CAR_Public/150923.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

            Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Vol. 17, No. 190


                            Headlines


AMERICAN EXPRESS: Rosen Law Firm Files Securities Class Suit
AVALANCHE BIOTECH: Khang & Khang Files Securities Class Suit
BARD CANADA: Inability to Prove Common Design Dooms Class Suit
BROWARD COUNTY, FL: Airport Sued Over 'Extreme Noise Pollution'
CACIQUE INC: Faces "Reyes" Suit Over Inaccurate Wage Statement

CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM: October 26 Lead Plaintiff Bid Deadline
CANADA: Liberals Set to Unveil Plan to Court Veteran Vote
CHEVRON CORP: Canadian Court Allows Ecuadorians to Pursue Suit
CHRISTENSEN FINANCIAL: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
CONAIR CORPORATION: Court Rejects Bid to Reconsider Order

CONFORMIS INC: November 2 Lead Plaintiff Bid Deadline
CYNTHIA ELLIOTT: Sued by Teachers for Using "F" Word
DOLLAR TREE: Parties Agree to Dismiss "Frizzell" Case
EAST COAST: "Khan" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
ELI LILLY: Faces Suit in Pa. Alleging Cymbalta-Related Injuries

EUREKA NAILS: "Aguaysa" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
EXTERIOR WALLS: Fails to Pay Employees OT, "Hernandez" Suit Says
FMR CORP: Accused of Racial Discrimination in E.D. Michigan
GENERAL MOTORS: Faces "Hinds" Suit Over Defective Ignition Switch
GENERAL MOTORS: Faces Suit Over Premature Deployment of Airbag

GRUBHUB INC: Court Remands "Mitchell" Class Suit
HINSDALE NURSERIES: Faces "Campos" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
HMM PALLETS: Faces "Marquez" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
INVACARE CORP: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss "Murray" Case
INVESTOR INCOME: Faces "He" Suit Over False Advertisements

JOHN L. SULLIVAN: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Vehicle Price
KING OSCAR: Named as One of 'Big Three' Price Fixing Cartels
KMDG LLC: Settlement Approved in "Lopez" FLSA Class Suit
LEIDOS INC: Court Dismissed "Fernandez" Suit with Leave to Amend
LERETA LLC: "Brooks" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages

LORILLARD TOBACCO: Court Dismissed "Henry" Smoking Suit
MARITIME ASSOCIATION: Sued Over Alleged Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MASSACHUSETTS BAY: Sued in Mass. For Charging Personal Files Fee
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Bunch" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Covington" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT

MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Davis" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Duvers" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Guilder" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Graham" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Harris" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT

MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Martin" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "McNeal" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MID-OHIO TRUCKING: Faces "Kaschalk" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
MITSUI O.S.K.: Court Dismisses Suit Against Vehicle Shippers
MONSTER CHEF: "Alvarez" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime

MONTGOMERY CITY, AL: Faces Suit Alleging Civil Rights Violation
NATIONAL FITNESS: Faces "Russ" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
NATURAL FRUIT: Faces Class Suit Over Forced, Child Labour
NELNET INC: Robert Shaw Can't Join "Cooper" Suit, Judge Says
NEW YORK: NYPD Sued Over Alleged Illegal Detention Practices

ONSTAR LLC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Duchene" Suit Claims
PATSY'S PIZZERIA: Faces "Guzman" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
PITA CAFE: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Daraei" Suit Claims
PIZZA HUT: Ex-Pizza Driver Sues Over NY Labor Law Violations
REVANCE THERAPEUTICS: Warren Police Suit Remanded to State Court

RIDGE COUNTRY: Faces "Esqueda" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
RIVERBOAT DELTA: Court Grants in Part Requests for Attorney Fees
ROYAL TRANSPORTATION: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
SANDRIDGE ENERGY: Sued in Oklahoma Over Plan Assets Mismanagement
SOUTH TEXAS: Faces "Granados" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime

SAINT-ALPHONSE SEMINARY: Sex Abuse Victims Receive $14M Settlement
ST. LOUIS CITY JAILS: Mo. Judge Denies Class Cert. in "Burke"
STAR OF TEXAS: Faces "Deutsh" Suit Alleging ADA Violations
SUMO GLASS: Faces "Castrellon" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
SUPERIOR HOME: Sued Over Failure to Pay Nurses Overtime Wages

TWITTER INC: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Users Messages
TY WELLNESS: Sued in Cal. Over Negligent Acupuncture Treatments
UNITED AIRLINES: Sued Over Early Out Program Lump Sum Payment
UNITEDHEALTHCARE INC: 7th Cir. Revives "Meinders" Junk Fax Suit
US FOODS: Faces Suit in Colorado for Gender Discrimination

WERNER ENTERPRISES: "Smith" Suit Moved From Calif. to Nebraska
WORK OUT WORLD: Accused of Violating Communications Act in N.J.


                            *********


AMERICAN EXPRESS: Rosen Law Firm Files Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights firm, announces that a
class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of all purchasers of
American Express Company common stock  from October 16, 2014
through February 11, 2015. The lawsuit seeks to recover investors'
losses under the federal securities laws.

To join the American Express class action, visit the firm's
website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-690.html,or contact
Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or
via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or kchan@rosenlegal.com for
information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS
IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN
ONE. YOU MAY CHOOSE TO DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT AND REMAIN AN
ABSENT CLASS MEMBER.

The complaint alleges that Defendants issued false and misleading
statements concerning American Express' business and prospects,
including the position of its negotiations with U.S. Costco to
renew its co-branding agreement, which was set to expire on March
31, 2016 and the financial repercussions of that agreement on
American Express' business. Consequently, American Express' stock
traded at artificially elevated prices, reaching a peak of almost
$95 per share on December 29, 2014.

On February 12, 2015, American Express revealed that it had lost
the U.S. Costco co-branding relationship, and that the financial
cost of that loss would be severe. American Express announced that
the U.S. Costco co-branding agreement accounted for 8% of the
Company's revenues in 2014, and that one in ten U.S. American
Express cards were issued pursuant to the U.S. Costco co-branding
arrangement. Additionally, 20% of its outstanding loans were made
pursuant to that agreement. Lastly, because of the expiration of
the U.S. Costco co-branding agreement, American Express stated
that its 2015 and 2016 profits would suffer, and that it would be
unable to make any progress on its prior efforts to boost earnings
per share until 2017. Thus, American Express' stock price dropped
from a close of $85.40 per share on February 11, 2015, to close at
$77.53 per share on February 13, 2015, a decrease of almost $8 per
share.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no
later than September 28, 2015. A lead plaintiff is a
representative party acting on behalf of other class members in
directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation go to
the firm's website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-690.htmlor
to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action,
please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of Rosen Law
Firm toll-free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at
pkim@rosenlegal.com or kchan@rosenlegal.com.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation.

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY  10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
Email: pkim@rosenlegal.com
       kchan@rosenlegal.com


AVALANCHE BIOTECH: Khang & Khang Files Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Khang & Khang LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been
filed against Avalanche Biotechnologies, Inc. ("Avalanche" or the
"Company") (NASDAQ: AAVL).

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares between July
31, 2014 and June 15, 2015, inclusive (the "Class Period") are
encouraged to contact the Firm immediately to discuss their legal
options.

If you purchased shares of Avalanche during the Class Period,
please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, of Khang & Khang, 18101 Von
Karman Avenue, 3rd Floor, Irvine, CA 92612, by telephone: (949)
419-3834, or by email at joon@khanglaw.com.

There has been no class certification in this case. Until
certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You
may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member.

According to the complaint, the Company allegedly issued
materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to
disclose that Phase 2a of the study for its drug AVA-101 was not
designed to show any statistical significance between the active
and control groups in the secondary endpoints.

If you purchased shares of Avalanche during the Class Period you
have until September 8, 2015 to ask the Court to appoint you as
lead plaintiff. If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or
if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights,
please contact Joon M. Khang, a prominent litigator for almost two
decades, by telephone: (949) 419-3834, or by email at
joon@khanglaw.com.

Contact:

Joon M. Khang, Esq.
KHANG & KHANG LLP
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
joon@khanglaw.com


BARD CANADA: Inability to Prove Common Design Dooms Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Andrea Gorys, Esq. -- agorys@theallgroup.com -- at Theall Group
LLP, in an article for Mondaq, reportd that despite the popular
belief that all product liability cases are appropriate for
certification as class actions, the recent decision of O'Brien v.
Bard Canada Inc. proves otherwise.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a certification
motion on the basis that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the
plurality of claims beyond her own experience. She could not
demonstrate that there was a common design defect amongst the 19
products made by the manufacturer. They were all different in
materials, shape, size, weight, density, weave, porosity,
flexibility, configuration, fixation methodology, design purposes,
and product warnings.

The plaintiff, Ms. O'Brien, moved for certification of a product
liability class action against Bard Canada Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively "Bard") alleging that their pelvic mesh
products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse ("POP") or stress
urinary incontinence ("SUI") were dangerous. She claimed Bard
negligently designed the product and further failed to warn of the
danger in using its medical devices. Ms. O'Brien had suffered
multiple side effects following the surgery to implant one of
Bard's medical devices.

Bard offers a variety of products to treat POP and SUI -- Ms.
O'Brien's proposed class included patients implanted with any one
of 19 different mesh products made by Bard. Although all of these
products use surgical mesh, each has distinct design features as
well as different design purposes. They are made of different
materials, and have different sizes, shapes, warnings, etc. As
explained by Bard, the products were designed to provide different
approaches to treat POP and SUI. Consequently, Bard's expert
evidence, provided by two different doctors, explained that it was
not scientifically reasonable to generically link adverse outcomes
from 19 different products. Moreover, their different designs are
clinically relevant because they are chosen for the specific
patient's circumstances.

Although the threshold for certification motions is low in that it
requires the moving party to adduce evidence that demonstrates
"some-basis-in-fact," Ms. O'Brien was unable to meet it because
she failed to show a common design defect among Bard's 19
products. While she presented expert evidence through a doctor
who opined on the use of surgical mesh to treat SUI and POP, his
evidence failed to establish any commonality of design or use
between Bard's 19 products.

This case illustrates that where manufacturers manufacture a
variety of products for use in similar situations, but can
demonstrate substantive distinctive traits between them, they have
a strong defence against certification of a class action. As
stated by the Court: "No type of class action is quintessentially
certifiable, even a products liability class action. Each class
action of whatever genre must be individually assessed."


BROWARD COUNTY, FL: Airport Sued Over 'Extreme Noise Pollution'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brittany Wallman, writing for Sun Sentinel, reported that Broward
County was hit with its third lawsuit in a month -- this one in
federal court -- by airport neighbors fed up with loud, low-flying
aircraft headed to the new airport runway.

They argue the loss in enjoyment of their homes is so great, it's
as if the county took their property without paying them for it.

In decades of litigation leading up to the controversial runway's
construction at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport,
much of the focus was on homeowners in the Melaleuca Gardens
neighborhood of Dania Beach, just south of the airport. Now that
the runway is open, the swath of those impacted by airplane
flyovers -- and the accompanying sound, fumes, vibrations and
droppings -- is larger, drawing in thousands of homeowners in
Hollywood, Dania Beach and Fort Lauderdale who live west of the
airport.

In the latest case, filed Sept. 1, lawyers from three firms joined
together, seeking class action status for all homeowners in the
new flight paths.

The named plaintiff is Noy Hadar, owner of two-story home in the
Maple Ridge neighborhood of Hollywood, just south of Griffin Road.

"He cannot even take a phone call in his house without getting
interrupted by a plane that basically flies right over him every
two or three minutes on some days," attorney Zeljka Bozanic said.
"Before the south runway opened, there was no noise whatsoever."

Attorneys Cullin O'Brien, Sue-Ann Robinson and Bozanic argue that
the residents are exposed to "extreme noise pollution" that
interferes with their ability to "use and enjoy their properties."

"When there's a noisy flight path that makes it unbearable on your
premises, that can constitute a taking," O'Brien said. "When you
have 727 engines as your new neighbors, something needs to be
done."

Aviation Director Kent George referred comment to the county
attorney's office, but has said in the past that flight patterns
are the domain of the Federal Aviation Administration. Assistant
County Attorney Tony Rodriguez declined comment, saying the county
had not been served with the lawsuit.

The new $800 million runway, on the airport's south side, opened a
year ago and typically carries about 30 percent of the 600 flights
a day. But the county has been slow to soundproof homes, and only
hired a company to launch promised programs to compensate
homeowners in the nosiest zones.

The federal case was assigned to Judge Donald Middlebrooks.

On Aug. 5, a team of lawyers from three firms filed two lawsuits
in Broward circuit court -- one on behalf of homeowners who were
denied sound-proofing, and a second lawsuit on behalf of those who
were approved but haven't gotten it yet.

Attorney Stephen Malove said the team will blanket the community -
- some 24,000 homes -- with letters seeking homeowners affected by
the new runway's air traffic.


CACIQUE INC: Faces "Reyes" Suit Over Inaccurate Wage Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juan Reyes, an individual, on behalf of the State of California,
as a private attorney general v. Cacique, Inc. and Does 1 to 50,
Case No. BC594586 (D. Cal., September 14, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for failure to provide accurate itemized
wage statements in compliance with Labor Code.

Cacique, Inc. is a California corporation that manufactures
Mexican-style cheeses, chorizos, and creams.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Eric B. Kingsley, Esq.
      Kelsey M. Szamet, Esq.
      KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC
      16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200
      Encino, CA 91436
      Telephone: (818) 990-8300
      Facsimile: (818) 990-2903
      E-mail: eric@kingsleykingsley.com
              kelsey@kingsleykingsley.com


CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM: October 26 Lead Plaintiff Bid Deadline
------------------------------------------------------------
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds
purchasers of CaesarStone Sdot-Yam Ltd. from March 25, 2013
through August 18, 2015 of the important October 26, 2015 lead
plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to
recover damages for CaesarStone investors under the federal
securities laws.

According to the lawsuit, Defendants made false and/or misleading
statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the cost of quartz
increased significantly by approximately 20% in 2014 while
CaesarStone claimed in SEC filings the impact of the price rising
was just 4%; (2) independent lab tests revealed that CaesarStone's
samples contained less quartz than advertised; (3) CaesarStone's
reported consolidated margins, gross margins, and EBITDA were
overstated; (4) the extent of and risk posed by a rising number of
lawsuits for approximately 60 silicosis-related injuries or deaths
suffered by workers and fabricators of its product in Israel was
understated; (5) the impact recent OSHA warnings concerning
silicosis would have on the opening of a new U.S. facility and
associated costs; and (6) recent inspection reports revealed audit
deficiencies related to revenue and inventory controls.

On August 19, 2015, analyst firm Spruce Point Capital Management
published a report on CaesarStone describing the aforementioned
false and misleading statements and failures of disclosure. On
this adverse news, CaesarStone ADRs fell $3.68, or 7.6%, to close
at $44.61 on August 19, 2015.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no
later than October 26, 2015. A lead plaintiff is a representative
party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the
litigation. If you wish to join the litigation go to the firm's
website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-699.htmlor to discuss
your rights or interests regarding this class action, please
contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm
toll-free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or
kchan@rosenlegal.com.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe,
concentrating its practice in securities class actions and
shareholder derivative litigation.

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY  10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
pkim@rosenlegal.com
kchan@rosenlegal.com


CANADA: Liberals Set to Unveil Plan to Court Veteran Vote
---------------------------------------------------------
Murray Brewster, writing for CBC News, reported that Justin
Trudeau's Liberals are promising to restore a system of lifetime
pensions for injured veterans, if elected on Oct. 19.

The pledge is part of a comprehensive pitch to woo disgruntled ex-
soldiers, whom the Conservatives have long considered their
natural constituency.

Trudeau will deliver the promise at an event in a southern Ontario
riding that includes the country's largest and busiest military
air base, CFB Trenton. The proposals give advocates, including the
veterans ombudsman, everything they've been demanding.

The treatment of ex-soldiers has been a political lightning rod
for the Conservatives and the perceived mishandling of the files,
along with nasty public exchanges, contributed to the demotion of
Julian Fantino out of the veterans portfolio in January.

Trudeau, during the first English language leaders debate earlier,
accused the Conservatives of "nickel and diming" Canada's veterans
when they return from deployment.

"This government, which likes to wrap itself in the flag, is
actually not caring for those people who have fought, injured
themselves and, in many cases, died," he charged.

The switch from lifetime pensions to a series of lump sum payments
under the new veterans charter, which was conceived under Paul
Martin's Liberals in 2005, is one of the biggest complaints among
wounded soldiers.

It has been at the heart of a class-action lawsuit launched by
Afghan veterans, who say the old Pension Act system was more
generous to Second World War and Korean soldiers than it those who
served in recent years.

The Liberal platform plank, obtained by The Canadian Press, offers
the wounded a choice of either lump sum or pensions-for-life. They
promise to re-instate the option during the current fiscal year.

The proposal also offers to pump millions of dollars into further
improving compensation and care.

              Plan to increase Earnings Loss Benefit

The Liberals say will invest $25 million to expand access to the
Permanent Impairment Allowance, which is given to the most
seriously wounded and has been the subject of criticism by the
veterans ombudsman, who has said eligibility criteria was too
strict.

Guy Parent found, in a 2014 study, that nearly half of the
country's most severely disabled ex-soldiers were not receiving
the allowance intended to compensate them for their physical and
mental wounds.

The Liberals also promise to invest $40 million to increase the
Earnings Loss Benefit to 90 per cent of a soldier's pre-release
salary, and index it to the cost of living. Right now, the benefit
is set at 75 per cent -- something Parent has also complained
about.

There is a pledge to invest $80 million per year to create a new
Veterans Education Benefit that provides full support for the cost
of up to four years of college, university, or technical education
for veterans after completion of service.

Another $100 million per year would go toward expanded support for
the families of veterans, including education, counselling, and
training for families who are providing care and support for
veterans. That might satisfy critics such as Jenny Migneault, who
chased Fantino down a hall in Ottawa trying to get him to commit
to improving caregiver services.

The Liberals are also promising to reopen nine regional veterans
affairs closed by the Conservatives and to hire an additional 400
staff to process claims.

The Harper Conservatives have faced unrelenting criticism from the
veterans community and responded earlier with a series of
initiatives, including a family caregiver's benefit and a one-time
$70,000 lump sum payout to injured soldiers.


CHEVRON CORP: Canadian Court Allows Ecuadorians to Pursue Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fuel Fix reported that a group of Ecuadorian villagers can proceed
in Canada with their class action lawsuit against Chevron Corp.
over environmental contamination in the rain forest, the country's
top court ruled.

The Supreme Court of Canada said in a unanimous decision that the
company can be pursued in the country for its alleged actions in
Ecuador, in a case that's spanned more than two decades.

Canadian courts take a "generous and liberal approach to the
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments," Justice Clement
Gascon wrote in the decision.The ruling on jurisdiction does not
mean the villagers will be awarded Canadian assets, only that the
case can proceed and be argued by both sides, the court ruled.


CHRISTENSEN FINANCIAL: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Theresa Rossero, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated
v. Christensen Financial, Inc., Case No. 6:15-cv-01500-RBD-KRS
(M.D. Fla., September 14, 2015), is brought against the Defendants
for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standard Act.

Christensen Financial, Inc. operates in interstate commerce by
offering mortgage products in Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Carlos V. Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 N. Orange Ave., 14th Floor
      Orlando, FL 32802-4979
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 420-5956
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


CONAIR CORPORATION: Court Rejects Bid to Reconsider Order
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, DELIA WILSON, on Behalf of Herself and All Others
Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. CONAIR CORPORATION, Defendant,
CIV. NO. 1:14-00894 WBS SAB (E.D. Cal.), Magistrate Judge Boone on
August 17, 2015, denied plaintiff's motion to compel production of
numerous curling irons in defendant's possession for destructive
testing. Judge Boone explained that, because the testing addresses
the merits of the action and not class certification, defendant
should not be compelled to produce the curling irons unless and
until plaintiff prevails on her motion for class certification.

In a Sept. 15 Order available at http://is.gd/kzCjC9from
Leagle.com, District Judge William B. Shubb denied plaintiff's
motion for reconsideration of the August 17, 2015 Order denying
her motion to compel.  Not only is the decision not "clearly
erroneous," it makes a lot of sense, Judge Shubb said.

Delia Wilson, Plaintiff, represented by Katherine J. Odenbreit,
Odenbreit Law, APC, Leslie Eileen Hurst, Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon,
LLP, Thomas J. O'Reardon, II, Blood Hurst & O'Reardon & Timothy G.
Blood, Blood Hurst & O'Reardon LLP.

Conair Corporation, Defendant, represented by Ryan Donald Saba --
rsaba@rosensaba.com -- Rosen Saba.


CONFORMIS INC: November 2 Lead Plaintiff Bid Deadline
-----------------------------------------------------
The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:

To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired
securities of ConforMIS Inc. ("ConforMIS") (NASDAQ:CFMS) pursuant
and/or traceable to the Company's Registration Statement and
Prospectus issued in connection with the Company's Initial Public
Offering, or between July 1, 2015 and August 28, 2015.

You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has
been commenced in the USDC for the District of Massachusetts. If
you purchased or otherwise acquired ConforMIS securities pursuant
to the IPO or between July 1, 2015 and August 28, 2015, your
rights may be affected by this action. To get more information go
to http://zlk.9nl.com/conformis-cfmsor contact Joseph E. Levi,
Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at (212)
363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or
obligation to you.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants
made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose
that: (i) the Company's manufacturing processes were flawed; (ii)
that as a result of the flaws in the Company's manufacturing
process, a number of the Company's knee replacement product
systems were defective; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing,
ConforMIS's public statements were materially false and misleading
at all relevant times.

On August 31, 2015 the Company announced that it had initiated a
voluntary recall of specific serial numbers of patient-specific
instrumentation for certain of its knee replacement product
systems, in response to complaints of moisture on the patient-
specific instrumentation. On this news, the Company's stock
dropped $3.78, or 19.11%, to close at $16.00 on August 31, 2015.

If you suffered a loss in ConforMIS you have until November 2,
2015 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your
ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as
a lead plaintiff.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New
Jersey, Connecticut and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have
extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving
financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in
securities and shareholder lawsuits. Attorney advertising. Prior
results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
30 Broad St., 24th FL New York, NY 10004
Toll free. 877-363-5972
T. 212-363-7500
F. 212-363-7171
jlevi@zlk.com


CYNTHIA ELLIOTT: Sued by Teachers for Using "F" Word
----------------------------------------------------
WHEC.com reported that the Teachers Association has filed a class-
action grievance against Commissioner Cynthia Elliott.

Elliott is accused of addressing a group of brand new teachers, in
a professional development meeting, in a harassing and
intimidating way, even going so far as to allegedly using the "F"
word.

"She walked into school No.8, began spewing out vulgarities, began
using the f-word . . . And threatening the teachers," said Dave
Wurz, RCSD Labor Relations Specialist.

Dave Wurz is a labor relations specialist with the Rochester City
School District. He is describing what teachers told him about a
recent visit at school No.8 by school board member Cynthia
Elliott. He says Elliott's behavior shocked and appalled the
teachers.

"She was harassing, she was verbally intimidating . . .  And she
said things like if you don't f---ing like what we're doing or
want to do this and that for parents then you need to f---ing get
out of here. Things of that nature," said Wurz.

Wurz says Elliott was referring to a case involving another
employee who has filed a lawsuit against the district. That
employee says she was cursed at and assaulted by a parent.

"I used the word . . . I was using the word in the context of the
situation that was reported on another television program with
regards to how you have to treat urban parents and urban
children," said Elliott.

Elliott says she let the teachers know that in an urban district,
they may have to contend with language and behavior that's
unacceptable. She says she's not condoning it, however, she wants
teachers to be prepared and decide now if this is not the place
for them.

"We don't have the time in the RCSD for this kind of nonsense and
these kinds of lies. Because when I said it I did not say it to
the teachers, but in context of what we have to do in order to
assure that the students and the parents in this school district
are successful," said Elliott.

Wurz says Elliott should be removed from her position.

Elliott says she is willing to meet with the teachers at any time
to discuss the issue and questions why they chose to resolve it in
the media.


DOLLAR TREE: Parties Agree to Dismiss "Frizzell" Case
-----------------------------------------------------
District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller approved a stipulation
dismissing the case, MARK FRIZZELL, Plaintiff, v. DOLLAR TREE
STORES, INC., Defendant, NO. 2:15-CV-00407-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal.).

All claims, excluding the complaint's fifth claim, are dismissed
with prejudice. The fifth claim, for violation of California Labor
Code Section 2698 et seq., is dismissed with prejudice for (1) all
plaintiff Mark Frizzell's individual claims under Labor Code
Section 2698 et seq., and (2) all of Frizzell's rights under Labor
Code Section 2698 et seq. to represent any other putative
aggrieved employees.

A copy of the Court's September 15, 2015 Order is available at
http://is.gd/Gg3AXDfrom Leagle.com.

Mark Frizzell, Plaintiff, represented by Kenneth Yoon, Law Offices
Of Kenneth H. Yoon & Stephanie E Yasuda, Law Offices of Kenneth
Yoon.

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Defendant, represented by Aleksandr
Katsnelson, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Jeffrey J. Mann, Littler
Mendelson, P.c. & Lindbergh Porter, Jr., Littler Mendelson.


EAST COAST: "Khan" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Shahzard Khan, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. East Coast Critical, LLC, et al., Case No. 15-2761D
(D. Mass., September 14, 2014), seeks to recover unpaid overtime
wages and damages pursuant to the Massachusetts Wage Act.

East Coast Critical, LLC owns and operates a home healthcare
Logistics Company located at 89 Sigourney Street in Revere,
Massachusetts.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Stephen Churchill, Esq.
      Hillary Schwab, Esq.
      Brant Casavant, Esq.
      FAIR WORK P.C.
      192 South Street, Suite 450
      Boston, MA 02111
      Telephone: (617) 607-3260
      Facsimile: (617) 488- 2261
      E-mail: steve@fairworklaw.com
              hillary@fairworklaw.com
              brant@fairworklaw.com


ELI LILLY: Faces Suit in Pa. Alleging Cymbalta-Related Injuries
---------------------------------------------------------------
Veronica lister v. Eli Lilly and Company, an Indiana corporation,
Case No. 2:15-cv-04216-CDJ (E.D. Pa., July 30, 2015) alleges
personal injuries and damages the Plaintiff suffered as a result
of Lilly's failure to adequately warn physicians and consumers
about the nature, frequency, severity, and duration of symptoms
associated with discontinuation of Cymbalta.

Cymbalta (generically known as duloxetine) is a prescription
antidepressant manufactured, marketed and sold by Lilly.

Eli Lilly and Company is an Indiana corporation with its
headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana.  Lilly is a pharmaceutical
company involved in the research, development, testing,
manufacture, production, promotion, distribution, marketing, and
sale of numerous pharmaceutical products, including Cymbalta.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Harris L. Pogust, Esq.
          Derek T. Braslow, Esq.
          T. Matthew Leckman, Esq.
          POGUST BRASLOW & MILLROOD, LLC
          Eight Tower Bridge, Suite 940
          161 Washington Street
          Conshohocken, PA 19428
          Telephone: (610) 941-4204
          Facsimile: (610) 941-4245
          E-mail: hpogust@pbmattorneys.com
                  mleckman@pbmattorneys.com
                  dbraslow@pbmattorneys.com


EUREKA NAILS: "Aguaysa" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Maria Aguaysa v. Eureka Nails & Spa Corp. d/b/a Eureka Nail And
Spa. and Eun Mi Lee, Case No. 1:15-cv-05284 (E.D.N.Y., September
14, 2014), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages and damages
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a spa in Newtown, Connecticut.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jacob Aronauer, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICES OF JACOB ARONAUER
      225 Broadway, Suite 307
      New York, NY 100017
      Telephone: (212) 323-6980
      E-mail: jaronauer@aronauerlaw.com


EXTERIOR WALLS: Fails to Pay Employees OT, "Hernandez" Suit Says
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ramon Hernandez, on behalf of himself and other persons similarly
situated v. Exterior Walls, Inc., Carlos Moreno and Ivan Moreno,
Case No. 2:15-cv-04392 (E.D. Lo., September 14, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages for work
in excess of 40 hours a workweek.

The Defendants are in the business of installing light gage metal
framing, drywall, masonry and stucco for commercial and
residential projects in various states, including California,
Texas, Florida and Louisiana.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Roberto Luis Costales, Esq.
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Telephone: (504) 914-1048
      Facsimile: (504) 272-2956
      E-mail: costaleslawoffice@gmail.com

         - and -

      William H. Beaumont, Esq.
      3801 Canal Street, Suite 207
      New Orleans, LA 70119
      Telephone: (504) 483-8008
      E-mail: whbeaumont@gmail.com


FMR CORP: Accused of Racial Discrimination in E.D. Michigan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Rollins v. FMR Corp d/b/a Fidelity Brokerage Services,
LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-12681-NGE-MKM (E.D. Mich., July 30, 2015)
alleges that the Plaintiff was terminated from employment with the
Defendant on the basis of illegal race discrimination.

Mr. Rollins is a resident of Farmington Hills, Oakland County,
Michigan.  He is an African American male and he has worked for
the Defendant since 2005, after his graduation from the University
of Michigan.

Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC is a division of FMR Corporation.
The Company is an international company providing various
financial services, and is headquartered in Smithfield, Rhode
Island.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Nicholas Roumel, Esq.
          NACHT, ROUMEL & SALVATORE, P.C.
          101 N. Main Street, Suite 555
          Ann Arbor, MI 48104
          Telephone: (734) 663-7550
          Facsimile: (734) 663-7592
          E-mail: nroumel@nachtlaw.com


GENERAL MOTORS: Faces "Hinds" Suit Over Defective Ignition Switch
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Roseann Hinds and Joseph Sylvester v. General Motors LLC, Delphi
Automotive PLC, and DPH-DAS LLC F/K/A Delphi Automotive Systems,
LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-07224 (S.D.N.Y., September 14, 2015), arises
out of the Defendants' egregious and ongoing failure to disclose
and affirmative concealment of a known ignition switch defect in
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vehicles.

General Motors LLC is in the business of designing, manufacturing,
constructing, assembling, marketing, warranting, distributing,
selling, leasing, and servicing automobiles.

Delphi Automotive PLC is headquartered in Gillingham, Kent, United
Kingdom, and is the parent company of Delphi Automotive Systems
LLC, headquartered in Troy, Michigan. Delphi through its various
entities, designed, manufactured, and supplied GM with motor
vehicle components.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Matthew R. McCarley
      FEARS NACHAWATI, PLLC
      4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 715
      Dallas, TX 75206
      Telephone: (214) 890-0711
      Facsimile: (214) 890-0712
      E-mail: mccarley@fnlawfirm.com


GENERAL MOTORS: Faces Suit Over Premature Deployment of Airbag
--------------------------------------------------------------
Susan E. Hammatt, individually, Susan E. Hammatt, as Conservator
of Christopher S. Hammatt, and Christopher S. Hammatt as
Conservatee, Christopher S. Hammatt, individually v. General
Motors Company, a Delaware Company, General Motors, LLC, Chevrolet
Division of General Motors d/b/a Chevrolet, Jimmie Johnson Kearny
Mesa Chevrolet, Select Automotive Holdings, Inc., Hendrick Co
Automotive, LLC, Autoliv, Inc., Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC,
Delphi Corporation, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No.
5:15-cv-01559 (C.D. Cal., August 3, 2015) arises from alleged
premature airbag deployment.

The complaint is for damages alleging 14 causes of action against
the Defendants for their alleged involvement and violations of
various statutes in the manufacture, marketing, sale, repair and
fraudulent concealment of known defects to the 2014 Chevrolet
Cruze.  The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants are responsible
for several defects in the Vehicle, including Safety Systems,
Airbags, Ground Faults and Ignition Failures.  The defects caused
injury to the Plaintiffs when the Vehicle had catastrophic system
failures causing it to malfunction prematurely deploying the "side
curtain" airbags.

General Motors LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with
its principal place of business located in Detroit, Michigan.  New
GM assumed all trade secrets, responsibilities and designs from
Old GM after 2009.

The Plaintiffs are represented by:

          Joseph M. Hoats, Esq.
          LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. HOATS
          12672 Limonite Avenue, Suite 3E #345
          Corona, CA 92880
          Telephone: (310) 920-5806
          Facsimile: (626) 529-0834
          E-mail: josephhoats.hoatslaw@gmail.com


GRUBHUB INC: Court Remands "Mitchell" Class Suit
------------------------------------------------
District Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell of the United States
District Court for Central District of California granted
Plaintiff's Motion to Remand in the case captioned, HAKIMA
MITCHELL, v. GRUBHUB INC, Case No. CV 15-05465-BRO(ASX).

Defendant provides food delivery services through an online
platform. Plaintiff began working for Defendant on or around
December 2014, and continues to work for Defendant as a Delivery
Service Provider (DSP), delivering food to diners who place orders
with restaurants via Defendant's online platform. Plaintiff brings
the representative action under PAGA on behalf of "aggrieved
employees," including "Plaintiff and all other persons who worked,
or will work, for Defendant as DSPs in the State of California
during the one-year period before the filing of this action to the
date of final judgment." Plaintiff alleges that Defendant is
liable for civil penalties as a result of: (1) willfully
misclassifying Plaintiff and other DSPs as independent contractors
in violation of California Labor Code Sections 226.8(a)(1), 3357;
(2) failing to pay Plaintiff and other DSPs minimum and overtime
wages for all hours worked in violation of California Labor Code
Sections 351, 510, 1194, 1198; (3) failing to provide Plaintiff
and other DSPs with meal and rest periods in violation of
California Labor Code Sections 226.7, 512, 1198; (4) failing to
provide Plaintiff and other DSPs with accurate written wage
statements in violation of California Labor Code Sec. 226(a); (5)
failing to provide Plaintiff and other DSPs earned wages in
violation of California Labor Code Sections 201-204; and (6)
failing to indemnify Plaintiff and other DSPs for expenses they
have incurred in direct consequence of performing their job duties
in violation of California Labor Code Sec. 2802.

Defendant removed the matter July 17, 2015, claiming that the
Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332,
because the matter is an action between citizens of different
states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

In the motion, Plaintiff moved to remand the case for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332(a).

In her Order dated August 28, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/xq9mKrfrom Leagle.com, Judge O'Connell found that
GrubHub did not satisfy the amount in controversy requirement to
establish diversity jurisdiction to remanded the case to the Los
Angeles County Superior Court.

Hakima Mitchell is represented by David Pourati, Esq. --
david@pourati.com -- LAW OFFICES OF DAVID POURATI APC

     - and -

Louis Max Benowitz, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS BENOWITZ
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Tel: (800)533-2392

Grubhub, Inc. is represented by John C. Fish, Jr., Esq. --
jfish@littler.com -- Roxanna Iran, Esq. -- riran@littler.com &
Andrew M. Spurchise, Esq. -- aspurchise@littler.com -- LITTLER
MENDELSON PC


HINSDALE NURSERIES: Faces "Campos" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos Campos, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated persons, known and unknown v. Hinsdale Nurseries, Inc.,
and James J. Cirrincione, Case No. 1:15-cv-08083 (N.D. Ill.,
September 14, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure
to pay overtime wages for hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a
week.

The Defendants own and operate a plant nursery in Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Raisa Alicea, Esq.
      CONSUMER LAW GROUP, LLC
      6232 N. Pulaski, Suite 200
      Chicago, IL 60646
      Telephone: (312) 800-1017
      E-mail: ralicea@yourclg.com


HMM PALLETS: Faces "Marquez" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ignacio Marquez, individually and on behalf of other employees
similarly situated v. H.M.M. Pallets, Inc. and Hector M. Munoz,
Case No. 1:15-cv-08064 (N.D. Ill., September 14, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in
violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

H.M.M. Pallets, Inc. is a pallet builder and repairer doing
business within the State of Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      David E. Stevens, Esq.
      CONSUMER LAW GROUP, LLC
      6232 N. Pulaski, Suite 200
      Chicago, IL 60646
      Telephone: (312) 307-0766
      Telephone: dstevens@yourclg.com


INVACARE CORP: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss "Murray" Case
-----------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Donald C. Nugent of the United States District for
Northern District of Ohio denied Defendants' motion to dismiss
Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
12(b)(6) in the case captioned, NANCY MURRAY, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INVACARE CORP.,
et al., Defendants, Case No. 1:13 CV 1882.

Plaintiff Nancy Murray brought a proposed class action on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated, against Defendants
as fiduciaries of Invacare's Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan)
pursuant to Sections 409 and 502 of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. Sections 1109 and 1132. The class
proposed by Plaintiff consists of participants and beneficiaries
of the Plan during the period from July 22, 2010 to the present.
In Count I of the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), Plaintiff
alleges that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties of
prudence and loyalty under ERISA when they allowed plan
participants to acquire more shares of Invacare stock at a time
when Defendants knew Invacare stock was an imprudent investment.
Counts II and III assert claims of failure to monitor co-
fiduciaries and knowing participation in co-fiduciaries' breaches.

In the motion, Defendants argued that under the pleading standards
established in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S.Ct. 2459
(2014), Count I of the SAC failed to state a Twombly-viable claim
that fiduciaries of Invacare's Retirement Savings Plan breached
their fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty by allowing
participants to invest their individual Plan accounts in publicly-
traded Invacare stock and that the Court may dismiss Count I for
the additional or alternative reason that Plaintiff fails to
adequately plead loss causation under the loss causation standard
of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, 554 U.S. 336 (2005).
Defendants asserted that Plaintiff's monitoring and cofiduciary
breach claims (Counts II and III) are wholly derivative of her
defective prudence and loyalty claims in Count I. Thus, if the
Court dismisses Count I, the derivative monitoring and co-
fiduciary breach claims fail as well.

In his Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 28, 2015
available at http://is.gd/HDtNgwfrom Leagle.com, Judge Nugent
found that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged loss causation under
Dura Pharmaceuticals.

Nancy Murray is represented by Robert I. Harwood, Esq. --
rharwood@hfesq.com -- Peter W. Overs, Jr., Esq. --
povers@hfesq.com -- HARWOOD FEFFER & Timothy L. McGarry, Esq. --
tmcgarry@hendersonschmidlin.com -- HENDERSON & SCHMIDLIN

Defendants are represented by Charles C. Jackson, Esq. --
charles.jackson@morganlewis.com -- Deborah S. Davidson, Esq. --
ddavidson@morganlewis.com, Emily A. Glunz, Esq. --
eglunz@morganlewis.com -- MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, David T. Bules,
Esq. -- dbules@calfee.com -- Mitchell G. Blair, Esq. --
mblair@calfee.com -- CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD


INVESTOR INCOME: Faces "He" Suit Over False Advertisements
----------------------------------------------------------
Rui He and Xiaoguang Zheng, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. Davor Rom, Investor Income Properties LLC,
and IIP Ohio, LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-01869-JG (N.D. Ohio, September
12, 2015), is brought on behalf of all person who purchased real
estate from the Defendants who suffered injury or unjust loss as a
result of the Defendant's false representation and advertisements
that the real estate they offered are profitable investments.

The Defendants are in the business of selling properties located
in Ohio to investors and providing leaseback management services
for "hands free" investments.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Lei Jiang, Esq.
      LEI JIANG LLC
      26943 Westwood Rd.
      Westlake, OH 44145
      Telephone: (440)835-2271
      Facsimile: (440)835-2817
      E-mail: ljiang@LeiJiangLaw.com


JOHN L. SULLIVAN: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Vehicle Price
----------------------------------------------------------------
Salvador Cruz, an individual and on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated v. John L. Sullivan Enterprises, Inc.,
d/b/a Livermore Toyota and Does 1 through 500, Case No. RG15785596
(D. Cal., September 14, 2015), seeks to put an end on the
Defendant's practice of selling vehicles for more than the
advertised price.

John L. Sullivan Enterprises, Inc. is engaged in the business of
buying, repairing and re-selling used vehicles to the general
public, and taking vehicles in trade.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Louis Liberty, Esq.
      Alexander A. Guillen, Esq.
      LIBERTY, OTTO & GUILLEN, APC
      3 553 Pilgrim Drive, Suite A-1
      Foster City, CA 94404
      Telephone: (650) 341~0300
      Facsimile: (650) 341-0302
      E-mail: info@carlawyer.com


KING OSCAR: Named as One of 'Big Three' Price Fixing Cartels
------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Seaman, writing for Under Current News, reported that the
third class action lawsuit alleging a price fixing cartel in the
US adds the name of King Oscar to the market's "big three", Bumble
Bee Foods, Starkist and Tri-Union Seafoods, which operates as
Chicken of the Sea.

The lawsuit, filed Aug. 20 from Texas-based distributor Affiliated
Foods, comes after filings from San Jose, California-based Pitco
Foods and York-based Olean Wholesale Grocery Cooperative.

Starkist, owned by South Korea's Dongwon Industries, Tri-Union and
Bumble Bee are mentioned as operating the alleged cartel in both
other lawsuits, but King Oscar is not named specifically.

King Oscar was bought by Thai Union Frozen Products, which owns
Tri-Union/Chicken of the Sea and is also attempting to buy Bumble
Bee from Lion Capital. King Oscar, which is based in Norway and
has a large plant in Poland, is a strong brand in sardines.

"By early 2000, growth in the packaged seafood industry had
slowed, and the prospects for growth were dim," states the
complaint from Affiliated Foods.

"Beginning at least as early as January 2000, in an effort to
combat the prospect of diminishing profits, the defendants and
their co- conspirators conspired to raise, fix, stabilize, or
maintain prices, allocate customers, and restrict capacity in the
market for packaged seafood sold in the United States," the
document states.

"As a direct and proximate result of defendants' cartel
activities," Affiliated Foods was overcharged for packaged
seafood, it is alleged.

The lawsuits come amidst a US Department of Justice anti-trust
investigation into the US packed seafood sector, revealed by Thai
Union Frozen Products, which owns Tri-Union. The latter confirmed
the investigation in late July, following speculation that the
company faced a tough anti-trust review in its plans to acquire
Bumble Bee.

As a result of the DOJ probe, the company decided to suspend the
share offering intended to finance the acquisition of Bumble Bee.


KMDG LLC: Settlement Approved in "Lopez" FLSA Class Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Rudolph T. Randa approved a settlement agreement
reached in the case, MANUEL LOPEZ, Individually and on behalf of
those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. KMDG LLC, d/b/a The
Branded Steer Wood Grill Rotisserie & Saloon, and DENNIS
GIANNOPOULOS, Defendants, CASE NO. 14-C-281 (E.D. Wis.).

This putative class action, brought to recover unpaid overtime
wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and Wisconsin's
wage and hour laws, is before the Court on an amended joint
stipulation seeking approval of a settlement agreement between
"Plaintiff Manuel Lopez and those individuals who have opted into
this action, Jesus Flores, Homero Lopez, Antonio Aquino, Noe
Guitron, Ever Lopez, Pedro Lopez, and Jose Rodriguez . . . and
Defendants KMDG LLC, d/b/a The Branded Steer Wood Grill Rotisserie
& Saloon and Dennis Giannopoulos."  The amended stipulation
corrects typographical errors. It is accompanied by the parties'
joint response to questions that the Court raised after reviewing
the original stipulation.

The parties' stipulation requests that all scheduled dates in this
matter be removed from the Court's calendar, but this case has no
remaining court dates or deadlines. Therefore that request is
denied as moot. Furthermore, no later than June 15, 2016,
Plaintiffs' counsel must file a) a motion with the Court to
dismiss this matter with prejudice, or b) a stipulated judgment
for $353,873.42.

A copy of the Court's Sept. 15 Decision and Order is available at
http://is.gd/jIIjjrfrom Leagle.com.

Manuel Lopez, Plaintiff, represented by B Michele Sumara, Hawks
Quindel SC, Larry A Johnson, Hawks Quindel SC & Summer H Murshid,
Hawks Quindel SC.

KMDG LLC, Defendant, represented by Michael J Widmann, Widmann Law
Office Ltd, Paul R Erickson, Gutglass Erickson Bonville & Larson
SC & Stacie H Rosenzweig, Halling & Cayo SC.

Dennis Giannopoulos, Defendant, represented by Michael J Widmann,
Widmann Law Office Ltd, Paul R Erickson, Gutglass Erickson
Bonville & Larson SC & Stacie H Rosenzweig, Halling & Cayo SC.


LEIDOS INC: Court Dismissed "Fernandez" Suit with Leave to Amend
----------------------------------------------------------------
Senior District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. of the United States
District Court for Eastern District of California granted
Defendant's motion to dismiss in the case captioned, MARTIN
FERNANDEZ on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff, v. LEIDOS, INC., Defendant, Case Nos. 2:14-CV-02247-
GEB-KJN.

Plaintiff filed a putative class action against the Defendant
alleging that Defendant failed to properly safeguard and protect
Plaintiff's and putative Class Members' personally identifiable
information (PII) and private health information (PHI), and
publicly disclos[ed] their PII/PHI without authorization (the Data
Breach), in violation of the California Confidentiality of Medical
Information Act (CMIA), California Unfair Competition Law and
California common law. Plaintiff and putative Class Members are
current and former United States military servicemen,
servicewomen, and the family members of these servicemen and
women.

On September 12, 2011, Plaintiff's and [putative] Class Members'
PII/PHI . . . . was contained on backup data tapes transported in
an unsecure manner by [Defendant's] newly hired, low-level
employee in his personal vehicle. A thief or thieves broke into
the Defendant's employee's  vehicle, which had no special
protections for the information, and took the backup data tapes,
thereby gaining information worth millions of dollars, which the
thief or thieves subsequently sold, transferred, opened, read,
mined, and otherwise used without Plaintiff's and putative Class
Members' authorization.

In the motion, Defendant argued that Plaintiff failed to state a
claim because Defendant is not the type of health-care entity
covered by the CMIA and that Plaintiff's actual injury allegations
are insufficient to sustain his burden of establishing Article III
standing.

In the Order dated August 27, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/20uiMKfrom Leagle.com, Judge Burrell, Jr. concluded
that Plaintiff has not alleged facts from which a plausible
inference could be drawn that Defendant is an entity governed by
CMIA. All of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1),
except for Plaintiff's CMIA claim, which is dismissed under Rule
12(b)(6). Plaintiff, however, was granted leave to file an amended
complaint addressing the referenced deficiencies in his Complaint.

Martin Fernandez is represented by Timothy G. Blood, Esq. --
tblood@bholaw.com -- BLOOD HURST & O'REARDON LLP & Richard L.
Coffman, Esq. -- rcoffman@coffmanlawfirm.com -- THE COFFMAN LAW
FIRM

Leidos, Inc. is represented by Kenneth Lee Chernof, Esq. --
Kenneth.Chernof@aporter.com -- Sharon Mayo, Esq. --
Sharon.Mayo@aporter.com -- ARNOLD & PORTER LLP


LERETA LLC: "Brooks" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
Shelia Brooks, individually and on behalf of other members of the
general public similarly situated v. Lereta, LLC, an unknown
business entity and Does 1 through 100, Case No. BC594511 (D.
Cal., September 14, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages
and damages pursuant to the California Labor Code.

Lereta, LLC owns and operates a real estate company doing business
throughout the State of California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edwin Aiwazian, Esq.
      LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC
      410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203
      Glendale, CA 91203
      Telephone: (818) 265-1020
      Facsimile: (818) 265-1021
      E-mail: lfj@lfjpc.com


LORILLARD TOBACCO: Court Dismissed "Henry" Smoking Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Robert L. Hinkle dismissed the case, JONATHAN
HENRY, Plaintiff, v. LORILLARD TOBACCO CORP., Defendant, CASE NO.
4:14CV511-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla.).

"The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to
comply with a court order," Judge Hinkle said.  "The clerk must
close the file."

Jonathan Henry, a prisoner in the Florida Department of
Corrections, asserts he suffers diseases caused by smoking
cigarettes manufactured by the defendant Lorillard Tobacco
Corporation. Lorillard has moved to dismiss on several grounds.
Mr. Henry has not responded to the motion to dismiss as required
by both the local rules and the magistrate judge's explicit order
directing him to respond. The deadline for responding has long
passed.

A magistrate judge's report and recommendation concludes that the
case should be dismissed. No objections have been filed.

A copy of the Court's September 12, 2015 Order is available at
http://is.gd/fxp3mNfrom Leagle.com.

JONATHAN HENRY, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, represented by TINA MARIE
SCHAEFER -- tina.schaefer@hugheshubbard.com -- HUGHES HUBBARD &
REED.


MARITIME ASSOCIATION: Sued Over Alleged Breach of Fiduciary Duty
----------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony C. Hampton, Edward J. Richards, and Ricky Henderson v.
Maritime Association- I.L.A. Pension, Retirement, Welfare and
Vacation Funds, Case No. 3:15-cv-00247 (S.D. Tex., September 14,
2015), asserts cause of action for the Defendant's alleged breach
of fiduciary duty to and failure to act in the best interest of
the Plan Participants and other similarly situated ILA 24
beneficiaries and members of the Plan.

Maritime Association- I.L.A. Pension, Retirement, Welfare and
Vacation Funds operates an employee benefits plan doing business
in the Southern District of Texas at 11550 Fuqua, Suite 425,
Houston, Texas 77034-4306.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Reginald McKamie Sr., Esq.
      1210 Antoine Drive
      Houston, TX 77055
      Telephone: (713) 465-2889
      Facsimile: (713) 465-2894
      E-mail: mckamie@mckamie.com


MASSACHUSETTS BAY: Sued in Mass. For Charging Personal Files Fee
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeanne Williams, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Case No.
15-278HB (D. Mass., September 14), seeks redress for the
Defendant's unlawful practice of charging current and former
employees a fee to obtain their personal files.

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority is an operator of bus,
subway, commuter rail, and ferry routes in the greater Boston,
Massachusetts area.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Matthew J. FogeLman, Esq.
      Danielle F. Jurena, Esq.
      FOGELMAN & FOGELMAN LLC
      189 Wells Avenue
      Newton, MA 02459
      Telephone: (617) 559-1530
      E-mail: mjf@fogelmanlawfirm.com
              dfj@fogelmanlawfirm.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Bunch" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sharon B. Bunch v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-
cv-02704 (D. Md., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Covington" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
---------------------------------------------------------------
DeJuana Covington v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No.
1:15-cv-02709 (D. Md., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Davis" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Davis v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-
02710 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Duvers" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Jeannine Duvers v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-
cv-02703 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Guilder" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tiffany Guilder v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-
cv-02714 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Graham" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Dorothy Graham v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-
cv-02713 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Harris" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Renita Harris v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No. 1:15-
cv-02716 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "Martin" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel E. Martin v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No.
1:15-cv-02720 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MAXIM HEALTHCARE: Faces "McNeal" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Earnestina McNeal v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Case No.
1:15-cv-02720 (D. MD., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is a Maryland corporation which
provides in-home personal care, management and treatment of a
variety of conditions by nurses, therapists, medical social
workers, and home health aides.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Timothy J. Becker, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Robert E. DeRose, Esq.
      Robi J. Baishnab, Esq.
      Joshua McInerney, Esq.
      BARKAN MEIZLISH HANDELMAN GOODIN DEROSE WENTZ, LLP
      250 E. Broad St., 10th Floor
      Columbus, OH 43215
      Telephone: (614) 221-4221
      Facsimile: (614) 744-2300
      E-mail: bderose@barkanmeizlish.com
              rbaishnab@barkanmeizlish.com
              jmcinerney@barkanmeizlish.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Neil B. Pioch, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Towne Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      Facsimile: (248) 864-7840
      E-mail: jthompson@sommerspc.com
              npioch@sommerspc.com
              jyoung@sommerspc.com

         - and -

      Carlos Leach, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
      Orlando, FL 32802
      Telephone: (407) 420-1414
      Facsimile: (407) 245-33414
      E-mail: CLeach@forthepeople.com


MID-OHIO TRUCKING: Faces "Kaschalk" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
---------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony C. Kaschalk, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Richard E. Parker, Mid-Ohio Trucking, Inc., and Mid-
Ohio Asphalt and Concrete, Inc., Case No. 5:15-cv-01871 (N.D. Oho,
September 14, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure
to pay overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants are engaged in the business of paving, asphalt and
concrete work.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      James E. Boulas, Esq.
      Jim Petropouleas, Esq.
      JAMES E. BOULAS CO., L.P.A.
      Raintree Plaza
      7912 Broadview Road
      Broadview Heights, OH 44147-1202
      Telephone: (440) 526-8822
      Facsimile: (440) 838-8822


MITSUI O.S.K.: Court Dismisses Suit Against Vehicle Shippers
------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned, IN RE VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST
LITIGATION, Case No. 13-3306(ES), MDL No. 2471, District Judge
Esther Salas of the United States District Court for District of
New Jersey ruled on Defendants' Consolidated Motion to Dismiss the
Indirect Purchasers' Complaints;  End-Payor Plaintiffs' Request
for Judicial Notice in Support of Response to Defendants' Motion
to Dismiss Indirect Purchaser Actions;  Defendants' Consolidated
Motion to Dismiss the Direct Purchasers' Complaint; Defendant
EUKOR Car Carriers, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss All Complaints; Hoegh
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Direct Purchasers' Complaint;
and Hoegh Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Indirect Purchasers'
Complaints.

In multidistrict litigation (MDL), purchasers of vehicle carrier
services alleged a conspiracy among ocean shipping companies to
fix prices, allocate customers and routes, and restrict capacity.

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (DPPs) filed a consolidated class
action complaint against Defendants seeking treble damages and
costs of suit under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec.
15, for violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec.
1.

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (IPPs) collectively include End-
Payors, Automobile Dealers (Auto Dealers), and Truck & Equipment
Dealers, each of whom filed consolidated class action complaints
against Defendants seeking equitable and injunctive relief under
section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 26, for violation of
section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1, and treble damages
and costs of suit under various state antitrust, consumer
protection, and unjust enrichment laws.

In the motion to dismiss, Defendants argued that claims for
damages and injunctive relief under the Clayton Act are barred by
the Shipping Act of 1984.

DPPs contended that agreements to restrict capacity are not
prohibited by the Shipping Act and are therefore subject to
private antitrust suits.

In her Opinion dated August 28, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/zeFwWgfrom Leagle.com, Judge Salas held that a plain
reading of the statutory language demonstrates that capacity
restrictions, as alleged in the complaints, are covered by the
Shipping Act and that because ocean common carriers are prohibited
from operating under an unfiled agreement that is required to be
filed with the FMC, the Shipping Act provides an exemption for
claims under the Clayton Act.

"Because the Shipping Act of 1984 bars Clayton Act claims and
preempts state law claims under the theory of conflict preemption,
the motions to dismiss are granted," the Court said.

F. RUGGIERO & SONS, INC., Plaintiff, is represented by HOLLIS LEE
SALZMAN, ROBINS KAPLAN LLP, JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI
OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., MEEGAN F. HOLLYWOOD, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, WARREN T BURNS, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC &
DANIEL H. CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

ROBERT O'ROURKE, Plaintiff, is represented by HOLLIS LEE SALZMAN,
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP, JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN
BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., MEEGAN F. HOLLYWOOD, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED
TO USDC, WARREN T BURNS, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & DANIEL H.
CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Martens Cars of Washington, Inc., Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S.
PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN
DAVID ELGA, CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, BRIAN K. HERRINGTON,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED
TO USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KELLY
MAGNUS PURCARO, Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrman & Knopf, LLP.

Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S.
PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN
DAVID ELGA, CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

HUDSON NISSAN, Plaintiff, is represented by GERARD V. MANTESE,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND,
PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN DAVID ELGA, CUNEO
GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KATHERINE
WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S.
PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN
DAVID ELGA, CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S.
PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN
DAVID ELGA, CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

HC ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by GERARD V.
MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN,
LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN DAVID ELGA,
CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC &
KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Toyota of Bristol, Plaintiff, is represented by GERARD V. MANTESE,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND,
PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN DAVID ELGA, CUNEO
GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KATHERINE
WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Desert European Motorcars, Ltd., Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, PETER S.
PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP, BENJAMIN
DAVID ELGA, CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP, DANIEL COHEN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, JONATHAN WATSON CUNEO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & KATHERINE WARREN VAN DYCK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT CORP., Plaintiff, is
represented by EUGENE A. SPECTOR, SPECTOR, ROSEMAN KODROFF &
WILLIS, PC, JOSEPH J. DEPALMA, LITE, DEPALMA, GREENBERG, LLC,
MICHAEL E. MOSKOVITZ, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, RACHEL ELLEN
KOPP, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, STEVEN A. KANNER, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, LAUREN E. FENTON-VALDIVIA, BRESSLER, AMERY &
ROSS, P.C., LEE ALBERT, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, LEWIS HARRY
GOLDFARB, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & ROBERT P. DONOVAN,
MCELROY DEUTSCH MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP.

Antonio Maravilla, Plaintiff, is represented by REGINALD VON
TERRELL, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Joan MacQuarrie, Plaintiff, is represented by ALEXANDER E BARNETT,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ELIZABETH C. PRITZKER, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, ELIZABETH TRAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
STEVEN N. WILLIAMS, COTCHETT PITRE & MCCARTHY LLP & JAMES E.
CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Brenda Keegan, Plaintiff, is represented by ALEXANDER E BARNETT,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ELIZABETH C. PRITZKER, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, ELIZABETH TRAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC &
STEVEN N. WILLIAMS, COTCHETT PITRE & MCCARTHY LLP.

Cargo Agents, Inc., Plaintiff, is represented by LAUREN ILENE
DUBICK, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & ROBERT N. KAPLAN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

DODA CAMAJ, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA
BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., PAUL F NOVAK, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & DIANA GJONAJ, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

TONY NIKPRELAJ, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., PAUL F NOVAK,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & DIANA GJONAJ, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED
TO USDC.

BETHANNE KNUDSON, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

ESTEBAN ADAME, Plaintiff, is represented by BRIAN RUSSELL STRANGE,
STRANGE & CARPENTER, KEITH L. BUTLER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC, PAUL J. GELLER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & STUART A.
DAVIDSON, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE USCD.

KENNETH A. NELSON, Plaintiff, is represented by Arthur M. Murray,
Murray Law Firm, Charles D. Gabriel, Pierce Gabriel Partners, LLC,
DANIEL H. CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Douglas D. Chunn,
Douglas D. Chunn, PA, ISAAC L DIEL, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC
NJ BAR, Robert L. Devereux, Devereux Murphy LLC, STEPHEN B.
MURRAY, JR, MURRAY LAW FIRM, Samuel P. Pierce, Jr., Pierce Gabriel
Partners, LLC, Terry Oxford, Susman Godfrey, LLP & WARREN T BURNS,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

RITA DIEL-BROWN, Plaintiff, is represented by Arthur M. Murray,
Murray Law Firm, Charles D. Gabriel, Pierce Gabriel Partners, LLC,
DANIEL H. CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Douglas D. Chunn,
Douglas D. Chunn, PA, ISAAC L DIEL, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC
NJ BAR, Joseph F. Devereux, Devereux Murphy LLC & KOREY A. NELSON,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

EUGENE THOMAS GOESSLING, Plaintiff, is represented by Arthur M.
Murray, Murray Law Firm, Charles D. Gabriel, Pierce Gabriel
Partners, LLC, DANIEL H. CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
Douglas D. Chunn, Douglas D. Chunn, PA, ISAAC L DIEL, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC NJ BAR, JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI
OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., Joseph F. Devereux, Devereux Murphy
LLC & KOREY A. NELSON, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

PAMELA E. GOESSLING, Plaintiff, is represented by Arthur M.
Murray, Murray Law Firm, Charles D. Gabriel, Pierce Gabriel
Partners, LLC, DANIEL H. CHAREST, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
Douglas D. Chunn, Douglas D. Chunn, PA, ISAAC L DIEL, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC NJ BAR, JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI
OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., Joseph F. Devereux, Devereux Murphy
LLC & KOREY A. NELSON, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

DAVID SCHROEDER, Plaintiff, is represented by BETSY CAROL
MANIFOLD, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS M. GREGOREK,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

ALEX WHITE, Plaintiff, is represented by Linda G Workman, Dicks
and Workman APC.

INTERESTED PARTY, Plaintiff, is represented by FRANCIS ONOFREI
SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

MANACO INTERNATIONAL FORWARDERS, INC., Plaintiff, is represented
by CHARLES ANDREW DIRKSEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DOUGLAS
A. ABRAHAMS, KOHN, SWIFT, & GRAF, PC, Gregory P. Hansel, Preti
Flaherty Beliveau Pachios & Haley, LLP, John Douglas Richards,
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Joseph C. Kohn, Kohn, Swift, &
Graf, P.C., KIT A. PIERSON, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, MICHAEL
BENJAMIN EISENKRAFT, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PC, DAVID A.
YOUNG, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, MANUEL JUAN DOMINGUEZ,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & MATTHEW W. RUAN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT CORP., Plaintiff, is
represented by Albert J. Pucciarelli, LAUREN E. FENTON-VALDIVIA,
BRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C., LEE ALBERT, Glancy Prongay & Murray
LLP & LEWIS HARRY GOLDFARB, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

ROSS STASIK, Plaintiff, is represented by BETSY CAROL MANIFOLD,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & Randall S. Newman, Randall S.
Newman PC:

     Randall S. Newman, Esq.
     RANDALL S. NEWMAN PC
     37 Wall St # D
     New York, NY 10005
     Tel: (212)797-3737

ADAIR LARA, Plaintiff, is represented by Adam C. Belsky, Gross
Belsky Alonso LLP, Monique Alonso, Gross & Belsky LLP, Sarah
Crowley, Gross Belsky Alonso LLP, TERRY GROSS, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN
BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

KATHLEEN C. DAVIS, Plaintiff, is represented by GUIDO SAVERI,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & R. Alexander Saveri, Saveri &
Saveri, Inc..

SEAN SPICER, Plaintiff, is represented by STEVEN N. WILLIAMS,
COTCHETT PITRE & MCCARTHY LLP.

PHYLLIS ROSEN, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

GUSTAVO ADOLFO PEREZ, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E.
CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. &
Steven Noel Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

JENNIFER FROZENA, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

ASHTON LEVIS, Plaintiff, is represented by AUSTIN B COHEN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Adam John Zapala, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
LLP & ELIZABETH TRAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

BRUCE HERTZ, Plaintiff, is represented by AUSTIN B COHEN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Adam John Zapala, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy
LLP, ELIZABETH TRAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES E.
CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

LAZARO VERSALLES, Plaintiff, is represented by DANIEL C. HEDLUND,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DIANNE M. NAST, NastLaw LLC, Erin
Cathleen Burns, NastLaw LLC & Steven Noel Williams, Cotchett Pitre
& McCarthy LLP.

MATTHEW HEILICHER, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

ELIZABETH POWERS KELLER, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

ERIC L. METH, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

JEFF RUBINSTEIN, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

JUDY A. REIBER, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL R. SHULMAN,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, FRANCIS ONOFREI SCARPULLA, LAW
OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA & JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE
CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

CRAIG BUSKE, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL R. SHULMAN,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, FRANCIS ONOFREI SCARPULLA, LAW
OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA & JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE
CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

ELIZABETH ALLIS, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL R. SHULMAN,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS ONOFREI SCARPULLA, LAW
OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

WILLIAM ELWOOD, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL R. SHULMAN,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS ONOFREI SCARPULLA, LAW
OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

DARREL SENIOR, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS ONOFREI
SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

MATTHEW RIGHETTI, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
MICHELETTI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS ONOFREI
SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

TIFFANY BUI, Plaintiff, is represented by Scott M Grzenczyk,
Girard Gibbs LLP.

NICHOLAS LETOURNEAU, Plaintiff, is represented by Scott M
Grzenczyk, Girard Gibbs LLP.

KATRINA BONAR, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

STEVEN BRUZONSKY, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

LORI CURTIS, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

JENNIFER DILLON, Plaintiff, is represented by ALYSON LOUISE
OLIVER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP & JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE
CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

SHERYL HALEY, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

SHARON HAMPSON, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

DANIEL MORRIS, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & Steven Noel
Williams, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

PAULA OCHSNER, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

JUDY SMITH, Plaintiff, is represented by Steven Noel Williams,
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP.

MICHAEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, is represented by CHRISTOPHER LOVELL,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS MICHELETTI,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & FRANCIS ONOFREI SCARPULLA, LAW
OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA.

EMILY FERRIS, Plaintiff, is represented by Jack Wing Lee, Minami
Tamaki LLP & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

TOM WARE, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Jack Wing Lee, Minami Tamaki LLP & SEAN
TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

ALAN FRONT, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

MARY G. BISSEN, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

GREG DANA, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

JOE GROJEAN, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

JERRY DAVID, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

WILDA J. NIN-PACHECO, Plaintiff, is represented by SEAN TAMIO
TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

RITA M. CLOWARD, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & SEAN TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

DIANE DAVID, Plaintiff, is represented by DEREK G. HOWARD, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, Jack Wing Lee, Minami Tamaki LLP & SEAN
TAMIO TAMURA-SATO, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

CRYSTAL BOYKIN, Plaintiff, is represented by CRYSTAL BOYKIN PRO SE

TUAN NGUYEN, Plaintiff, is represented by Alan R. Plutzik, Bramson
Plutzik Mahler & Birkhaeuser, LLP.

TUAN NGUYEN, Plaintiff, is represented by Daniel Edward
Birkhaeuser, Bramson, Plutzik, Mahler & Birkhaeuser & Timothy D.
Battin, Straus & Boies LLP.

EMPIRE NISSAN OF SANTA ROSA, LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by
PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP.

HODGES IMPORTED CARS, INC d/b/a HODGES SUBARU, Plaintiff, is
represented by PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN,
HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP.

PANAMA CITY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC d/b/a JOHN LEE NISSAN,
Plaintiff, is represented by PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND,
PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP.

Melinda Deneau, Plaintiff, is represented by Melinda Deneau PRO
SE.

Jill M. Alban, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Grant M. Alban, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Al Baker, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA
BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J. BONSIGNORE,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Emmett Brophy, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Monica Brushey, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Melinda Deneau, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Jennifer Dillon, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

JEFFREY GANNON, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J.
BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Sean Gurney, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA
BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J. BONSIGNORE,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Leslie Denise Hart, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Elizabeth Ashley Hill, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E.
CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. &
ROBERT J. BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Maria Kooker, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J.
BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Christie Laster, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Kori Lehrkamp, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J.
BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

John Leyva, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA
BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Joan MacQuarrie, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Roberta Rothsetin, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Alexandra Scott, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J.
BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

CATHERINE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

Richard Tomasko, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & ROBERT J.
BONSIGNORE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Demian Vargas, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

MARY ARNOLD, Plaintiff, is represented by ANNE T. REGAN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DAVID M. CIALKOWSKI, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & JAMES E. CECCHI, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY &
AGNELLO, P.C..

STEPHANIE B. CROSBY, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C..

RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF ARIZONA, INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF
CALIFORNIA, INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF COLORADO, INC., RUSH TRUCK
CENTERS OF FLORIDA, INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF GEORGIA, INC.,
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF IDAHO, INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF KANSAS,
INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., RUSH TRUCK
CENTERS OF OHIO, INC., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF OKLAHOMA, INC., RUSH
TRUCK CENTERS OF TEXAS, LP., RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF UTAH, INC.,
Plaintiffs, are represented by ERIC R. BRESLIN, DUANE MORRIS, LLP.

SCOTLAND CAR YARD ENTERPRISES d/b/a SAN RAFAEL MITSUBISHI,
Plaintiff, is represented by PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND,
PEARLMAN, HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP.

HARTLEY BUICK/GMC TRUCK, INC. d/b/a HARTLEY HONDA, Plaintiff, is
represented by PETER S. PEARLMAN, COHN, LIFLAND, PEARLMAN,
HERRMANN & KNOPF, LLP.

JOSHUA SO, Plaintiff, is represented by NOAH M. SCHUBERT, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

Automobile Dealership Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, is represented by
GERARD V. MANTESE, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Plaintiff, is represented by CHAHIRA SOLH,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIEL A. SASSE, CROWELL & MORING,
ELIZABETH ANNE FIGUEIRA, CROWELL AND MORING LLP & RYAN CHRISTOPHER
WONG, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

PENDRELL JACKSON, Plaintiff, is represented by JAMES E. CECCHI,
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. & PETER GEORGE
SAFIRSTEIN, MORGAN & MORGAN.


The Defendants are:

NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC., Defendant, is represented by ERIC
R. FISH, BAKER HOSTETLER LLP & JOHN R. FORNACIARI, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Defendant, is represented by NIPPON
YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA PRO SE.

WILH WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA, Defendant, is represented by BENJAMIN
F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO --
riverasotor@ballardspahr.com -- BALLARD SPAHR, JASON ALLEN
LECKERMAN -- leckermanj@ballardspahr.com -- BALLARD SPAHR LLP &
MAXIM M.L. NOWAK -- maxim.nowak@hoganlovells.com -- HOGAN LOVELLS
US LLP.

WILH WILHELMSEN ASA, Defendant, is represented by BENJAMIN F.
HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO,
BALLARD SPAHR, JASON ALLEN LECKERMAN, BALLARD SPAHR LLP & MAXIM
M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.,, Defendant, is represented by ADAM
MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ANNE P. DAVIS,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M. GARTEN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

"K" LINE AMERICA, INC., Defendant, is represented by JEREMY JAMES
CALSYN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, MARK W. NELSON, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC, MICHAEL R. LAZERWITZ, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & STEVEN JOHN KAISER, CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP.

EUKOR VEHICLE CARRIERS INC., Defendant, is represented by BENJAMIN
F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO,
BALLARD SPAHR, JASON ALLEN LECKERMAN, BALLARD SPAHR LLP & MAXIM
M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN LOGISTICS AS, Defendant, is represented by
BENJAMIN F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-
SOTO, BALLARD SPAHR, JASON ALLEN LECKERMAN, BALLARD SPAHR LLP &
MAXIM M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN LOGISTICS AMERICAS LLC, Defendant, is
represented by BENJAMIN F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC,
ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO, BALLARD SPAHR, JASON ALLEN LECKERMAN,
BALLARD SPAHR LLP & MAXIM M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

WALLENIUS LINES AB, Defendant, is represented by BENJAMIN F. HOLT,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO, BALLARD
SPAHR, JASON ALLEN LECKERMAN, BALLARD SPAHR LLP & MAXIM M.L.
NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S.A., Defendant, is represented
by STEVEN F. CHERRY, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & TODD F.
BRAUNSTEIN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

TOYOFUJI SHIPPING CO. LTD., Defendant, is represented by JOHN
CLAYTON EVERETT, JR., COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER CO., LTD, Defendant, is represented by
ADAM MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ANNE P.
DAVIS, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M. GARTEN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC.

WWL Vehicle Services Americas Inc., Defendant, is represented by
BENJAMIN F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ROBERTO A. RIVERA-
SOTO, BALLARD SPAHR & MAXIM M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

American Shipping and Logistics Inc., Defendant, is represented by
BENJAMIN F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & MAXIM M.L. NOWAK,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC, Defendant, is represented
by BENJAMIN F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & MAXIM M.L.
NOWAK, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP.

American Auto Logistics, LP, Defendant, is represented by BENJAMIN
F. HOLT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & MAXIM M.L. NOWAK, HOGAN
LOVELLS US LLP.

Mitsui O.S.K. Bulk Shipping (U.S.A.), Inc., Defendant, is
represented by ADAM MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC, ANNE P. DAVIS, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M.
GARTEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

MOL (AMERICA), INC., Defendant, is represented by ADAM MICHAEL
PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M. GARTEN,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

MOL Logistics (USA), Inc., Defendant, is represented by ADAM
MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M.
GARTEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC.

World Logistics Service (U.S.A.), Inc., Defendant, is represented
by ADAM MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, ANNE P.
DAVIS, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M. GARTEN, COUNSEL
NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO
USDC & ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO, BALLARD SPAHR.

World Transport Co. Ltd., Defendant, is represented by ADAM
MICHAEL PERGAMENT, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, DANIELLE M.
GARTEN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC, JAMES L. COOPER, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC & ROBERTO A. RIVERA-SOTO, BALLARD SPAHR.

CSAV AGENCY, LLC, Defendant, is represented by STEVEN F. CHERRY,
COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & TODD F. BRAUNSTEIN, COUNSEL NOT
ADMITTED TO USDC.

Hoegh Autoliners AS (Norway), Defendant, is represented by MELISSA
HELEN MAXMAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KEVIN MICHAEL KELLY,
COZEN O'CONNOR.

Hoegh Autoliners, Inc. (US), Defendant, is represented by MELISSA
HELEN MAXMAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KEVIN MICHAEL KELLY,
COZEN O'CONNOR.

Hoegh Autoliners AS (Norway), Defendant, is represented by MELISSA
HELEN MAXMAN, COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC & KEVIN MICHAEL KELLY,
COZEN O'CONNOR.


MONSTER CHEF: "Alvarez" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ariel Alvarez, and all others similarly situated v. Monster Chef,
Inc., Case No. 6:15-cv-01509-JA-TBS (M.D. Fla., September 14,
2015), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages and damages pursuant
to the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Monster Chef, Inc. owns and operates Vines Grille& Wine Bar
restaurant in Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Robert S. Norell, Esq.
      ROBERT S. NORELL, P.A.
      300 N.W. 70th Avenue, Suite 305
      Plantation, FL 33317
      Telephone: (954) 617-6017
      Facsimile: (954) 617-6018
      E-mail: rob@floridawagelaw.com


MONTGOMERY CITY, AL: Faces Suit Alleging Civil Rights Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Aldaress Carter, individually, and for a class of similarly
situated persons or entities v. The City of Montgomery and Branch
D. Kloess, Case No. 2:15-cv-00555-WHA-CSC (M.D. Ala., August 3,
2015) is brought over alleged violations of the Civil Rights Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William M. Dawson, Jr., Esq.
          2600 Highland Avenue, Suite 404
          Birmingham, AL 35205
          Telephone: (205) 201-9005
          Facsimile: (866) 730-1427
          E-mail: bill@billdawsonlaw.com


NATIONAL FITNESS: Faces "Russ" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Russ, on her own behalf and on behalf of those similarly
situated v. National Fitness Clubs of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Gulf
Coast Fitness, d/b/a Gold's Gym of Cape Coral, and d/b/a Gold's
Gym of Ft. Myers, and Joseph Cianfero, Case No. 2:15-cv-00554-JES-
MRM (M.D. Fla., September 14, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate fitness clubs in Miami, Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Angeli Murthy, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      600 N. Pine Island Road, Suite 400
      Plantation, FL 33324
      Telephone: (954) 318-0268
      Facsimile: (954) 327-3016
      E-mail: amurthy@forthepeople.com


NATURAL FRUIT: Faces Class Suit Over Forced, Child Labour
---------------------------------------------------------
Jon Fernquest, writing for Bangkok Post, reported that Andy Hall,
34, produced a 2013 report centred on working conditions at a
company named Natural Fruit factory in southern Thailand levelling
accusations of forced labour and child labour, unlawfully low
wages and long hours.

Titled "Cheap Has a High Price" and published by the Finnish civil
rights group Finnwatch, the report intensified the scrutiny of
Thailand's food industry which has faced years of allegations of
mistreatment of its mainly migrant labour force.

Natural Fruit is a major supplier to the European drink market
producing pineapple juice concentrate which the company has
supplied to Finnish retailers SOK and Kesko as well as private
label juices. The owner of Natural Fruit Wirat Piyapornpaiboon is
the elder brother of the former labour minister and general
secretary of the Democratic Party Chalermchai Sri-On. Natural
Fruit is a powerful company in Thailand's pineapple industry as
the owner is the President of the Thai Pineapple Industry
Association (TPIA).

Natural Fruit has denied the allegations in the report and
launched an attack against Mr. Hall with several court cases,
including a civil case seeking US$10 million in damages.

                   Already Acquitted Once

Mr. Hall was acquitted by a court on a defamation charge pursued
by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) and the attorney
general is appealing acquittal adding to Mr. Hall's legal woes.

Natural Fruit has now filed a string of its own criminal and civil
cases against Mr Hall, the most serious of which was accepted on.

The Southern Criminal Court has agreed to hear the case against
Andy Hall for defamation and violation of the Computer Crimes Act.

Mr Hall has been ordered to appear in court on Oct 19 for a plea
hearing, with the court expected to decide whether he gets bail.

Mr. Hall faces up to seven years in prison if convicted.

          Defamation Laws Stifle Investigative Journalism

Mr Hall stands by his research and has accused the company of
trying to detract from the report's damning findings through legal
action.

Both Thailand's criminal defamation and computer misuse laws have
been criticised by rights groups for their broad wording and the
ease with which they can be used to stifle investigative work.

In a statement, Finnwatch executive director Sonja Vartiala
described the court case as "a saga of intimidation already
lasting 30 months aimed at nothing but gagging a human rights
case.

          Legal Action in US & EU Against Thai Companies

Thailand's food industry is a key supplier to Western supermarkets
and has increasingly been subject to scrutiny and sometimes legal
action in Western countries that import Thai goods.

Thailand has long turned to migrants from poorer neighbours
Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos to help keep major industries afloat,
from fishing to seafood to food processing to construction.

A US subsidiary of the major Thai conglomerate CP Group was sued
in a class action lawsuit in California against leading US
retailer CostCo, which imports CP Group's fish, under a new 2010
California law acting against slave labour in the supply chain of
goods exported to the US.

The European Union threatened to place Thailand under an export
ban unless more was done to tackle labour abuses.

The US maintained Thailand's low ranking in its annual ranking for
countries accused of turning a blind eye to human trafficking.


NELNET INC: Robert Shaw Can't Join "Cooper" Suit, Judge Says
------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr., denied Robert M. Shaw's motion
for summary judgment and barred Mr. Shaw from joining the case,
JAMES DAVID COOPER, JR., Plaintiff, v. NELNET, INC., Defendant,
Case No. 6:14-CV-314-ORL-37DAB (M.D. Fla.).

"Despite his belief to the contrary, as evidenced by the caption
in his Motion, Mr. Shaw is not a plaintiff and his Motion is
irrelevant to the substance of the class-action settlement
agreement in this action."

"This case remains closed pursuant to the Court's Order at Doc.
85.  Any further unauthorized filings in this case will be
stricken."

A copy of the Court's September 15, 2015 Order is available at
http://is.gd/HXlTcNfrom Leagle.com.

James David Cooper, Jr., Plaintiff, is represented by Scott David
Owens, Scott D. Owens, P.A., Katherine M. Bowen, Keogh Law, LTD,
Keith J. Keogh, Keogh Law, LTD, Patrick Christopher Crotty, Scott
D. Owens, P.A. & Timothy James Sostrin, Keogh Law, LTD.

Nelnet, Inc., Defendant, is represented by Daniel C. Johnson,
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, PA & Richard Barry Benenson,
Brownstein, Hyatt, Farber & Schreck, LLP.


NEW YORK: NYPD Sued Over Alleged Illegal Detention Practices
------------------------------------------------------------
Theodore Bryant III v. City of New York, Case No. 1906114 (D.N.Y.,
September 14, 2015), arises out of the New York Police
Department's alleged unlawful detention, search and seizure
practices without justification and beyond the boundaries of
reasonableness.

City of New York is a municipal corporation duly existing under
the laws of the State of New York.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Paul Thomas Layton, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICE OF PAUL THOMAS LAYTON, P.C.
      30 Vesey Street, Suite 1803
      New York, NY 10007
      Telephone: (212) 227-1104


ONSTAR LLC: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Duchene" Suit Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Duchene, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. OnStar, LLC, Case No. 1:15-cv-00935-PLM-PJG (E.D.
Mich., September 14, 2015), seeks damages, injunctive and
declaratory relief resulting from the illegal actions of the
Defendants in contacting the Plaintiff and Class members on their
cellular telephones for non-emergency purposes using a prerecorded
message or artificial voice.

OnStar, LLC provides vehicle-integrated safety and security
solutions, mobility services, and information technology services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Sergei Lemberg, Esq.
      LEMBERG LAW, LLC
      1100 Summer Street, 3rd Floor
      Stamford, CT 06905
      Telephone: (203) 653-2250
      Facsimile: (203) 653-3424


PATSY'S PIZZERIA: Faces "Guzman" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
------------------------------------------------------------
Valentin Guzman, individually and on behalf of others similarly
situated v. Patsy's Pizzeria Franchise Corp., d/b/a Patsy's
Pizzeria, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-07220 (S.D.N.Y., September 14,
2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Patsy's Pizzeria Franchise Corp. owns and operates several
pizzerias in New York.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Michael Faillace, Esq.
      MICHAEL FAILLACE & ASSOCIATES, PC
      60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2540
      New York, NY 10165
      Telephone: (212) 317-1200
      E-mail: Michael@Faillacelaw.com


PITA CAFE: Does Not Properly Pay Employees, "Daraei" Suit Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Payam Daraei and Fariba Victoria Asbaghi v. Pita Cafe
Mediterranean Grill, et al., Case No. BC594552 (D. Cal., September
14, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
wages for all time worked at minimum or contractual wage rate in
violation of the California Labor Code.

Pita Cafe Mediterranean Grill owns and operates a restaurant
located at 11033 Santa Monica Boulevard in Los Angeles, California
90025.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Neda Roshanian, Esq.
      ROSHANIAN LAW FIRM
      1000 North Central Avenue, Suite 210
      Glendale, CA 91202
      Telephone: (818) 964-1122
      E-mail: neda@roshanianlaw.com


PIZZA HUT: Ex-Pizza Driver Sues Over NY Labor Law Violations
------------------------------------------------------------
Newsday reports that a former Schenectady pizza delivery driver is
one of two former employees who are suing Pizza Hut, claiming the
company's delivery fees on orders illegally cuts into their tips.

Newsday, citing The Daily Gazette of Schenectady, said the suit
filed in Albany federal court states that the pizza chain violates
New York labor laws by keeping delivery fees as a profit for
themselves.


REVANCE THERAPEUTICS: Warren Police Suit Remanded to State Court
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. of the United States
District Court for Northern District of California granted
Plaintiff City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System's
motion to remand in the case captioned, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND
FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, v. REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
et al., Defendants, Case No. 15-CV-02512-HSG.

On May 1, 2015, Plaintiff City of Warren Police and Fire
Retirement System filed the securities class action in the San
Mateo County Superior Court. In its complaint, Plaintiff asserted
only federal Securities Act claims against Defendant Revance
Therapeutics, Inc., certain officers and directors thereof, and
certain venture capitalists and underwriters associated with a
public offering of Revance securities.  On June 5, 2015, Defendant
removed the instant case to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Sec. 1441(a).

In the motion, Plaintiff argued that Defendant's removal of the
case is expressly barred by the Securities Act of 1933.

In his Order dated August 31, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/LLo4qkfrom Leagle.com, Judge Gilliam, Jr. found that
Plaintiff's interpretation of the provisions at issue better
reflects the plain language of the statute. Defendants'
interpretation relies on an overly constricted reading of the
jurisdictional provision's reference to Sec. 77p. Defendants have
not carried their burden to establish that removal is proper. The
action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of
California for the County of San Mateo.

Plaintiff is represented by James Ian Jaconette, Esq. --
jamesj@rgrdlaw.com -- Shawn A. Williams, Esq. --
shawnw@rgrdlaw.com -- ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

     - and -

Thomas C. Michaud, Esq.
VANOVERBEKE MICHAUD AND TIMMONY, P.C.
79 Alfred St
Detroit, MI 48201
Tel: (313)578-1200

Defendants are represented by Adam Christopher Trigg, Esq. --
atrigg@cooley.com -- John C. Dwyer, Esq. -- dwyerjc@cooley.com --
Shannon Marie Eagan, Esq. -- seagan@cooley.com -- COOLEY LLP


RIDGE COUNTRY: Faces "Esqueda" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alonso Esqueda, individually and on behalf of other employees
similarly situated v. Ridge Country Club, Case No. 1:15-cv-08058
(N.D. Ill., September 14, 2015), is brought against the Defendant
for failure to pay overtime wages for work in excess of 40 hours
per week.

Ridge Country Club owns and operates a golf club in Chicago,
Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      David E. Stevens, Esq.
      CONSUMER LAW GROUP, LLC
      6232 N. Pulaski, Suite 200
      Chicago, IL 60646
      Telephone: (312) 219-6838
      E-mail: dstevens@yourclg.com


RIVERBOAT DELTA: Court Grants in Part Requests for Attorney Fees
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge William B. Shubb of the United States District
Court for Eastern District granted in part Plaintiff's motion for
attorney's fees in the case captioned, HOLLYNN D'LIL, Plaintiff,
v. RIVERBOAT DELTA KING, INC.; CITY OF SACRAMENTO; OLD SACRAMENTO
BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, INC.,; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive,
Defendants, Case No. 2:11-2230 WBS AC.

Hollynn D'Lil, a paraplegic, brought this action under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.
("ADA"), and analogous state laws against defendants Riverboat
Delta King, Inc. ("Delta King") and the City of Sacramento arising
out of physical obstacles she allegedly encountered while visiting
the Delta King. Plaintiff asserted claims for:

     (1) the public services provisions of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. Sec.
12132, against the city;

     (2) section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 against the
city, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794;

     (3) the public accommodations provisions of the ADA against
Delta King and the city, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12182;

     (4) California Health and Safety Code section 19955 against
Delta King and the city;

     (5) California Government Code section 4456 against the city;

     (6) the California Disabled Persons Act ("CDPA") against
Delta King and the city, Cal. Civ. Code Sec. 54 et seq.;

     (7) the Unruh Civil Rights Act against Delta King and the
city, Cal. Civ. Code Sec. 51 et seq.;

     (8) California Government Code section 11135 against the
city;

     (9) California Government Code section 12948 against Delta
King and the city; and

    (10) state law negligence against Delta King and the city.

Plaintiff separately settled all claims against both defendants,
but was unable to agree on attorney's fees and costs with Delta
King.

In the motion, Plaintiff sought a minimum fee award of $789,760
and costs of $218,893, for a total award of $1,008,653 without
even considering her requested enhancement.

Delta King contended plaintiff has already been overcompensated in
the amount of $74,294.43 and thus the court should award plaintiff
absolutely no fees or costs.

In her Memorandum and Order dated August 28, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/q2G66hfrom Leagle.com, Judge Shubb held that with
deductions for unreasonable litigation expenses and costs of
$35,792.15, the total litigation expenses and costs the court will
tax against defendant is $183,097.90. The total award of
attorney's fees and costs together is $720,585.40, to which the
$370,000 in fees and costs paid by the city must be off-set, for a
total award of $350,585.40.  The plaintiff's counsel, Timothy S.
Thimesch, Esq., agreed at oral argument that his award of fees
should be reduced to compensate defendant for appearing at the
originally scheduled hearing. The court will therefore deduct $750
(3 hours at defense counsel's hourly rate of $250) to account for
the two attorneys and one representative who attended the hearing
on behalf of defendant so that Defendant is directed to pay Mr.
Thimesch $349,835.40 in attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and
costs.

Hollynn D'Lil is represented by:

Timothy S. Thimesch, Esq.
THIMESCH LAW OFFICES
158 Hilltop Crescent,
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Tel:(925)588-0401

Defendants are represented by Charles L. Post, Esq. --
cpost@weintraub.com -- Chelcey Emiko Lieber, Esq. --
clieber@weintraub.com -- Scott M. Plamondon, Esq. --
splamondon@weintraub.com -- Donna L. Holtz, Esq. --
dholtz@weintraub.com -- WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN


ROYAL TRANSPORTATION: Sued Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debra Clark, Brooksey Irvine, Reginald Morrissette, Melba Pearson,
and Ezell Williams on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. Royal Transportation Company, Donald
Fitzsimmons, Debra Fitzsimmons, and Shannon Fitzsimmons, Case No.
2:15-cv-13243-SFC-MKM (E.D. Mich., September 14, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages for work
in excess of 40 hours per week.

Royal Transportation Company is a Michigan corporation which is
engaged in the transportation business.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Maia E. Johnson, Esq.
      David A. Hardesty, Esq.
      GOLD STAR LAW, P.C.
      2701 Troy Center Dr., Ste. 400
      Troy, MI 48084
      E-mail: mjohnson@goldstarlaw.com
              dhardesty@goldstarlaw.com


SANDRIDGE ENERGY: Sued in Oklahoma Over Plan Assets Mismanagement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Richard A. McWilliams, individually, and on behalf of and all
others similarly situated v. Sandridge Energy, Inc., et al., Case
No. 5:15-cv-01001-D (W.D. Okla., September 14, 2015), arose from
the Defendants failure to act solely in the interest of the Plan
participants and beneficiaries, and to exercise the required
skill, care, prudence, and diligence in managing the Plan assets
invested in the SandRidge Company Stock Fund.

Sandridge Energy, Inc. is an oil and natural gas company with a
principal focus on exploration and production activities in the
mid-continent region of the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Daniel Monty Delluomo, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICES OF DELLUOMO & CROW
      2816 N.W. 57th Street, Suite 103
      Oklahoma City, OK 73112
      Telephone: (405) 843-0400
      Facsimile: (405) 843-5005
      E-mail: monty@delluomo.com

         - and -

      Robert I. Harwood, Esq.
      Tanya Korkhov, Esq.
      HARWOOD FEFFER LLP
      488 Madison Avenue
      New York, NY 10022
      Telephone: (212) 935-7400
      Facsimile: (212) 753-3630
      E-mail: rharwood@hfesq.com
              tkorkhov@hfesq.com


SOUTH TEXAS: Faces "Granados" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
---------------------------------------------------------------
Alejandro Granados, Fernando Martinez, Santiago Ojeda, Alberto
Martinez and Luis Santamaria v. South Texas Specialty Welders, LLC
and Matias Vera, Case No. 2:15-cv-00395 (S.D. Tex., September 14,
2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants are engaged in providing specialty welding services
to their customers and are doing business in Texas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Gay E. Gilson, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF GAY E. GILSON
      5525 S. Staples, Suite 3B
      Corpus Christi, TX 78411
      Telephone: (361) 887-0552
      Facsimile: (210) 887-0554
      E-mail: gegilson@gilsonlaw.com

         - and -

      Adriaan T. Jansse, Esq.
      CAVARETTA, KATONA & LEIGHNER, PLLC
      One Riverwalk Place
      700 N. St. Mary's Street, Suite 1500
      San Antonio, TX 78205
      Telephone: (210) 588-2901
      Facsimile: (210) 588-2908
      E-mail: janssea@ckf-law.com


SAINT-ALPHONSE SEMINARY: Sex Abuse Victims Receive $14M Settlement
------------------------------------------------------------------
CTV News Montreal, reported that the 111 victims of the
Redemptorist Order of the Saint-Alphonse Seminary in Sainte-Anne-
de-Beaupre have finally received nearly $14 million in
compensation.

Former students who were sexually assaulted by the nine priests
named in the case had until April 17 to file their claim.

After a five-year battle and a long trial, the Redemptorists
finally deposited $20 million into an account to compensate
victims, the largest sum of ever paid in a restitution case of
this kind in Quebec.

After attorney fees and other expenses, victims of the
Redemptorist priests will share nearly $14 million.

Quebec Superior Court ruled back in July 2014 that the
Redemptorist Order will have to pay at least $75,000 in damages to
each victim who attended the Saint-Alphonse Seminary between 1960
and 1987.

Ex-students came forward alleging they were assaulted while
attending the now-defunct Quebec City-area school.

Former student Frank Tremblay launched the suit in 2010 against
the order, the school and his attacker, Rev. Raymond-Marie Lavoie.

To this day, only Lavoie has been convicted of criminal charges.
In 2011, he pleaded guilty to 18 counts involving 13 victims over
an 11-year period from 1973 to 1984 and was sentenced to jail
time.

Of the nine priests named in the class-action suit, six are dead
and the other three have claimed that they live below the poverty
line.

The judge ordered Tremblay be awarded the full amount of $150,000.

Carlo Tarini, a spokesman for the Quebec Association of Victims of
Priests, called Tremblay "a genuine hero" for coming forward.


ST. LOUIS CITY JAILS: Mo. Judge Denies Class Cert. in "Burke"
-------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Ronnie L. White denied Plaintiff's request to
certify a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure in the case, CALVIN BURKE, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS CITY
JAILS, et al., Defendants, NO. 4:14CV2107 RLW (E.D. Mo.).

The Court said, "Prose parties may not bring class action suits in
the federal courts. Under Rule 23(a)(4), a class representative
must "fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class."
Plaintiff is not qualified to do so. Additionally, a litigant may
bring his own claims to federal court without counsel, but not the
claims of others.  See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1654; see also 7A Wright,
Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 3d Sec.
1769.1 ("class representatives cannot appear prose.")."

A copy of the Court's Sept. 15 Memorandum and Order is available
at http://is.gd/qyrAzpfrom Leagle.com.


STAR OF TEXAS: Faces "Deutsh" Suit Alleging ADA Violations
----------------------------------------------------------
John Deutsh v. Star of Texas Credit Union, Case No. 1:15-cv-00651
(W.D. Tex., July 31, 2015) alleges that the Defendant refused to
provide the Plaintiff and others similarly situated with
sufficient Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant parking in
the parking lot that serves the Company.

Mr. Deutsh is a paraplegic with no use of his legs, and uses a
wheelchair for mobility.

Star of Texas Credit Union operates the Star of Texas Credit Union
Austin retail banking center located in Austin, Texas.  Star of
Texas Credit Union is a Texas Financial Institution headquartered
in Austin.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Omar W. Rosales, Esq.
          THE ROSALES LAW FIRM, LLC
          PO BOX 6429
          Austin, TX 78762-6429
          Telephone: (512) 520-4919
          Facsimile: (512) 309-5360
          E-mail: talon_eye@yahoo.com


SUMO GLASS: Faces "Castrellon" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Concepcion Castrellon, individually and on behalf of other
individuals similarly situated v. Sumo Glass, Inc. and Does 1
through 25, Case No. BC594397 (D. Cal., September 14, 2015), is
brought against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages
in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Young W. Ryu, Esq.
      Lisa A. Hill, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF YOUNG W. RYU
      A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
      9595 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 900
      Beverly Hills, CA 90212
      Telephone: (888) 365-8686
      Facsimile: (800) 576-1170
      E-mail: young.ryu@ywrlaw.com
              lisa.hill@ywrlaw.com

SUPERIOR HOME: Sued Over Failure to Pay Nurses Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tracie McCann, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. Superior Home Health Services, LLC and Superior Home
Health Of San Antonio, LLC, Case No. 5:15-cv-00804 (W.D. Tex.,
September 14, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure
to pay its licensed vocational nurses overtime for the hours they
work over 40 each week.

The Defendants provide home health and hospice care throughout San
Antonio, the Rio Grande Valley, and the Las Vegas, Nevada area.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Lawrence Morales II, Esq.
      Allison S. Hartry, Esq.
      THE MORALES FIRM, P.C.
      115 E. Travis, Suite 1530
      San Antonio, TX78205
      Telephone: (210) 225-0811
      Facsimile: (210) 225-0821
      E-mail: lawrence@themoralesfirm.com
              ahartry@themoralesfirm.com


TWITTER INC: Accused of Wrongful Conduct Over Users Messages
------------------------------------------------------------
Wilford Raney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Twitter, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-04191 (N.D. Cal.,
September 14, 2015), seeks to stop the Defendant's practice of
systematically intercepting, reading, and altering the private
messages of its users without their knowledge or consent.

Twitter, Inc. owns and operates the social network where users
create, read, and share short, 140-character messages called
"tweets."

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Samuel M. Lasser, Esq.
      EDELSON PC
      1934 Divisadero Street
      San Francisco, CA 94115
      Telephone: (415) 994-9930
      Facsimile: (415) 776-8047
      E-mail: slasser@edelson.com

         - and -

      Rafey S. Balabanian, Esq.
      Alexander T.H. Nguyen, Esq.
      Amir C. Missaghi, Esq.
      EDELSON PC
      350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
      Chicago, IL 60654
      Telephone: (312) 589-6370
      Facsimile: (312) 589-6378
      E-mail: rbalabanian@edelson.com
              anguyen@edelson.com
              amissaghi@edelson.com


TY WELLNESS: Sued in Cal. Over Negligent Acupuncture Treatments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Veronica Cordova v. T.Y. Wellness Center, et al., Case No.
BC594451 (D. Cal., September 14, 2015), is an action for damages
as a proximate result of the Defendant's alleged negligent
acupuncture treatments.

T.Y. Wellness Center owns and operates a medical facility in Los
Angeles, California.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Mauro Fiore Jr., Esq.
      LAW OFFICES OF MAURO FIORE, JR.
      1901 West Pacific Ave. #260
      West Covina, CA 91790
      Telephone: (626) 856-5856
      Facsimile: (626) 869-1001


UNITED AIRLINES: Sued Over Early Out Program Lump Sum Payment
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jerome Scarber v. United Airlines, Inc., et al., Case No.
2015L009407 (D. Ill., September 14, 2015), is an action for
damages as a result of the Defendant's unlawful denial of the
Plaintiff's Early Out Program lump sum payment of $100,000.00.

United Airlines, Inc. is a national, as well as an international
airline, and is an Illinois corporation located in Cook County,
State of Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Noel T. Wroblewski, Esq.
      1349 N. Artesian Ave., #3
      Chicago, IL 60622
      Telephone: (773) 278-9146
      Facsimile: (773) 278-9346
      E-mail: noel.wroblewski@yahoo.com


UNITEDHEALTHCARE INC: 7th Cir. Revives "Meinders" Junk Fax Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Circuit Judge William Joseph Bauer of the United States Court of
Appeals, Seventh Circuit, reversed a district court's order
granting Defendants' motions to dismiss in the case captioned, DR.
ROBERT L. MEINDERS, D.C., LTD., individually and as the
representative of a class of similarly-situated persons,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE, INC., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees, Case No. 14-3668.

In April 2014, Meinders filed a putative class action lawsuit
against United in Illinois state court. The complaint alleged
that, at some point in 2013, United sent him and a number of
similarly-situated persons an unsolicited "junk fax" advertising
United's services, which violated the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA), the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive
Practices Act, 815 ILCS Sec. 505/2, and amounted to common law
conversion. United removed the case to the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Illinois, on the basis of
federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331.

Once in federal court, United moved to dismiss the complaint for
improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. United argued that Meinders had entered into a
"Provider Agreement" with a United-owned entity, ACN Group, Inc.,
in 2006, which bound him to arbitrate his "junk fax" claims in
Minnesota. United claimed that the alleged "junk fax" it sent to
Meinders related to the Provider Agreement, and thus fell within
the purview of the arbitration clause, because it provided
Meinders with information about new technology designed to assist
United providers in recouping payments from patients.

Meinders contends that United was neither a party nor signatory to
the Provider Agreement and, therefore, that it could not enforce
the agreement's arbitration provision.

The district court granted United's motion to dismiss for improper
venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and
determined that United, although not a signatory to the Provider
Agreement, was entitled to enforce the agreement's arbitration
clause on the ground that it "assumed important obligations under
the Provider Agreement such as ACN Group's obligation to
coordinate and transmit payments to providers such as Meinders."

On appeal, Meinders contends that the district court denied him
due process by entering judgment against him on factual and legal
issues to which he did not have a full and fair opportunity to
respond.

In the Order dated September 1, 2015 available at
http://is.gd/ktkNRufrom Leagle.com, Judge Bauer held that the
district court deprived Meinders due process by entering judgment
against him on law and facts to which he did not have a full and
fair opportunity to respond.  The Seventh Circuit remanded the
matter to the district court where factual issues may be more
appropriately addressed in the first instance. On remand, the
district court should permit discovery to the extent necessary to
allow Meinders to submit a full response to Van Ham's declaration
and United's assumption theory.


US FOODS: Faces Suit in Colorado for Gender Discrimination
----------------------------------------------------------
Kimberly Hastings v. US Foods, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-01650-MJW
(D. Colo., July 31, 2015) alleges gender discrimination and
violation of the Equal Pay Act.

Ms. Hastings worked at US Foods from February 2006 through May 1,
2015.  She is a resident of Denver, Colorado.

U.S. Foods, Inc. is a Delaware corporation doing business in
Colorado as a foreign corporation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Claire Munger, Esq.
          HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP
          1444 Blake Street
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: (303) 883-6933
          Facsimile: (303) 292-1956
          E-mail: cmunger@hkm.com


WERNER ENTERPRISES: "Smith" Suit Moved From Calif. to Nebraska
--------------------------------------------------------------
The class action lawsuit styled Smith v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-02978, was transferred from the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California to the U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska (Omaha).  The Nebraska District
Court Clerk assigned Case No. 8:15-cv-00287 to the proceeding.

The lawsuit arose from labor-related issues.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          William D. Turley, Esq.
          David T. Mara, Esq.
          TURLEY LAW FIRM
          7428 Trade Street
          San Diego, CA 92121
          Telephone: (619) 234-2833
          Facsimile: (619) 234-4048
          E-mail: bturley@turleylawfirm.com

The Defendant is represented by:

          Scott M. Lidman, Esq.
          Ian Maher, Esq.
          John K. Lilly, Esq.
          LITTLER, MENDELSON LAW FIRM
          2049 Century Park East, Suite 500
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: (310) 553-0308
          Facsimile: (310) 553-5583
          E-mail: slidman@littler.com
                  imaher@littler.com


WORK OUT WORLD: Accused of Violating Communications Act in N.J.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Noreen Susinno, individually and of behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Work Out World, Inc. and John Does 1-25, Case No.
3:15-cv-05881-PGS-TJB (D.N.J., July 30, 2015) alleges violations
of the Communications Act of 1934.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

          Ari Hillel Marcus, Esq.
          MARCUS ZELMAN LLC
          1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
          Ocean, NJ 07712
          Telephone: (732) 695-3282
          Facsimile: (732) 298-6256
          E-mail: ari@marcuszelman.com



                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *