on behalf of Swisher, and
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
against Swisher, the members of the Swisher board of directors,
individually, and Ecolab.  The plaintiff has alleged that:

     (i) the sale of Swisher to Ecolab contemplated by the
Purchase Agreement is unfair and inequitable to the Swisher
stockholders and constitutes a breach of the fiduciary duties of
the directors in the sale of Swisher,

    (ii) defendants have exacerbated their breaches of fiduciary
duty by agreeing to lock up the Sale Transaction with deal
protection devices that preclude other bidders from making a
successful competing offer for Swisher, and preclude stockholders
from voting against the Sale Transaction,

   (iii) the Sale Transaction will divest the Swisher stockholders
of their ownership interest in Swisher for inadequate
consideration;

    (iv) each of the defendants violated and continues to violate
applicable law by directly breaching and/or aiding and abetting
the defendants' breaches of fiduciary duties of loyalty, due care,
independence, good faith and fair dealings,

     (v) the Sale Transaction is the product of a flawed process
that was designed to sell Swisher to Ecolab on terms detrimental
to plaintiff and the other Swisher stockholders,

    (vi) the proxy statement fails to provide Swisher stockholders
with material information and/or provides them with materially
misleading information and

   (vii) the proxy statement fails to provide Swisher stockholders
with all material information concerning the financial analysis of
Cassel Salpeter & Co., LLC.

The causes of action set forth in the complaint are:

     (i) a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the
individual defendants,

    (ii) a claim for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary
duty against Ecolab,

   (iii) a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duties against
the individual defendants, and

    (iv) a derivative claim for unjust enrichment against the
individual defendants.

The plaintiff primarily seeks to:

     (i) enjoin defendants from consummating the Sale Transaction
unless and until the individual defendants adopt and implement a
fair procedure or process to sell Swisher,

    (ii) direct the individual defendants to exercise their
fiduciary duties to obtain a transaction which is in the best
interests of Swisher and its stockholders and

   (iii) rescinding, to the extent already implemented, the
Purchase Agreement or any of the terms thereof.

The plaintiff also seeks costs and disbursements, including
reasonable attorneys' and experts fees, and such other equitable
and/or injunctive relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

The case is, Malka Raul v. Swisher Hygiene Inc. et al., Case No.
15-CVS-16703 (Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina)).


TATE'S BAKE: Recalls Chocolate Chip Cookies Due to Walnut
---------------------------------------------------------
Tate's Bake Shop of Southampton, NY is recalling Tate's 7 oz
Chocolate Chip Cookies with Best By date of Mar 20, 2016 and
Tate's 7 oz Gluten Free Ginger Zinger Cookies with Best By date of
Jan 04, 2016 because they may contain undeclared walnut allergen.
People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to walnuts run
the risk of serious or allergic reaction if they consume these
products.

Tate's 7 oz Chocolate Chip cookies and Tate's 7 oz Gluten Free
Ginger Zinger cookies are distributed nationwide through retail
stores.

The product can be identified by a Best by date of March 20, 2016
for the Chocolate Chip cookies and Jan 04, 2016 for the Ginger
Zinger cookies, ink jetted on the bottom of the outer package.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

The recall was initiated after it was discovered that a product
containing walnuts was distributed in packaging that did not
reveal the presence of walnuts.

Consumers who have purchased Tate's 7 oz Chocolate chip cookies
with a best by date of Mar 20, 2016 or Tate's 7 oz Gluten Free
Ginger Zinger with a best by date of Jan 04 2016 are urged to
return it to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers
with questions may contact the company at 1-631-780-6511 between
the hours of 9:00AM to 5:00PM, Monday through Friday.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/fzGfR8


TILLY'S INC: Intends to Defend "Christiansen" Case
--------------------------------------------------
Tilly's, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 1, 2015, that the Company intends to
defend this case, Kirstin Christiansen, Shellie Smith and Paul
Haug, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
vs. World of Jeans & Tops, Superior Court of California, County of
Sacramento, Case No. 34-2013-139010.

The Company said, "On January 29, 2013, the plaintiffs in this
matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against us alleging
violations of California Civil Code Section 1747.08, which
prohibits requesting or requiring personal identification
information from a customer paying for goods with a credit card
and recording such information, subject to exceptions. In June
2013, the Court granted our motion to strike portions of the
plaintiffs' complaint and granted plaintiffs leave to amend.
Plaintiffs have amended the complaint. The parties have completed
class certification discovery and briefing, and a hearing was held
on August 13, 2015. The complaint seeks certification of a class,
unspecified damages, injunctive relief and attorneys' fees. We
intend to defend this case vigorously."


TILLY'S INC: Working on Potential Resolution of "Rebolledo" Case
----------------------------------------------------------------
Parties in the class action by Maria Rebolledo have attended a
mediation proceeding and are working on a potential resolution of
the case, Tilly's, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for
the quarterly period ended August 1, 2015.

The Company said, "On December 5, 2012, the plaintiff in this
matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against us alleging
violations of California's wage and hour, meal break and rest
break rules and regulations, and unfair competition law, among
other things. An amended complaint was filed on February 22, 2013,
to add a claim for penalties under the California Private
Attorneys General Act."

"In March 2013, we filed a motion to compel arbitration, which was
denied in June 2013 and later affirmed on appeal. In October 2014,
we filed an answer to the amended complaint. The parties recently
attended a mediation proceeding and are working on a potential
resolution. If this matter does not settle, we intend to defend
this case vigorously."

The case is, Maria Rebolledo, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public vs.
Tilly's, Inc.; World of Jeans & Tops, Superior Court of the State
of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2012-00616290-CU-OE-
CXC.


TILLY'S INC: Intends to Defend "Whitten" Case
---------------------------------------------
Tilly's, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 1, 2015, that the Company intends to
defend this case, Karina Whitten, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, v. Tilly's Inc., Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC 548252.

The Company said, "On June 10, 2014, plaintiff filed a putative
class action and representative Private Attorney General Act
lawsuit against us alleging violations of California's wage and
hour, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, and unfair
competition law, among other things. The complaint seeks class
certification, penalties, restitution, injunctive relief and
attorneys' fees and costs. Plaintiff filed a first amended
complaint on December 3, 2014, removing the expense reimbursement
claim. We answered the complaint on January 8, 2015. We intend to
defend this case vigorously."


TILLY'S INC: Settled "Ortiz" Class Action in E.D. Cal.
------------------------------------------------------
Tilly's, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended August 1, 2015, that the parties have
settled the action, Herbert Ortiz and Audra Haynes, individually,
and on behalf of the generally public, v. Tilly's Inc., United
States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case
No. 1:15-CV-108-MJS.

On November 6, 2014, plaintiff filed a putative class action and
representative Private Attorney General Act lawsuit against the
Company in the Superior Court of California, County of Fresno,
alleging violations of California's wage and hour, meal break and
rest break rules and regulations, and unfair competition law,
among other things. The complaint seeks class certification,
penalties, restitution, injunctive relief and attorneys' fees and
costs.

The Company said, "On January 21, 2015, we answered the complaint
and removed the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of California. In June 2015, the parties settled
the action and the case was dismissed on July 10, 2015."


TIME WARNER: MOU Reached in NY Action Related to Comcast Deal
-------------------------------------------------------------
Time Warner Cable Inc. said in its Form 8-K Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, that the
parties to a class action in New York related to the contemplated
merger with Comcast Corporation have entered into a memorandum of
understanding providing for the settlement of the New York Action.

Beginning on February 14, 2014, numerous putative class action
complaints in connection with the contemplated merger of TWC and
Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") pursuant to a different merger
agreement were filed on behalf of purported TWC stockholders in
the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (the
"NY Supreme Court") naming as defendants TWC, the members of the
TWC board of directors, Comcast and Comcast's merger subsidiary.
Five of the New York complaints were consolidated into a class
action in the NY Supreme Court captioned Barrett, Wedeking,
Graulich IRA, Lassoff and Thomas v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et
al., Index No 650507/2014 (the " New York Action").

Following the announcement of the Mergers on May 26, 2015, on June
29, 2015, the parties in the New York Action filed a stipulation
agreeing that plaintiffs could file a Second Consolidated Class
Action Complaint (the "Second Amended Complaint"), and dismissing
with prejudice Comcast and Comcast's merger subsidiary.  After the
court so ordered the stipulation, the plaintiffs in the New York
Action filed the Second Amended Complaint on July 1, 2015.  The
Second Amended Complaint names as defendants TWC, the members of
the TWC board of directors, Charter and the other parties to the
Merger Agreement.  The Second Amended Complaint generally alleges,
among other things, that members of the TWC board of directors
breached their fiduciary duties to TWC stockholders during the
Charter merger negotiations by entering into the Merger Agreement
and approving the Mergers, and that Charter aided and abetted such
breaches of fiduciary duties.

On September 9, 2015, the parties to the New York Action entered
into the MOU providing for the settlement of the New York Action.
While the defendants in the New York Action continue to vigorously
deny all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability or damage to
any of the plaintiffs or the class of stockholders of TWC, and
believe that no supplemental disclosure is required under the
applicable law, in order to (i) avoid the burden, inconvenience,
expense and distraction of further litigation in connection with
the New York Action, (ii) finally put to rest and terminate all of
the claims that were or could have been asserted against the
defendants in the New York Action and (iii) permit the Mergers to
proceed without risk of the NY Supreme Court ordering an
injunction or damages in connection with the New York Action, TWC,
Charter and New Charter have agreed, without admitting any
liability or wrongdoing, pursuant to the terms of the MOU, to make
certain supplemental disclosures related to the proposed Mergers.
The MOU contemplates that the parties will enter into a
stipulation of settlement.  The stipulation of settlement will be
subject to customary conditions, including court approval
following notice to TWC stockholders.  In the event that the
parties enter into a stipulation of settlement, a hearing will be
scheduled at which the NY Supreme Court will consider the
fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement.  If the
settlement is finally approved by the court, it will resolve and
release all claims by stockholders of TWC challenging any aspect
of the proposed Mergers, the Merger Agreement and any disclosure
made in connection therewith, including in the Definitive Proxy
Statement, pursuant to terms that will be disclosed to TWC's and
Charter's respective stockholders prior to final approval of the
settlement.  The settlement is also contingent upon, among other
things, the Mergers becoming effective under Delaware law.  There
can be no assurance that the parties will ultimately enter into a
stipulation of settlement or that the court will approve the
settlement contemplated by the MOU.  In the event that the
settlement is not approved or such conditions are not satisfied,
the defendants will continue to vigorously defend against the
allegations in the New York Action.


TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS: Illegally Collects Debt, "Libby" Suit Says
--------------------------------------------------------------
Linda Libby, individually and on the behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Transworld Systems, Inc. et al, Case No.
3:15-cv-07797 (D.N.J., October 30, 2015) seeks to stop the
Defendant's unfair and unconscionable means to collect a debt.

Transworld Systems, Inc. owns and operates a debt collection firm.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Ari Hillel Marcus, Esq.
      Yitzchak Zelman, Esq.
      MARCUS ZELMAN LLC
      1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
      Ocean, NJ 07712
      Telephone: (732) 695-3282
      Facsimile: (732) 298-6256
      E-mail: ari@marcuszelman.com
              yzelman@marcuszelman.com


UTI WORLDWIDE: Filed New Motion to Dismiss Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------
UTi Worldwide Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2015, that the Company has filed a
new motion to dismiss the class action related to the fiscal 2015
financing.

On March 17, 2014, a putative securities class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company and certain of its executives in the
United States District Court for the Central District of
California. As amended on September 5, 2014, the complaint, which
is captioned Michael J. Angley, individually and on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated v. UTi Worldwide Inc.,
Eric W. Kirchner, Richard G. Rodick, Edward G. Feitzinger and
Jeffrey W. Misakian, No. 2:14-cv-02066, generally alleges that the
defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by misstating or
failing to disclose, in certain public statements made and in
filings with the SEC between March 28, 2013 and February 26, 2014,
material facts relating to the Company's liquidity position,
financial condition, financial covenants, financial systems and
freight forwarding operating system. The complaint seeks
unspecified damages and other relief. The Company and the
individual defendants deny any allegations of wrongdoing and
intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. All defendants
moved to dismiss on November 4, 2014.

On June 10, 2015, the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss,
with leave for plaintiffs to amend. On June 29, 2015, plaintiffs
filed an amended complaint and on July 20, 2015, the Company filed
a new motion to dismiss.


VIOLIN MEMORY: Class Action in Discovery Phase
----------------------------------------------
Violin Memory, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2015, that a consolidated class
action lawsuit is in the discovery phase of the litigation.

Beginning on November 26, 2013, four putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California naming as defendants the Company,
a number of the Company's present or former directors and
officers, and the underwriters of the Company's September 27, 2013
initial public offering (the "IPO"). The four complaints were
consolidated into a single, putative class action, and co-lead
plaintiffs were appointed by the court.

On March 28, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint
purporting to assert claims under the federal securities laws,
based upon seven categories of alleged omissions, on behalf of
purchasers of the Company's common stock issued in the IPO. The
complaint sought damages in an unspecified amount and other
relief. On April 18, 2014, the defendants filed motions to dismiss
the complaint. On October 31, 2014, the court granted in part and
denied in part defendants' motions to dismiss. The court's order
dismissed all except one category of alleged omissions, and gave
plaintiffs the opportunity to amend the complaint. On November 21,
2014, the plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint and,
in so doing, chose not to amend their claims against the Company
or the present or former directors and officers.

On April 30, 2015, the court issued an order granting in part the
defendants' motions to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint.
The court's order dismissed all except two categories of claims
against the Company and the present or former directors and
officers of the Company and certain claims against the
underwriters. On May 6, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a second
amended consolidated complaint. On May 20, 2015, the Company and
the present and former directors and officers filed an answer to
the second amended consolidated complaint denying the material
allegations of the complaint and alleging numerous affirmative
defenses to the remaining claims. The case is now in the discovery
phase of the litigation.


VOLKSWAGEN GROUP: Faces "Pomerantz" Suit Over Defeat Devices
------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Pomerantz and Tiffany Ford individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et
al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01425-LO-MSN (E.D. Va., October 30, 2015)
arises out of the Defendants alleged intentional installation of
so-called "defeat devices" on at least 482,000 diesel Volkswagen
and Audi vehicles sold in the United States since 2009.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. is engaged in the business of
designing, manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling
automobiles and other motor vehicles and motor vehicle components
throughout the United States of America.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John A. C. Keith, Esq.
      David J. Gogal, Esq.
      William B. Porter, Esq.
      BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, P. C.
      4020 University Drive, Suite 300
      Fairfax, VA 22030
      Telephone: (703) 691-1235
      Facsimile: (703) 691-3913
      E-mail: jkeith@bklawva.com
              dgogal@bklawva.com
              wporter@bklawva.com

         - and -

      Marc M. Seltzer, Esq.
      Steven G. Sklaver, Esq.
      SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
      1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
      Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
      Telephone: (310)789-3100
      Facsimile: (310)789-3150
      E-mail: mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com
              ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com

         - and -

      William C. Carmody, Esq.
      SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
      560 Lexington Avenue, 15th Floor
      New York, NY 10022
      Telephone: (212) 336-8330
      Facsimile: (212) 336-8340
      E-mail: bcarmody@susmangodfrey.com

         - and -

      Vineet Bhatia, Esq.
      SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
      1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
      Houston, TX 77002
      Telephone: (713)651-9366
      Facsimile: (713)654-6666
      E-mail: vbhatia@susmangodfrey.com


WAL-MART STORES: Petition for Writ Filed in Braun/Hummel Case
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2015, that in the case,
Braun/Hummel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the Company has filed a
petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, the
plaintiffs have filed their response in opposition and the Company
have filed its reply brief.

The Company is a defendant in Braun/Hummel v. Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc., a class-action lawsuit commenced in March 2002 in the Court
of Common Pleas in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs
allege that the Company failed to pay class members for all hours
worked and prevented class members from taking their full meal and
rest breaks.

On October 13, 2006, a jury awarded back-pay damages to the
plaintiffs of approximately $78 million on their claims for off-
the-clock work and missed rest breaks. The jury found in favor of
the Company on the plaintiffs' meal-period claims.

On November 14, 2007, the trial judge entered a final judgment in
the approximate amount of $188 million, which included the jury's
back-pay award plus statutory penalties, prejudgment interest and
attorneys' fees. By operation of law, post-judgment interest
accrues on the judgment amount at the rate of six percent per
annum from the date of entry of the judgment, which was November
14, 2007, until the judgment is paid, unless the judgment is set
aside on appeal. On December 7, 2007, the Company filed its Notice
of Appeal.

On June 10, 2011, the Pennsylvania Superior Court of Appeals
issued an opinion upholding the trial court's certification of the
class, the jury's back pay award, and the awards of statutory
penalties and prejudgment interest, but reversing the award of
attorneys' fees. On September 9, 2011, the Company filed a
Petition for Allowance of Appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme
Court.

On July 2, 2012, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted the
Company's Petition. On December 15, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme
Court issued its opinion affirming the Superior Court of Appeals'
decision. At that time, the Company recorded expenses of $249
million for the judgment amount and post-judgment interest
incurred to date. The Company will continue to accrue for the
post-judgment interest until final resolution.

However, the Company continues to believe it has substantial
factual and legal defenses to the claims at issue, and, on March
13, 2015, the Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari with
the U.S. Supreme Court. On April 20, 2015, the plaintiffs filed
their response in opposition and on May 4, 2015, the Company filed
its reply brief.


WORLD VARIETY: Recalls Italian Pine Nuts Due to Salmonella
----------------------------------------------------------
World Variety Produce, Inc. of Los Angeles, CA is voluntarily
recalling Italian Pine Nuts 2oz and 3oz, because it has the
potential to be contaminated with Salmonella, an organism which
can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young
children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune
systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience
fever, diarrhea (which may be bloody), nausea, vomiting and
abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella
can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream and
producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections (i.e.,
infected aneurysms), endocarditis and arthritis.

Italian Pine Nuts were distributed through retailers in Arizona,
Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas,
Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and
Washington.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

Recalled Italian Pine Nuts can be identified by the following
descriptions:

  Melissa's Italian Pine Nuts
  ---------------------------
  Brand:  Melissa's Italian Pine Nuts
  Packaging:  2oz (57g) Plastic Bag
  UPC Code:  0-45255-14351-5
  Use By Date: (located on back panel)  09.14.2016
  Batch Code: (located on back panel)  15CNP10

  Wegmans Italian Classics Pine Nuts 3oz
  --------------------------------------
  Brand:  Wegmans Italian Classics Pine Nuts
  Packaging:  3oz (85g) Square Plastic Tub
  UPC Code:  0-77890-24823-2

Best Used By Date (located on bottom of tub) 041016, 041716
The recall was a result of a routine random sampling program by
the FDA which revealed that the finished products contained the
bacteria. The company has ceased the production and distribution
of the product as the FDA and World Variety Produce, Inc. continue
their investigation as to what caused the problem.
Consumers who have purchased Melissa's Italian Pine Nuts 2oz &
Wegmans Italian Classics Pine Nuts 3oz are urged to destroy and
dispose of recalled product. Consumers with questions may contact
the company at hotline@melissas.com or call 1-800-588-0151, Mon-
Fri 6:00 AM-6:00 PM PST.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/J2pkLg


XURA INC: To Defend Against Israeli Optionholder Class Action
-------------------------------------------------------------
Xura, Inc. said in its Form 10-Q Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2015, for the quarterly
period ended July 31, 2015, that the Company intends to defend the
Israeli Optionholder Class Action.

CTI and certain of its former subsidiaries, including Comverse
Ltd. (a subsidiary of the Company), were named as defendants in
four potential class action litigations in the State of Israel
involving claims to recover damages incurred as a result of
purported negligence or breach of contract due to previously-
settled allegations regarding illegal backdating of CTI options
that allegedly prevented certain current or former employees from
exercising certain stock options. The Company intends to
vigorously defend these actions.

Two cases were filed in the Tel Aviv District Court against CTI on
March 26, 2009, by plaintiffs Katriel (a former Comverse Ltd.
employee) and Deutsch (a former Verint Systems Ltd. employee). The
Katriel case (Case Number 1334/09) and the Deutsch case (Case
Number 1335/09) both seek to approve class actions to recover
damages that are claimed to have been incurred as a result of
CTI's negligence in reporting and filing its financial statements,
which allegedly prevented the exercise of certain stock options by
certain employees and former employees. By stipulation of the
parties, on September 30, 2009, the court ordered that these
cases, including all claims against CTI in Israel and the motion
to approve the class action, be stayed until resolution of the
actions pending in the United States regarding stock option
accounting, without prejudice to the parties' ability to
investigate and assert the unique facts, claims and defenses in
these cases.

On May 7, 2012, the court lifted the stay, and the plaintiffs have
filed an amended complaint and motion to certify a class of
plaintiffs in a single consolidated class action. The defendants
responded to this amended complaint on November 11, 2012, and the
plaintiffs filed a further reply on December 20, 2012. A pre-trial
hearing for the case was held on December 25, 2012, during which
all parties agreed to attempt to settle the dispute through
mediation.

The mediation process ended without success. According to the
parties' consent to submit summations in the motion to certify the
claims as a class action, including the certification of the class
of plaintiffs, the court held the following dates for submission
of summations: Summations on behalf of the plaintiffs were
submitted on August 31, 2014; Summations on behalf of the
defendants were submitted on November 20, 2014; and summations of
response by the plaintiffs were submitted on December 30, 2014.

On February 9, 2015, the Judge presiding over the case recused
herself due to a conflict of interests. On March 30, 2015, the
plaintiffs filed a motion to the Court seeking to have the case
assigned to a new presiding Judge and as a result on April 4, 2015
a new presiding judge was assigned to the case. The parties are
now awaiting for the Court's decision.

Separately, on July 13, 2012, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking an
order that CTI hold back $150 million in assets as a reserve to
satisfy any potential damage awards that may be awarded in this
case, but did not seek to enjoin the Share Distribution. On July
25, 2012, the court decided that it will not rule on the motion
until after it rules on plaintiffs' motion to certify a class of
plaintiffs. On August 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed a motion for
leave to appeal the court's decision to the Israeli Supreme Court
(the "Appeal") and on November 11, 2012, CTI responded to
plaintiff's motion.

On July 1, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to the Supreme
Court to withdraw the Appeal and accordingly the Appeal was
dismissed.

Two cases were also filed in the Tel Aviv Labor Court by
plaintiffs Katriel and Deutsch, and both sought to approve class
actions to recover damages that are claimed to have been incurred
as a result of breached employment contracts, which allegedly
prevented the exercise by certain employees and former employees
of certain CTI and Verint stock options, respectively. The Katriel
litigation (Case Number 3444/09) was filed on March 16, 2009,
against Comverse Ltd., and the Deutsch litigation (Case Number
4186/09) was filed on March 26, 2009, against Verint Systems Ltd.
The Tel Aviv Labor Court has ruled that it lacks jurisdiction, and
both cases have been transferred to the Tel Aviv District Court.
These cases have been consolidated with the Tel Aviv District
Court cases.

The Company has not accrued for these matters as the potential
loss is currently not probable or estimable.

An additional case has been filed by an individual plaintiff in
the Tel Aviv District Court similarly seeking to recover damages
up to an aggregate of $3.3 million allegedly incurred as a result
of the inability to exercise certain stock options. The case
generally alleges the same causes of actions alleged in the
potential class action discussed above. The parties conducted a
mediation process that ended without success. On June 26, 2014 the
Court ordered the plaintiff to notify it why not to transfer the
claim to the Labor Court. On July 10, 2014, the plaintiff filed a
notice to court according to which the subject-matter jurisdiction
is reserved to the District Court. The Court did not accept the
plaintiff's argument and has assigned the case to the Labor Court.
A preliminary hearing at the Labor court was held on July 8, 2015.
The court scheduled dates for further proceedings, as follows:
Completion of preliminary proceedings by October 10, 2015;
Plaintiff will submit affidavits on his behalf by January 1, 2016;
The defendants will submit affidavits on their behalf by April 1,
2016; Evidentiary hearings have been set for June 23, 2016 and
July 14, 2016.


ZENOBIA COMPANY: Recalls Flax Seed Products Due to Salmonella
-------------------------------------------------------------
Zenobia Company LLC of Yonkers, NY is recalling Ground Flax Seed
Meal, because they have the potential to be contaminated with
Salmonella, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes
fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and
others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with
Salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea (which may be bloody),
nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances,
infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into
the bloodstream and producing more severe illnesses such as
arterial infections (i.e., infected aneurysms), endocarditis and
arthritis.

Product was distributed nationwide through online mail order
between dates of 6/15/15 - 11/4/15.

This product is labeled Ground Flax Seed Meal packaged in
resealable plastic bags of the following sizes: 4 oz. and 16 oz.
or 50 pounds bulk. UPC #'s 00575004, 00575016, 00575111

No illnesses have been reported to date.

The recall was initiated after our supplier notified us that the
Ground Flax Seed Meal potentially containing Salmonella was
shipped to us by them unknowingly.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-877-890-
5244, Monday - Friday, 9am - 5pm, EST. Consumers who have
purchased Ground Flax Seed Meal are urged to discard product and
contact company for a full refund.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://is.gd/Q1ugGa


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *