CAR_Public/150901.mbx              C L A S S   A C T I O N   R E P O R T E R

            Tuesday, September 1, 2015, Vol. 17, No. 174


                            Headlines


1189 WEBSTER: "Valencia" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
1ST IMPRESSION: Faces "Phillips" Suit Seeking to Recover Wages
ADOBE: Pays $1.2-Mil. to Settle Data Breach Class Suit
AJIN METAL: Faces "Nam" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Bess" Suit Over Air Ticket-Price Fixing

AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Brown" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Bruzda" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "La" Suit Over Air Ticker-Price Fixing
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Sundar" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Wint" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing

AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Garzel" Suit for Alleged Price Fixing
AMERICAN MEDICAL: Australian women to sue Over Mesh-based Product
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: Faces "Hoelscher" Lawsuit Under FLSA
ARAB BANK: Faces Class Suit Over "Financed Terrorism"
AZIN INC: Faces "Ferrara" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay, Minimum Wage

BI-LO HOLDINGS: Faces "Rennock-Witter" Suit Under FLSA, CRA, ADEA
BLUE CROSS: Faces Suit in Mich. Over Plan Assets Misappropriation
BLUE CROSS: Medical Center Alleges Violations of Antitrust Laws
BOOMSTOWN ENTERTAINMENT: Turecky Suit Alleges WARN Act Violations
BRONCO OILFIELD: "Espinosa" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT

CAPITOL BUILDING SUPPLY: Faces "Kennedy" Lawsuit Under FLSA
COLLECTO INC: Faces "Jackson" Suit in Cal. Over FDCPA Violation
COMCAST CORPORATION: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Action Claims
CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR: Faces "Hatmaker" Suit Over ERISA Violation
CO'R RESTAURANT: Sued in N.Y. Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages

CYBEX INTERNATIONAL: Recalls Arm Curl Machines
DEPOTEXAS INC: "Lopez" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages
DOT HILL: Faces "Ira" Suit in Del. Over Proposed Seagate Merger
ECO WASTE: "Ordonez" Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Pay
EL REY: Faces "Bue" Suit Under FLSA, Illinois Minimum Wage Law

EXQUISITO RESTAURANT: Faces "Franco" Suit Over Unpaid OT Wages
EZCORP INC: Block & Leviton Files Securities Class Suit
FIRST INDEX: All American Painting Sues for TCPA Violation
FIRSTSOURCE ADVANTAGE: Faces "Pollack" Suit Over FDCPA Violation
GORDON AYLWORTH: Faces "Olson" Suit in Wash. Over FDCPA Violation

GOT WARRANTY: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Mey" Suit Claims
GRACO CHILDREN'S: Faces Class Suit Over "Troubling" Car-Seat
HUFFY: Recalls Bicycles with Front Disc Brakes
JAGUAR: NJ Woman Sues Over Land Rover Battery Drain Problems
LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION: Ruling Eases LSAT Accommodations Process

LINC ENERGY: Faces Class Suit Over 'Toxic' Damage
LONMIN & PROTEA: Marikana Victims Seek R4.5-Mil.
LOPEFRA CORP: Faces "Llopiz" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
MADEWELL INC: Recalls Sightseer Sandals Due to Fall Hazard
MAN WEI: Faces "Ding" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages

MEDSPEED LLC: Faces "Williams" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
MERGE HEALTHCARE: Faces Suit in Ill. Over Prop. Merger With IBM
MERGE HEALTHCARE: Faces "Gerard" Suit Over Prop. Merger With IBM
MM CONSTRUCTION: Fails to Pay Employees OT Wages, Suit Claims
MONSTER INC: Sued in Cal. Over Misleading Cable Products Label

NABORS INDUSTRIES: Faces Lawsuit Seeking Remedies Under FLSA
NESTLE INDIA: Food Minister Won't Withraw Class Suit
NESTLE INDIA: Looking to Appeal Decision on Maggi Class Suit
NYK LINE: Faces "Rogers" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
OSRAM SYLVANIA: Recalls T8 LED Lamps Due to Burn Hazard

PING AN: Faces "Wang" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
PLANAR SYSTEMS: Faruqi Probes $157-MM. Sale to Leyard
POSTMATES INC: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, "Peppier" Suit Says
PROTECH SECURITY: Faces "Padilla" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
PURE FOOD: Faces Class Suit Over Employees' Back Pay

REMY INTERNATIONAL: Sued in Ind. Over Proposed BorgWarner Merger
RESURGENT CAPITAL: Faces "Watson" Suit Over FDCPA Violation
RK ASSOCIATES: Sued Over Handicap-Inaccessible Parking Spaces
ROBERT BOSCH: Recalls Rotary Tools Due to Injury Hazard
SCAG POWER: Recalls Zero-Turn Lawn Mowers Due to Fire Hazard

SELF-RELIANCE: Faces "Wengerd" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
TAXI AFFILIATION: Faces "Williams" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
TEXAS LAW SHIELD: Faces Class Suit Over CHL Owners
THORATEC CORP: Andrews & Springer Files Securities Class Suit
TIPPMANN SPORTS: Recalls Paintball Markers Due to Fire Hazard

TREK BICYCLE: Recalls Superfly Bicycles Due to Fall Hazard
TRINET GROUP: Faces "Welgus" Suit for Securities Law Violations
UNITEDHEALTH: Sued in Minn. for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
UNITED STATES: DOL, Alaska Work Against Misclassification
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: Player Sues Over Fotball Concussions

US MONEY: Faces "Stux" Suit in Cal. Over Alleged Coin Overpricing
U.S. OPM: Faces "McGarry" Suit for Alleged Privacy Act Violation
VICTORY AUTOMOTIVE: Faces "Gallaher" Suit Seeking Overtime Pay
WEST PALM: Faces "Monteverde" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT Wages
WHOLE FOODS: Hagens Berman Files Securities Class Suit

WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION: Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages




                            *********


1189 WEBSTER: "Valencia" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Miguel Valencia, Jose Felipe Jovel, Octavio De Los Angeles, and
Apolinar Contreras, on behalf of themselves and other similarly
situated employees v. 1189 Webster Car Wash Corp., Ismael Po
Poter, and Jennel Yn Popoter, Case No. 1:15-cv-06734 (S.D.N.Y,
August 25, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid minimum wages, unpaid
overtime compensation, liquidated damages, prejudgment and post-
judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a car wash shop located at 1189
Webster Avenue, Bronx, New York 104 56.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Justin Cilenti, Esq.
      Peter H. Cooper, Esq.
      CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC
      708 Third A venue - 6111 Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (212) 209-3933
      Facsimile: (212) 209-7102
      E-mail: info@icpclaw.com


1ST IMPRESSION: Faces "Phillips" Suit Seeking to Recover Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Louis Phillips v. 1st Impression Landscaping, Inc., also d/b/a 1st
Impression Stormwater And Excavation Division and Shawn Liberator
and Kenneth Fiedler, Case 1:15-cv-02328 (D.Md., Aug. 7, 2015),
seeks to recover unpaid wages, liquidated damages, interest,
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under the Federal Fair Labor
Standards Act and unpaid wages, interest, liquidated reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs under Maryland Wage and Hour Law,
Maryland Code Annotated, Labor and Employment Article.

1st Impression Landscaping, Inc., also D/B/A 1st Impression
Stormwater and Excavation Division, is an incorporated for profit
business engaged in the building, renovating, and repairing of
sewers and drain pipes in commercial and residential locations in
the Mid-Atlantic region.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Steven M. Lubar, Esq.
     Benjamin L. Davis III, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF PETER T. NICHOLL
     36 South Charles Street, Suite 1700
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Tel: (410) 244-7005
     Fax: (410) 244-8454
     E-mail: slubar@nicholllaw.com
             bdavis@nicholllaw.com


ADOBE: Pays $1.2-Mil. to Settle Data Breach Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------
Darren Pauli, writing for The Register, reported that Adobe has
paid an undisclosed amount to settle customer claims and faces
US$1.2 million in legal fees after its 2013 data breach which
compromised the details of 38 million users.

The creative content king was served a November 2013 class action
lawsuit filed in California in which it is claimed "shoddy"
security practises lead to the breach.

The breach occurred when hackers raided a backup server on which
they found, and subsequently published, a 3.8GB file containing
152 million usernames and poorly-encrypted passwords, plus
customers' credit card numbers.

Adobe initially reported the breach affecting three million users
and later increased that figure to 38 million.

The company knew its security practices at the time were poor
since it used the same encryption key for all passwords.

It had not deployed a new encryption system nor decommissioned the
old backup server by the time of the breach.

US District Judge Lucy Koh rejected Adobe's request to dismiss the
action because the impact to users was "very real" despite the
plaintiff's inability to prove Adobe failed to inform them of the
breach fast enough.

Court documents [PDF] [PDF] published by CourtHouseNews, a news
service for legal eagles, show Adobe will pay US$1.18 million in
attorney fees and expenses covering some 2540 hours of work.

Judge Koh granted a voluntary dismissal of class action claims
after Adobe and plaintiffs agreed on an undisclosed settlement.

An Adobe spokesperson told the publication it is "pleased" to have
the case resolved.


AJIN METAL: Faces "Nam" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gi Syung Nam, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Jong Ho Cho, Ajin Metal Scrap Corporation, Core Steel
International, Inc., Metal Source America, Inc., and Na Y Kim,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00135-TCB (August 25, 2015), is brought against
the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of
the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a metal recycling company in
Alabama.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Brian G. Kim, Esq.
      Beverly Lucas, Esq.
      Homero Leon, Esq.
      LEON AND KIM, LLC
      3006 Clairmont Road
      Atlanta, GA 30329
      Telephone: 678.302.1956
      Facsimile: 404.601.1391
      E-mail: Brian@leonandkim.com
              Beverly@leonandkim.com
              Homero@leonandkim.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Bess" Suit Over Air Ticket-Price Fixing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Amy Bess, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
v. American Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest
Airlines Co., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-03881-
JSC (N.D. Cal., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants'
alleged unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to fix,
raise, maintain, and stabilize prices for air passenger
transportation services within the United States.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Kimberly A. Kralowec, Esq.
      Kathleen Styles Rogers, Esq.
      Chad A. Saunders, Esq.
      THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP
      44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1210
      San Francisco, CA 94104
      Telephone: (415) 546-6800
      Facsimile: (415) 546-6801
      E-mail: kkralowec@kraloweclaw.com
              krogers@kraloweclaw.com
              csaunders@kraloweclaw.com

         - and -

      Jennie Anderson, Esq.
      ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP
      155 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor
      San Francisco, CA 94104
      Telephone: (415) 986-1400
      Facsimile: (415) 986-1474
      E-mail: jennie@andrusanderson.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Brown" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Theresa Brown, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines, Inc.,
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United Continental
Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-07433
(E.D. Ill., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants' alleged
unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to limit flight
capacity and thereby fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price
of domestic air travel services.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      Tyler J. Story, Esq.
      WEXLER WALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 346-2222
      Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
      E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
              mrm@wexlerwallace.com
              aek@wexlerwallace.com

         - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Telephone: (865) 247-0080
      Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Bruzda" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Bruzda, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines, Inc.,
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United Continental
Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-07435
(N.D. Ill., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants' alleged
unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to limit flight
capacity and thereby fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price
of domestic air travel services.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      Tyler J. Story, Esq.
      WEXLER WALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 346-2222
      Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
      E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
              mrm@wexlerwallace.com
              aek@wexlerwallace.com

         - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Telephone: (865) 247-0080
      Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "La" Suit Over Air Ticker-Price Fixing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron La, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines, Inc.,
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United Continental
Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-07441
(N.D. Ill., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants' alleged
unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to limit flight
capacity and thereby fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price
of domestic air travel services.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      Tyler J. Story, Esq.
      WEXLER WALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 346-2222
      Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
      E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
              mrm@wexlerwallace.com
              aek@wexlerwallace.com

         - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Telephone: (865) 247-0080
      Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Sundar" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Arvind Sundar, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines, Inc.,
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United Continental
Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-07444
(N.D. Ill., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants' alleged
unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to limit flight
capacity and thereby fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price
of domestic air travel services.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      Tyler J. Story, Esq.
      WEXLER WALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 346-2222
      Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
      E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
              mrm@wexlerwallace.com
              aek@wexlerwallace.com

         - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Telephone: (865) 247-0080
      Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Wint" Suit Over Ticker-Price Fixing
-------------------------------------------------------------
Aria Wint, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines, Inc.,
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United Continental
Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-07447
(N.D. Ill., August 25, 2015), arises from the Defendants' alleged
unlawful combination, agreement and conspiracy to limit flight
capacity and thereby fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price
of domestic air travel services.

The Defendants own and operate the largest commercial airline
companies in the United States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
      Amy E. Keller, Esq.
      Tyler J. Story, Esq.
      WEXLER WALLACE LLP
      55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3300
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 346-2222
      Facsimile: (312) 346-0022
      E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
              mrm@wexlerwallace.com
              aek@wexlerwallace.com

         - and -

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
      Lisa A. White, Esq.
      GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
      800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
      Knoxville, TN 37929
      Telephone: (865) 247-0080
      Facsimile: (865) 522-0049
      E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com
              lisa@gregcolemanlaw.com


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Faces "Garzel" Suit for Alleged Price Fixing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Garzel, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, v. American Airlines Group Inc., American Airlines,
Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co., United
Continental Holdings, Inc., and United Airlines, Inc., Case: 1:15-
cv-06940 (N.D.Ill., Aug. 7, 2015), alleges conspiracy by the four
largest airlines in the United States to limit flight capacity and
thereby fix, raise, maintain, and/or stabilize the price of
domestic air travel services in violation of Section 1 of the
Sherman Act.

The Defendants conduct air transportations services for consumers
throughout the United Sates.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Edward A. Wallace, Esq.
     Mark R. Miller, Esq.
     Amy E. Keller, Esq.
     WEXLER WALLACE LLP
     55 West Monroe Street
     Suite 3300
     Chicago, IL 60603
     Tel: (312) 346-2222
     Fax: (312) 346-0022
     E-mail: eaw@wexlerwallace.com
             mrm@wexlerwallace.com
             aek@wexlerwallace.com


AMERICAN MEDICAL: Australian women to sue Over Mesh-based Product
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Brent Balinski, writing for Manufacturers' Monthly, reported that
hundreds of Australian women are reportedly preparing to sue
American Medical Systems over the effects of a mesh-based product.

9News reports that over 100 claims, being examined by Shine
Lawyers, detail the claimed effects of a polypropylene product
designed to deal with prolapse.

The implants were the subject of a US class action, which saw
30,000 claims settled and payouts amounting to nearly $US 1
billion.

The product, which has been said to damage pelvic organs and lead
to pain, bleeding and infection, is still sold locally.


AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: Faces "Hoelscher" Lawsuit Under FLSA
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judy Hoelscher v. Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a Delaware
corporation, Case 2:15-cv-01554-MHB (D.Ariz., Aug. 12, 2015),
alleges unlawful failure of the Defendant to pay overtime wages in
direct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Americans for Prosperity Foundation is one of the many political
advocacy groups created and funded by the Koch brothers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Phillips Dayes, Esq.
     Trey Dayes, Esq.
     Sean Davis, Esq.
     NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM
     3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
     Phoenix, AZ 85012
     Tel: 1-800-JOB-LAWS
         (602) 288-1610 ext. 301
     E-mail: docket@phillipsdayeslaw.com


ARAB BANK: Faces Class Suit Over "Financed Terrorism"
-----------------------------------------------------
Jamal Doumani, writing for Arab News, reported that roughly 500
Americans, with dual Israeli citizenship, have done -- in a class
action suit, in federal court in New York, claiming that Arab Bank
was liable under the US Anti-Terrorism Act for injuries they, or
their relatives, sustained while visiting Israel at the hands of
Hamas operatives.

The plaintiffs asserted in their complaint that the bank "financed
terrorism" by processing transactions for members of the militant
group. As the New York Times court reporter wrote in his news
report about the case, "It is nearly impossible to get individual
terrorists to appear in the United States for a civil case, and
terrorist groups and members do not generally have much money to
pay victims. Banks, however, do, and a number of cases against
banks saying they helped to finance terrorism are pending. The
Arab Bank case was the first to go to trial."

The case has taken 11 years to litigate. In September 2014, the
court found Arab Bank liable for "knowingly" supporting terrorism
relating to 24 different acts, and last the bank's lawyers opted
to reach a settlement with the plaintiffs, though the amount of
the settlement, whose framework would be formalized in the next
few months, was not disclosed. The case set a precedent: It was
the first time ever that that any financial institution faced a
jury for alleged violations of the Anti-Terrorism Act's civil
provisions.

Was it all a scam? Unquestionably. The Arab Bank is no a
pipsqueak, little financial institution, but the largest in the
Middle East, founded in Jerusalem in 1930, long before Zionism
formally grafted itself on the whole of Palestine, but
headquartered in Amman, Jordan. It serves clients in more than 600
branches in 30 countries on five continents, and has played a
major role as an economic facilitator of the region's development
and trade.

The bank's ordeal in the US began in 2004. When one Mati Gil, a
dual US-Israel citizen, brought claims against the bank, alleging
that he was "injured" in a shooting perpetrated by a Hamas
operative along the Israel-Gaza border, and that the Arab Bank was
thus liable for "aiding and abetting terrorism." Judge Jack
Weinstein, nominated as a federal judge to the Eastern District
Court of New York by President Lyndon Johnson in 1967, dismissed
the case, essentially for being frivolous (read: Aimed at
extorting money from the bank).

He said in his judicial summation: "There's no proof that anything
but routine financial services to the charities alleged to be
front organizations were provided, and none of the charities were
designated by the US as front groups when the charities received
services from the bank." Judge Weinstein was dismissing the case,
he said, because "the plaintiff must establish by a preponderance
of evidence that the bank recklessly, knowingly or intentionally
caused plaintiff's injuries, either by the bank's own actions or
in a conspiracy with Hamas or other organizations."
Mr. Gil failed to do that, he said. "Hamas is not the defendant,
the bank is," he added. "And the evidence does not prove that the
bank acted with an improper state of mind ..." Case closed, right?
Wrong. Appeals can drag on for years, 11 in this case.

And yes, like me, you're wondering why the Arab Bank decided to
settle rather fight the case. Search me, but sometimes, after 11
years of litigation, millions of dollars in lawyers' fees and
unnecessary distractions, including bad publicity, my guess is you
choose to give the crooks their pound of flesh and move on.


AZIN INC: Faces "Ferrara" Lawsuit Seeking OT Pay, Minimum Wage
--------------------------------------------------------------
Joshua Ferrara v. Azin Inc. d/b/a Casa Dora Italian Restaurant,
and Hassan Hamadi, Case 3:15-cv-01007-TJC-JRK (M.D.Fla., Aug. 12,
2015), seeks to recover unpaid overtime compensation under the
Fair Labor Standards Act and unpaid minimum wages under Florida's
Minimum Wage Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Jay P. Lechner, Esq.
     Jason M. Melton, Esq.
     WHITTEL & MELTON, LLC
     One Progress Plaza
     200 Central Avenue, #400
     St. Petersburg, FL 33701
     Tel: (727) 822-1111
     Fax: (727) 898-2001
     E-mail: Pleadings@theFLlawfirm.com
             lechnerj@theFLlawfirm.com
             daveyard@theFLlawfirm.com


BI-LO HOLDINGS: Faces "Rennock-Witter" Suit Under FLSA, CRA, ADEA
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ruthlynn Rebecca Rennock-Witter v. Bi-Lo Holdings, LLC, Winn Dixie
Stores, Inc.; and Southeastern Grocers, LLC, Case 0:15-cv-61680-
FAM (S.D.Fla., Aug. 12, 2015), alleges non-payment by the
Defendants of overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA), and unlawful termination of employment in
violation of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act and the anti-retaliation provisions of the FLSA.

Bi-Lo is the parent company of Winn Dixie, and recently changed
its name to Southeastern Grocers.  All Defendants jointly operate
grocery stores in Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Steven F. Grover, Esq.
     STEVEN F. GROVER, PA
     Wells Fargo Tower
     One East Broward Blvd., Ste. 700
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Tel: 954-356-0005
     E-mail: stevenfgrover@gmail.com


BLUE CROSS: Faces Suit in Mich. Over Plan Assets Misappropriation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
West Michigan Molding, Inc., f/k/a Grand Haven Plastics, Inc. and
Grand Haven Plastics, Inc. Cafeteria Plan v. Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Michigan, Case No. 4:15-cv-13012-TGB-RSW (E.D. Mich.,
August 25, 2015), arises out of the Defendant's alleged
misappropriation of WMM's self-insured employee benefit Plan
assets.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a Michigan non-profit health
care corporation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Perrin Rynders, Esq.
      Aaron M. Phelps, Esq.
      Kyle P. Konwinski, Esq.
      VARNUM LLP
      Bridgewater Place, PO Box 352
      Grand Rapids, MI, 49501-0352
      Telephone:  (616) 336-6000
      Facsimile: (616) 336-7000
      E-mail: prynders@varnumlaw.com
              amphelps@varnumlaw.com
              kpkonwinski@varnumlaw.com


BLUE CROSS: Medical Center Alleges Violations of Antitrust Laws
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Service District of the Parish of East Baton Rouge,
Louisiana d/b/a Lane Regional Medical Center v. Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service
Corporation, Cambia Health Solutions, Inc., CareFirst, Inc.,
Premera Blue Cross, Premera Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alaska,
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc., USAble Mutual Insurance
Company, d/b/a Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield,
Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross,
California Physicians' Service, Inc. d/b/a Blue Shield of
California, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc.,
d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado, Anthem Health
Plans, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Connecticut, Highmark, Inc., Highmark BCBSD, Inc. d/b/a Highmark
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Delaware, Group Hospitalization and
Medical Services, Inc. d/b/a CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield,
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Service Association d/b/a
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Blue Cross of Idaho Health
Service, Inc., Regence BlueShield of Idaho, Inc., Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Illinois, Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. d/b/a
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana, Wellmark, Inc.
d/b/a/ Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc.
d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky, Anthem Health
Plans of Maine, Inc., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Maine, CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. d/b/a CareFirst
BlueCross BlueShield, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of assachusetts,
Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, BCBSM, Inc. d/b/a/
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross Blue Shield of
Mississippi, HMO Missouri, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of Missouri, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City,
Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Caring for Montanans,
Inc. f/k/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of Nevada, Anthem Health Plans of New Hampshire, Inc.
d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Hampshire,
Horizon Health Care Services, Inc. d/b/a Horizon Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of New Jersey, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New
Mexico, HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Shield of Northeastern New
York, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Western New York, Inc. Empire
HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. d/b/a Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield,
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield,
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc., Noridian
Mutual Insurance Company d/b/a Blue Cross Blue Shield of North
Dakota, Community Insurance Company d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Ohio, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma,
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Hospital Service
Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania d/b/a Blue Cross of
Northeastern Pennsylvania, Capital Blue Cross, Highmark Health
Services, Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield and d/b/a
Highmark Blue Shield, Independence Blue Cross, Triple-S Salud,
Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island, BlueCross
BlueShield of South Carolina Inc., Wellmark of South Dakota, Inc.
d/b/a Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Dakota,
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of Texas, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Blue Cross
and Blue Shield of Vermont, Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, Inc. Regence
BlueShield, Highmark West Virginia, Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross
Blue Shield West Virginia, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin
d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Wisconsin, Blue Cross
Blue Shield of Wyoming, Consortium Health Plans, Inc.,
National Account Service Company, L.L.C., and Blue Cross and Blue
Shield Association, Case 3:15-cv-00523-BAJ-SCR (M.D.La., Aug. 7,
2015), alleges the Defendant engaged in "Market Allocation
Conspiracy" in violation of the Sherman Act, and the Clayton Act.

Blue Cross provides health insurance coverage in the United
States.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Lance C. Unglesby, Esq.
     UNGLESBY LAW FIRM
     246 Napoleon Street
     Baton Rouge, LA 70802
     Tel: (225) 387-0120
     Fax: (225) 336-4355
     E-mail: lance@unglesbylaw.com

        - and -

     Edith M. Kallas, Esq.
     WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
     1180 Avenue of the Americas, 20th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 447-7060
     Fax: (800) 922-4851
     E-mail: ekallas@whatleykallas.com

        - and -

     Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Esq.
     W. Tucker Brown, Esq.
     WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
     2001 Park Place North
     1000 Park Place Tower
     Birmingham, AL 35203
     Tel: (205) 488-1200
     Fax: (800) 922-4851
     E-mail: jwhatley@whatleykallas.com
             tbrown@whatleykallas.com

        - and -

     Patrick J. Sheehan, Esq.
     WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
     60 State Street, 7th Floor
     Boston, MA 02109
     Tel: (617) 573-5118
     Fax: (617) 371-2950
     E-mail: psheehan@whatleykallas.com

        - and -

     Deborah J. Winegard, Esq.
     WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
     1068 Virginia Avenue, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30306
     Tel: (404) 607-8222
     Fax: (404) 607-8451
     E-mail: dwinegard@whatleykallas.com

        - and -

     Henry C. Quillen, Esq.
     WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP
     159 Middle Street, Suite 2C
     Portsmouth, NH 03801
     Tel: (603) 294-1591
     Fax: (800) 922-4851
     E-mail: hquillen@whatleykallas.com

        - and -

     Dennis C. Reich, Esq.
     REICH & BINSTOCK, LLP
     4265 San Felipe, Suite 1000
     Houston, TX 77027
     Tel: (713) 622-7271
     Fax: (713) 623-8724
     E-mail: dreich@rbfirm.net


BOOMSTOWN ENTERTAINMENT: Turecky Suit Alleges WARN Act Violations
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephanie Turecky, and all others similarly-situated v. Boomstown
Entertainment, LLC, Arizona Universal Holdings LLC, CRGE
Cincinnati, LLC, Frank Capri, and John Does 1-10, Case No. 1:15-
cv-00527 (S.D. Ohio, August 12, 2015), is asserting statutory and
common law claims arising from the Defendants' alleged violations
of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, the Fair
Labor Standards Act, and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act.

The Defendants jointly maintained, operated and controlled
facilities and operations of the Cincinnati Toby Keith's
restaurant since it opened its doors in early 2012 until the time
it closed its doors on July 16, 2015, and constituted a "single
employer" of Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Christian A. Jenkins, Esq.
      MINNILLO & JENKINS, Co. LPA
      2712 Observatory Avenue
      Cincinnati, OH 45208
      Tel: (513) 723-1600
      Fax: (513) 723-1620
      E-mail: cjenkins@minnillojenkins.com

          - and -

      Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Esq.
      GOLDENBERG SCHNEIDER, LPA
      One West Fourth Street, 18th Floor
      Cincinnati, OH 45202
      Tel: (513) 345-8291
      Fax: (513) 345-8294
      E-mail: jgoldenberg@gs-legal.com


BRONCO OILFIELD: "Espinosa" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Espinosa, and all others similarly-situated v. Bronco
Oilfield Services, Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-00344 (S.D. Tex., August
12, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages and other
damages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendant is an oilfield service company with significant
operations throughout Texas and the United States.  The Defendant
provides chemical injection and fluid pumps, coil tubing,
formation breakdown, casing/tubing testing, and kill work services
to oil companies and operators. The Defendant also offers bobtail
pump trucks and other pumping services to its clients.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Michael A. Josephson, Esq.
      FIBICH, LEEBRON, COPELAND,
      BRIGGS & JOSEPHSON
      1150 Bissonnet
      Houston, TX 77005
      Tel: (713) 751-0025
      Fax: (713) 751-0030
      E-mail: mjosephson@fibichlaw.com

          - and -

      Richard J. Burch, Esq.
      BRUCKNER BURCH, PLLC
      8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1500
      Houston, TX 77046
      Tel: (713) 877-8788
      Fax: (713) 877-8065
      E-mail: rburch@brucknerburch.com


CAPITOL BUILDING SUPPLY: Faces "Kennedy" Lawsuit Under FLSA
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan M. Kennedy, Jr. v. Capitol Building Supply, Inc., and
Gypsum Management & Supply, Inc., Case 1:15-cv-02327 (D.Md., Aug.
7, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid wages, liquidated damages,
interest, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under the Federal
Fair Labor Standards Act and unpaid wages, interest, reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs under Maryland Wage and Hour Law,
Maryland Code Annotated, Labor and Employment Article.

Defendants are the distributers and supplier of drywall,
acoustical panels, metal framing, insulation, joint compound and
various other products related to interior construction.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Steven M. Lubar, Esq.
     Benjamin L. Davis III, Esq.
     THE LAW OFFICES OF PETER T. NICHOLL
     36 South Charles Street, Suite 1700
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Tel: (410) 244-7005
     Fax: (410) 244-8454
     E-mail: slubar@nicholllaw.com
             bdavis@nicholllaw.com


COLLECTO INC: Faces "Jackson" Suit in Cal. Over FDCPA Violation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fernando Jackson, Bryce Evans, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated v. Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA, Case
No. 5:15-cv-01609 (C.D. Cal., August 9, 2015), is brought against
the Defendants for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Matthew M. Loker, Esq.
      Mona Amini, Esq.
      Seyed Abbas Kazerounian, Esq.
      KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP APC
      245 Fischer Avenue Unit D1
      Costa Mesa, CA 92626
      Telephone: (800) 400-6808
      Facsimile: (800) 520-5523
      E-mail: ml@kazlg.com
              mona@kazlg.com
              ak@kazlg.com

         - and -

      Alexander H. Lim, Esq.
      Joshua B. Swigart, Esq.
      HYDE AND SWIGART APC
      7121 Magnolia Avenue Suite J
      Riverside, CA 92504
      Telephone: (951) 784-7773
      Facsimile: (619) 297-1022
      E-mail: alex@westcoastlitigation.com
              josh@westcoastlitigation.com


COMCAST CORPORATION: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, Action Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan Konopca, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 3:15-cv-06044 (D.N.J.,
August 6, 2015), seeks to stop the Defendant's practice of
contacting the Plaintiff on the cellular telephone using an
automated telephone dialing system and prerecorded messages.

Comcast Corporation operates a mass media company with its
principal place of business located at 1701 John F Kennedy Blvd,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Yitzchak Zelman, Esq.
      MARCUS ZELMAN, LLC
      1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
      Ocean, NJ 07712
      Telephone: (347) 526-4093
      Facsimile: (732) 298-6256
      E-mail: yzelman@marcuszelman.com


CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR: Faces "Hatmaker" Suit Over ERISA Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
Betty Hatmaker, Charlene Edwards, and all others similarly-
situated v. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-
00351 (E.D. Tenn., August 12, 2015), is brought against the
Defendant for breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

This action is brought on behalf of Y-12 retirees in the United
States seeking to either restore their healthcare benefits to the
levels that existed prior to January 1, 2015, or to be reimbursed
for the value of the increased out-of-pocket costs and the
reduction in the level of benefits suffered by the Plaintiffs and
the members of the Classes as a result of changes made to their
retiree healthcare benefits by the Defendant.

The Defendant established and maintained the CNS Retire Healthcare
Plan for the purpose of providing subsidized retiree medical and
prescription drug benefits to former employees of the Contractors
who met certain age and service requirements, and of providing
similar benefits to the eligible spouses and dependents of
retirees from the Contractors. The Defendant's principal place of
business is in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Gregory F. Coleman, Esq.
    GREG COLEMAN LAW PC
    First Tennessee Plaza
    800 S. Gay Street, Suite 1100
    Knoxville, TN 37929
    Tel: (865) 247-0080
    Fax: (865) 522-0049
    E-mail: greg@gregcolemanlaw.com


CO'R RESTAURANT: Sued in N.Y. Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eugenio Enrique Ballinas Villares, Leonel Garcia Lopez, Angel
Gonzalez, Alberto Marticorena, and Jose Rodriguez, individually
and in behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. Co'r
Restaurant, L.L.C., d/b/a O'Reilly's Pub, and Cornelius O'Reilly,
Case No. 1:15-cv-06196 (S.D.N.Y., August 6, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in
violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a full-service restaurant doing
business as O'Reilly's Pub and located at 54 West 31st Street, New
York, New York.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John Gurrieri, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF JUSTIN A. ZELLER
      277 Broadway, Suite 408
      New York, NY 10007
      Telephone: (212) 884-0935
      Facsimile: (212) 224-2246
      E-mail: jmgurrieri@zellerlegal.com


CYBEX INTERNATIONAL: Recalls Arm Curl Machines
----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Cybex International, Inc., of Medway, Mass., announced a voluntary
recall of about 4,400 Arm Curl Machines. Consumers should stop
using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to
resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

The swivel handles can break off from the frame causing users to
hit themselves in the face or head, posing an impact injury
hazard.

This recall involves four models of exercise machines that allow
consumers to use the resistance from the selected weight to
perform bicep curls. The user sits on an adjustable seat, selects
the amount of weight, and grabs the swivel handles to perform a
curl motion towards them. The recall affects the VR2, VR2TA,
Eagle, and the VR3 models with the following serial numbers. A
complete list of serial numbers is available at www.cybexintl.com.
The serial number is located on the frame tube of the weight stack
by the floor. Cybex and the model name are printed on the top of
the machine.

  Models                  Serial Numbers starting with
  ------                  ----------------------------
  VR2 Arm Curl            451691S068646, 4535XXXX
                          A01-050 through A03-230
                          SN #1, SN#0006
                          X05-070 through X12-230
                          Y01-090 through Y12-300
                          Z01-060 through Z12-200

  VR2TA Arm Curl          A01-100 through A12-190
                          B01-260 through B09-180
                          X10-230
                          Y10-210, Y12-310
                          Z02-240 through Z12-160

  Eagle Arm Curl          1107090W through 1107098X
                          A01-061 through A12-291
                          B01-081 through B12-281
                          C01-091 through C10-311
                          X01-071 through X12-311
                          Y01-131 through Y12-311
                          Z01-051 through  Z12-301

  VR3 Arm Curl            1005120708168N
                          A01-051 through A12-291
                          B00-121 through B12-281
                          C01-041 through C10-311
                          Z09-061 through Z12-281

The firm has received 108 reports of incidents, including 12
reports of injury to users. One injury involved loss of sight to
one eye.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/qhaunsb

The recalled products were manufactured in United States and sold
at Cybex or its distributors directly to gyms from November 1996
through October 2008 for between $3,700 and $4,200.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled product and
contact the firm for a free repair kit. Cybex is contacting
purchasers of the recalled arm curl machines directly.


DEPOTEXAS INC: "Lopez" Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid Wages
---------------------------------------------------------
Jesse Lopez, and all others similarly situated v. DepoTexas, Inc.,
Zach Miller, Michael Clepper, and Fabian Rodriguez, Case No. 5:15-
cv-00682 (W.D. Tex., August 12, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid
wages, damages, pre and post-judgment interest, attorney's fees,
expenses, expert fees, and costs of court pursuant to the Fair
Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants provide deposition services and litigation support
solutions for law firms. It is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Glenn D. Levy, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF GLENN D. LEVY
      906 Basse, Suite 100
      San Antonio, TX 78212
      Tel: (210) 822-5666
      Fax: (210) 822-5650
      E-mail: glenn@glennlevylaw.com


DOT HILL: Faces "Ira" Suit in Del. Over Proposed Seagate Merger
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry A. Sacks Ira and The Sacks Family Trust, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated v. Dot Hill Systems
Corp., et al., Case No. 11428 (D. Del., August 25, 2015), is
brought on behalf of all the public shareholders of Dot Hill
Systems Corp. to enjoin the self-interested, inadequate, and
opportunistic buyout transaction of Dot Hill by Seagate Technology
plc.

Dot hill systems Corp. is a Delaware corporation that provides
software and hardware solutions services for storing, sharing,
protecting, and managing data.

Seagate Technology plc is a New York Stock Exchange traded company
which is engaged in data storage, among other things.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Seth D. Rigrodsky, Esq.
      Brian D. Long, Esq.
      Gina M. Serra, Esq.
      Jeremy J. Riley, Esq
      RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A.
      2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120
      Wilmington, DE 19803
      Telephone: (302) 295-5310
      E-mail: sdr@rl-legal.com
              bdl@rl-legal.com
              gms@rl-legal.com
              jjr@rl-legal.com

         - and -

      THE GRANT LAW FIRM, PLLC
      Lynda J. Grant
      521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor
      New York, NY 10175
      Telephone: (212) 292-4441


ECO WASTE: "Ordonez" Seeks to Recover Unpaid Overtime Pay
---------------------------------------------------------
Fredy Ordonez, and all others similarly situated v. Eco Waste and
Recycling, LLC and Manbro Contracting, LLC, Case No. 4:15-cv-02324
(S.D. Tex., August 12, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid overtime
compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees pursuant to
the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Defendants operate a dump truck haulage business and provide
waste management.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Josef F. Buenker, Esq.
      2030 North Loop West, Suite 120
      Houston, TX 77018
      Tel: (713) 868-3388
      Fax: (713) 683-9940


EL REY: Faces "Bue" Suit Under FLSA, Illinois Minimum Wage Law
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ismeal Bue, on behalf of himself, and all other plaintiffs
similarly situated, known and unknown, v. El Rey USA Meats and
Seafood, Inc., and Daniel Leon, Individually, Case: 1:15-cv-07039
(N.D.Ill., Aug. 12, 2015), was brought under the Fair Labor
Standards Act, the Portal-to-Portal Act, and the Illinois Minimum
Wage Law.

El Rey USA Meats and Seafood, Inc. sells food to merchants in
Chicagoland area and the Midwest.  Daniel Leon is the owner of El
Rey USA Meats and Seafood.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     John William Billhorn, Esq.
     BILLHORN LAW FIRM
     53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 840
     Chicago, IL 60604
     Phone: (312) 853-1450


EXQUISITO RESTAURANT: Faces "Franco" Suit Over Unpaid OT Wages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jose A. Franco, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated employees v. Argeney Nunoz, and Exquisito Restaurant
Inc., Case 1:15-cv-04645 (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 7, 2015), alleges that
Defendants failed to pay Plaintiffs minimum and over-time wages
under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.

Argeney Nunoz operates Exquisito Restaurant.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Richard M. Garbarini, Esq.
     GARBARINI FITZGERALD P.C.
     250 Park Avenue
     7th Floor
     New York, NY 10177
     Tel: (212) 300-5358
     Fax: (888) 265-7054


EZCORP INC: Block & Leviton Files Securities Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------
Block & Leviton LLP (www.blockesq.com), a securities litigation
firm representing investors nationwide, has filed a class action
securities litigation alleging violations of the federal
securities laws against EZCORP, Inc. ("EZCORP" or the "Company")
(NASDAQ: EZPW) and two of its officers, who are also members of
its board of directors.

The case is pending in the United District Court for the Western
District of Texas, Austin Division and is captioned Rooney v.
EZCORP Inc. et al, Case Number 1:15-cv-700. Shareholders have
until September 18, 2015, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in
this action. The Complaint was brought on behalf of all investors
who purchased or otherwise acquired EZCORP's securities (the
"Class") between October 27, 2014 and July 16, 2015 (the "Class
Period").

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period,
defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to
disclose material information, including with respect to the
Company's accounting of Grupo Finmart's structured asset sales. As
a result, on July 17, 2015, the Company announced that it would
restate its financial statements for fiscal 2014 (including the
interim periods within that year) and the first quarter of fiscal
2015. EZCORP also announced that the previously issued financial
statements for those periods should no longer be relied upon. This
news caused EZCORP's share price to drop substantially, harming
investors.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of all Class members.
If you are a shareholder who purchased securities of EZCORP during
the Class Period, you have until September 18, 2015 to seek
appointment as a lead plaintiff in this action. This deadline is
mandated by federal law and cannot be extended. Your ability to
share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision to
serve or seek appointment as lead plaintiff.

If you have questions about the lawsuit, would like a copy of the
Complaint, possess information relevant to this investigation, or
seek information about any of the foregoing, please contact
attorney Steven Harte, at (617) 398-5600 or email him at
Steven@blockesq.com. Block & Leviton is also experienced at
representing whistleblowers and encourages any insiders with
information about the allegations to contact them.
Confidentiality is assured.

Steven Harte, Esq.
BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
155 Federal St Suite 400, Boston, MA 02110
(617) 398-5600
Email: Steven@blockesq.com


FIRST INDEX: All American Painting Sues for TCPA Violation
----------------------------------------------------------
All American Painting, L.L.C., individually and as a
representative of a class of similarly-situated persons v. First
Index, Inc., Case: 4:15-cv-01230 (E.D.Mo., Aug. 12, 2015), seeks
an award of statutory damages for each violation of the federal
Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Phillip A. Bock, Esq.
     Brian J. Wanca, Esq.
     Ryan M. Kelly, Esq.
     ANDERSON + WANCA
     3701 Algonquin Rd., Ste. 760
     Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
     Tel: 847-368-1500

        - and -

     Phillip A. Bock, Esq.
     Tod A. Lewis, Esq.
     James M. Smith, Esq.
     BOCK & HATCH, LLC
     134 N. La Salle St., Ste. 1000
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Tel: 312-658-5500

        - and -

     Max Margulis, Esq.
     MARGULIS LAW GROUP
     28 Old Belle Monte Rd.
     Chesterfield, MO 63017
     Tel: 636/536-7022
     E-mail: MaxMargulis@Margulislaw.com


FIRSTSOURCE ADVANTAGE: Faces "Pollack" Suit Over FDCPA Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
Avrohom Pollak, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-06046 -
MAS-DEA (D.N.J., August 6, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Yitzchak Zelman, Esq.
      MARCUS ZELMAN, LLC
      1500 Allaire Avenue, Suite 101
      Ocean, NJ 07712
      Telephone: (347) 526-4093
      Facsimile: (732) 298-6256
      E-mail: yzelman@marcuszelman.com


GORDON AYLWORTH: Faces "Olson" Suit in Wash. Over FDCPA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Olson a/k/a Jennifer Miller, on behalf of herself and all
other similarly situated v. Gordon, Aylworth & Tami, P.C. et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01239 (W.D. Wash., August 6, 2015), is brought
against the Defendants for violation of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jennifer Olson
      PRO SE


GOT WARRANTY: Has Made Unsolicited Calls, "Mey" Suit Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Diana Mey, individually and on behalf of a class of , all persons
and entities similarly situated v. Got Warranty, Inc., N.C.W.C.,
Inc., Palmer Administrative Services, Inc., Case No. 5:15-cv-00101
(N.D. W. Va., August 6, 2015), seeks to put an end on the
Defendants' practice of placing computer-dialed telemarketing
calls to consumers' cellular telephone.

The Defendants own and operate a car dealership company in West
Virginia.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John W. Barrett, Esq.
      Jonathan R. Marshall, Esq.
      BAILEY & GLASSER LLP
      209 Capitol Street
      Charleston, WV 25301
      Telephone: (304) 345-6555
      E-mail: jbarrett@baileyglasser.com
              jmarshall@baileyglasser.com

         - and -

      Edward A. Broderick, Esq.
      Anthony Paronich, Esq.
      BRODERICK LAW, P.C.
      99 High St., Suite 304
      Boston, MA 02110
      Telephone: (617) 738-7080
      E-mail: ted@broderick-law.com
              anthony@broderick-law.com

         - and -

      Matthew P. McCue, Esq.
      THE LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW P.MCCUE
      1 South Avenue, Suite 3
      Natick, MA 01760
      Telephone: (508) 655-1415
      Facsimile: (508) 319-3077
      E-mail: mmccue@massattorneys.net


GRACO CHILDREN'S: Faces Class Suit Over "Troubling" Car-Seat
------------------------------------------------------------
Jessica Dye, writing for Reuters, reported that a federal judge in
California has asked the court's committee on attorney conduct to
examine what he described as the "troubling" behavior of Graco
Children's Products and its outside counsel in a proposed class
action over recalled child car seats.

While U.S. District Judge James Donato in the Northern District of
California declined in order to sanction Graco or its attorneys
from Schiff Hardin, he said he would refer his concerns over their
representations about the availability of full refunds to
purchasers of the seats to the district's Standing Committee on
Professional Conduct "for further consideration and
recommendation."


HUFFY: Recalls Bicycles with Front Disc Brakes
----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, announced a voluntary
recall of about 460 Huffy bicycles equipped with front disc
brakes. Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

An open quick release lever on the bicycle's front wheel hub can
come into contact with the front disc brake assembly, causing the
front wheel to come to a sudden stop or separate from the bicycle,
posing a risk of injury to the rider.

The recalled products are all model year 2014 Huffy TR 745 and TR-
S 740 bicycles with 27.5-inch wheels. "Huffy" is on the downtube
of the frame of both bicycles and model name TR 745 or TR-S 740 is
on the rear portion of the frame. The TR 745 has a green frame
with model number 26504M on the bottom of the frame near the
pedals. The TR-S 740 has a white frame and model number 26604M on
the bottom of the frame near the pedals. Bicycles that have a
green dot on the inside of the quick release lever are not
included in this recall.

No consumer incidents have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/o4bythr

The recalled products were manufactured in China and sold at
Walmart.com, Sears Puerto Rico and The Northwest Company (Cost U
Less) from September 2014 through May 2015 for between $250 to
$370.

Consumers should stop using the bicycles immediately and contact
Huffy for a free replacement quick release lever for the front
wheel.


JAGUAR: NJ Woman Sues Over Land Rover Battery Drain Problems
------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Wood, writing for Car Copmlaint, reported that Jaguar
Land Rover LR2 battery drain problems might be the focus of a
class-action lawsuit after New Jersey resident Amy Block filed
suit over her 2009 Land Rover LR2.

Block says she bought her Land Rover LR2 for $32,000 but the
battery constantly drained from alleged defects in the electrical
systems. She claims Land Rover concealed the problem from
consumers since at least 2007 and when she complained about her
own problems, all she got was a replacement battery.

However, the plaintiff says the new battery did nothing to fix the
alleged defects that cause the batteries to drain.

The lawsuit names the entertainment system, battery and other
electrical systems as a burden to owners and an unnecessary cost
to maintain. The plaintiff claims consumers wouldn't have bought
the Land Rover vehicles if the automaker would have told consumers
about the alleged defects.

In addition, the lawsuit alleges owners paid too much for their
Land Rover vehicles because of constant repairs needed to keep the
batteries operating. The plaintiff further claims Jaguar Land
Rover sold and advertised the Land Rover LR2 knowing it contained
defective systems that caused drained batteries and vehicles that
are unable to start.

The lawsuit accuses Jaguar Land Rover of violations of the New
Jersey Consumer Fraud Act with the plaintiffs seeking damages,
injunctive relief and restitution from the automaker in an amount
of more than $5 million.

The proposed Jaguar Land Rover class-action lawsuit includes
owners and lessees of the 2008-2015 Land Rover LR2. Additionally,
the lawsuit includes other Land Rover vehicles that have the same
alleged defects that cause the batteries to drain.

The Jaguar Land Rover battery drain lawsuit was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of New Jersey - Block v. Jaguar
Land Rover North America, LLC.


LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION: Ruling Eases LSAT Accommodations Process
--------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Sloan, writing for The National Law Journal, reported that
Elizabeth Hennessey-Severson wasn't sure she wanted to be a named
plaintiff in a class action against the organization that
administers the Law School Admission Test. It might hurt her
chances of getting into law school, she worried.

But the aspiring lawyer thought about others like herself who had
struggled with disabilities, she said -- in her case, attention-
deficit hyperactivity disorder and dyslexia, among others -- but
were denied accommodations during the test.

"There are so many other people who would benefit from a change in
policies," Hennessey-Severson said.

In 2012, she became one of 22 named plaintiffs who alleged the Law
School Admission Council's accommodation procedures violated the
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). On Aug. 7, U.S. Magistrate
Judge Joseph Spero issued the latest ruling in the litigation,
upholding most of an expert panel's plan for making the
accommodation process less burdensome.

In May 2014, the council entered into a consent decree with the
U.S. Department of Justice and the state of California creating
the panel, but later argued its recommended reforms exceeded the
experts' mandate.

The proposals Spero sustained include the automatic referral to an
outside expert when the council rejects an accommodation and
allowing submission of medical documents dating to when the test
taker was 13 years old. The judge also said the council could tie
the proof it demands to the level of accommodation sought. For
example, people seeking 50 percent extra time or more to complete
the test would require more evidence than those seeking lesser
accommodations."The department is pleased that the judge upheld
the work of the best-practices panel and looks forward to the
[council's] implementation of their guidelines," Justice
Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson said.

A spokeswoman for the council declined to comment. The parties
have until Oct. 6 to file an appeal.
CLARITY SEEN

"Requiring the [council] to articulate their reasons for denying
accommodations is very important," said Angeli Rios, president of
the National Association of Law Students With Disabilities, which
tracked the litigation. "It allows for clarity, because I've heard
from many students who said they didn't know how to proceed
because they didn't know why they were denied."

Under the consent decree, the council agreed to stop "flagging"
LSAT scores -- alerting law schools when LSAT takers received
extra time -- and paid nearly $8 million to more than 6,000 people
who applied for accommodations between 2009 and 2014.L. Scott
Lissner, past president of the Association on Higher Education and
Disability and Americans With Disabilities Act coordinator at Ohio
State University, said university compliance officers and
disability service providers followed the lawsuit closely.

Spero's ruling "reads like a good template for most high-stakes
testing," he said. "Potentially, this ruling has a lot of informal
significance. It's well-written and informative. I think other
testing bodies will pay attention."

The ADA requires reasonable accommodations for the disabled; in
standardized testing, those typically sought include extra time,
extra breaks between test sections or separate testing rooms.

Disability advocates have long considered the council's
accommodations screening too stringent, and many would-be test
takers have filed individual lawsuits over the years.

Jo Anne Simon, an attorney in New York, said she has represented
hundreds of people denied accommodations. "I think every
disability-rights attorney wants to work themselves out of a job,
and that might the case here," Simon said following Spero's
ruling.
WARNINGS

Council administrators long argued necessity, because the LSAT
carries so much weight in admissions. Their research suggests LSAT
scores, earned under standardized conditions, are the single best
predictor of success during the first year of law school.

That value will decline if more takers win accommodations, said
Pepperdine University School of Law professor Derek Muller.

"It's certainly a laudable goal to extend as many protections as
possible to people with disabilities, but this is another way of
making the LSAT less predictive," he said. "It comes at a cost.
Admissions departments and law schools will have to figure out
better ways of determining the quality of their applicants."

A coalition of neuropsychology and psychology organizations in
June filed an amicus brief opposing some of the panel's
recommendations.

"Students who enter law school based on inflated [LSAT] scores
from unnecessary accommodations are at financial risk if they
enter law school without the reading, writing, organization,
planning and reasoning abilities that are crucial to studying
law," the brief reads.

The council receives about 2,000 requests for LSAT accommodations
each year, about half of which it grants in some form. Learning
disorders are the most common disabilities cited, followed by
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and visual impairments.

The five-member expert panel, which was jointly appointed by the
parties, concluded the council demanded too many supporting
documents -- more than did other standardized-testing authorities.

And it recommended the council approach accommodations with an eye
toward saying yes, rather than no.

Matthew Kaplan estimates he spent more than $3,000 on two days of
testing to document his dyslexia and dysgraphia -- a condition
that impairs one's ability to write. Even with his doctor's
endorsement and a history of accommodations in high school,
college and on the SAT, the council in 2011 denied his request for
extra time. The following year he joined the class action.

"The [council] is the gatekeeper to entry into the legal
profession, and it starts with the LSAT," said Kaplan, who soon
will begin his third year at the University of the District of
Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law. "They don't see that
picture. They're just interested in protecting their turf."

Hennessey-Severson (left) is also headed to campus this fall, at
Boston University School of Law. She asked for extra time on the
LSAT due to her learning disorders, and was approved. She
considered other graduate degrees as the class action wound
through the courts, but ultimately was determined to become a
lawyer.

"I just hope people don't have to bend over backwards to get the
accommodations they need, the way we had to," she said.


LINC ENERGY: Faces Class Suit Over 'Toxic' Damage
-------------------------------------------------
Justin Searle, writing for The Chronicle, reported that Hopeland
landholders on the western Darling Downs have instructed law firm
Universal Law to launch a class action in respect of damage and
other potential harm caused by Linc Energy.

Hopeland Community Sustainability Group spokeswoman Shay Dougall
said the class action came after criminal prosecution launched
against Linc Energy by the Department of Environment and Heritage
Protection.

The department alleges Linc Energy's underground coal gasification
mining caused "widespread, of high impact and, in part,
irreversible" damage to prime agricultural land in and around the
Hopeland area.

Mrs Dougall said solicitor Cameron Bell, of Universal Law, was
collecting evidence from landholders about coal seam gas and
underground coal gasification mining.

"Mr Bell has for some time taken an active interest in assisting
us with our grievances," she said.

"However, the evidence now obtained by EHP provides the potential
for an action against Linc Energy for the harm caused by
underground coal gasification activities over the last 10 years.

"For too long we've been expected to sit back quietly and accept
the mining companies' assertions that their activities are not
affecting our lands, our water and our health.

"Now we want full disclosure from the miners and the government.

"This class action should serve as a reminder to those responsible
for the development of such projects that the interests of
corporations should never override the rights of a community to
health, water, food, housing.

"The governments that allow these developments must also be held
accountable for undertaking adequate risk manage before they're
approved and for stringently following-through if they are
approved."

"It's just not right that a community is told it must deal with
all these problems that have been thrust upon us just so some
international mining companies can make a buck, cheered on by both
state and federal governments."

A Linc Energy spokesman said: "Linc Energy believes this class
action is premature given the Department's case against us is not
even at the committal hearing stage.

"Linc Energy is firmly of the view that the department commenced
these proceedings without sufficient scientific evidence and,
based upon our detailed knowledge of the operations and
environment at our demonstration facility, the allegations were
taken out of context and/or are simply incorrect.

"Even after extensive regional surveys, the Department sill
concludes that there is no risk to public health, air quality,
groundwater, surface waters, soils or agricultural productivity."


LONMIN & PROTEA: Marikana Victims Seek R4.5-Mil.
------------------------------------------------
Athandiwe Saba, writing for News24, reported that the lawyers of
mine workers wounded and arrested during the Marikana massacre are
claiming not only R1 billion in damages from the state, but also
more millions from mining company Lonmin and Protea Coin Security.

Papers filed on by Nkome Attorneys for the 274 mine workers who
were wounded and arrested in the lead-up to and after the August
16 2012 massacre say they are seeking an additional R4.5 million
from Lonmin and Protea Coin Security, the company Lonmin hired to
beef up security.

"We have brought in Lonmin and Protea Coin Security because people
were assaulted and badly injured by the security contracted by
Lonmin," said attorney Andries Nkome.

The claim against Lonmin was filed with the mine workers' class
action against President Jacob Zuma, Police Minister Nathi Nhleko
and the National Prosecuting Authority.

In court papers, the miners say Zuma should have protected their
constitutional rights, including their rights to life and human
dignity. They also say Zuma should have refrained from "launching
a premature operation ... destined to result in loss of life".

The mine workers say Zuma should have intervened with police and
persuaded Lonmin to engage and negotiate with strikers.

The R1 billion total is broken down into three different claims.

The first is based on the severity of the emotional and physical
scarring the mine workers incurred. Each of the 274 miners is
asking for R1.5 million for past and future medical expenses, past
loss of earning capacity and general damages.

The second claim, worth R1 million per claimant, relates to the
unlawful arrest and detention of the miners after August 16 2012.

The third, for R500 000 each, is for malicious prosecution -- they
were charged with the murders of their 34 colleagues, as well as
public violence and breaching the dangerous weapons and gatherings
acts.

Nkome told City Press the amount of R3 million per miner was only
an average. The youngest mine worker to survive the massacre,
Mzoxolo Magidiwana, is claiming R7 million from the state.

He was shot numerous times with an automatic R5 rifle, leaving him
with a ruptured small bowel, as well as a fractured leg, hip and
wrist. He uses a walking stick and has not returned to work since
the incident, which left him in a coma for two weeks.

His claim includes his medical bills, as he was admitted to
Lonmin's Andrew Saffy Memorial Hospital in Wonderkop and then
transferred to Sunninghill Hospital. He stayed in intensive care
until early November.

"As a result of the assault and the arrest, the plaintiff has
suffered, and will suffer, damages in the amount of R5.5 million,
made up of past medical expenses, past and future loss of earnings
and general damages," reads Magidiwana's claim.

Nkome did warn that if the state, Lonmin and Protea Coin Security
used delaying tactics and dragged the case out, the defendants
could be paid more than R1 billion.

"We are very confident we can win these cases because the parties
have already made concessions at the [Farlam] commission [of
inquiry] and there is video footage proving our case," said Nkome.

"President [Zuma] took his time releasing the report and
[Advocate] Dali Mpofu and the team were left with only two months
to compile close to 300 summons for lawsuits."

Nkome said none of the responding parties had filed responding
papers


LOPEFRA CORP: Faces "Llopiz" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jorge Llopiz, and others similarly-situated v. Lopefra Corp. and
Cecilio Lopez, Case No. 1:15-cv-23189-CMA (S.D. Fla., August 25,
2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants own and operate a construction company that
regularly transacts business within Miami-Dade County, Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Daniel T. Feld, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL T. FELD, P.A.
      20801 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 403
      Aventura, FL 33180
      Telephone: (786) 923-5899
      E-mail: DanielFeld.Esq@gmail.com

         - and -

      Isaac Mamane, Esq.
      MAMANE LAW LLC
      1150 Kane Concourse, Second Floor
      Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154
      Telephone (305)773-6661
      E-mail: mamane@gmail.com



MADEWELL INC: Recalls Sightseer Sandals Due to Fall Hazard
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Madewell Inc., of New York, N.Y., announced a voluntary recall of
about 50,600 Sandals (in addition about 300 were sold in Canada).
Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

The metal shank can dislodge and break through bottom of the
outsole, posing a fall hazard.

This recall involves all Madewell Sightseer sandals from the
spring 2015 collection. Sandals with the following 10 style
numbers and names in all sizes are being recalled:

  --- C0275 Sightseer Knotted Slide Sandal
  --- C0276 Sightseer T-Strap Thong Sandal in Black Leather
  --- C0277 Sightseer T-Strap Thong Sandal in Metallic Colorblock
  --- C0278 Sightseer Buckle Gladiator Sandal
  --- C0279 Sightseer Slide Sandal
  --- C1105 Sightseer Crisscross Sandal
  --- C5893 Sightseer T-Strap Toe-Loop Sandal
  --- C5895 Sightseer Ankle-Wrap Sandal in Shiny Silver
  --- C5897 Sightseer Lace-Up Sandal
  --- C6090 Sightseer Ankle-Wrap Sandal in Metallic Sand

The style number is located on a sticker on the outsole.

The firm has received eight reports of metal shanks dislodging and
breaking through the bottom of the outsole. No injuries have been
reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/ojohkjm

The recalled products were manufactured in Brazil and sold at
Madewell stores, online at madewell.com, online at shopbop.com
from February 2015 to July 2015 for between $60 and $80.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled shoes and
contact Madewell to return them for a full refund.


MAN WEI: Faces "Ding" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ai Ming Ding, and Jin Wei Wang, on their own behalf and on behalf
of all others similarly situated v. Man Wei & Son US Inc., Wei Jun
Liang, John Doe and Jane Doe # 1-10, Case No. 1:15-cv-04982
(E.D.N.Y., August 25, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for
failure to pay overtime wages for work in excess of 40 hours per
week.

The Defendants own and operate a business that provides
appliances, hand & power tools, hardware, lighting, and other
products for the home.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jian Hang, Esq.
      HANG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
      136-18 39th Ave., Suite 1003
      Flushing, NY 11354
      Telephone: (718) 353-8588
      E-mail: jhang@hanglaw.com


MEDSPEED LLC: Faces "Williams" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quadria Williams, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. MedSpeed LLC, Case No. 2015CH12744 (D. Ill.,
August 25, 2015),  is brought against the Defendants for failure
to pay overtime wages in violation of the Illinois Minimum Wage
Law and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act.

MedSpeed LLC owns and operates a healthcare transportation company
headquartered in Elmhurst, Illinois.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      James X. Bonnes, Esq.
      Catherine Sons, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF JAMES X. BONNES, P.C.
      8 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 2600
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 201-0575
      E-mail: jxbonnes@bonneslaw.com
              cpsons@bonneslaw.com

         - and -

      Thomas M. Ryan, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M. RYAN, P.C.
      35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 650
      Chicago, IL 60601
      Telephone: (312) 726-3400
      E-mail: tom@tomryanlaw.com


MERGE HEALTHCARE: Faces Suit in Ill. Over Prop. Merger With IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------
Monte Montierth, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Merge Healthcare Incorporated, et al., Case
No. 2015-CH-12749 (D. Ill., August 25, 2015), is brought on behalf
of all the public shareholders of Merge Healthcare Incorporated to
enjoin the proposed acquisition of Merge by International Business
Machines Corporation for an unfair price and inadequate
consideration.

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Merge is a provider of medical
imaging.

International Business Machines Corporation is a technology and
consulting corporation that manufactures and markets computer
hardware, middleware and software, and offers infrastructure,
hosting and consulting services in areas from mainframe computers
to nanotechnology.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Vincent L. DiTommaso, Esq.
      Peter S. Lubin, Esq.
      DITOMMASO LUBIN, P.C.
      17W 220 22nd Street, Suite 410
      Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
      Telephone: (630) 333-0000
      E-mail: vdt@ditommasolaw.com
              psl@ditommasolaw.com

         - and -

      Julia J. Sun, Esq.
      LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
      30 Broad Street, 24th Floor
      New York, NY 10004
      Telephone: (212) 363-7500


MERGE HEALTHCARE: Faces "Gerard" Suit Over Prop. Merger With IBM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Howard Gerard, Sr., individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Merge Healthcare, Inc., et al., Case No.
2015CH12740 (D. Ill., August 25, 2015), is brought on behalf of
all the public shareholders of Merge Healthcare Incorporated to
enjoin the proposed acquisition of Merge by International Business
Machines Corporation for an unfair price and inadequate
consideration.

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Merge is a provider of medical
imaging.

International Business Machines Corporation is a technology and
consulting corporation that manufactures and markets computer
hardware, middleware and software, and offers infrastructure,
hosting and consulting services in areas from mainframe computers
to nanotechnology.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Marvin A. Miller, Esq.
      Lori A. Fanning, Esq.
      Andrew Szot, Esq.
      MILLER LAW LLC
      115 S. LaSalle Street
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 332-3400
      Facsimile: (312) 676-2676
      E-mail: mmiller@millerlawllc.com
              lfanning@millerlawllc.com
              aszot@millerlawllc.com

         - and -

      Peter Safirstein, Esq.
      Elizabeth Metcalf, Esq.
      MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
      28 West 44th Street, Suite 2001
      New York, NY 10036
      Telephone: (212) 564-1637
      Facsimile: (212) 952-9458
      E-mail: psafirstein@morganseclaw.com


MM CONSTRUCTION: Fails to Pay Employees OT Wages, Suit Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Felipe Torres, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated v. MM Construction Systems Inc. a/k/a MM Roofing &
Construction Services Inc., and Pedro Moreno, Case No. 3:15-cv-
02773-M (N.D. Tex., August 25, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime and minimum wages for work
performed in excess of 40 hours weekly.

The Defendants own and operate a construction company that
regularly transacts business within Dallas County, Texas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      J.H. Zidell, Esq.
      Robert L. Manteuffel, Esq.
      Joshua A. Petersen, Esq.
      J.H. ZIDELL, P.C.
      6310 LBJ Freeway, Ste. 112
      Dallas, TX 75240
      Telephone: (972) 233-2264
      Facsimile: (972) 386-7610
      E-mail: zabogado@aol.com
              rlmanteuffel@sbcglobal.net
              josh.a.petersen@gmail.com


MONSTER INC: Sued in Cal. Over Misleading Cable Products Label
--------------------------------------------------------------
Benjamin Perez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Monster Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-
03885-JCS (N.D. Cal., August 25, 2015), arises from the
Defendants' alleged false and misleading labels of Monster brand
High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) cables.

Monster Inc. is a California corporation that researches, designs,
markets and distributes HDMI cables nationwide.

Best Buy Co., Inc. is a Minnesota corporation that operates as a
consumer electronics retailer.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      L. Timothy Fisher, Esq.
      Julia A. Luster, Esq.
      BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
      1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
      Walnut Creek, CA 94596
      Telephone: (925) 300-4455
      Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
      E-mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
              jluster@bursor.com

         - and -

      Scott A. Bursor, Esq.
      BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
      888 Seventh Avenue
      New York, NY 10019
      Telephone: (212) 989-9113
      Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
      E-mail: scott@bursor.com


NABORS INDUSTRIES: Faces Lawsuit Seeking Remedies Under FLSA
------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Barton, Lawrence "Wayne" Bruce, Michael L. Fuller, Jr.,
Dallas Hardaway, Randal "Randy" Hardaway, Kevin Todd Reed, and
James Patrick Stewart, Each Individually and on Behalf of all
Other Persons Similarly Situated Current and Former
Workers/Employees of Defendants v. Nabors Industries, Ltd., Nabors
Industries, Inc., and Express Payroll, Inc., Case 6:15-cv-00733
(E.D.Tex., Aug. 7, 2015), seeks remedies under the Fair Labor
Standards Act.

Nabors owns and operates land-based drilling rig fleet and is a
provider of offshore platform workover and drilling rigs in the
U.S. and multiple international markets.

Payroll Express, Inc. provides human resource products and
services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     William l. Sciba, III, Esq.
     302 West Forrest
     Victoria, TX 77901
     COLE, EASLEY, SCIBA & WILLIAMS, P.C.
     Phone: (361) 575-0551
     Fax: (361) 575-0986
     E-mail: wsciba@colefirmservice.com


NESTLE INDIA: Food Minister Won't Withraw Class Suit
----------------------------------------------------
The Indian Express reported that Food and Consumer Affairs
Minister Ram Vilas Paswan said that the Centre would not withdraw
its class-action suit against Nestle despite the Bombay High Court
order lifting the ban on Maggi.

The Centre has filed a 640-crore suit against Nestle at National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for "misleading" ads and
"unfair" trade practices.


NESTLE INDIA: Looking to Appeal Decision on Maggi Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
The Telegraph reported that India's food safety regulators are
consulting legal experts to determine whether to appeal against
Bombay High Court's ruling three days ago that questioned the
process they had followed to ban Maggi noodles across the country.

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is
weighing the option of approaching the Supreme Court to defend its
decision to ban the noodles, a senior government official and a
member of an advisory panel to the FSSAI said.

If the FSSAI does appeal, the regulators will need to explain to
the court why they banned the noodles on the basis of test results
from laboratories not accredited for those tests, food safety
analysts not associated with the FSSAI have said.

The FSSAI had on June 5 ordered the recall and ban on the sales of
Maggi noodles citing test results from laboratories in Calcutta,
Delhi, Gujarat, and Chennai, showing high levels of lead. Five of
the six laboratories where the tests were done did not have
accreditation to look for lead in noodles although the FSSAI's own
rules require that such tests should to be done in appropriately
accredited laboratories.

"The FSSAI is still analysing the (high court) order and
consulting legal experts," a senior official in the health
ministry who deals with the FSSAI issues said. "This issue is not
under consideration by this ministry - whether to appeal will be
decided only by the FSSAI," the official added.

Bombay High Court had on ordered that fresh samples of Maggi
noodles should be sent to three independent accredited
laboratories in Hyderabad, Mohali, and Jaipur.

In its order, the court had observed that under the food safety
rules, a laboratory has to pass a "twin test" before it can be
described as a recognised laboratory. The laboratory had to be
accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and
Calibration Laboratories and "over and above that", the laboratory
had to be recognised by the food authority.

"The FSSAI has talked to legal experts and clarity over whether to
appeal or just to wait for the results of the fresh tests will
emerge," said Bejon Misra, a consumer rights' activist and former
member of the food safety authority.

A food safety expert said the FSSAI is in a difficult position.
"Not challenging the high court order would be a loss of face and
appealing against it would require it to explain why it ignored
its own rules relating to accreditation," the expert who asked not
to be named told this newspaper.

A Nestle spokesperson told this newspaper tonight that the company
has no information yet on whether the FSSAI would challenge the
high court ruling.

But a consumer court is expected to begin hearing on a class
action suit against Nestle filed by the department of consumer
affairs seeking about Rs 284 crore as compensation for the
complainant and an additional Rs 355 crore as punitive damages
from the company for "gross negligence, apathy, and callousness".

Food and consumer affairs minister Ram Vilas Paswan has said
Bombay High Court's order quashing the ban on Maggi noodles does
not alter the grounds on which the government stands.


NYK LINE: Faces "Rogers" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------
Rebecca Rogers v. Nyk Line (North America), Inc., Case No. 3:15-
cv-00251-DPM (D. Ark., August 25, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Nyk Line (North America), Inc. owns and operates a shipping
company in Marion, Crittenden County, Arkansas.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Lawrence W. Jackson, Esq.
      Attorney at Law
      P.O. Box 746
      Marion, AR 72364
      Telephone: (870) 559-2150
      Facsimile: (870) 739-4403

         - and -

      Thomas F. Donaldson, Esq.
      Attorney at Law
      P.O. Box 949
      117 East Military Road
      Marion, AR 72364
      Telephone: (870) 739-2588


OSRAM SYLVANIA: Recalls T8 LED Lamps Due to Burn Hazard
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Osram Sylvania, Inc., of Danvers, Mass., announced a voluntary
recall of about 46,300 T8 LED lamps in the U.S. (an additional
8,700 sold in Canada). Consumers should stop using this product
unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt
to resell a recalled consumer product.

Lamps can overheat and melt, posing a burn hazard.

This recall involves SubstiTUBE IS T8 LED lamps. The recalled
lamps are white, cylindrical in shape and measure 48 inches long
and 1 inch in diameter. "OSRAM SubtiTUBE(R) IS LED T8" is printed
on a silver label affixed to the end of lamps. The model number
73312-1 or 73315-1 also appears on the label beneath the statement
"Compatible LED T8 for use with instant start T8 electronic
ballasts."

Osram Sylvania Inc. received 34 reports of overheating and
melting. No injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/nemzxw4

The recalled products were manufactured in South Korea and sold at
Osram Sylvania industrial/commercial distributors between December
2014 and May 2015.

Consumers should immediately stop using the lamps, remove them
from the fixture and immediately contact Osram Sylvania for a free
replacement.


PING AN: Faces "Wang" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime Wages
-------------------------------------------------------------
Guilan Wang, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v.
Ping An Jia Yuan Family Care Services, Inc. d/b/a Jia Jia Yue Zi
Zhong Xin, Jia Lu a/k/a Katy Lu, Case No. 1:15-cv-04987 (E.D.N.Y.,
August 25, 2015), is brought against the Defendants for failure to
pay overtime compensation for all hours worked over 40 each
workweek.

The Defendants own and operate a birth care services company
located at 56-11 136th Street, Flushing, NY 11355.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John Troy, Esq.
      TROY LAW, PLLC
      41-25 Kissena Blvd., Suite 119
      Flushing, NY 11355
      Telephone: (718) 762-1324
      Facsimile: (718) 762-1342
      E-mail: johntroy@pllc.com


PLANAR SYSTEMS: Faruqi Probes $157-MM. Sale to Leyard
-----------------------------------------------------
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities firm
headquartered in New York City, is investigating the Board of
Directors of Planar Systems, Inc. ("Planar" or the "Company")
(Nasdaq:PLNR) for potential breaches of fiduciary duties in
connection with the sale of the Company to Leyard Optoelectronic
Co., Ltd. for approximately $157 million in cash.

The Company's stockholders will only receive $6.58 for each share
of Company common stock they own. However, the offer represents a
inadequate premium since Planar stock traded at $8.68 per share as
recently as December 29, 2014 and at least one Wall Street analyst
price target for Planar stock is at $7.50 per share.

The investigation focuses on whether Planar's Board of Directors
breached their fiduciary duties to the Company's stockholders by
failing to conduct a fair sales process and whether and by how
much this proposed transaction undervalues the Company to the
detriment of Planar's shareholders.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is a national law firm which represents
investors and individuals in class action litigation. The firm is
focused on providing exemplary legal services in complex
litigation in the areas of securities, shareholder, antitrust and
consumer litigation, throughout all phases of litigation. The firm
has an experienced trial team which has achieved significant
victories on behalf of the firm's clients. To keep track of the
latest securities litigation news, follow us on Twitter at
www.twitter.com/MergerActivity or on Facebook at
www.facebook.com/FaruqiLaw.

If you own common stock in Planar and wish to obtain additional
information and protect your investments free of charge, please
visit us at www.faruqilaw.com/PLNR or contact Juan E. Monteverde,
Esq. either via e-mail at jmonteverde@faruqilaw.com or by
telephone at (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330.

Juan E. Monteverde, Esq.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP
369 Lexington Avenue, 10th Floor New York, NY 10017
Toll Free: (877) 247-4292
Phone:    (212) 983-9330
jmonteverde@faruqilaw.com


POSTMATES INC: Does Not Properly Pay Workers, "Peppier" Suit Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Chito Peppier, on behalf of himself and all other persons
similarly situated v. PostMates, Inc., Case No. 2015 CA 006560 B
(D. Colum., August 25, 2015), is brought against the Defendant for
failure to pay minimum wages in violation of the Washington D.C.
Minimum Wage Revision Act and the Wage Payment Collection Law.

PostMates, Inc. is a San Francisco-based courier service that
provides delivery services in cities throughout the country via an
on-demand dispatch system.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Garyt E. Mason, Esq.
      Jason S. Rathod, Esq.
      WHITFIELD BRYSON & MASON LLP
      1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Suite 605
      Washington, D.C. 20036
      Telephone: (202)429-2290
      Facsimile: (202)429-2294
      E-mail: gmason@wbmllp.com
              jrathod@wbmllp.com

         - and -

      Nicholas A. Migliaccio, Esq.
      MIGLIACCIO LAW FIRM PLLC
      438 16th Street SE
      Washington, DC 20003
      Telephone: 202.470.3520
      Facsimile: 202.810.0081
      E-mail: nmigliaccio@cksskwdc.com


PROTECH SECURITY: Faces "Padilla" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriel Padilla, and David Duque, on behalf of themselves, and all
other similarly situated plaintiffs known and unknown v. Protech
Security Group, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-06932 (N.D. Ill., August 7,
2015), is brought against the Defendant for failure to pay
overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standard Act.

Protech Security Group, Inc. is in the business of providing
security services.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      John William Billhorn, Esq.
      BILLHORN LAW FIRM
      53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 840
      Chicago, IL 60604
      Telephone: (312) 853-1450
      E-mail: jbillhorn@billhornlaw.com


PURE FOOD: Faces Class Suit Over Employees' Back Pay
----------------------------------------------------
Nathan Tempey, writing for The Gothamist, reported that former
workers at Gramercy Park's shuttered raw vegan restaurant Pure
Food and Wine and its affiliated juice bar and mail-order snack
operation One Lucky Duck have filed a federal class action lawsuit
against the companies and owner Sarma Melngailis, who vanished in
early July after three weeks of payroll problems.

The newly unionized workers walked out the first week of July
following what they say were first late, then bounced checks,
capped off by a payday with no checks at all. The lawsuit demands
back wages for the about 60 workers, along with 60 days' pay and
$500 per day in penalties for Melngailis's alleged failure to warn
of impending mass layoffs, as required by law.

Investors and vendors are also calling. Workers have said that in
the final weeks the restaurant was out of ingredients for some of
its signature dishes due to unpaid vendor bills, and a state
lawsuit filed by investor Asparagus Trading Corporation claims the
company fronted Melngailis $31,000 for July rent with the
understanding she would hand over the business. She didn't, and
the company claims she siphoned off money meant to stabilize the
restaurant. A judge in that case has ordered Melngailis's
bookkeepers to open up their records for inspection. Because
Melngailis has not been reachable since July, the ruling allows
for her to be served to her by email and snail mail. Melngailis is
also facing eviction by her landlord NYC Suite Home, according to
court records.

The workers' wage-theft lawsuit is one piece of their larger
campaign to recoup the money they say they're owed, have
Melngailis fined for federal labor violations, and potentially
have her jailed. They are also speaking with investors and hope to
reopen Pure Food and Wine under new ownership with stronger
employee protections.

Melngailis has not responded to repeated requests for comment by
email, Twitter, Facebook, and phone. The voicemail for a phone
number workers had used to reach her is now full.


REMY INTERNATIONAL: Sued in Ind. Over Proposed BorgWarner Merger
----------------------------------------------------------------
Maxine Phillips, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Remy International, Inc., et al., Case No.
1:15-cv-01343-TWP-TAB (S.D. Ind., August 25, 2015), is brought on
behalf of all the public stockholders of Remy International, Inc.
to enjoin the proposed merger between Remy and BorgWarner Inc. for
inadequate consideration based upon the materially incomplete and
misleading representations and information contained in the Proxy
Statement.

Remy International, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that
manufactures, remanufactures, and distributes light duty starters,
alternators, hybrid power technology, and Delco Remy brand heavy
duty systems.

BorgWarner Inc. is an American worldwide automotive industry
components and parts supplier.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      William N. Riley, Esq.
      James A. Piatt, Esq.
      RILEY WILLIAMS & PIATT, LLC
      301 Massachusetts Avenue
      Indianapolis, IN 46204
      Telephone: (317) 633-5270
      Facsimile: (317) 426-3348
      E-mail: wriley@rwp-law.com
              jpiatt@rwp-law.com

         - and -

      Juan E. Monteverde, Esq.
      Miles D. Schreiner, Esq.
      FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
      369 Lexington Ave., Tenth Floor
      New York, NY 10017
      Telephone: (212) 983-9330
      Facsimile: (212) 983-9331
      E-mail: jmonteverde@faruqilaw.com
              mschreiner@faruqilaw.com


RESURGENT CAPITAL: Faces "Watson" Suit Over FDCPA Violation
-----------------------------------------------------------
Megan Watson, on behalf of herself and all other similarly
situated v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P.; LVNV Funding LLC and
Does 1-15, Case 2:15-cv-06073-JLL-JAD (D.N.J., Aug. 7, 2015),
seeks damages and declaratory and injunctive relief arising from
the Defendants' alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, which prohibits debt collectors from engaging in
abusive, deceptive and unfair practices.

Resurgent Capital Services is a manager and servicer of domestic
and international consumer debt portfolios for credit grantors and
debt buyers.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Lawrence C. Hersh, Esq.
     17 Sylvan Street, Suite 102B
     Rutherford, NJ 07070
     Tel: (201) 507-6300


RK ASSOCIATES: Sued Over Handicap-Inaccessible Parking Spaces
-------------------------------------------------------------
Denise Payne, individually and on behalf of all other similarly
situated v. R.K. Associates #2, Inc., and, Einstein and Noah
Corp., d/b/a Einstein Brothers Bagels #3320, Case No. 1:15-cv-
22983-RNS (S.D. Fla., August 8, 2015), is brought against the
Defendant for failure to provide handicap accessible parking
spaces.

The Defendants own and operate a restaurant located at 16840
Collins Ave., Sunny Isles Beach, FL 33160.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Thomas Charles Allison, Esq.
      ESPINOSA | JOMARRON
      Suite 305, 4300 Biscayne Blvd.
      Miami, FL 33137
      Telephone: (305) 717-7530
      Facsimile: (305) 717-7539
      E-mail: tallison@ejtrial.com


ROBERT BOSCH: Recalls Rotary Tools Due to Injury Hazard
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Robert Bosch Tool Corp., of Mount Prospect, Ill., announced a
voluntary recall of about 93,000 Dremel(R) MICRO(TM) Model 8050
Rotary Tool (an additional 2750 sold in Canada). Consumers should
stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

The tool's circuit board can overheat and melt the tool's
enclosure. If the tool is being held while overheating, it could
present a risk of burn. Additionally, some tools may lose their
speed control changing to high speed in use, turn on by
themselves, or may not turn off, posing a personal injury hazard.

This recall involves the Dremel(R) MICRO(TM) Model 8050 Rotary
Tool with date codes 407 through 505.  The model number and date
codes are located on the name plate of the product, which is on
the side opposite the Dremel logo.  Products are dark gray with a
silver label and blue control buttons and have 8V lithium ion
batteries.

Bosch Tool has received six reports from consumers of tools
overheating. There are no reports of injuries.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/oojk7vk

The recalled products were manufactured in Mexico and sold at Ace
Hardware, Home Depot, Lowe's, Menards and other home improvement,
hardware and major retailers nationwide and online including
www.acehardware.com, www.amazon.com, www.homedepot.com,
www.lowes.com and www.menards.com from July 2014 through May 2015
for about $90.

Consumers should immediately contact Robert Bosch Tool for
information on a free repair.


SCAG POWER: Recalls Zero-Turn Lawn Mowers Due to Fire Hazard
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Scag Power Equipment, a division of Metalcraft of Maryville, of
Maryville, Wisc., announced a voluntary recall of about 4,400 Scag
Liberty-Z zero-turn lawn mowers. Consumers should stop using this
product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or
attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

The gas tank can leak, posing a fire hazard.

This recall involves two Scag Liberty-Z zero-turn lawn mowers;
model SZL48-22KT with serial numbers K7100001 through K7102353 and
model SZL52-24KT with serial numbers K7200001 through K7202020.
The model and serial numbers are printed on a vertical plate under
the mower's seat. "Scag" in red letters, "Liberty Z" in white
letters and a blue "Z" is printed on a plate below the front of
the seat. The mowers have an orange base with two orange and black
steering handles. The mowers also have two large black with orange
rim wheels in the back of the mower and two smaller black with
orange rim wheels in the front of the mower.
Incidents/Injuries

Scag Power Equipment has received five reports of gas tank leaks
on the mowers. No injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/pxx6rym

The recalled products were manufactured in United States and Scag
Power Equipment authorized dealers nationwide from October 2014
through May 2015 for about $4,500.

Consumers should immediately stop using these recalled lawn mowers
and contact Scag Power Equipment or an authorized dealer for a
free repair. Scag Power Equipment authorized dealers have
contacted all known owners.


SELF-RELIANCE: Faces "Wengerd" Suit Over Failure to Pay Overtime
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cindy Wengerd and Sarah Walker, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly situated individuals v. Self-Reliance, Inc., Case
No. 3:15-cv-00293-TMR (S.D. Ohio, August 25, 2015), seeks to
recover unpaid overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor
Standard Act.

Headquartered in Springfield, Ohio, Self-Reliance, Inc., provides
in-home family support for children and adults with challenging
behaviors, developmental disabilities, and other disabilities.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Mark A. DiCello, Esq.
      Robert F. DiCello, Esq.
      THE DICELLO LAW FIRM
      7556 Mentor Avenue
      Mentor, OH 44060
      Telephone: (440) 453-8888
      Facsimile: (440) 953-9138
      E-mail: madicello@dicellolaw.com
              rfdicello@dicellolaw.com

         - and -

      G. Tony Atwal, Esq.
      Jacob R. Rusch, Esq.
      JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
      33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
      Minneapolis, MN 55402
      Telephone: (612) 436-1800
      Facsimile: (612) 436-1801
      E-mail: tatwal@johnsonbecker.com
              jrusch@johnsonbecker.com

         - and -

      Jason J. Thompson, Esq.
      Jesse L. Young, Esq.
      SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C.
      One Town Square, Suite 1700
      Southfield, MI 48076
      Telephone: (248) 355-0300
      E-mail: jyoung@sommerspc.com
              jthompson@sommerspc.com


TAXI AFFILIATION: Faces "Williams" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quadria Williams, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated v. Taxi Affiliation Services, LLC, Case No.
2015CH12742 (D. Ill., August 25, 2015), is brought against the
Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the
Fair Labor Standard Act.

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Taxi Affiliation Services,
LLC, owns and operates a taxicab transportation company.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      James X. Bormes, Esq.
      Catherine Sons, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF JAMES X. BORMES, P.C.
      8 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 2600
      Chicago, IL 60603
      Telephone: (312) 201-0575
      E-mail: jxbormes@bormeslaw.com
              cpsons@bormeslaw.com

         - and -

      Thomas M. Ryan, Esq.
      LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M. RYAN, P.C.
      35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 650
      Chicago, IL 60601
      Telephone: (312) 726-3400
      E-mail: tom@tomryanlaw.com


TEXAS LAW SHIELD: Faces Class Suit Over CHL Owners
--------------------------------------------------
Adam Weinstein, writing for The Trace, reported that thanks to a
judge's order, carriers of concealed handguns in Texas are now a
protected legal class. They can defend themselves against physical
threats, but it seems they need all the help they can get against
profit-minded lawyers.

Harris County civil court Judge Mike Miller ruled on July 27 that
holders of Texas's concealed-handgun license, or CHL, can band
together in a class-action lawsuit against Texas Law Shield, a
legal firm that's ensconced itself deeply in the state's gun-
owning community -- possibly in violation of the law, according to
Texas Lawyer.

For a flat annual fee, Texas Law Shield says it will defend
members against any civil or criminal charges that arise from
their use of a gun. But now TLS itself stands accused of
"barratry" -- an archaic term that covers a host of legal abuses,
from ambulance-chasing to excessive litigation to paying to
receive clients.

It's that last proviso that has TLS in hot water: A 2013 lawsuit
by two Texas gun owners alleges that "most concealed handgun
license (CHL) classes in Texas include a 'pitch' by a salesperson
for Texas Law Shield, who encourages students to sign on to Texas
Law Shield at a cost of about $130 a year for 'peace of mind.'" In
return, the suit alleges, TLS pays about 500 facilities that offer
CHL courses -- a prerequisite for anyone seeking a carry permit in
Texas -- $30 for each of their students that sign up for the
company's legal service. (The plaintiffs' attorneys sought to make
their suit a class action, inviting other CHL students who'd been
solicited by TLS to join and receive compensatory damages from the
company -- whether they'd signed up for TLS's services or not.
Judge Miller approved that plan.)

TLS charges its members $131.40 a year if they have a concealed-
carry license, and $89 a year if they don't. But what members
actually get in return -- and who they're getting it from -- has
aroused plenty of curiosity and skepticism among gun owners.

What exactly is TLS? It was founded in 2009 by a group of Houston
lawyers after a public uproar over the case of Joe Horn, a 61-
year-old Pasadena, Texas, man who fatally shot two Afro-Latino
burglars, possibly in the back, outside his neighbor's house after
911 dispatchers had told him not to interfere. A grand jury
cleared Horn of any charges, but mounting a defense left Horn
penniless and made his case a cause c‚lŠbre among Lone Star gun
enthusiasts, who feared their use of deadly force could land them
in court.

That left an opening for TLS to offer legal protection for uneasy
gun owners. The company's site claims that it's not a law firm,
but a "legal services provider." Still, the company does employ
six of its own lawyers to represent Houston-area members. The
result is plenty of confusion even among well-informed gun owners
as to what membership entails. Many who ask about TLS on Internet
gun forums assume it's insurance for those charged with a crime or
sued in civil court; the NRA offers such an insurance policy that
reimburses users for certain court expenses. But TLS refers its
members directly to attorneys who handle their legal problems,
purportedly at no extra cost. (A TLS spokesperson was not
available for comment.)

"It is not a prepaid legal service, it is truly a retainer for a
lawyer," claimed Brian Mobley, a concealed-carry trainer in Texas
who invites TLS to "discuss part of the Texas penal code in my CHL
classes." That distinction is important to many would-be members,
as "prepaid legal services" have often been accused of bait-and-
switch style scams, racking up fees for users.

But Charles Cotton -- the controversial NRA board member and Texas
attorney who helps run Texas CHL Forum, the comment board that
Mobley commented on -- insisted Mobley was mistaken. "Why do you
say it's not prepaid legal?" Cotton asked. "It is my understanding
that the fee paid to Texas Law Shield is a flat fee annually. It's
not a retainer unless it's a deposit against future billings."
Cotton added that he wasn't telling readers whether or not to buy
TLS's coverage, "but if people are going to pitch these programs
here on TexasCHLforum, I want to make sure our Members are
thoroughly informed."

TLS's "testimonials" page contains no firsthand accounts of the
company lining up a legal defense for its members. It includes
four generic "incident reports" claiming TLS got members out of
possible criminal charges, but the only direct quotes are from
members who haven't needed legal help. "After seeing what my
friend went through after shooting someone in self defense [I knew
I needed] Law Shield, states Kathy M. of Willis, Texas, in a
typical quote.

But does she need it? That's not entirely clear. Texas is one of
many "stand your ground" states that offer civil immunity and a
high threshold for criminal prosecution when self-defense is
claimed. And the gamut of cases TLS covers is frustratingly
narrow. "Our program covers the 'use' of all legal firearms," the
company's FAQ states. What does that mean, exactly? TLS presents
its hard-to-find contract terms to would-be members only after
they start the application process, but it's full of ambiguous
clauses and opt-outs for the company.

TLS defines coverage of the "use" of a firearm as:

Any incident where the Legal Service Contract Holder either
discharges or displays a firearm for the purpose of using the
firearm as a weapon to stop a threat, whether the Legal Service
Contract Holder pulls the trigger and discharges the firearm or
not. This term does not include taking the firearm to a location
that is prohibited by federal, state, or local law, negligent or
unintended discharges, or negligent or unintended displays.

That seems straightforward enough: "So if you're not using your
firearm to stop a threat, you are not covered," Mark Bennett, a
criminal defense attorney based in Houston, writes on his legal
blog. But that's a huge potential problem for members, he adds:
"Often in a gun case the central issue is whether you are using
your firearm to stop a threat." Imagine, for example, a licensed
gun owner like George Zimmerman, who was charged with murder after
shooting Trayvon Martin to death. Zimmerman claimed he was
defending himself against an assault from Martin, but the criminal
charges against Zimmerman turned precisely on whether or not he
was justified in perceiving a threat. So a TLS member could
conceivably find himself in a catch-22 where the charges against
him -- the very charges for which he hoped TLS would assist him
with -- exempt TLS from bankrolling a defense.

"If Texas Law Shield looks at the case . . . and concludes that
you were not justified in using your weapon, they can deny
coverage, leaving you to hire a lawyer," Bennett writes. "Texas
Law Shield looks to me like a sucker's bet."

About the only thing that's clear is TLS's full-court press to
snag paying members. The Texas CHL forum is packed with commenters
who recalled receiving the company's high-pressure spiel in their
licensing classes. "I was sitting next to a member of the Dallas
SWAT team in my CHL class . . .  and when the TLS came in and made
their pitch he was very against it," one commenter volunteered on
a Texas Gun Talk forum. "He claimed that the way it was presented
to us in class that TLS was 'fear mongering' and taking advantage
of people who may be less experienced with guns. (for the record
their pitch made it seem like if you did not buy into their system
you would be screwed if you ever used your weapon or if anyone
ever found out you had a CHL and carried a weapon)."

Those tactics are precisely why TLS is in legal hot water. Texas
approves 250,000 or so CHL holders to carry guns each year. If
just a fraction of the ones who sat through TLS's in-class
solicitations agree with the plaintiff's lawyer that the company
used "an underhanded means to try to attract their business," TLS
could end up paying all those gun owners millions in penalties.

TLS has retained an outside law firm to defend itself against the
pending class action. "The judge is simply wrong for a variety of
reasons, and we are going to appeal it," the company's attorney
told Texas Lawyer.

It's nice to have that option: Under the terms of TLS's contract,
the company doesn't have to cover any of its members' own appeals.


THORATEC CORP: Andrews & Springer Files Securities Class Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andrews & Springer LLC, a boutique securities class action law
firm focused on representing shareholders nationwide, announced
that a class action lawsuit has been filed by another law firm on
behalf of stockholders of Thoratec Corporation (NASDAQ:THOR)
("Thoratec" or the "Company") seeking to challenge the Company's
recently announced merger with St. Jude Medical ("St. Jude").

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS
IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN
ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT
THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.

On July 22, 2015, Thoratec and St. Jude announced the signing of a
definitive merger agreement pursuant to which St. Jude will
acquire Thoratec in a merger worth $3.4 billion. As a result of
the merger, Thoratec shareholders are only anticipated to receive
$63.50 per share in cash in exchange for each share of Thoratec.
While the Company claims that shareholders will receive a premium
for their shares, the $63.50 per share consideration only
represents a 10.3% premium based on the Company's July 21, 2015
closing price of $57.58

On August 4, 2015, a Thoratec shareholder represented by another
law firm filed a class action complaint challenging Thoratec's
merger with St. Jude. The complaint was filed in the Superior
Court of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG15780585.

Andrews & Springer is a boutique securities class action law firm
representing shareholders nationwide who are victims of securities
fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty or corporate misconduct. Having
formerly defended some of the largest financial institutions in
the world, our founding members use their valuable knowledge,
experience, and superior skill for the sole purpose of achieving
positive results for investors. For more information please visit
our website at www.andrewsspringer.com

Craig J. Springer, Esq
Andrews & Springer LLC
3801 Kennett Pike #305, Wilmington, DE 19807
1-800-423-6013
cspringer@andrewsspringer.com
www.andrewsspringer.com.


TIPPMANN SPORTS: Recalls Paintball Markers Due to Fire Hazard
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Tippmann Sports LLC, of Fort Wayne, Ind., announced a voluntary
recall of about 6,500 Paintball Markers (Guns). Consumers should
stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is
illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer
product.

Trigger safety can fail and allow paintballs to fire unexpectedly,
posing an impact hazard.

This recall involves rental versions of Tippmann model FT-12 .50
caliber and 0.68-inch caliber paintball markers. The markers are
made of metal and are black. They have a round front grip and a
rear grip with yellow inserts. With the barrel attached, the
markers are about 20 inches long.  The left side of the upper
receiver has "Tippmann" molded into the front and a silver, metal
name plate with "Rental" riveted to the center. Serial numbers on
recalled markers are from 86941 to 108040. The serial number is
etched onto the bottom rear of the marker just below the rear
hinge.

Tippmann has received reports of three incidents in which the
trigger safety failed to perform properly. No injuries have been
reported.

The recalled products were sold through retail outlets. This
product was sold from January 2015 to July 2015 directly to
distributors and paintball fields as a rental marker for use by
customers.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled paintball
markers and contact Tippman for a free repair kit or to arrange to
ship the affected marker to Tippmann for repair at no cost.
Tippman is contacting its customers directly.


TREK BICYCLE: Recalls Superfly Bicycles Due to Fall Hazard
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with
Trek Bicycle Corporation, of Waterloo, Wis., announced a voluntary
recall of about 330 Trek 9.8 Superfly FS SL, X1 and XT bicycles.
Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise
instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a
recalled consumer product.

The seatpost can crack and break, posing a fall hazard to the
rider.

This recall involves model year 2015 Trek 9.8 Superfly FS SL, X1
and XT bicycles equipped with Bontrager Approved Carbon seatposts.
Recalled bicycles have a serial number ending in J or K. The
serial number is located on the bottom of the bicycle frame.
Superfly FS, X1 or XT is printed on the bicycle's top tube. Trek
is printed on the frame downtube. "Bontrager Carbon" is printed on
the seatpost.

Trek has received two incidents report involving the recalled
bicycles. No injuries have been reported.

Pictures of the Recalled Products available at:
http://tinyurl.com/njyx66q

The recalled products were manufactured in Taiwan and sold at
Bicycle stores nationwide from September 2014 through July 2015
for about $5,300 for the FS SL and about $3,500 for the X1 and XT
bicycles.

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled bicycles and
contact an authorized Trek retailer for a free replacement
seatpost plus a $20 coupon toward any Bontrager merchandise. The
coupon can be used through December 31, 2015.


TRINET GROUP: Faces "Welgus" Suit for Securities Law Violations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Howard Welgus, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated, v. Trinet Group, Inc., burton m. Goldfield and William
Porter, Case 5:15-cv-03625-BLF (N.D.Cal., Aug. 7, 2015), was filed
on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the
common stock of TriNet between May 5, 2014 and August 3, 2015,
inclusive.

TriNet describes itself as a leading provider of a comprehensive
human resources solution for small to medium-sized businesses,
enabling clients to outsource their human resources, or HR,
function to one strategic partner.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Shawn A. Williams, Esq.
     ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
     Post Montgomery Center
     One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Tel: 415/288-4545
     Fax: 415/288-4534 (

        - and -

     Corey d. Holzer, Esq.
     HOLZER & HOLZER, LLC
     1200 Ashwood Parkway, Suite 410
     Atlanta, GA 30338
     Tel: 770/392-0090
     Fax: 770/392-0029


UNITEDHEALTH: Sued in Minn. for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
--------------------------------------------------------
Podiatric OR of Midtown Manhattan, P.C., on its own behalf and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. UnitedHealth Group
Inc., et al., Case No. 0:15-cv-03234-DSD-HB (D. Minn., August 7,
2015), arises out of the Defendants' alleged breach of fiduciary
duty, specifically by adopting the Uniform Refusal to Pay and
applying it to deny all office-based surgery claims.

UnitedHealth Group Inc. owns and operates a health insurance
company with its principal place of business in Minnetonka,
Minnesota.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Karen H. Riebel, Esq.
      Kristen G. Marttila, Esq.
      LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.
      100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200
      Minneapolis, MN 55401-2159
      Telephone: (612) 339-6900
      Facsimile: (612) 339-0981
      E-mail: khriebel@locklaw.com
              kgmarttila@locklaw.com

          - and -

      Cyril V. Smith, Esq.
      ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP
      100 East Pratt Street, Suite 2440
      Baltimore MD 21202
      Telephone: (410) 332-0444
      Facsimile: (410) 659-0436
      E-mail: csmith@zuckerman.com

         - and -

      D. Brian Hufford, Esq.
      Jason S. Cowart, Esq.
      ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP
      399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor
      New York, NY 10022
      Telephone: (212) 704-9600
      Facsimile: (212) 704-4256
      E-mail: dbhufford@zuckerman.com
              jcowart@zuckerman.com


UNITED STATES: DOL, Alaska Work Against Misclassification
---------------------------------------------------------
Guy Brenner and Carolyn M. Dellatore, writing for The National Law
Review, reported that The U.S. Department of Labor ("U.S. DOL")
and the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development
recently signed a memorandum of understanding to share information
and conduct joint investigations regarding independent contractor
misclassification.

The agreement is part of the U.S. DOL's Misclassification
Initiative, the goal of which is to prevent, detect, and remedy
employee misclassification.  Kentucky's Labor Cabinet entered into
a similar agreement.

Alaska is the 25th state to sign a memorandum of understanding
with the Department of Labor as part of its misclassification
initiative. The other states signing the memorandum are Alabama,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho,
Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode
Island, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The coordinated effort between the U.S. DOL and participating
states raises the stakes for companies who utilize independent
contractors.  In the past, a company in Alaska might pay a single
fine to a state agency for not making proper unemployment
insurance payments due to misclassification of its workers.

Under the new agreement, Alaska will now share this information
with the U.S. DOL, which may opt to cooperate in the underlying
investigation, or conduct a separate investigation.

As such, companies in Alaska, like those in the 24 other states
that have signed memoranda with the U.S. DOL, should expect that
any misclassification inquiry will automatically expand to include
both state and federal agencies, thereby increasing the scrutiny
on such companies and the risks associated with a
misclassification determination.


UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: Player Sues Over Fotball Concussions
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carman Tse, writing for San Francisco IST, reported that a former
football player for U.C. Berkeley is now suing the school for
multiple concussions he suffered while playing for the team.

Bernard Hicks, who played defensive back for the Calfiornia Golden
Bears from 2004 to 2008, filed the lawsuit against Regents of the
University of California on August 3, saying the school and the
team's coaching staff did not do enough to prevent and manage head
injuries he suffered while playing. His lawyer says the school did
not inform players of the long-term effects of brain injuries.
"The university is the players' caretaker," Hicks' attorney
Matthew Whibley told The Daily Californian. "We think it would be
fair for them to at least inform the players what they're getting
themselves into."

Cal Athletics released a statement that did not directly address
Hicks' lawsuit, but said "the medical care we provide our student-
athletes meets or exceeds the standards in collegiate and national
sports medicine."

Football has come under greater scrutiny in recent years after
studies have shown long-term, chronic effects of head injuries
sustained from the game. In April, a federal judge approved a $1
billion settlement in a class-action lawsuit against the NFL by
former players. Hicks, who turns 29 in October, says he suffers
from "permanent and debilitating" injuries such as depression,
suicidal thoughts, dizziness, memory loss, and blurred and double
vision. Had he known of the lasting effects of head injuries,
Hicks contends, he would have played less or rested longer.


US MONEY: Faces "Stux" Suit in Cal. Over Alleged Coin Overpricing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erica Stux v. U.S. Money Reserve, Inc. and Fidelity Gold &
Bullion, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-05955 (C.D. Cal., August 6, 2015),
is an action for damages as a result of the Defendants' fraudulent
and unconscionable business practice of selling coins for prices
far above the market price for the coins or even the value of the
metals in the coins.

The Defendants operate as distributors of gold coins and other
precious metals.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Mazin A. Sbaiti, Esq.
      THE STECKLER LAW FIRM
      12720 Hillcrest Road Suite 1045
      Dallas, TX 75230
      Telephone: (972) 387-4040
      Facsimile: (972) 387-4041
      E-mail: mazin@stecklerlaw.com


U.S. OPM: Faces "McGarry" Suit for Alleged Privacy Act Violation
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Teresa J. McGarry on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated, v. The United States Office of
Personnel Management, Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, and The United States Department of Homeland
Security, Case 1:15-cv-01705-JLK (D.Col., Aug. 7, 2015), arises
out of alleged cyber-breaches of OPM's systems that violated the
Privacy Act of 1974, the Administrative Procedure Act, and
constitutes negligence.

Defendant OPM is an Agency of the United States government that
handles many aspects of the federal employee recruitment process.

KeyPoint describes itself as a "leading provider of investigative
and risk mitigation services to government organizations,
including the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Customs and
Border Protection and Department of Homeland Security."

DHS handles aviation and border security to emergency response.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Daniel M. Reilly, Esq.
     Ellie Lockwood, Esq.
     E-mail: elockwood@rplaw.com
     REILLY POZNER LLP
     1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1700
     Denver, CO 80202
     Tel: 303-893-6100
     Fax: 303-893-6110
     E-mail: dreilly@rplaw.com

        - and -

     Jon Rosenthal, Esq.
     1835 NE Miami Gardens Drive
     North Miami Beach, FL 33179
     Tel: 954-322-0065
     E-mail: jrosenthal@bellsouth.net

        - and -

     Joseph C. Kohn, Esq.
     Denis F. Sheils, Esq.
     Barbara L. Gibson, Esq.
     KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C.
     One South Broad Street, Suite 2100
     Philadelphia, PA 19107
     Tel: (215) 238-1700
     Fax: (215) 238-1968
     E-mail: jkohn@kohnswift.com
             dsheils@kohnswift.com
              bgibson@kohnswift.com


VICTORY AUTOMOTIVE: Faces "Gallaher" Suit Seeking Overtime Pay
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Gallaher v. Victory Automotive Group, Inc., Case 2:15-cv-
00044 (M.D. Tenn., Aug. 7, 2015) alleges violations of the
overtime pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Victory Automotive is a Michigan-based corporation that operates
retail automobile dealerships.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

     Kyle F. Biesecker, Esq.
     BIESECKER DUTKANYCH & MACER, LLC
     3200 West End Ave., Ste. 500
     Nashville, TN 37203
     Phone: (615) 783-1600
     E-mail: kfb@bdlegal.com


WEST PALM: Faces "Monteverde" Suit Over Failure to Pay OT Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Giovanna Monteverde, Jessica Candace Reid, Stephanie Krauel and
Gabrielle Williams, individually and on behalf of all other
similarly situated v. West Palm Beach Food and Beverage, LLC,
William Bullard, Randy Beasley, and Harold R.E. Johnson, Case No.
9:15-cv-81203-RLR (S.D. Fla., August 25, 2015), is brought against
the Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages in excess of
forty 40 hours per week.

The Defendants own and operate an adult entertainment club in
Florida.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Jack C. Morgan III, Esq.
      Scott J. Hertz, Esq.
      2320 First Street, Suite 1000
      Fort Myers, FL 33901
      Telephone: (239) 338-4218
      Facsimile: (239) 337-3850
      E-mail: jmorgan@ralaw.com
              Serve.jmorgan@ralaw.com
              Shertz@ralaw.corn

         - and -

      John B. Gallagher, Esq.
      2631 East Oakland Park Boulevard, Suite 201
      Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306
      Telephone: (954) 524-1888
      Facsimile: (954) 524-1887
      E-mail: ga12701@aol.com


WHOLE FOODS: Hagens Berman Files Securities Class Suit
------------------------------------------------------
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, a national investor-rights law
firm, alerts investors of the October 5, 2015 lead plaintiff
deadline in the securities fraud class action lawsuit filed
against Whole Foods Market (NASDAQ:WFM) ("Whole Foods" or "the
Company").

If you have losses in Whole Foods securities during the Class
Period contact Hagens Berman Partner Reed Kathrein, who is leading
the firm's investigation, by calling (510) 725-3000, emailing
WFM@hbsslaw.com or visiting http://hb-
securities.com/investigations/WFM.

The lawsuit, pending in U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Texas, is filed on behalf of investors who purchased
Whole Foods securities between August 9, 2013 and July 30, 2015,
inclusive, (the "Class Period").

The lawsuit stems from the revelation that Whole Foods officials
failed to disclose that the Company routinely overstated the
weight of its pre-packaged products, and overcharged consumers.
On June 25, 2015, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs
("NYCDA") announced it had uncovered systematic overcharging for
pre-packaged foods at Whole Foods' eight New York City locations.
In response, Whole Foods stated that there was no evidence of
overcharging and that it would vigorously defend itself against
what it described as "overreaching allegations" by NYCDA.

But then, on July 29, 2015, the company filed its Form 8-K,
announcing its financial and operating results for the quarter
ended July 5, 2015. During its earnings call, the Company
attributed its lower-than-expected quarterly results to the news
of the NYCDA investigation, and the overcharging revelations.
Glenda Flanagan, the company's Chief Financial Officer and
Executive Vice President stated, "The impact was really felt
across the whole country, not in New York City. This was national
news." On this adverse news, Whole Foods' stock fell $4.74 per
share, or 11.61%, to close at $36.08 on July 30, 2015.

If you were negatively impacted by your investment in Whole Foods
between August 9, 2013 and July 30, 2015, and would like to learn
more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead
plaintiff, please contact us for your no-cost evaluation.

Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding
Whole Foods should consider their options to help in the
investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program.
Under the new SEC whistleblower program, whistleblowers who
provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30
percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more
information, call Reed Kathrein at (510) 725-3000 or email
WFM@hbsslaw.com.

                        About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is an investor-rights class-action
law firm headquartered in Seattle, Washington with offices in nine
cities. The firm represents investors, whistleblowers, workers and
consumers in complex litigation. More about the firm and its
successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Read the firm's
Securities Newsletter at http://www.hb-securities.com/newsletter.
The firm's blog is located at www.meaningfuldisclosure.com. For
the latest news from Hagens Berman, visit
http://www.hbsslaw.com/newsroomor follow us on Twitter at
@hagensberman.

Reed Kathrein, Esq.
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
55 Cambridge Parkway, Suite 301
Cambridge, MA 02142
Tel. (617) 482-3700
Fax. (617) 482-3003
www.hbsslaw.com


WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION: Suit Seeks to Recover Unpaid OT Wages
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pavel Cruz Tena, and others similarly-situated v. Worldwide
Transportation Services, Inc. and Ali A. Malek, Case No. 1:15-cv-
23172-FAM (S.D. Fla., August 25, 2015), seeks to recover unpaid
overtime wages, liquidated damages, interests, costs and
attorney's fees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standard Act.

The Defendants are in the business of providing executive quality
service for airport transport, weddings, proms and special events
corporate limousine transportation.

The Plaintiff is represented by:

      Isaac Mamane, Esq.
      MAMANE LAW LLC
      1150 Kane Concourse, Second Floor
      Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154
      Telephone (305) 773-6661
      E-mail: mamane@gmail.com


                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N  I N F O R M A T I O N

Class Action Reporter is a daily newsletter, co-published by
Bankruptcy Creditors' Service, Inc., Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania,
USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  Marion
Alcestis A. Castillon, Ma. Cristina Canson, Noemi Irene A. Adala,
Joy A. Agravante, Valerie Udtuhan, Julie Anne L. Toledo,
Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. ISSN 1525-2272.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.

Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to
be reliable, but is not guaranteed.

The CAR subscription rate is $775 for six months delivered via
e-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each. For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.



                 * * *  End of Transmission  * * *